More

Rahm Emanuel, Chicago Mayor? Polls Chicagoans About Possible Bid

Rahm

First Posted: 09/14/10 02:04 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:40 PM ET

Speculation is growing that Rahm Emanuel will run for mayor of Chicago, as the White House Chief of Staff has hired a pollster to survey Chicagoans about his possible candidacy.

The Chicago Sun-Times's Lynn Sweet is reporting that Stanley Greenberg, Emanuel's "longtime pollster," is calling around the city asking locals about their perceptions of Emanuel and his performance in the White House.

Just over a week ago, there was little talk about the mayoral election in Chicago: it seemed like a foregone conclusion that Chicago's Mayor Richard M. Daley would cruise to a seventh term. But last Tuesday, Daley announced that he would not seek that seventh term, and the city has seen an explosion of political ambition, sometimes from unlikely corners.

Among the people who appear to be running are city clerk Miguel del Valle, U.S. Congressman Luis Gutierrez and former Senator and presidential candidate Carol Moseley Braun, who currently runs an organic food company. Countless others have also expressed interest in the post, although few have officially announced their candidacy.

But it is Emanuel's interest that has garnered the most attention. Earlier in the year, Emanuel openly expressed his interest in being Chicago's mayor, though he said that he wouldn't challenge his good friend Daley. So when Daley announced his retirement, speculation about Emanuel's possible bid grew.

Like so many others, Emanuel has not officially declared his candidacy. His reluctance to do so has prompted persistent questions about his future to nearly everyone in the White House: President Obama said Rahm would be a "terrific" mayor of Chicago, and David Axelrod couldn't appear on television last week without getting an earful on the subject.

Emanuel did, however, win an early poll of the mayoral race conducted by We Ask America, though the candidates it asked about were largely based on speculation.

Lynn Sweet's report that Emanuel is taking his own poll only adds seriousness to the rumors that he is contemplating a run. From Sweet's blog:

Sources told me that polling calls for Emanuel were being made over the weekend and that Emanuel has activated his Chicago network of pals to reach out to political figures in Chicago on his behalf. While Emanuel backed out of a Chicago visit this past weekend, I'm told he will be in Chicago by the end of the month.

Emanuel has some clear advantages over possible contenders in the mayoral contest. First, as a national figure, his name recognition is much higher than his prospective opponents. Also, his $1 million campaign fund is eclipsed only by the baffling $4.4 million held by Chicago's powerful Alderman Ed Burke. Either way, Rahm would almost certainly be able to mobilize volunteers and receive the 12,500 petition signatures necessary to qualify by November 22nd.

But he faces some hurdles, as well. His name came up often during the corruption trial of former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich, and he has some ties to convicted developer Tony Rezko as well. Plus, his tenure in the White House and his reputation as a hard-nosed, politically-minded centrist have cost him support in the progressive community and among the labor unions that still hold ample sway in Chicago.

A lack of strong local support could be a problem for Rahm, as Sweet writes: "A week has passed and no one in his old congressional district, a potential base, has led a call to draft him."

These questions -- perceptions of Rahm's congressional career, of his time at the White House, of his ties to Blago and Rezko -- are exactly the ones that Greenberg is asking Chicagoans this week. Their answers could determine the political future of the 50-year-old chief of staff.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CHICAGO

Speculation is growing that Rahm Emanuel will run for mayor of Chicago, as the White House Chief of Staff has hired a pollster to survey Chicagoans about his possible candidacy. The Chicago Sun-Times...
Speculation is growing that Rahm Emanuel will run for mayor of Chicago, as the White House Chief of Staff has hired a pollster to survey Chicagoans about his possible candidacy. The Chicago Sun-Times...
Filed by Will Guzzardi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 78
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
02:10 PM on 09/15/2010
What kind of legal commitment and obligation can the public get from these candidates for what they espouse they will do for the city, the people of the city, city budget(s) and undoing all of the wrong that Daley did? Don't you think that's a good idea?
02:39 PM on 09/15/2010
The best we can hope for is an active campaign where the people (if not the press) can ask them about how they plan to deliver on managing the city and then compare their records to their promises.

We also need to start holding our Aldermen accountable. They will most likely have more power after Daley is gone (as they should) and we need to make sure they use it wisely.
01:02 PM on 09/15/2010
Rahm please stay in Chicago so you could be unemployed in 2012. Let Chicago disassembly the Daley Machine and let the city get back to reality!!!!
01:42 PM on 09/15/2010
What has Chicago ever done to you?
08:43 PM on 09/15/2010
made our state go broke
09:55 PM on 09/14/2010
Given all the other would be mayors, I think Rahm might make a good one. He may be no Bloomberg, in the sense of actually having built up a business based on smarts and hard work, but he is likely cleaner than anyone else in Chicago who is in play. If Claypool or Quigley ran, I might beg to differ. But Meeks got pwned by Blago and is otherwise a special interest in the city; the other candidates are wreathed in the corruption that is our City's composting agent but which we can no longer afford - simply because we are broke and perhaps more important because we are falling behind other "world class" cities. Why Rahm? He can get Chicago money from DC and he is a counterweight to Madigan's stranglehold on Springfield. Who let the googoo candidates out? Who? I want a top dog.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
prolbowl
11:09 PM on 09/14/2010
Rahm would finish selling off every last public asset to his corporate constituency. No to Rahm. BTW Claypool is not clean. He did Daley's dirty work at the Park District with tons of patronage contracts to machine interests. "Claypool the Reformer"is the biggest myth in Chicago
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mratcheson
02:00 AM on 09/15/2010
I'm not sure at this point who I would support. But I could see Rahm being an effective mayor. I'm open to the concept. I liked him when he was my Congressman.
09:28 PM on 09/14/2010
No.....way! We just rid ourselves of one autocratic bully, we do not need another!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mratcheson
02:01 AM on 09/15/2010
Perhaps being the mayor of a city of 2.5m+ people needs someone tough?
10:29 AM on 09/15/2010
Professional wrestling style dramatics is not the same thing and civic governance. Between the Daleys we had ineffective showboaters who only cared about getting on the news and paying off friends, who didn't care about infrastructure, education, public safety, public health and the general state of the community. We don't need to go back to that.
08:03 PM on 09/15/2010
Tough is tough, and a bully is a bully. I don't see what the two have in common.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
maxtruthful
09:19 PM on 09/14/2010
Dart already won the election.

How far is Rahm up to his neck deep in all of this?
If one person does not get paid - then all bets are off for Blago, Daley, Obama and Rahm, et-all.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mratcheson
02:23 AM on 09/15/2010
I honestly don't understand what you are saying in your second paragraph. But I do agree Dart is a very strong contender, probably stronger than Rahm.
09:10 PM on 09/14/2010
As a Chicagoan I have one word, NO! I have always voted democratic but my God he would make me vote republican!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mratcheson
02:09 AM on 09/15/2010
The mayoral election is nonpartisan.
10:27 AM on 09/15/2010
There's a primary.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chgotchr
08:13 PM on 09/14/2010
Rahm needs to retire from politics and find a nice quiet hedge fund to while away his post-politics years.
06:39 PM on 09/14/2010
" You'll pay how much? Sure, I'll vote for him. Twice? okie dokie."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mratcheson
02:02 AM on 09/15/2010
That's pretty offensive. What makes you think my vote is for sale? Is yours?
08:04 PM on 09/15/2010
I think it was meant to be offensive.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gwilder
Independent, Author, Parent, Musician, American
04:58 PM on 09/14/2010
No Rahm does not have my vote. I think he is politician with not backbone as he has proven.
04:24 PM on 09/14/2010
I lived in Chicago for 25 years. I hated Rahm then, I despise him now. I would do all in my power that he never have any office in Chicago other than dog catcher.
06:17 PM on 09/14/2010
I really think you should have more respect for Animal Control. They do a great deal to protect the public from the spread of infectious disease. It is a role that should be held by dedicated civil servants.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mratcheson
02:11 AM on 09/15/2010
Why did you hate him? In what way did he not represent us well when he was in Congress? I assume you lived in the 5th district....
10:26 AM on 09/15/2010
He's corrupt. He's never served as an executive. He doesn't support the building of infrastructure and instead plays the game of politics as professional wrestling. He stands for corporate control of the Democratic Party and the end of influence of the people.

He's the embodiment of everything that has gone wrong with Democrats.
08:05 PM on 09/15/2010
I live in the 5th district. What exactly did he do for the 5th?
04:11 PM on 09/14/2010
If Rahm had worked for meaningful infrastructure spending in the stimulus bill, instead of tax cuts for cronies and attempts to hit an arbitrary number, I might think he might be remotely qualified for mayor, but as it is, his utter lack of respect for the basic functions of government make me think he would be the last person we need as mayor.

City government is about services: education, transportation, communications, sanitation, public health, public safety, environmental health, disaster preparedness, cultural affairs, parks and recreations, social services. There's also all that zoning and business stuff. And a lot of services tie directly to business growth - businesses benefit from a well-educated workforce that can get to a timely manner. A city that invests in transportation now, especially freight transportation will better serve the business community in the future. Better communications structure with a focus on IT will also serve business.

But none this matters to Rahm. He's just about the professional wrestling aspects of politics and the fundraising. Look what happened to Freddie Mac under his watch - political contribution scandal after scandal, while he got rich.

Under Daley, many neighborhoods were under-served. TIFs put an unfair burden on middle-class homeowners, but at least SOME aspects of civic governance were attended to. And the parking meter thing goes without saying.

But all of this would be worse under Rahm. And that's why he isn't fit to be our mayor, or even a Water Reclaimation District Commissioner.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mratcheson
02:36 AM on 09/15/2010
Ok, I didn't realize Rahm was in charge of Freddie Mac, though I think I knew he worked there. When was his "watch"? I thought he made his money at a hedge fund, not true?

The TIF thing is nuts. There is a minimum of $700m carved from our property taxes that is sitting around doing nothing. The money should be returned to the taxing bodies, it would mean the schools would have $350m or more to make up their shortfalls. And we could have more police officers on the streets where they are badly needed. Perhaps money for the CTA? And I agree, a focus on municipal IT would serve us well.

You might be right about Rahm not being the right choice. Do we have a Bloomberg in our midst who is interested in the job?
10:24 AM on 09/15/2010
Here's an article about Rahm at Freddie: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/obama/chi-rahm-emanuel-profit-26-mar26,0,5682373.story

It's true that Daley hasn't let any giants rise under him, but that doesn't mean we can't make the most of who we have. I like Quigley, Hoffman and Dart.

Furthermore, it's not a bad thing for the City Council to have to take more responsibility and have more power. It would be good to hold Aldermen accountable. Nobody even bothered under Daley. It'll be strange times ahead.
03:25 PM on 09/14/2010
I would vote for him a hundred times if it got him out of the White House.
04:11 PM on 09/14/2010
Why do you hate Chicago?
photo
BVictor1
Chicago, My kind of town...
03:24 PM on 09/14/2010
Yes, I'd vote for him. Not because I like him per say, but he knows the game and he has a ton of connections. I want someone in office that can keep the council whipped into shape.

He'll be able to possible "bring home the bacon" so to speak.
04:12 PM on 09/14/2010
Then let him be a lobbyist. He hasn't the sense of civic responsibility or interest in governing to be a Metropolitan Water Reclamation District Commissioner.
photo
BVictor1
Chicago, My kind of town...
02:09 AM on 09/15/2010
I remember when Millenium Park was being built, as the price insreased, people moaned and groaned and complained. NOW, it's one of the top tourist attractions, been praised in the world wide media and enjoyed by the local public. Getting that park built was certainly civic responsibility and duty.

Could Rahn do that? or even care about it? I don't know... But I could see him bring infrastructure dollars, badly needed infrastructure dollars to the city.

I guess that's what campaigns are for, to woo the public with promises of things to be done.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
prolbowl
11:11 PM on 09/14/2010
the Council hasn't been whipped enough the last 20 years?
11:41 PM on 09/14/2010
Exactly! We need a Council that thinks independently of the Mayor. There is also a likelihood that a good deal of the Daley rubber stampers will be out of the picture after this election.
photo
BVictor1
Chicago, My kind of town...
08:03 AM on 09/16/2010
People have the right to vote them out every 4 years. If they don't, them oh well...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gavrielle
Empty... Empty... Empty...
03:08 PM on 09/14/2010
Under no circumstances would I vote for him. He's too weak when it comes to bucking vested interests in favor of doing the people's business. He'd sell us out to the highest bidder, just like Daley, then curse us for complaining about it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mratcheson
02:16 AM on 09/15/2010
Maybe. I'm not sure.
03:04 PM on 09/14/2010
if Meeks doesn't get the nod and Rahm or Gutierrez does, you will see a large influx of AA going to who the GOP runs and vice v for the HIspanics ,,,,

For the first time in 50 years the GOP will probably put together a campaign
03:15 PM on 09/14/2010
Meeks is a joke. Puleeze.
photo
BVictor1
Chicago, My kind of town...
03:29 PM on 09/14/2010
I certainly don't want Meeks.