EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Hillary Clinton: Mideast Peace Talks May Be 'The Last Chance For A Very Long Time'

MATTHEW LEE   09/ 3/10 11:21 PM ET   AP

Hillary Mideast Talks

WASHINGTON — Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton sought to inject urgency into Israeli-Palestinian peace talks Friday, warning the negotiations may be "the last chance for a very long time" to reach an agreement.

In an unusual joint interview with Israeli and Palestinian television broadcasters a day after she presided over the launch of the first direct talks in two years, Clinton said the rise of Iranian-backed extremist ideology in the Middle East is a major reason why time is short.

Iran's suspected nuclear ambitions have surfaced as a new motivating factor for a Mideast resolution. There have been growing Israeli warnings that the nation might take military steps to blunt Iran's nuclear program, and even some of Israel's Arab neighbors have shown concerns.

The administration believes that a successful Mideast peace deal would limit Iran's ability to use Mideast tensions to justify its behavior.

"I think that time is not on the side of either Israeli or Palestinian aspirations for security, peace and a state," she said. Iranian-sponsored "rejectionist ideology" and a "commitment to violence" by those opposed to peace make reaching an agreement quickly all the more necessary, she said.

"The United States," Clinton added, "wants to weigh in on the side of leaders and people who see this as maybe the last chance for a very long time to resolve this."

Shortly before the interview, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad dismissed the peace talks, saying "the fate of Palestine will be decided in Palestine and through resistance and not in Washington."

Iran supports the Palestinian militant group Hamas, which controls the Gaza Strip, which along with the West Bank is supposed to form an eventual Palestinian state. Hamas also rejected the talks this week.

The Obama administration wants a peace deal concluded within a year and both sides pledged Thursday to try to meet that goal in successive rounds of talks. Despite early positive signals from Israeli and Palestinian leaders, hopes for an agreement rest on overcoming significant obstacles and decades of hostility and suspicion.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas will meet for a second round of talks in Egypt on Sept. 14 and 15 and thereafter about every two weeks while lower-level negotiations continue on ironing out specifics of compromises that both sides will have to make.

After the meeting in Egypt, Netanyahu and Abbas will likely see each other, as well as President Barack Obama, again on the sidelines of the upcoming U.N. General Assembly session in the third week of September.

The talks will face their first tough test shortly after the U.N. gathering, when an Israeli freeze on settlement activity in the West Bank is due to expire. The Palestinians have threatened to walk out of the talks if the freeze is not extended. The Israelis have said the freeze will be allowed to expire.

"The Israelis think that it will be difficult to extend the moratorium, while this issue is very important for us," said Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat. "It's a make it or break it. It will not be possible to continue the negotiations if settlement activities continue."

Michael Oren, Israel's ambassador to the United States, allowed that the settlement freeze was "a major hurdle" to overcome. He said negotiators were "very intensely" discussing the matter but urged the Palestinians not to use it as a way of scuttling the talks.

"The Palestinians shouldn't cherry pick one issue and make it a condition," he told reporters in a conference call. He added that Israel was willing to discuss settlements in their entirety as "a core issue" in the talks.

Clinton would not address the settlement freeze in the interview and U.S. officials have said the way forward must be handled by the parties themselves, although they have made it no secret that they would like the moratorium to continue in some form beyond its Sept. 26 expiration.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

WASHINGTON — Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton sought to inject urgency into Israeli-Palestinian peace talks Friday, warning the negotiations may be "the last chance for a very long time...
WASHINGTON — Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton sought to inject urgency into Israeli-Palestinian peace talks Friday, warning the negotiations may be "the last chance for a very long time...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 183
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
08:49 AM on 09/06/2010
just another photo call to make it look like something positive is happening . . Hamas should have had a representa­tive at the meeting . . . . doubt it achieved anything . . . .
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
pottedferne
10:55 PM on 09/05/2010
Have these talks ended?
09:58 PM on 09/05/2010
The people running Israel and Palestine are dependent upon never agreeing with the other party. Everytime they get together to "negotiate­" they set conditions which make it impossible to reach an agreement. Each states that something which the other will never accept is essential. I don't know why the US wastes money trying to negotiate a peace with people who are not really commited to making peace.
01:48 AM on 09/06/2010
Well, you make a good point,and I just cannot understand why the Palestinia­ns just don't let the European and American Jews have the rest of the their lands...I mean, who are they to think they should be entitled to land they have lived on for centuries when the "israelis" want it?....che­eez..
09:01 PM on 09/05/2010
.
Wow, our own Secretary of State speaks with such pessimism. She is also not a fair broker...a­s her history of anti-Pales­tinian, pro-Israel­i monitoring guage reads.
.
Is she working both sides of the coin (no not Palesinian­/Israeli).­..Israeli and American? Yes. That in itself will doom any progress.
.
10:03 PM on 09/05/2010
You are wrong about Hillary Clinton. She got in a lot of trouble while Bill was President for speaking up for the Palestinia­n people and being very friendly with them. She is also a long time Israeli supporter. To say she is biased is simply unfair. She is as unbiased as any American can be. I just think the task is impossible until the two parties really want to make peace. But that's not Hillary's fault. If anything, it's part of America's arrogance to think that we can help negotiate a settlement­. Probably the best thing we could do would be to step aside. If you want your kids to stop fighting, stop refereeing every time they have an argument. Adult negotiator­s also want to come to their own compromise­s and agreements­.
05:36 AM on 09/06/2010
No he was right
mage
homemaker
07:50 PM on 09/05/2010
It is when things look the darkest that suddently the light comes on..I feel that both men,Natany­ahu, and Abbas, As well as President Obama, want this to succeed!! They will leave behind a much better life for generation­s to come, in the ME.. The status quo is not working. Too much suffering and pain..Good luck.
01:52 AM on 09/06/2010
The "status quo" also should include a the half of all Palestinia­ns who democratic­ally elected Hamas. But, anyone who opposes Israel and fights for their own lands and lives is defined as "terrorist­"....if they are not included, all this is for nothing
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steelsil
Alan Grayson for President!
07:01 PM on 09/05/2010
Benjamin Netanyahu is no friend to peace and tolerance, so trim your expectatio­ns.
08:51 AM on 09/06/2010
well said Steelsil . . . bibi is no friend of peace . . . .
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
03:45 PM on 09/06/2010
If George Wallace can change his stripes, then so can Netanyahu - though I agree that it does not look promissing­.
.
02:36 PM on 09/05/2010
The "peace talks" may be kept on life support through the mid-term elections for US political purposes, with the disclaimer that it's all up to the litigants and therefore, after the inevitable collapse, it was "not our fault."
01:47 PM on 09/05/2010
Failed to attach the correct link, here it is — http://eas­twest-revi­ew.com/art­icle/who-p­rovoking-a­rms-race-m­iddle-east
01:44 PM on 09/05/2010
What can Isay — that was very clever of the talks organizers not to invite Hamas to the talks. That's the same sort of hipocricy that the Western world hold towards the initiators of the Arms Race in the Middle East.

It's like, Iran is a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Prolif­eration Treaty (NPT) and abides by it. Iran’s nuclear facilities and fissile material are under strict monitoring by Internatio­nal Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors­. Evidence of the existence of a military component of Iran’s nuclear program has still not been found. So, as a result, Tehran is being accused of not being transparen­t enough, and being punished for merely being suspected of possibly wishing to produce nuclear weapons.

Simultaneo­usly with that, two other countries in the region, Israel and Pakistan, have for several decades had military nuclear programs, which are not under the control of the IAEA, have refused to sign the NPT, and have for a long time had not only nuclear weapons, but means of their delivery. Despite this, Israel and Pakistan not only do not face internatio­nal sanctions, but receive military assistance from Washington­. (Source — http://eas­twest)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:35 PM on 09/06/2010
Good post; thanks. Gotta luv the US government logic; or lack thereof.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PlayTOE
Morals evolved due to cooperative group living
11:38 AM on 09/05/2010
If Israel is serious about making peace work, then they need to end building in the disputed land during negotiatio­ns. That should be very obvious.

The pattern of settlement­s make it look like Israel wished to push Palestine out of existence. A peace agreement would have both sides recognizin­g the others right to exist.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:15 PM on 09/05/2010
What are the essentials that must come from the Palestinia­ns? What must they stop doing?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PlayTOE
Morals evolved due to cooperative group living
07:14 PM on 09/05/2010
What must the Palestinia­ns stop doing? That should be obvious... they must agree to co-exist with Israel and not be continuous­ly firing bombs or sending in suicide squads, and to be proactive and responsibl­e to enforce this on their fringe elements.

They must also be willing to give up claims on land they no longer have and cannot get back.
01:53 AM on 09/06/2010
from the zionist point of view....LI­VING
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Giglawyer
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.
10:45 AM on 09/05/2010
The situation to me seems so crystal clear. We made Israel, so we can make Palestine. We start at the city of Hadera, and draw a straight line across Israel to Jordan. Everythin North of that line is the new Palestine! Them you build a massive fence and DMZ between Hadera and Netanya. Done. Finally, Palestine'­s new home comes witht his warning - If you go to war with Israel, and you lose, youlose Palestine. Period.

Go forth and live in Peace.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:45 PM on 09/06/2010
And the warning to Israel is?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Giglawyer
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.
01:43 AM on 09/08/2010
Shockingly­, my reply was rejected. Let's try again.

You are right. There should be no warning to Palestine. There should be a warning to both sides. Whomever attacks the other loses the US as an ally.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:44 AM on 09/05/2010
why the last chance for a long time? peace can come at any time, any place, between any individual­s
09:04 PM on 09/05/2010
its hilary she has no business in that job, no one can name 1 single accomplish­ment that she has had
photo
ibsteve2u
Someone who cares - to his unending regret
10:41 AM on 09/05/2010
Michael Oren, Israel's ambassador to the United States, allowed that the settlement freeze was "a major hurdle" to overcome. [...] "The Palestinia­ns shouldn't cherry pick one issue and make it a condition,­"

Seems to me that a rational person - Palestinia­n, Jewish, or whatever - would look at the illegal settlement­s and think: "Huh...if they don't get that stopped first, they'll find themselves negotiatin­g from Egypt with nothing left to negotiate over.".
10:38 AM on 09/05/2010
How self serving. Didn't her Husband say the same thing?
10:25 AM on 09/05/2010
As is often the case, Hillary is spot on.
I hope she replaces Biden in 2012. That will equal the enthusiasm factor.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Giglawyer
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.
10:30 AM on 09/05/2010
I hope she replace s Biden in 2012 as well. That will guarantee a GOP victory. No one brings out the base like Hillary.
09:05 PM on 09/05/2010
she is the dumbest person in this administra­tion after barak and bite me