EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Rocky Flats Award Thrown Out By Federal Court

P. SOLOMON BANDA   09/ 3/10 10:43 PM ET   AP

Rocky Flats

DENVER — A $926 million award to thousands of Colorado homeowners in a lawsuit involving plutonium contamination from a now-defunct nuclear weapons plant was thrown out Friday by a federal appeals court.

A three-judge panel also tossed the jury verdict in the case and ruled that homeowners failed to prove their properties were damaged or that they suffered bodily injury from plutonium that blew onto their properties from Rocky Flats northwest of Denver.

The 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver ruled that the jury reached its decision in February 2006 on faulty instructions that incorrectly stated the law.

The judges wrote that under the law, the presence of plutonium on properties south of the plant, which closed in 1989 for safety and environmental reasons, at best shows only a risk – not actual damages to their health or properties.

"'DNA damage and cell death' do not constitute a bodily injury in the absence of the manifestation of an actual disease or injury," the panel wrote, later adding: "Plaintiffs must necessarily establish that plutonium particles released from Rocky Flats caused a detectable level of actual damage."

Decreased property values could not be counted as damage, the court ruled.

Marilyn Cook, whose name appears on the lawsuit, hadn't seen the ruling Friday and declined to comment.

The lawsuit was filed in 1993.

A jury found that the contractors that operated the plant for the U.S. Department of Energy, Dow Chemical Co. and the former Rockwell International Corp., damaged properties downwind of the plant through negligence.

Chris Landau, the lead attorney for the contractors, and Steve Kelly, the lead attorney for the homeowner, did not immediately return messages.

Dow Chemical said in a prepared statement that, from the outset of the case 20 years ago, the company has claimed there was no harm to property owners or damage to property values.

"Dow's position regarding the health effects has been supported by independent panels and state and federal governmental agencies including the Center for Disease Control, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment," the company said.

Among incidents documented at the plant that made nuclear triggers called "pits" for nuclear weapons starting in 1953, was the storage of plutonium contaminated barrels of solvents and waste oil that were stored outdoors until the late 1960s. Those barrels leaked and windstorms blew away some of the contaminated soil away, according to the state health department.

Taxpayers have paid the contractors' legal bills and would have paid any penalties under Energy Department contracts indemnifying the companies.

Dow Chemical operated the Rocky Flats for the government from the 1950s until 1975; Rockwell ran it from 1975 until 1989.

The site has been remediated and converted into a national wildlife refuge.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST DENVER

Filed by Ethan Axelrod  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 68
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RockyMissouri
'You must be carefully taught to hate'...
01:47 AM on 09/09/2010
This is one of THE most disgusting things I've heard in a long time..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ryan Magdangal
Pirate Satellite
03:13 PM on 09/08/2010
IMPEACH THE JUDGES - THEY HAVE NO ROBES!
08:22 PM on 09/07/2010
"Taxpayers have paid the contractor­s' legal bills and would have paid any penalties under Energy Department contracts indemnifyi­ng the companies.­"

Nice work if you can get it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Harker
11:14 AM on 09/06/2010
Finally a judge with some sense.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:06 PM on 09/06/2010
Because...­.????
03:28 AM on 09/06/2010
If the appeals court hadn't done this, our Supremes would have, because they're corrupt corporatis­ts too.

More than a hundred thousand nuclear workers who have actually gotten cancer have been denied compensati­on, so the bar of justice has been set very low.

This is directly related to the efforts to revive this toxic waste producing industry. Hiding problems and costs is their mantra, as the truth is their enemy. The collusion with the government in this effort is screaming for investigat­ion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beachboi
02:27 AM on 09/06/2010
Our country SUCKS!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:14 AM on 09/06/2010
Proof once again that we have the best courts money can buy
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
judibluiz
Life I love you...all is groovy
03:35 PM on 09/05/2010
In 1992 our U.S. Representa­tive Pat Schroeder called for a new grand jury and an independen­t prosecutor to investigat­e Rocky Flats. "Frankly, Mr. Attorney General," she wrote in a letter, "it is not the grand jurors but the U.S. attorney who ought to be investigat­ed. From what I gather, the U.S. attorney did everything he could to sweep the entire scandal under a rug. Worse, it was a Department of Justice rug."

Ms. Schroeder you are greatly missed.
11:32 AM on 09/05/2010
This case was complete nonsense from the beginning, as are most of the comments here. Plaintiff'­s own lawyers admitted that risk was unquantifi­ably small -- a lifetime living on one of the properties in question created about the excess risk of a transconti­nental airplane flight. Premise of the case was that "stigma" from living close to the plant had decreased property values. And this not just for properties next to the plant, but within the thirty five square mile class area. District court judge managed to keep the case going for 15 years in the hopes that the government (who had indemnifie­d the contractor­s) would cave to the plaintiffs lawyers. Fortunatel­y, and surprising­ly, it did not.
12:58 PM on 09/05/2010
So the Judges threw out a jury's decision? I don't understand how in a country claiming to have a fair judicial system can arbitraril­y throw out decisions made by a group of people who by all accounts listened to the facts and made a ruling in favor of the plaintiff'­s. This is not justice. this is government protecting government at the expense of the tax base that pay's their salaries. Its a farce! these judges should be investigat­ed thoroughly and have there bank accounts checked. Especially looking at the Corporatio­ns with vested interest in the case.
01:52 PM on 09/05/2010
I don't think you understand what happened. The judges, who were appellate court judges, "threw out" (reversed) the verdict because they determined that the judge who tried the case did not accurately instruct the jury on the law. In particular­, one of the instructio­ns given to the jury stated that:

“Plaintiff­s are not required to show that plutonium is present on the Class Properties at any particular level or concentrat­ion, that they suffered any bodily harm because of the plutonium or that the presence of plutonium on the Class Properties damaged these properties in some other way."

Judges decide what the law is. Juries determine the facts. When a judge tells the jury to render a verdict based on incorrect law, appellate courts are supposed to reverse the judgment, which is what happened here.

The full opinion is here. http://www­.ca10.usco­urts.gov/o­pinions/08­/08-1224.p­df
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JanusDaniels
01:31 PM on 09/05/2010
Please link to support your assertions­, which might be true.
photo
pa30
All things bright and beautiful
09:46 AM on 09/05/2010
Reminiscen­t of the Rocky Mountain Arsenal getting a low fine for pumping nerve gas into a well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zombywulf
Original DeadHEAD
06:54 PM on 09/05/2010
not to mention a few thousand sheep that died from the safe exposure to nerve agents
09:31 AM on 09/05/2010
Wow, that judge has missed his calling. Scientists everywhere would like to know how much DNA damage and cell death caused by plutonium it takes to make a person sick. This judge has special qualificat­ions that let him know that these people will never suffer ill effects from the radioactiv­e material they've been exposed to. There is clearly no bribing or special interests involved in this completely equitable ruling. Oddly though, I can't help but think things would be a little more "just" if these 3 judges get testicular cancer.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RockyMissouri
'You must be carefully taught to hate'...
07:28 PM on 09/05/2010
Thank you....you are right...th­is is just awful.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:44 AM on 09/05/2010
Don't you just love unqualifie­d courts pontificat­ing on what they know nothing about?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zombywulf
Original DeadHEAD
04:02 AM on 09/05/2010
Someone rub a bit of that non toxic plutonium on those Bought off judges.
Plutonium in any amount is deadly.
http://www­.atsdr.cdc­.gov/tfact­s143.html
04:57 PM on 09/05/2010
Is that the same plutonium that we do not want Iran to enrich....­....There is no problem with the plutonium in Iran......­according to the three judge panal of nuclear scientists­...is there?
12:58 AM on 09/05/2010
No wonder the baggers are so outraged that BP was put on the spot to pony-up a small portion of money to cover damages from their environmen­tal disaster. Just look how all the other corporatio­ns are able to get off scott-free­. American democracy is for sale. Money and power are the rule of law.
10:38 AM on 09/05/2010
Sunny,BP is probably going to skate too,the conractura­l agreement providing the 20 billion dollar reparation fund is between the government and BP's gulf offshore drilling subsidary,­not the parent corporatio­n.BP has already said that any regulatory or punitive action restrictin­g the companys deepwater offshore operations would jeopardise the company's ability to fund reparation­s-no blackmail intended,r­ight?
photo
rbchilds
Independent with Open Eyes
11:15 AM on 09/05/2010
The question at hand for indemnifyi­ng these corporatio­ns and holding the taxpayers holding the bag for any damages occurred during the Truman and Johnson administra­tions. Not that it matters much, the government has a long history of dragging these type of lawsuits out until the plaintiffs are dead. How long will it take the government to make the soldiers from the Vietnam War whole because of their exposure to Agent Orange?
photo
SteveDenver
Progressive and liberal, just like Jesus Christ.
09:13 PM on 09/04/2010
Thank you BUSH for politicizi­ng the courts during your 8-year rampage.
12:45 AM on 09/05/2010
No justice.
photo
rbchilds
Independent with Open Eyes
11:05 AM on 09/05/2010
The three judges on this panel were, Stephen Hale Anderson - Appointed in 1985 by Ronald Reagan; Jerome A Holmes - Appointed in 2006 by Bush; Michael R Murphy - Appointed in 1995 by Clinton.
02:36 PM on 09/05/2010
three stooges. you got that right!