More

'Medal Of Honor,' Video Game That 'Kills' U.S. Troops, Banned By Military

ANNE FLAHERTY   09/ 8/10 05:57 PM ET   AP

Medal Of Honor Game

WASHINGTON — Military bases across the U.S. have banned the sale of a new video game that lets a player pretend to be a Taliban fighter and "shoot" U.S. troops in Afghanistan.

"Medal of Honor" by Electronic Arts, a major game developer based in Redwood City, Calif., hits stores Oct. 12. Gamers are scoffing at the decision, saying that advanced technology has made it commonplace in the gaming world to let players switch sides and play the bad guy.

After public protests, including by British Defense Secretary Liam Fox, U.S. military officials decided not to stock the game in any of the nearly 300 base exchange shops.

The game also won't be sold at any of the 49 GameStop stores located on various military bases. Troops will be allowed to own copies, but they would have to buy them off-base.

"We regret any inconvenience this may cause authorized shoppers, but are optimistic that they will understand the sensitivity to the life-and-death scenarios this product presents as entertainment," said Maj. Gen. Bruce Casella, who commands the Army & Air Force Exchange Service, which oversees more than 180 base exchange shops.

Casella made the decision last week, with the Navy quickly following suit. Kathleen Martin, a spokeswoman for the Navy Exchange Service Command, said the game won't be sold at any of the Navy's 104 exchange shops "out of respect for the men and women serving and their families."

Past versions of the 11-year old "Medal of Honor" game have been set in World War II, allowing players to act as either members of the Allied force or the Nazi regime.

The latest version is set in modern Afghanistan, where some 140,000 U.S. and NATO troops are fighting the Taliban. The story is told through a small group of characters known as "Tier 1" operators, elite fighters who take their orders directly from the president and defense secretary.

"Operating directly under the National Command Authority, a relatively unknown entity of hand-picked warriors are called on when the mission must not fail," according to an online description of the video game by Electronic Arts.

The website does not advertise the fact that the multiplayer version allows a player to role-play as a member of the Taliban.

One online promotion features video interviews with Special Operations personnel who the company says served as consultants to improve the authenticity of the game. The faces of the men interviewed were blurred and their names not given.

"By me being a part of it, I at least have some say on how the community is represented," one man says.

Britain's Fox said last month that he was "disgusted and angry" by what was a "tasteless product." Fox called on retailers to show their support for the troops by not selling it.

"At the hands of the Taliban, children have lost fathers and wives have lost husbands," Fox said. "It's shocking that someone would think it acceptable to recreate the acts of the Taliban against British soldiers."

Electronic Arts did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Spokeswoman Amanda Taggart was quoted last month by the Sunday Times as saying video gamers routinely play both good guys and bad guys.

"Most of us have been doing this since we were 7: Someone plays cop, someone must be robber," the newspaper quoted her as saying.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Filed by Bianca Bosker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 110
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
02:53 AM on 09/10/2010
Wow! It's amazing how sensitive the US military is!

On another note- I like having a multifaceted game... Where the only option is not some chisel-jawed American G.I.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ConfuciusSay-
Aglets: their purpose is sinister.
11:14 PM on 09/09/2010
The Army Censors from Good Morning Vietnam are at it again.
08:27 PM on 09/09/2010
I do hope everyone realizes that, in a video game, the only difference between the "good guys" and the "bad guys" is a change of clothes. The goal remains the same: kill and destroy everything, collecting hearts or stars or energy balls along the way.
Personally, I don't like first person shooters. It's like having tunnel vision.
07:09 PM on 09/09/2010
Don't like it? don't buy it. I certainly won't. send the company a message they'll really listen to, falling profit margins.
06:11 PM on 09/09/2010
Sorry, there is a huge difference between playing "cops and robbers" or even a WW2 game and putting out a game that makes money based on current situations where kids are getting killed each day.

Why don't you just get to fly some planes into the world trade center to kick the game off? Or maybe you can play one of the people in the tower watching the planes come in? Or maybe, they should use real names of killed in action soldiers, so when you are the Taliban, you can collect actual names of kids you killed?

There is a line between good fun and something that is clearly wrong, and Electronic Arts should know it.

But hey, they are making amazing money on it. I bet they hope the war continues so they can continue to make sequels and profit.

Sick.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Subterfuge
08:25 PM on 09/09/2010
Video games have been putting terrorists vs. 'counter-terrorists' against each other since before Counter-Strike. You pick a side and then both teams fight it out. If you want to play online against other people and be a soldier who gets to hunt the taliban, someone is going to have to play the part of the taliban.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThaGovna
I walk on water, eat bullets, and poop ice cream.
12:13 PM on 09/09/2010
Were any of the C&C games that featured Taliban like "soldiers" banned?

Whatever.

It's a video game. We've made games where we've been killing Soviet, Chinese, etc. soldiers for forever. Nothing wrong with that right? Nothing wrong with this either. It's all good as long as we're the one's doing the killing (in a VIDEO GAME) right?

Get over it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GeorgioSutton
03:10 PM on 09/09/2010
Exactly....Call of Duty: World at War....why wasnt that banned? oh yeah....WWII is over..
10:34 AM on 09/10/2010
:D so is the Iraq war. Perfect timing!
11:16 AM on 09/09/2010
Maybe they'd prefer if we made the Medal of Honor: Pat Tillman Edition. That way we could have Coalition vs. Coalition multiplayer. /snark. These kinds of debates are just so pointless.
10:14 AM on 09/09/2010
collectively, we're about 12 years old.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Subterfuge
08:26 PM on 09/09/2010
Haha, I laughed out loud for real. I think it was the caught-off-guard effect.
10:07 AM on 09/09/2010
We're losing our way day by day. The ability to "kill" American troops on a game that mimics a current and live theater of operations is tasteless and unnecessary. Its seems we are obsessed as a country with our rights and pushing their expression to the farthest limits. Whatever happened to plain old decency? Yes, you could create this option in a game, but why would you? We are a nation at war and this trivializes the sacrifices of our brave young men and women. Is anything sacred in the US anymore? Anything?

Our current society seems to think everything is such a game...playing politics is more important than responsible leadership...play with sex as if you won't have consequences and regrets later...play video games to our fat little heart's content, men that should be out in the world leading and being role models are wasting their lives on couches playing video GAMES...play like promoting professional s.l.u.t.s to the status of celebrity isn't going to have a negative impact on our impressionable young people...we're going to play ourselves right down the freaking toilet. The history of great empires of old repeating once again.
JStading
Trust me, I'm an attorney...
10:40 AM on 09/09/2010
It's a video game that is rooted in realism.  That's why they allow players to swap sides.  What happened to decency?  It's all around us.  If you don't believe me, go to your local office building and look at how woman have jobs that are not just administrative ::::gasp::::.  Also, black people can now use the same doors as white people!  Oh My!  Don't cha just yearn for the good ol days.

I don't think society thinks everything is a game, but anyone who doesn't appreciate that video games are games is well....slow.  As for harping on people for playing video games, if you don't have any recreation in you're life, you're going to burnout by the time you're 20.  Calm down.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blakej19
D.F.A.
05:44 PM on 09/09/2010
I guess you haven't played a video game in years, many and Many I mean nearly all war games allow you to fight allies or axis in ww2 games and current games are almost all based in a desert somewhere in the middle east, may not say Afghanistan or Iraq but the people playing know exactly. Counter strike, has been around for 12 + years and no one ever complained.

And I work 10+ hours a day and come home take care of my daughter and before I sleep I play video games, what is wrong with that? I workout when I have the time, but to sit here and talk trash about people who play video games is ridiculous. My generation grew up with it so its a part of our culture as cocaine was the culture of the 80s. get over it! its just a game, if your taught right from wrong than you realize whats right and whats just BS and this is BS. America needs to stop being so sensitive, were in a war and death and killing is a part of that. We should not shield ourselves from the truth.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:57 AM on 09/09/2010
On behalf of EA, I would like t thank the Pentagon for helping increase the sales of our new shoot-'em-up - I mean action/adventure - game "Medal of Honor."

It's very different from the hundreds and hundreds of other numbingly stupid shoot-'em-up - I mean action/adventure - games on the market, and in these difficult economic times, we need all the help pushing this dreck we can get...
10:00 AM on 09/09/2010
Thank HP whilst you at it.
JStading
Trust me, I'm an attorney...
10:42 AM on 09/09/2010
The Pentagon's help isn't needed and these games are far from numbingly stupid.  All you need is three words to understand why this game will do well: Modern Warfare 2.  In the first 24 hours, that game sold $300m.  To date, it's over $1.3b.  This game is similar enough to that to merit a guess that it will track similarly.  People will buy it, hard times or not.
12:59 PM on 09/09/2010
That's what I don't get. You can play either side in MW2. WTF.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:03 PM on 09/09/2010
Just because something makes a lot of money doesn't mean it isn't stupid. Really stupid. Given the state of pop culture, I believe, in fact, that it's safe to say the MORE stupid something is - the more likely it will make a lot of money.

Who makes more money - MacDonald's or a restaurant that makes wholesome food from scratch?

Brittany Spears - or the London Symphony?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mister Biggles
09:42 AM on 09/09/2010
I can think of zero good reasons for EA to do this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Martin Houde
I am no microbe
01:01 PM on 09/09/2010
Easy.

Multiplayer : Someone plays the US trooper. That guy wants to play against a real player, not the computer. So he fights against a real-player playing the enemy.

It's been like that every since multiplayer came into view. I played WWII games as Allied, Soviet, German troops. I played Command & Conquer as Allied, Chinese, Arab, etc. The Counter-Strike series of games features terrorism situation. One side plays the terrorists, the other plays the counter-terrorism team. Some guys have solo campaigns of US vs Soviets, then the reverse.

The name of the game here is not to kill police, or US troops, or good guys, for the sake of it. It's only to pit player against player, and diversify the game. It's been like that for decades (board games preceded video games). This, now, is making a storm into a glass of water...Ludicrous.
JStading
Trust me, I'm an attorney...
02:05 PM on 09/09/2010
Wait, video games are just a natural extension of board games and this whole debate is patently absurd?  Does....not....compute....
06:13 PM on 09/09/2010
There is a difference between fantasy or historic situations, and present day where kids are getting killed. EA shouldn't make money off of it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blakej19
D.F.A.
05:46 PM on 09/09/2010
I guess you haven't played a video game in years, many and Many I mean nearly all war games allow you to fight allies or axis in ww2 games and current games are almost all based in a desert somewhere in the middle east, may not say Afghanistan or Iraq but the people playing know exactly. Counter strike, has been around for 12 + years and no one ever complained.

And I work 10+ hours a day and come home take care of my daughter and before I sleep I play video games, what is wrong with that? I workout when I have the time, but to sit here and talk trash about people who play video games is ridiculous. My generation grew up with it so its a part of our culture as cocaine was the culture of the 80s. get over it! its just a game, if your taught right from wrong than you realize whats right and whats just BS and this is BS. America needs to stop being so sensitive, were in a war and death and killing is a part of that. We should not shield ourselves from the truth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dr Scott
All I ask is that you make sense
09:20 AM on 09/09/2010
Echoing the sentiments of most posters here. It's a game. It's okay to play violent games, as long as you're not allowed to shoot the good guys? Geez, we got games that allow you to be a car thief and run over pedestrians. While some might think this is tasteless (let's face it, the whole genre is tasteless), I guarantee that actual soldiers could not care less about the role reversal feature. A few might even see it as a valuable lesson in enemy tactics. American soldiers ain't THAT sensitive.
12:00 PM on 09/09/2010
it is a game but car theives and pedestrians  targets while in poor taste still is not the same as making sport of soldiers that  at this very moment risking their live for you in real wars.   Showing restraing or respect for that reason alone is enough, but then we have some that live in the American cocoon as they launch book burnings. 
05:52 PM on 09/09/2010
But it's ok to make sport of soldiers of other nations? Past and/or present?

Seriously, it is a game, when you play as the other role, each time you play the game whoa, like magic, the troops are alive again!
09:16 AM on 09/09/2010
I can somewhat understand what they are talking about, but typically in a multiplayer game, what "faction" you are has little if any effective on how you play. Pretty much all of the current big titles like Modern Warfare 2 (you play against, russians, Brazilian gangs and yes arab-looking fighters) or Battlefield Bad Company 2 (same company as Medal of Honor) you can use any of the of guns when you play as a faction so if the game says you are going to play as the russians, but you love playing with the M16 then no problem you can use it. No other words, when you play you are not going around thinking or acting like a russian or a terrorist, you are just trying to accomplish whatever objective is at hand. The factions are more like uniforms for a football team nothing more.
09:15 AM on 09/09/2010
Video Game violence = Bad / Offensive
Middle East violence = Good? / Inoffensive?

I'm not following the logic. How about a FPS that really represents war, no health regeneration or extra lives.
JStading
Trust me, I'm an attorney...
10:44 AM on 09/09/2010
Have you bothered to look at the game?  There is no health generation, no extra lives, and it looks increadibly realistic.
12:04 PM on 09/09/2010
Really? I though they would have mentioned something like that in the article.
05:54 PM on 09/09/2010
I'd bet that most people arguing against this game have never played games like this before.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
docpark
Vascular Surgeon
09:03 AM on 09/09/2010
I miss you and the boys very much.