More

Gulf Oil Spill Victims Unsure Whether To Take BP's Payout Or Sue

CURT ANDERSON   09/ 9/10 04:18 PM ET   AP

Oil Spill Claims

MIAMI — Alabama seafood market owner David Scott faces a difficult decision as he tries to rejuvenate his business after the Gulf oil spill: He can accept a piece of BP's $20 billion claims fund – relatively fast, easy money – or sue the oil giant for a bigger payday, wait years and risk ending up with nothing.

Thousands of business owners, fishermen and others along the Gulf Coast are confronting a similar conundrum. Those who accept a check for their long-term losses from the victims' compensation fund will have to give up their right to sue BP.

Scott, who runs Destin Connections Seafood Market in Montgomery, Ala., said business was off more than $49,000 in May and June compared with the year before. He said he is still weighing his options and waiting to see what BP is willing to offer.

"At this point, we've got to give BP a chance to do what they said they were going to do," he said. "I can prove my loss. Sales were just way off, and I couldn't get what I needed, and people weren't coming in to buy either."

Others fear that it could take years for the extent of the economic blow to be known, making it difficult to figure out whether a payout negotiated now will make them whole.

"Is the shrimp going to come back? Are the oysters going to survive? Are we going to have a market?" asked George Barisich, head of the United Commercial Fisherman's Association in Louisiana. "One lump settlement – should I take it if it's decent? Should I wait it out? It's on the back of everyone's minds right now. It's another one of the unknowns that's driving everyone sleepless right now."

Right now, the BP compensation fund is paying businesses and individuals for their short-term losses, and those accepting such interim checks do not have to sign away their right to sue. But starting sometime after Nov. 23, and continuing for three years, the fund will compensate victims for long-term losses.

Attorney Kenneth Feinberg, who is running the fund under a deal between BP and the Obama administration, said in a recent interview that those who file a long-term claim will get a preview of their potential payout before they have to decide whether to accept it. If they don't like it, they can sue.

"I think that my definition of eligibility will actually prove to be broader than if you litigate," Feinberg said. "But I might be wrong, and if parties want to litigate, they can litigate."

Feinberg has yet to set a deadline for applying for long-term compensation. Deadlines for filing lawsuits vary depending on the type of case and jurisdiction, but in general people would have between one and six years to file a negligence action against BP and other companies involved in the disaster.

How many are expected to file claims for long-term losses is anyone's guess. As of Wednesday afternoon, more than 51,000 interim claims had been submitted, including more than 44,000 for lost earnings. Of the total, 10,252 claims had been paid, for a total of almost $80 million.

In addition, more than 300 lawsuits have been filed. But those plaintiffs can withdraw their lawsuits if they decide to accept a payout from the compensation fund.

The eligibility rules for the long-term settlements have not been set but are widely expected to be similar to those for the interim claims: The nearer you are geographically to the oil spill and the more closely you depend on the Gulf's natural resources, the better chance you have of getting a share.

Feinberg said he may also bar recipients from suing not just BP but other companies, such as Transocean and Halliburton.

The Florida Restaurant and Lodging Association, which represents much of Florida's $57 billion hospitality industry, is connecting its members to three law firms to help them choose between a claim or a lawsuit. The association's president, Carol Dover, said dozens of interim claims have been rejected or reduced to "pennies on the dollar" because the businesses are far from the spill site.

Feinberg said his goal in administering the BP fund is to compensate victims for their losses, not punish BP. In contrast, suing holds the prospect of a big punitive damage verdict.

But punitive damage awards often take years to resolve and can be cut down on appeal. The 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska spawned a two-decade legal fight during which an initial $5 billion punitive damage award was whittled to about $500 million.

Gary Bauer, owner of crab processor Ponchartrain Blues in Slidell, La., said a fair claim settlement will be hard to turn down for many.

"If you go to litigation, oh God, your life is on hold, your income's on hold. Everyone knows it is going to take six, eight years," he said.

_____

Associated Press writer Cain Burdeau in Slidell, La., contributed to this story.

___

Online: Gulf Coast Claims Facility: http://www.gulfcoastclaimsfacility.com

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

MIAMI — Alabama seafood market owner David Scott faces a difficult decision as he tries to rejuvenate his business after the Gulf oil spill: He can accept a piece of BP's $20 billion claims fund...
MIAMI — Alabama seafood market owner David Scott faces a difficult decision as he tries to rejuvenate his business after the Gulf oil spill: He can accept a piece of BP's $20 billion claims fund...
Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 17
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Guitarsandmore
devoted father, community activist, musician, reti
02:03 PM on 09/12/2010
You can always file a lawsuit. First take the money, then file a lawsuit. The money wasn't enough and the residents had no choice but to take the little money they were offered to stave off bankruptcy and starvation but they still had to file suit in order to make themselves whole again.

Second, It is a moral imperative to bring BP to justice. A crime has been committed and if the attorney general can't see this then the residents have to file their own law suit. There is scientific evidence to be presented showing pollution along the beaches and in the water. There were the acts of concealment committed by BP, hiding the truth from the cameras and public at large. BP Used the chemical dispersments to further conceal the damage. Every attempt was made to cover up the real truth. Then there was the bogus claim BP made that there was no risk and if anything went wrong they had a plan to fix it right away and clean it up. It is obvious to the entire world how wrong that claim is. They had no plan and they spent months floundering under water flubbing every opportunity to clean up their mess.

Criminal negligence, lying to congress, lying to a grand jury, lying to the public, lying to the environmental protection agency, lying to the regulatory commission, lies, lies, lies!!!

Off with their heads!
06:45 PM on 09/10/2010
I would tell them to take the money and run. After dealing with attorneys over the years, the sum any one offers you is close to what you will get after the attorneys take their fees. Nope, class action suite make only one person richer the attorneys.
05:16 PM on 09/13/2010
Bravo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Very well spoken!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Waterphoneman
artist, musician, inventor & mouth from the south
12:03 PM on 09/10/2010
A class action suite against BP is needed. BP has lied, hidden facts, and sank a whole bunch of crude oil with a toxic dispersant. We that live on the Gulf are afraid to eat seafood as oil and the dispersant are being detected in our Gulf water and in the seafood. I think on the whole everybody is being short changed by BP and its' promises of making everything alright and claiming that they will pay for "legitimate" losses. I have lost the security to eat healthy, fresh, Gulf seafood. Will they pay for that?
08:19 AM on 09/10/2010
GCCF employs the traditional “delay, deny, defend” strategy used by insurance companies.

BP oil spill victims must know their legal rights. Here are two examples:

(a) The GCCF Protocol states, “The GCCF will only pay for harm or damage that is proximately caused by the Spill. The GCCF will take into account, among other things, geographic proximity, nature of industry, and dependence upon injured natural resources.” GCCF’s requirement that a claimant has the increased burden of proving “proximate causation” between his or her damages and the Deepwater Horizon incident is a clear violation of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA). Furthermore, paying for damages based on geographic proximity and nature of industry is also a clear violation of OPA. In order to recover damages, a claimant merely needs to show that his or her damages “resulted from” the oil spill; and

(b) In the event that a claim for damages is not paid by the responsible party (BP) within 90 days, the BP oil spill victim may elect to present the claim to the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund or to commence an action in court against BP.

BP oil spill victims must be proactive. Merely reacting to GCCF is playing into BP's strategy. BP oil spill victims must be prepared to act on "Day 91."

Source:
http://donovanlawgroup.wordpress.com/2010/08/23/the-gulf-coast-claims-facility-limits-bps-liability-and-guarantees-the-oil-companys-continued-operation-in-the-gulf-of-mexico/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rougebaisers
01:44 AM on 09/10/2010
Ok Washington, WTF are you gonna do about this?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
angusmciver
Feels Empty
10:48 PM on 09/09/2010
Its a no win situation. Either way the gulf has lost enough you may never get back. Sue and you may live out the next 20 years with zip, as with Exxon BP has the ability to litigate till you die. And maybe it ends up in SCOTUS in which a single vote may decide your fate. Settle now and I doubt many may recover what they have lost. So hang tough, try to carry on, and good luck. I feel your pain.
08:22 PM on 09/09/2010
They should be allowed to sue and any settlement can just subtract what was already given if it exceeds the amount. Problem solved.
08:18 PM on 09/09/2010
Help! SOS! South La. has been subjected carpet bombing for the last 2 months.Everytime that I turn on my T.V., I hear the soft music and sweet voices of a BP commercial telling me how much that BP cares.HELP! SOS!
08:21 PM on 09/09/2010
I know. I puke every time they come on.
07:42 PM on 09/09/2010
even voluntary slavery is illegal.

so too, should be any contract that attempts to prevent you from suing in the future.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:01 PM on 09/09/2010
Sue.  Sue their larcenous cabooses.

I wish I could provide the means to let all these people hang in there and SUE.
05:37 PM on 09/09/2010
http://www.project195.org/EVENTS.htm
We're sending over 100 people to restore New Orleans wetlands this fall! We need your support! Americans from all over this great land have decided to actually DO something really positive.Project195 looks to restore over 4 acres of wetlands, from now through November!
We as a nation need to come to grips that a remote control and a laptop are not the tools needed for effective change.You have to get your hands dirty.Although I have to cap this trip by October 15th, I urge everybody to join us in the Big Easy this fall.It's time to get in the game.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
aDelphinium
Occupy with heart
09:30 PM on 09/12/2010
If I could, I would. I was in New Orleans for a weekend about ten years ago. I LOVE that city!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LindyK
05:27 PM on 09/09/2010
I think its a no-brainer. You have to sue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Derek Spisak
04:53 PM on 09/09/2010
Take the money, sign the forms, under duress, then sue...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
aDelphinium
Occupy with heart
09:23 PM on 09/12/2010
that sounds like a great idea!