iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Hints At Procedural Compromise On Bush Tax Cuts, Says GOP's Holding 'Middle Class Hostage'

First Posted: 09/10/10 01:08 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:35 PM ET

Obama

In his first press conference since late May, President Obama offered one of the sternest rebukes to date of the Republican Party's position on the Bush tax cuts, saying that those pushing to extend the cuts for the wealthy are holding the "middle class hostage."

In the process, Obama may have tipped his hand as to how the Democratic Party will structure the forthcoming legislative debate. His position, he said, is to work first on an extension of the tax cuts for those making less than $250,000 a year. After that, Obama added, Republicans and Democrats can debate or vote on whether to continue extending the tax cuts for the wealthy.

"My position is, lets get done what we all agree on," said the president. "What they've said is, 'We all agree that the middle-class tax cuts should be made permanent. Let's work on that, let's do it.' We can have a further conversation about how they want to spend an additional $700 billion dollars to give an average of $100,000 to millionaires. That, I think, is a bad idea. If you were going to spend that money there are a lot of better ways of spending it. But more to the point, these are the same folks who say they are concerned about the deficit -- why would we borrow money on policies that won't help the economy and help people who don't need help."

This seems like one of the clearest indications yet as to how the administration is looking to structure the debate ahead. With a number of moderate Senate Democrats urging the president to extend the full package of Bush tax cuts, there has been growing uncertainty as to whether the president has the votes for extending rates just for those making under $250,000. The compromise proposal most often discussed is to have a temporary extension of all tax cuts, after which Congress can re-consider expiration.

But the White House appears to be homing in on a procedural, not a policy, compromise -- pledge to have two votes: the first on extending the cuts for those making less than $250,000 followed by a second vote on extending the cuts for the wealthy. The former is, as polls show, deeply popular and could get the support of those moderate Democrats provided that a second vote takes place. The latter, owing to opposition among the majority of Democrats in the Senate, may not have the votes for passage.

"I have said that middle-class families need tax relief right now and I'm prepared to work on a bill and sign a bill this month that would ensure that middle class families get tax relief," Obama said at Friday's press conference. "Ninety-seven percent of Americans make less than $250,000 a year... and I'm saying we can give those families, 97 percent, permanent tax relief. And by the way, for those who make more than $250,000, they would still get tax relief on the first $250,000. They just wouldn't get it for income above that. Now that seems like a common sense thing to do. And what I've got is the Republicans holding middle-class tax relief hostage because they are insisting we have got to give tax relief to millionaires and billionaires to the tune of about $100,000 per millionaire, which would cost over the course of ten years $700 billion and the economists say is probably the worst way to stimulate the economy. That doesn't make sense and that is an example of what this election is all about. If you want the same kind of skewed policies that led us into this crisis, then the Republicans are willing to offer that."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
In his first press conference since late May, President Obama offered one of the sternest rebukes to date of the Republican Party's position on the Bush tax cuts, saying that those pushing to extend t...
In his first press conference since late May, President Obama offered one of the sternest rebukes to date of the Republican Party's position on the Bush tax cuts, saying that those pushing to extend t...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 15,046
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (173 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wee weed up
02:44 AM on 09/13/2010
Somehow it seemed as though the farm had grown richer without making the animals themselves any richer— except, of course, for the pigs and the dogs.
Four legs good, two legs better!
ALL ANIMALS ARE EQUAL
BUT SOME ANIMALS ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS.
05:17 AM on 09/13/2010
hey wee don't do that up it will blow in your face.looks like it already did
12:31 AM on 09/13/2010
Yet another dishonest headline. Obama and his leftist cronies in Congress are "holding the middle class hostage" just as much as the GOP is. All they have to do is extend all the current rates.
08:58 AM on 09/13/2010
agreed
11:27 PM on 09/12/2010
Funny we are talking about keeping the tax cuts for the middle class. The meme on here and from most liberals/dems has always been that the Bush cuts only benefited the top 2% and that the middle class never actually got a cut. Hmmm.
12:12 AM on 09/13/2010
Yes, the middle class got tax cuts too but they are tiny. At the same time corporate welfare that hurts working people's wages has exploded:NAFTA, H-1b, and free trade with slave labor communist China. All these benefited the rich at the expense of working people. Then there are the trillions in bailouts which directly benefited billionaires.

What we need are massive tax cuts for workers. Why should labor ever be taxed? Working people are the most vulnerable and least politically connected. They are exactly the people who shouldn't pay any taxes on wages. We aren't like CEO's who all the time go to congress begging for more and more welfare and bailouts.
12:34 AM on 09/13/2010
I love the way the left uses the term "working people". I'm fortunate enough to be targeted by the Rookie in Chief as one of those evil rich people that don't deserve to keep our money. Funny thing is, I worked for every cent I have and didn't inherit a penny and in fact support family members. I guess I'm not one of the noble "working people" because I just worked too hard and worked too successfully so that now I don't deserve to keep the fruits of that work.
06:03 PM on 09/12/2010
You know why Dems are having such a tough time ? They let the GOP zeros dominate the news media and conversation. Where is Biden ? Why are the rest of the Dems not out there hammering away and the hypocritical GOP. I wish Dems would grow a pair and get more aggressive on the message !
photo
asiclilpup
Tax the rich Feed the Poor.
03:31 PM on 09/12/2010
No legislative genius here but I was wondering, since the bush tax cuts were passed thru reconciliation which self expires in ten years-does extending them make them permanent? Could be legislative trickery going on here.
10:31 AM on 09/13/2010
I think there is legislative trickery, but it's not that direct. A temporary extension is just that - they will not become permanent. But, I think the hope is that in 2 years, we have a presidential election and Congress may be more conservative, depending how the midterms go. If the cuts are extended for 2 years, the tax cuts become a big issue that can have some pretty big political effects.
photo
asiclilpup
Tax the rich Feed the Poor.
11:32 AM on 09/13/2010
I also thought about that idea of keeping the cuts alive until the 2012 election which kind of made sense to me . My hope was that someone well versed in the laws could answer my question. I googled my question until I was bleary eyed and didn't find any satisfactory answer. Thanks for your input, and take care.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FACTISFACT
A war veteran. Finally retired
02:23 PM on 09/12/2010
The President has taken a solid stand with the Middle class and the poor. Now it is up to the Middle class and the Poor to be solidly attached to him so that in time they can ride horse on the back of the Rich of the Representative Mentors or masters.

What a travesty with facts, people who are to be friends and spokes men of the middle class have become the servant of the rich and enemy of the middle class only for personal gain and money. The Middle Class must now decide permanently to make life long friendship with. With the President's Democratic Party or the Servants Party of the Rich.
01:23 PM on 09/12/2010
Okay I agree with Obama on this one. The tax cuts for the anyone making less than 250,000 a year must stay but we have to find a way to pay for it also and thats never gonna happen if they want to at the same time give tax cuts to millionaires and billion which was estimated to cast like 4 trillion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
salty0311
01:22 PM on 09/12/2010
It's fall mr president. And were still waiting for our recovery summer....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Obrand
liberalis; liberty & equal rights
12:47 PM on 09/12/2010
So, Boehner says that eliminating tax breaks for the top earners will stifle job creation.
What are those top earners spending their money on now? Certainly not jobs, of course there is always an explanation like unsure of the economy, etc.
If Boehner manages to keep the rich in the tax cut bill, the rich are not forced to spend the disposable income on jobs, for sure.
There is another great opportunity here to change the focus back to Democratic values.
Why not make the Republican argument moot by modifying the proposed tax cuts for small business? Make that tax cut dependant on creating those jobs the Republicans claim would be lost if the rich don't get their disposable income?
I doubt If I had disposable income I would suddenly become the benevolent job creator.
I'd buy a yacht.
10:25 AM on 09/13/2010
Bingo. Tax cuts for the wealthy have shown to give a very small return per 'investment' dollar.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
1murillo
Can't be neutral on a moving train - Zinn
11:49 AM on 09/12/2010
Use of 100% bold, italic or 100% underline has the same effect as 100% CAPITAL; they make nothing stand out.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
1murillo
Can't be neutral on a moving train - Zinn
11:47 AM on 09/12/2010
This is genius and it should go forward.
Agree on retaining cuts for the first $250,000. Democrats and Republicans have been agreeing on that since the question was raised.
And agree to hold a vote for the subsequent ($250,000) amount; that which the Republicans have been announcing they want.
Unless the Republicans suddenly announce they don't want tax cuts for the first $250,000 - hypocrisy that wouldn't be a surprise this session - there should be absolutely no argument against such tax cuts.
If there's a vote for the income over $250,000, that vote could also be held in front of public opinion. If there are politicians willing to stand up for the 2-3% of Americans that will qualify, let them to do so without hiding.
09:17 AM on 09/12/2010
TAX CUTS FOR THE WEALTHY IS A PRIME EXAMPLE OF DISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH. YOU ARE ADDING TO THE DEFICIT WITHOUT PAYING FOR IT.. NOT ONLY DO THEY PAY LESS WHEN THEY MAKE MORE BUT WE ALL ARE FOOTING THE BILL AS TAXPAYERS. IT'S NOT EVEN REALLY WEALTH... IT IS A RULE MADE BY REPUBLICANS TO ENSURE THE THE MIDDLE CLASS PAY MORE ON A PERCENTAGE IN TAXES THAN THE RICH DO, I DONT UNDERSTAND WHY IT IS SO HARD TO CONVEY THAT REPUBLICANS WOULD HAVE A SECRETARY PAYING 32% IN TAXES WHILE HER TOP BOSS PAYS 13%... SURE HE'S PAYING MORE IN WORTH..BUT HES THE ONE WHO WANTED TO BE WORTH SO MUCH.LOL.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
SPQR1052
07:56 AM on 09/12/2010
The uber wealthy have had 10 years to produce (jobs) they have not. Wean  them from the nipple.

Click here.

Current tax rate is lowest in history, includig during Clinton's presidency.  I say elimate ALL tax cuts created during the BUSH CRIE FAMILY SPREE  especially for the uber rich.
08:16 AM on 09/12/2010
i say cut spending first
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EJavaM07
Doing what no one else will.
10:46 AM on 09/12/2010
So let's have a third vote then, adding as a votable internet site, each and every place we plan to spend money, and then have the people vote on each one.

We start out with the assumption that all are good and worthy programs, and then, and the Us people vote against certain ones, the least popular get cut to a level most can agree on.

I, for one, would vote to halve the DoD budget, because having the finest military in the world mean nothing if you don't have food, shelter, and a good job.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
themuse
11:09 AM on 09/12/2010
That will lower your standard of living. Penny-wise, pound foolish.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EJavaM07
Doing what no one else will.
12:49 PM on 09/12/2010
To whom much is given, much is expected.

Come on rich boys and girls, prove it by stepping up to the plate.

And that means being willing to be taxed at our tax rate, plus 1% for all the years you've gotten off with having to pay much less than we pay as a percentage of your income.

And that's at our tax rate on everything.

No outs for the type of income it is.

All income is income.

Tax it at the same rate!
photo
Eileen Left
Lifes a bowl of punch, go ahead and spike it
12:09 AM on 09/12/2010
Its like Obama is standing up for 97% of us saying "Yes we can" while the republicans are standing up for 3% of us saying "No we can't"!
12:45 AM on 09/12/2010
You can say that, again. Fanned and faved.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IFany
move forward or die
11:54 PM on 09/11/2010
Why would the right admit that it;s their policies that has driven this nation into the ground, Why would they be honest about anything pertaining to the Bush administration miserable and the rape of our treasury, Surely they can lie and lie and lie . facts be damn, they will blame anyone and anything rather than admit that conservatism is a farce.they will use Racism, bigotry, ignorance but never the truth. their decision to have collective memory loss, and to distract the nation using every minority that they can, than expose themselves to the questions and scrutiny of honest debate. Every post here you have of a person calling themselves conservative is the same people that voted for McCain, Palin, That speaks volumes to their intellect , honesty, and judgement