iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

State Parks Explore Corporate Sponsorship

First Posted: 08/30/10 10:31 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:30 PM ET

Aptopix Oregon Summer

CONCORD, N.H. (AP) — Not every state park in New Hampshire includes a mountain, but all staffers might be wearing pictures of little peaks on their uniforms next summer thanks to a corporate sponsorship the state is exploring with Eastern Mountain Sports.

Faced with widening budget gaps, numerous states are reaching out to private companies to sponsor state park facilities, programs or park systems as a whole. The details are still being worked out in New Hampshire, but the intent is to have Eastern Mountain Sports promote state parks in its outdoor clothing and apparel stores in exchange for having state parks promote the company's products. That could mean park uniforms featuring the Mountain Sports logo, the company's name arranged in the shape of a mountain range.

Maine, Virginia and Georgia are among other states that either have or are looking into some kind of sponsorship with corporations to support state parks.

"There's a very fine line you try to walk in doing this," said Gary Waugh, a state official in Virginia. "People come to state parks for a very natural outdoor experience and you don't want to commercialize it. On the other hand, budgets are tight."

Unlike in other states, New Hampshire's park system hasn't had its state funding cut, because it doesn't get any – it relies solely on user fees. But even before the economy worsened, revenues typically fell well short of operating expenses, and the system faces a $1.8 million deficit.

In a 10-year strategic plan published late last year, park officials urged lawmakers to consider providing annual funding but said the state also should invite communities or volunteer groups to help maintain the parks. Ted Austin, director of the Division of Parks and Recreation, said a corporate partnership is in keeping with the mandate he's under to explore new models for collaborating with both the public and private sector.

He approached Eastern Mountain Sports in February about a partnership and began announcing it earlier this summer, though nothing has been put in writing, and its unclear whether further approval is required by state officials.

"My rationale was simply: Things you sell in your stores can wonderfully be put to good use in our parks, and activities in our parks can be thoroughly enjoyed with things you sell. So in its simplest sense, it struck me as this should be a no-brainer," Austin said in a recent interview.

In addition to uniforms, Austin envisions Eastern Mountain Sports providing kayaking lessons or other programs in state parks. In stores, a "park of the future" contest might invite young people to suggest new programs and features. That could attract more active outdoor enthusiasts who now bypass the parks, he said.

Austin said the sponsorship plan is particularly attractive given the company's reach: Eastern Mountain Sports has more than 60 stores in New England and the mid-Atlantic region. But a company executive had a different take.

Ted Manning, vice president of merchandising and marketing for Eastern Mountain Sports, said the company would likely promote New Hampshire parks in its stores in neighboring Massachusetts, but probably not much beyond that. Though the Peterborough-based company is excited to work with its home state, it has been talking with other states as well, he said.

Manning is upfront about the fact that his company hopes to make money through such partnerships, but he said larger goals include raising awareness of state parks as important natural resources and creating nontraditional relationships with customers and communities.

"It's not enough for EMS to simply be a retailer that buys stuff and sells stuff. We're really committed to broadening the conversation we have with the consumer," about conservation and other issues, he said.

Lauren Curry, spokeswoman for the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, said such partnerships reflect several converging trends, including state budget woes, the growing environmental movement and the private sector's desire to connect with customers in a new way.

Her state has hired a marketing company to explore corporate sponsorships that could benefit not only state parks but coastal resources and wildlife areas. Those deals may include advertisements on facilities or sponsorship of various programs, she said.

"It's not one specific company or one specific project. We're looking very big-picture across our assets," she said. Though the idea sparked some public concern initially, most people realize that any sponsorship plans will be handled in a tasteful manner, she said.

"We have been very careful to say we're not renaming a park after a company. No one cares more than the Department of Natural Resources about being good stewards of our states," she said. "We're the last ones who want to see our beautiful natural resources cheapened in any way."

Virginia is close to announcing a promotional partnership with the outdoor clothing company The North Face, said Waugh, spokesman for the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation. That follows the state's decision to allow an energy company to install touch-screen welcome kiosks with trail information and printable maps.

Visitors have not minded the limited advertising of the company's name on the kiosks, he said.

In Maine, the Bureau of Parks and Lands sometimes works with private companies on specific programs and events.

The bureau launched its Maine State Parks Passport program in the spring and gave out "passports" to park-goers in an effort to get more people to state parks. Companies such as L.L. Bean, Hannaford, Oakhurst, Delorme, Kittery Trading Post and Wicked Joe's Coffee are among the sponsors of the program, and their names appear inside the passports in return for their financial support.

"They're all Maine companies, and it's been mutually beneficial for us," said Will Harris, the bureau's director.

Philip McKnelly, director of the National Association of State Park Directors, said preliminary results from a survey his group is conducting indicate a growing number of states are considering corporate sponsorships for state parks, though he wasn't aware of any that included branded uniforms like New Hampshire is considering.

Richard Ober, chairman of a committee that advises New Hampshire's park system, said he doesn't expect major opposition to the Eastern Mountain Sports plan.

"There is a lot of sensitivity to not commercializing the parks, to not turn them into a billboard for products and services. That's why I think the specifics of working with a New Hampshire-based outdoor recreation company seems to be about as close a mission fit as you could have," he said. "If it was to partner with Apple to promote iPods, it might have raised some eyebrows."

Quick Poll

Should state parks seek out corporate sponsorship?

Yes

No

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

CONCORD, N.H. (AP) — Not every state park in New Hampshire includes a mountain, but all staffers might be wearing pictures of little peaks on their uniforms next summer thanks to a corporate spo...
CONCORD, N.H. (AP) — Not every state park in New Hampshire includes a mountain, but all staffers might be wearing pictures of little peaks on their uniforms next summer thanks to a corporate spo...
Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 23
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:59 PM on 09/01/2010
It won't be long before we are visitng "_________ Insurance Company Park"....or Yosemite will be renamed "Pharma Park".....or how about "BP Natural Preserve" to add an oxymoron to the soup, just like all of the iconic buildings and concert venues that used to bring on nostalgic memories.....but now I don't even know what each venue is called anymore.... nor do I care.

Our government is owned by big business; our sports teams are owned by big business and we are owned by big business. America....what a country.
09:11 AM on 09/01/2010
I never even liked when the Ballparks are renamed to the highest bidders Corporate Name. To me, this cheapens baseball and takes away the historic value, in some way. To add to that, Im not enough of a fan to remember everytime some stadium is renamed. I think its a ridiculous and cheap way to live. It teaches us that money talks and everything else (history) if insignificant. I want my children to ask me who Comiskey Park is named after, not what corporation. They have way too much control and it can only be bad for us.
photo
angrymanspokane
Just a regular guy
08:04 PM on 08/31/2010
Let Disney run the State Parks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VioletDatura
_-*-,,~*~_-*-,,~*~_-*-,,~*~
06:33 PM on 08/31/2010
NOOOOOOO!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BillyClub
03:09 PM on 08/31/2010
Privatizing public assets! One of the brainstorms of that wannabe political genius--Ronald "The Deregulator" Reagan! See: http://world.mediamonitors.net/content/view/full/60068
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mountainweb
Conservative Commonsense
08:59 AM on 08/31/2010
Bottom line, "budgets are tight". We all want state and federal parks but are not willing to pay for them. Corporate sponsorship is not ideal but may be what saves the parks unless another way is found. The national parks are not in any better shape by the way.

I work with an organization that builds and maintains hiking trails for the National Park Service at a Civil War Battlefield. If it were not the the volunteers that we bring into the park and manage, the trails would be trashed since they do not have the funds to hire enough full time people to maintain the hiking trails. If the current administration is not willing to fund the parks, at either the state or national level, you get what you pay for and sadly if citizens are not willing to pay for it, then you cannot complain when the parks find another way to survive. Higher user fees may be the only other answer...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:41 AM on 08/31/2010
Long overdue!
I, for one, look forward to Weyerhauser Old-Growth Forest, Enron Retirement Funds Lava Park and the Valdez Alaskan Wildlife Preserve.
As for all those eco-terrorists who whine about the Nike banner girdling the equator of the moon....
04:18 PM on 08/30/2010
So then they wouldn't be state parks anymore, would they?
04:10 PM on 08/31/2010
No they wont. They will be "for profit" machines, and will be ruined forever.
04:40 PM on 08/31/2010
What is pathetic is that in popular parks that need help in funding, the people will not agree to pay a daily fee. All sorts of cries go up and the result might be that the corporations who want them will end up buying them. And you are so right..ruined forever. Actually they will cease to be public parks. Then the national parks too..which are already being bastardized in subtle ways.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:17 PM on 08/30/2010
mix corporations and the state and you get fas*cism....so says benito mussolini....
04:13 PM on 08/30/2010
I cannot believe someone thinks this is a good idea!

...brought to you by Carl's Jr.!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Austintatious
12:40 PM on 08/30/2010
This is merely one more symptom of the corporatization of the American culture. It's contributing to the "dumbing down" of the American people, and a propensity toward crassness and mindless commercialism.

The country continues to move further to the right, politically, as this culture of corporatism becomes further entrenched. The result is that Americans become less enlightened, more narrow minded and less tolerant, despite the dramatic increase in opportunity to learn and broaden horizons presented by the worldwide web and new information technologies.

It is the sign of an unhealthy and rapidly declining culture, an addiction to materialism that the American populace cannot or will not resist. It will lead to catastrophe.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
teaserpony
12:38 PM on 08/30/2010
Nothing a can of spray paint, a Sharpie or a hand full gravel can't take care of.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
padrushka
question authority
12:34 PM on 08/30/2010
oh boy..what the world needs now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom95134
12:15 PM on 08/30/2010
Close the parks down before you let corporate sponsorship get involved. Teddy Roosevelt must be spinning in his grave right about now.
04:19 PM on 08/30/2010
When it starts happening even more in the National Parks...then Teddy will rise up and start hunting again.
11:55 AM on 08/30/2010
Corporate sponsorship of any government activity is a cover for privatizing profits and socializing losses. The government does not need corporate sponsorship of anything. The government can TAX corporations. It would be very sad to see parks become advertising space.
12:51 PM on 09/02/2010
If the state parks are closing due to lack of funding from the gov't, and there are people or corporations in the private sector that see the value of the parks and want to help, I don't see it as a problem, I see it as a community coming together to do what's right!