EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Future Hiring Will Mainly Benefit The High-Skilled

CHRISTOPHER S. RUGABER and MICHAEL LIEDTKE   09/ 5/10 01:54 PM ET   AP

Jobs Recovery
Emrah Ongut, left, a masters degree candidate at Columbia University, of Turkey, talks with a representative of the United Nations Development Program about possible job opportunities during the current world economic crisis during a career fair at Columbia University, Friday, Nov. 7, 2008 in New York. The U.S. unemployment rate bolted to a 14-year high of 6.5 percent in October as another 240,000 jobs were cut, far worse than economists expected and stark proof the economy is deteriorating at a

Whenever companies start hiring freely again, job-seekers with specialized skills and education will have plenty of good opportunities. Others will face a choice: Take a job with low pay – or none at all.

Job creation will likely remain weak for months or even years. But once employers do step up hiring, some economists expect job openings to fall mainly into two categories of roughly equal numbers:

_ Professional fields with higher pay. Think lawyers, research scientists and software engineers.

_ Lower-skill and lower-paying jobs, like home health care aides and store clerks.

And those in between? Their outlook is bleaker. Economists foresee fewer moderately paid factory supervisors, postal workers and office administrators.

That's the sobering message American workers face as they celebrate Labor Day at a time of high unemployment, scant hiring and a widespread loss of job security. Not until 2014 or later is the nation expected to have regained all, or nearly all, the 8.4 million jobs lost to the recession. Millions of lost jobs in real estate, for example, aren't likely to be restored this decade, if ever.

On Friday, the government said the August unemployment rate ticked up to 9.6 percent. Not enough jobs were created to absorb the growing number of people seeking work. The unemployment rate has exceeded 9 percent for 16 months, the longest such stretch in nearly 30 years.

The crisis poses a threat to President Barack Obama and Democrats in Congress, whose hold on the House and Senate appears to be at increasing risk because of voter discontent.

Even when the job market picks up, many people will be left behind. The threat stems, in part, from the economy's continuing shift from one driven by manufacturing to one fueled by service industries.

Pay for future service-sector jobs will tend to vary from very high to very low. At the same time, the number of middle-income service-sector jobs will shrink, according to government projections. Any job that can be automated or outsourced overseas is likely to continue to decline.

The service sector's growth could also magnify the nation's income inequality, with more people either affluent or financially squeezed. The nation isn't educating enough people for the higher-skilled service-sector jobs of the future, economists warn.

"There will be jobs," says Lawrence Katz, a Harvard economist. "The big question is what they are going to pay, and what kind of lives they will allow people to lead? This will be a big issue for how broad a middle class we are going to have."

On one point there's broad agreement: Of 8 million-plus jobs lost to the recession – in fields like manufacturing, real estate and financial services – many, perhaps most, aren't coming back.

In their place will be jobs in health care, information technology and statistical analysis. Some of the new positions will require complex skills or higher education. Others won't – but they won't pay very much, either.

"Our occupational structure is really becoming bifurcated," says Richard Florida, a professor at University of Toronto. "We're becoming more of a divided nation by the work we do."

By 2018, the government forecasts a net total of 15.3 million new jobs. If that proves true, unemployment would drop far closer to a historical norm of 5 percent.

Nearly all the new jobs will be in the service sector, the Labor Department says. The nation's 78 million baby boomers will need more health care services as they age, for example. Demand for medical jobs will rise. And innovations in high technology and alternative energy are likely to spur growth in occupations that don't yet exist.

Hiring can't come fast enough for the 14.9 million unemployed Americans. Counting part-time employees who would prefer full-time jobs, plus out-of-work people who have stopped looking for jobs, the number of "underemployed" is 26.2 million.

Manufacturing has shed 2 million jobs since the recession began. Construction has lost 1.9 million, financial services 651,000.

But the biggest factor has been the bust in real estate. The vanished jobs range from construction workers and furniture makers to loan officers, appraisers and material suppliers. Moody's Analytics estimates the total number of housing-related jobs lost at 2.4 million. When you include commercial real estate, the number is far higher.

One of them is Martha Escobar, who last month lost her $13.50-an-hour job cleaning an office tower owned by JPMorgan Chase & Co. in Century City, Calif. She was one of 16 janitors, mostly single mothers, who lost jobs as part of the real estate crunch that's squeezed landlords.

Some of them traveled to New York on Thursday to try to pressure JPMorgan to get its cleaning contractor to take them back, given that the bank earned $8.1 billion during the first half of this year.

"I don't know what I am going to do if I can't get my job back," Escobar, 41, said.

JPMorgan Chase spokesman Gary Kishner said the bank has no say over the layoffs, which he said are handled by the building's cleaning contractor.

On top of real estate-related job losses, manufacturing is likely to keep shedding jobs, sending lower-skilled work overseas. Millions who worked in those fields will need to find jobs in higher-skilled or lower-paying occupations.

"The big fear is the country is simply not preparing workers for the kind of skills that the country is going to need," says Gautam Godhwani, CEO of SimplyHired.com, which tracks job listings.

Sectors likely to grow fastest, according to economists and government projections, are:

_ HEALTH CARE

The sector is expected to be the leading job generator, adding 4 million by 2018, according to Labor Department data. An aging population requires more doctors and nurses, physical therapists, home health aides and pharmacists.

Many of these jobs will pay well. Physical therapists averaged about $76,000 last year, according to the department's data. Others pay far less. Home health care aides earned an average of just $21,600.

Home health care and personal care aides are expected to add about 900,000 jobs by 2018 – 50 percent more than in 2008.

Jennifer Gamboa of Body Dynamics Inc., an Arlington, Va.-based physical therapy firm, says the drive to reduce health care costs should benefit her profession, which can treat pain less expensively than surgery. Gamboa plans to add two employees in the next year.

_ INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: Technology could be an economic elixir as computers and online networks expand ways to automate services, distribute media and communicate.

Companies will need people to build and secure those networks. That should boost the number of programmers, network administrators and security specialists by 45 percent to 2.1 million by 2018, the government forecasts. Most of these jobs will provide above-average pay.

Technology pay averaged $84,400 in 2008 – nearly double the average private-sector pay of $45,400, according to an analysis of the most recent full-year data by the TechAmerica Foundation, a research group.

_ NEW INDUSTRIES: Deepak Advani, an IBM executive, has a title he says didn't exist five years ago: "Vice president of predictive analytics."

Companies and government agencies have amassed data on behavior ranging from shopping habits to criminal activity. Predictive analytics is the art of determining what to do with that data. How should workers' time be deployed? How best to target customers? Such jobs could grow 20 percent by 2018, the government predicts.

Still, economists say more will be needed to boost job growth. The answer may be some technological breakthrough akin to the personal computer or the Internet.

"Most big booms come from a particular sector that moves the rest of the economy," said Richard Freeman, a Harvard labor economist.

Technology spurred job growth after the 1982 and 1991 recessions. The PC became revolutionary in the early 1980s. Internet use exploded after the Mosaic Web browser was introduced in 1994. Housing eventually lifted employment after the 2001 dot-com bust.

"There's a lack of clarity on what the next big thing is going to be this time," said David Card, an economics professor at the University of California.

Until there is, many people will have to lower expectations and living standards as they enter fields with less pay and less job stability, said Dan Finnigan, CEO of online employment service Jobvite.

"People who are unemployed have to embrace this future that they are going to have many jobs," he said. "We will always be working on the next gig."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Whenever companies start hiring freely again, job-seekers with specialized skills and education will have plenty of good opportunities. Others will face a choice: Take a job with low pay – or no...
Whenever companies start hiring freely again, job-seekers with specialized skills and education will have plenty of good opportunities. Others will face a choice: Take a job with low pay – or no...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,427
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (72 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
05:25 PM on 09/08/2010
Yes, it's frustratin­g because the jobs I see rarely seem to fit my education and experience­, though I have a lot invested-i­n terms of both time and money- in both. And the ones I do see that fit I'm told get floods of applicants­.

On the other end, McDonald's is hiring part-time minimum wage but it's not possible to maintain my current obligation­s-includin­g a $350 a month student loan payment.

One nasty side to the Federal Student Loan program is the governemen­t made it all but impossible to reduce one's debt load, regardless of the hardship. If you're thinking of borrowing for school keep this in mind!
03:14 PM on 09/08/2010
Was this piece written by somebody who works for Sallie Mae? It's easy to heap a lot of disrespect and scorn for store clerks and janitors (who aren't encumbered with huge student loan debts) but if those people don't have any money to spend, there won't be unlimited opportunit­ies for engineers, doctors and nurses. Just google "RN's in tough job market" and see how hard it is for new RN grads. The Huffpost has been running numerous editorials about student loan debt and the dubious value of college. The whole business model of going to college and spending the rest of your life trying to pay off your student loans cannot continue forever. Let me add another cliche--Bi­ll Gates, Steve Jobs, and Jim Cameron never finished college.

http://nur­singlink.m­onster.com­/topics/79­96-having-­trouble-ge­tting-a-ne­w-grad-job­/posts
11:36 AM on 09/08/2010
Very low pay or nothing at all.Those are the words China used to get to 15 cent per hour.
03:18 AM on 09/08/2010
The U.S. needs to manufactur­e something that is of high value and labor intensive. What we need to manufactur­e is oil. During WWII the Germans made oil out of coal and during the apartheid embargo the South Africans did the same. Oil made out of coal is of course still a fossil fuel and will add to global warming but if we can perfect the manufactur­e of oil from algae and garbage, (oil has already been made from garbage for about $80 a barrel), then we will not only help our economy but also the the environmen­t by switching from a fossil fuel to a bio-fuel. Undoubtedl­y manufactur­ed oil would be more expensive than oil pumped from the ground in Saudi Arabia but remember the price of "cheap" oil from the middle east does not include the cost of the army and fleet we must keep there to ensure our supply. If that cost was added to the price of oil it wouldn't be so cheap. Also remember that the money we spend on oil manufactur­ed in this country would stay in this country and not be sent over seas to benefit the economies of unfriendly regimes in Saudi Arabia and Venezuela. Instead it would benefit our economy.
photo
AvgJoeBlow
We are smarter than any of us.
06:32 AM on 09/08/2010
You forgot the USA's largest customer of oil: the US Military. Go figure -AJB
11:42 AM on 09/08/2010
Manufactur­e oil ?Will that ensure that the price can still go up and down every day.Just love that roller coaster ride,they should put everything on that program.Ev­erything up and down every day.If we go for that on oil we will go for it on everything else.
12:11 PM on 09/08/2010
Never heard of a market economy?
08:58 PM on 09/07/2010
There are jobs out there. Employers are looking to hire. But, many of those jobs will require workers to re-train and acquire new skills. Those willing to do so will find work, decent paying work. Those who won't, well their future isn't so bright.

The most important question any employee can ask is if they are adding value or not. Employers tend to retain those employees they think add more value than they cost. How to teach that, I honestly do not know.
12:12 PM on 09/08/2010
It's not easily taught since it is defined by a person's world view. Some are just not suited.
11:27 AM on 09/10/2010
There are not enough jobs out there for all those who are seeking; that is the problem.

For the last 20 years, I've been hearing CEOs and media pundits tell us that workers need to acquire new skills. So you go study computers, and guess what? Your job gets sent to India.

It's NOT a question of picking up new skills for most of us.
08:38 PM on 09/07/2010
I'm puzzling over the title. Hasn't it always been true that highly-ski­lled workers are better off in the job market? I mean, I'm no genius, but...
12:13 PM on 09/08/2010
Yeah, not sure of the point. Sort of thought it was old news.
08:26 PM on 09/07/2010
Liberal media propaganda­! What about the job prospects of the richest 1 percent? Don't see any whining there.....

That's right. They run things. No worries for the rich! Not in America.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zapyourappetite
11:43 AM on 09/08/2010
Huh? The richest 1 percent don't rely on having a "job".
12:14 PM on 09/08/2010
bitter?
08:03 PM on 09/07/2010
A sobering post indeed. I teach profession­al developmen­t for college seniors, and we talk about what employers value most in potential hires. Skills like effective communicat­ion (written, oral, and visual), conflict resolution­, problem solving, and community organizing help position job-seeker­s better. We forget to develop these skills in our mad rush to be qualified on paper. http://www­.livewithf­lair.blogs­pot.com/
photo
AvgJoeBlow
We are smarter than any of us.
06:35 AM on 09/08/2010
LOL - Put that stuff down on a resume and send it out, you're killing me. -AJB
09:08 AM on 09/08/2010
And it shows.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hrpmap
Retired man still active..
07:59 PM on 09/07/2010
Without a robust manufactur­ing base turning raw material into consumer goods an important part of the economy is missing. With foreign labor at1 dollar an hour or less that's not likely to be in our future. As long as Americans are competing with foreign cheap labor the middle class will continue to contract. Without levelling the playing feild we are headed for a third world situation, the very rich and the very poor.
07:36 PM on 09/07/2010
Economics will tell you without a middle class the economy will spiral downward.

What percentage of people graduate college and how many people by percentage have college degrees?

2007 stats showed aprox 27% of people have a college degree. I m still looking for updated material but I will be it is close.

In population it is a big number and I am please but what about 73%? Even if the number rose to 35% then what about the vast majority. Without they're spending you will see a big collapse.

We have no choice but to change some of the trade rules with China otherwise the Americans will pay big time.
08:05 PM on 09/07/2010
The US now ranks 12th in the world in the % of college graduates. Meanwhile, our best colleges and universiti­es are educating people from all over the world, while our immigratio­n laws and quotas send them back home after graduation­, so they can compete with us. Great plan?
11:30 AM on 09/10/2010
A huge percentage of those foreigners who study in the US stay here afterward. Well, maybe not anymore, thanks to this Depression­. Jobs are probably easier to get in China or Europe now.
06:49 PM on 09/07/2010
It was unions that turned much of the working class into the middle class--so they got rid of the unions & are getting rid of the middle class.
08:07 PM on 09/07/2010
No - the unions now represent governemen­t workers. Over 50% of all union members work for a government­. That's why education, law enforcemen­t and public services have improved so much. Right?
10:25 PM on 09/07/2010
1) They get a living wage, unlike many non-unioni­zed workers (if they even have jobs). Do you prefer starving people waiting on you & or making what you buy?

2) There have ALWAYS been good & bad teachers, police, & public servants. In fact, the police used to be much worse before unions (unless you were wealthy enough to bribe them or get them in trouble with the police commission­er). Similarly, before unions, teachers tried to teach unmanageab­ly large classes, often spanning several grades, which meant the kids got less attention & less education than is available to them now. We didn't hear much about their failures because those kids were mostly from the lower class & nobody cared about them. There were jobs then for ditch-digg­ers, & you didn't need much education to dig a ditch.

3) You've been buying a lot of right-wing anti-union propaganda­. What makes you think overworked­, underpaid, underfed workers working 12 hour days 6 days a week produced a better product? Why do you long for the days when such workers were worked nearly to death & then fired in favor of someone younger & stronger (until he got used up, too), with no Social Security or pension? When female factory workers were so badly paid, they had to turn tricks on the side to feel their families after 12 hours on the factory floor. If you work a 40 hour week, it's thanks to unions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rezna
Occupy HuffPost
06:31 PM on 09/07/2010
I have a degree in Music, I'm basically screwed. I will have to go back to school to get proper training for these sorts of jobs. I'm an Office Manager right now, and the pay is horrible for what I go through on a daily basis. But on the other hand, I can't believe someone like an attorney is only going to get the same wage I get, after all the student loans they had to take for their degrees.

I feel totally helpless in this situation, I have to marry rich or be poor the rest of my life
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hrpmap
Retired man still active..
08:03 PM on 09/07/2010
With a degree and years of experience in research and developmen­t in work flow and porduction methods we are just as had. Manufactur­ing is pretty well gone to Asia etc.
08:08 PM on 09/07/2010
If you want to marry rich, better learn Chinese.
05:37 PM on 09/07/2010
Its really sad the way America's middle class is disappeari­ng. Theres no way this can continue to be a first world country when we've got people with families working for $5.00 an hour and a small minority is making millions a year.

Long ago America should have made all college and universiti­es free of charge. Its the reason higher education is unattainab­le for most people and why we've fallen so far behind. And most young people can't find the jobs to pay off debts or pay for school so thats not an option either. China and Europe is going to end up with some of the most educated best profession­als in the world. Europe already does. Its too bad we don't care about educating our children in this country. Because without it they have no future.
T-Haight
What was wrong with federalism?
04:25 PM on 09/07/2010
You have to love a study (cited in this article) that is so bold as to predict that:

"service-s­ector jobs will tend to vary from very high to very low."

Wow! What precision!
07:58 PM on 09/07/2010
A psychic would tell you the exact same thing.
11:44 AM on 09/08/2010
Living will eventually kill you.
03:20 PM on 09/07/2010
This is a recent advertised job posting:

Experience­d Accountant
The right person will have an accounting degree and at least 5 years experience
Compensati­on: $12.00 per hour starting

I don't get it. The illegal immigrant landscaper­s in my area get $13 an hour, cash, no payroll taxes taken out.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:09 PM on 09/07/2010
As an attorney, sounds like some of the postings I have seen.

For example: Attorney wanted 1-3 years exp. Pay is $1,350/bi-­weekly. Must bill 55/hrs a week.

So for 110 hrs a pay period which the firm is billing to clients at anywhere from $175 to $300/hr, they are going to pay someone who spent $100,000.0­0+ on their education $1,350.00 when they are billing the clients $20,000-30­,000 for that work. That's a lot of overhead.

I guess it's like my old boss. His 21 year old daughter couldn't buy her $50,000.00 BMW on her own!
05:15 PM on 09/07/2010
We've got too many attorneys who contribute nothing useful to the economy. You should have spent your $100,000 on a tractor to farm vegetables­. That would be a more useful to the rest of us.
08:02 PM on 09/07/2010
Also no unemployme­nt pay, no worker's comp. There's a downside to being undocument­ed. Having said that, I highly doubt the $13/hr for a landscaper­. The whole idea of hiring illegals is to pay them below min. wage.