iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Ken Buck's Evolution: Colorado GOP Senate Candidate Removes Controversial Positions From His Website


First Posted: 09/07/10 03:47 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:35 PM ET

Colorado Republican Ken Buck is a darling of the Tea Party movement, and he has admitted that this constituency was "huge" to his success over establishment candidate Jane Norton in the state's U.S. Senate primary. In recent months, however, he has changed his website, moderating some of his more controversial policy positions.

AFGHANISTAN: In the earlier version of Buck's website, accessed on May 18, the Senate candidate said that he supports a nation-building effort in Afghanistan that will take "at least 10 years":

My son is a third year cadet at West Point. I'm very proud of my son's decision to serve his country. He understands the risks involved. He also understands there is a price for freedom in this country and he's willing to stand up and shoulder that burden. For so many of our brave men and women today, that means shouldering the burden in Iraq and Afghanistan.


We definitely need to continue a major effort in Afghanistan. We are told this effort will take at least 10 years. It will require both military and civilian personnel to help build up the country. The generals on the ground tell us we are likely to be in Afghanistan for the long term with a difficult and complicated mission.

As Colorado's Senator, I will always look first to the advice of the generals, and I will strongly support the mission of our troops who are in harm's way.

Today, his site has no reference to the long occupation of Afghanistan. The site was changed as of July 14 (possibly earlier):

I am proud of my son Cody, a fourth year cadet at West Point. The contributions made by all the men and women who serve in the military around the world so we can enjoy our freedoms at home will always be reflected in my priorities.


I will fight for a strong national defense and to ensure our military members, veterans and their families receive the benefits and care they have earned.

ABORTION: The "Respect for Life" page also changed. The earlier version:

I believe in the value of life and and support policies that promote respect for life. Based on my upbringing, my faith and my life experiences, I believe life begins at conception. I oppose abortion except to protect the life of the mother.


As a District Attorney, I have fought to protect the lives of the born and advocated for the lives of the unborn.

I believe Roe v. Wade was incorrectly decided. As your U.S. Senator, I will sponsor a Constitutional Amendment to protect the life of the unborn. I will vote to confirm only those judicial nominees who respect the intent of America's founders as enshrined in our U.S. Constitution.

Congress should not support federal funding of abortion or embryonic stem cell research or organizations that promote either.

The current version (also around July 14) retains Buck's position that abortion is acceptable only "to protect the life of the mother" (meaning no abortion in cases of rape or incest), but no longer calls for a constitutional amendment outlawing the procedure:

As a father of two, Ken believes in the value of life and is opposed to abortion except to protect the life of the mother. As U.S. Senator, Ken will oppose federal funding of abortion and will fight to protect the life of the unborn.

IMMIGRATION: The early version of Buck's site advocated "sealing our borders to illegal traffic, both north and south and at our ports" and warned about the growing problem of identity theft from undocumented immigration:

How can we be a strong country if we can't control our borders? How can we be a strong country if we can't deal effectively with the problem of illegal immigration? The answer, of course, is we can't. We should start the path to immigration reform by finally sealing our borders to illegal traffic, both north and south and at our ports. Then we must enforce the laws that are already on the books to deal with illegal immigration.


The federal government has not been effective in protecting our borders and addressing the issue of illegal immigration. What the federal government has done is shift the burden of enforcing these laws to the county level.

One of the growing problems flowing from illegal immigration is identity theft. Weld County, my home county, is unfortunately no stranger to the crime of identity theft. The Federal Trade Commission ranked Weld County fourth in the country for identity theft cases in 2006, third in 2007 and 11th in 2008. We are working hard to deal with this problem but it will continue to grow until we get serious about dealing with illegal immigration.

We need to have a finely crafted guest worker program that is sufficient to meet the needs of our economy. I believe we can do that and still get serious about dealing effectively with the larger illegal immigration problem.

Sometime on or before July 14, the site was changed to:

As Weld County District Attorney, I have a strong record on controlling illegal immigration. I believe we don't need new laws to deal with the problem. We need the backbone to enforce the laws that are on the books.


Securing our borders should be a top priority in controlling illegal immigration and protecting our country against terrorist threats.

The current version, which appeared on at least July 26, still talks about undocumented immigration, but it also discusses encouraging "legal immigration" and making sure immigrants aren't "forced into the shadows of our society":

The immigration system in our country is broken. We need to revamp the system so that we can ensure it is a safe, viable option for those wanting to migrate legally into our country.


First, we have to secure the border to stop the flow of illegal immigration. It is essential to our security that we curb the number undocumented immigrants coming into our country.


Second, we need to establish a program that will help make legal immigration a feasible option. This will allow legal immigrants to fill jobs that American labor cannot fill.

Finally, we need to stand firm and say 'no' to amnesty. Illegal immigrants must return to their country of origin to enter the United States with respect to our laws. This will ensure that immigrants receive the proper protections of law and not be forced into the shadows of our society.

Buck may not be highlighting these positions on his website, but that doesn't mean he no longer believes all of them. He has reiterated his support for a controversial personhood amendment, which would give full legal rights to fertilized human eggs.

His position on Afghanistan, however, has changed. Sometime in "late June," Buck spoke with The Denver Post about whether the "current strategy is the right strategy in Afghanistan." He said it was "for a short period of time," but that "overall we have to get out of the nation-building business." "The idea that we are going to create a Western-style democracy in Afghanistan is pure folly," he added. "We're not going to get that done in 10 years, in 50 years. And we're going to lose thousands of lives and we're going spend billions of dollars."

As the Huffington Post's Sam Stein has reported, Buck has made a name for himself with his "tough take on immigration policy". He supports Arizona's controversial immigration law and backs changing the 14th amendment's citizenship clause to exclude children of undocumented immigrants, although he has attempted to distance himself from some of the more extreme rhetoric by people like Colorado GOP third-party candidate Tom Tancredo.

In a mid-July profile, USA Today noted that Buck seemed to be "sliding to the center" in an effort to sidestep "some of the furors that have trailed other Tea Party-backed Senate contenders."

Another Tea Party favorite, Nevada's GOP Senate candidate Sharron Angle, also redid her website this summer and removed mentions of her support for abolishing the Department of Education, having Social Security "transitioned out" to the private sector and repealing legislation prohibiting offshore drilling.

The Huffington Post contacted the Buck campaign but did not receive a response.

*************************

What's happening in your district? The Huffington Post wants to know about all the campaign ads, debates, town halls, mailings, shenanigans, and other interesting campaign news happening by you. E-mail us any tips, videos, audio files, and photos to election@huffingtonpost.com.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Colorado Republican Ken Buck is a darling of the Tea Party movement, and he has admitted that this constituency was "huge" to his success over establishment candidate Jane Norton in the state's U.S. S...
Colorado Republican Ken Buck is a darling of the Tea Party movement, and he has admitted that this constituency was "huge" to his success over establishment candidate Jane Norton in the state's U.S. S...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 545
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (18 total)
01:19 PM on 09/16/2010
Agree,

(If you think this is bad look at Colorado's Governor Race)

New Ras-Polls indicate no real change for these guys.

Please consider me, heck SHOUT me out, you can also just google me. I look at it this way.
I can do a better job and fight for you and the USA, no matter where you live, alot better than the Buck n' Bennet show.


charleymiller2010
11:37 AM on 09/10/2010
Just because they are not on the web site doesn't mean he changed his position!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bobojack1
11:00 PM on 09/09/2010
This guy is a pathetic joke. He is a almost a male version of Angle.
photo
WOODSTOCKER51
HAVE A NICE DAY!
08:06 AM on 09/08/2010
I believe Roe v. Wade was incorrectly decided. As your U.S. Senator, I will sponsor a Constitutional Amendment to protect the life of the unborn"

.....SO HE/SHE CAN GROW UP TO BECOME A SOLDIER...AND HELP FIGHT REPUBLICAN CREATED WARS AND MAKE THE WEALTHY,,,,,,,,,,,.RICHER!
08:17 AM on 09/08/2010
Protect the unborn until they're born and then f**k 'em.......................fanned and faved
08:02 AM on 09/08/2010
We know that most politicians are liars so the only question left is which lies are worse. These teabag lunatics are just less refined than your normal republican liars and that is why they have set up special training centers to teach them how to lie better and with the increased ignorance and hatred of the typical mid-term voter many of them will be elected anyway.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WhatDaBleep
Right is Wrong and Left is Correct
07:48 AM on 09/08/2010
Tea-publicans - if they can't stand on their own issues and beliefs - they LIE!
photo
WOODSTOCKER51
HAVE A NICE DAY!
08:06 AM on 09/08/2010
BEING A LIAR IS THE NUMBER ONE QUALIFICATION OF BEING A RETHUG!
08:18 AM on 09/08/2010
..........and they don't even have to be good at it, because their voters are so ignorant.
07:47 AM on 09/08/2010
"As your U.S. Senator, I will sponsor a Constitutional Amendment to protect the life of the unborn."

"He has reiterated his support for a controversial personhood amendment, which would give full legal rights to fertilized human eggs."

And then he will build a ladder out of cheese and climb it to the moon. It would be easier, after all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Donald Simon
05:19 AM on 09/08/2010
Seems like the Tea Party should be called the Hard Liquor Party. That's what they must be drinking to say what they do.
07:49 AM on 09/08/2010
MD2020 Party!
Tim Paynter
Activist, attorney, humano!
01:00 AM on 09/08/2010
Beware politicians who are ready to spill their tea before the cup is cold!
photo
crydespite
no-one is ever 'just saying'
12:16 AM on 09/08/2010
Nothing too unusual here. Compare Obama the Campaign with Obama the Presidency.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Weirdwriter
01:49 AM on 09/08/2010
Yeah, it's not even a close comparison. Lame.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Truth In Voting
Paranoid Rightwing Catchphrase Bingo!!
12:13 AM on 09/08/2010
What? You mean the good men and women of Teabagistan have been had?!

Say it isn't so!


And here, conservative voters were so sure that THIS year would be the year that candidates would finally admit out loud to having many of the same views as them. Let down again.

Maybe in 2012, the citizens of Teabagistan won't be so easily conned by primary-election candidates that vow to fight the federally funded same-sex marriage stem-cell abortions of border security in Obamacare.
12:59 PM on 09/10/2010
"......vow to fight the federally funded same-sex marriage stem-cell abortions of border security in Obamacare."

Sarah...is that you????
11:35 PM on 09/07/2010
I don't know which possibility is scarier: Either he's changing his views to win votes and his real reason for running for office is unrelated, or he still is a tea party hardliner at heart and he's donned this sheepskin to slip into Washington where he can do as he pleases. In any case I hope he doesn't win.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Justdontgetit
Don't screw with old people, they will mess you up
11:11 AM on 09/08/2010
I'm voting "sheepskin".
photo
ThankGodhesgone
Always Progressive and loving the CONs meltdown.
11:14 PM on 09/07/2010
Interesting when politicians of this ilk will say absurd things, but delete or change them when their comments come to light.

Do they not really believe in what they originally said?
photo
radiodog
Retired school superintendent and US Army veteran
11:37 PM on 09/07/2010
I think that most of these people believe in very little, other than being elected and reelected. Teabaggers who have been nominated by Republicans in moderate districts all over the country are doing the same thing. Sharron Angle in Nevada is a prime example. John McCain disavowed much of what he previously stood for to get renominated. However, the issue is not peculiar to Republicans. Many Democrats run toward middle ground once the local Democrats nominated them based on professed progressive platforms.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Truth In Voting
Paranoid Rightwing Catchphrase Bingo!!
12:20 AM on 09/08/2010
I mostly agree, but I would also contend that it's far more common for Democrats to run on a further left platform and then move to the center once elected, whereas Republicans try to move to the center before elections and attempt to shirk responsibility for their far-right votes before, during, and after elections (basically, all the the time).

Both Obama and McCain took sharp left turns in the 2008 elections, and neither delivered on most of it (though it's understandable why McCain hasn't delivered, he had a lot of kiss-and-making up to do for his deeply conservative voters here in Arizona). That's the thing: promising hope and change and progress is similar to promising a smaller government, only voters can't really measure any "size of government" lies, but they can plainly see if progressive promises like marriage equality are kept or not.
photo
ThankGodhesgone
Always Progressive and loving the CONs meltdown.
12:32 AM on 09/08/2010
Please let me know of any Democrat runner that has stated anything as outlandish as Angle's rape victims should make lemons into lemonade, or that the press should only ask questions that she wants to answer? Or Jan Brewer's comments that headless bodies were found in Arizona.

Then we can discuss how many Democrats equally run away from the things that that they professed, earlier, until they were told to tone it down.
11:10 PM on 09/07/2010
Why do the Teapaw candidates li e so much?
With the brain of those, what can they contribute to the governance of the country?
10:48 PM on 09/07/2010
It's the very problem of the GOP today - they don't really know what they believe in and would say just about anything and its opposite just to get elected. But they have no real opinion, no original ideas, nothing.