iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Bonnie Raitt, R.E.M., MoveOn Team Up To Defend Open Internet

First Posted: 09/22/2010 3:50 pm Updated: 05/25/2011 5:50 pm

The Federal Communications Commission will meet Thursday in the midst of an ongoing debate over net neutrality regulations that have pitted major telecoms, which want control of the flow of information across their broadband networks, against small businesses, bloggers, political actors and other Internet users who are resisting the telecommunication takeover attempt.

On Wednesday, a group of popular musicians entered the fray, joining with MoveOn.org to press the FCC to write regulations that will prevent telecoms from asserting control over the flow of information. Jackson Browne, R.E.M. the Roots, Rosanne Cash, OK Go, Moby and Bonnie Raitt are among the artists to sign the letter. They will be encouraging their fans to contact the FCC and push the commission to write rules preserving an open Internet. Telecoms are pushing the FCC to do nothing and let Congress act instead, while major corporations such as Verizon and Google strike bilateral deals that carve up the Internet.

But Congress has already acted. In 1996, the Telecommunications Act updated the original 1934 Communications Act, New Deal legislation that prevented monopolies from dominating the means of communication. In 2002, under pressure from the cable and phone industry, the Bush administration's FCC classified broadband as an "information service" rather than as a "telecommunications service." It is, quite plainly, a telecommunications service, but the FCC deemed it otherwise for the sole purpose of avoiding the legislative requirement that neutrality rules be written to protect the Internet from control by major corporations.

By 2005, the phone and cable companies had begun publicly discussing their plans to subvert net neutrality. "Why should [companies] be allowed to use my pipes?" Southwestern Bell CEO Ed Whitacre told BusinessWeek. "The Internet can't be free in that sense ... for a Google or Yahoo! or Vonage or anybody to expect to use these pipes for free is nuts!"

Earlier this year, the Supreme Court ruled that the FCC could not regulate broadband as an "information service." It had already ruled in 2005 that the FCC could classify broadband as a "telecommunications service." So, following the 2010 court ruling, the FCC announced plans to reclassify broadband as what it actually is.

That's when the telecom lobbying went into high gear. The GOP launched an attack arguing that Obama was attempting to take state control of the Internet, as if regulating broadband the way that phone lines are regulated amounted to nationalization. The telecom lobbying effort soon came to focus around an effort to pressure FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski not to reclassify broadband, but to leave it unregulated until Congress acts.

The collaboration between MoveOn and the artists is an effort to persuade Genachowski to act.

The full letter:

Dear FCC Commissioner Julius Genachowski:


The Internet has facilitated an explosion of creativity and commerce, offering unprecedented opportunities to musicians and music entrepreneurs. Due to the open structures of the Internet, musicians and other creators and innovators can compete on an equal technological playing field with the biggest companies. The result is a blossoming and legitimate marketplace that compensates creators while rewarding fans with access to an incredible array of music.

None of this could have happened without Net Neutrality -- the principle that protects the open Internet. That's why we support efforts to preserve Net Neutrality for the benefit of innovation and free expression -- and urge the FCC to act immediately to ensure that the Internet is kept free and open.

As artists, we are encouraged that the Commission recognizes the importance of net neutrality. We encourage you to apply its core principles to any and all broadband points of access, including the wireless space. We also encourage you to consider the perspectives of musicians, who depend on an open Internet to compete in a crucial marketplace and express ourselves creatively.

We will continue to support the Commission on the road to achieving clear and enforceable rules of the road for the Internet for the benefit of creators, innovators, entrepreneurs and the public. However, we also feel that the time to act is now, to avoid prolonged uncertainty for all stakeholders, including musicians and music entrepreneurs. The future of the Internet depends on decisions made today, as does the future of music. We believe that Net Neutrality is the best and only way to ensure that both futures remain bright.

Sincerely,
R.E.M.
The Roots
Rosanne Cash
Bonnie Raitt
Jackson Browne
MOBY
OK Go
Jamie Kitman
Writers Guild of America, East


FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

 
 
  • Comments
  • 176
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
12:20 AM on 09/27/2010
Ok look. I have a lot of education and experience with wall street and in economics and finance and this debate makes no sense to me. Everyone is up in arms over some companies wanting to be able to prioritize data and be able to price for different services on the internet. This is what capitalism is all about. they aren't breaking any laws so long as they stay within the comm. act of 1994 which Ive dealt with alot, its rather toothless. So look at it this way if large corporations decide to carve up the internet basic economic theory says they can't charge what consumers wont pay. The market is self-regulating (ie. it sets its own prices) if companies set the price above the demand level they don't make a profit (they lose money) so they would have to price these packages competitively. And as for people not wanting to have to the internet carved up and have to pay for different services, you had to know this was coming. It happened with the airlines after deregulation and cable TV service. Its basic business but the ideas behind anti-trust regulation are all the protection consumers need. So lets get back to more pressing concerns like how the current government is bankrupting us or fixing the social security program before its to late and no one gets any benefits.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
michael429
08:24 PM on 09/27/2010
Your argument (articulate as it is)....ignores the reality that most broadband providers are cable companies and have a virtual monopoly in the areas that they serve...there is not enough wireless bandwith for satellite providers to serve us...the problem of an open neutral Internet would be solved if the Cable companies would make the investment to upgrade the "Last Mile" and provide fiber to the wall but they don't want to make the investment, especially in rural areas. in the context of this reality, regulation is necessary and important to serve the public.....that is, unless you don't think that the Internet is as essential as any other utility....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edejan
10:05 PM on 09/27/2010
Your argument is well formed and articulate, justifying your education and experience but your conclusions are based on a false premise:

"The market is self-regulating (ie. it sets its own prices)..."

Have you noticed anything in our economy which doesn't support the theorem?
12:31 PM on 09/24/2010
Sayyyy, is that Genachowski under his desk, groping around for his cojones, while desperately seeking political cover and mass media distraction so he can undermine the will of the people as his future corporate employers expect?
09:13 AM on 09/23/2010
Thank YOU, classy headliners, above!! Where is U2? Madonna? Fiddy? Third Eye Blind? and where are  so many others??? Need to get them ALL on board.
photo
thinkb4uleapII
My micro-bio is no longer empty.
04:31 AM on 09/23/2010
Slavery is alive and well in the good ole US of A. No, not slavery of the form that places humans in physical shackles and uses the sting of an actual whip to enforce compliance -- but a more sinister form that perpetuates ignorance, uses cunning, embraces subterfuge, and feeds a broken and unethical system of government to achieve it's ends.

Unlike their predecessors, the modern slave-trader and slave-master maintain voluntary compliance of their 'chattel'. If there is a liberty the slave-master wishes to withdraw from the 'chattel' populace for his own gain, he conspires with the slave-trader to convince the unwitting 'chattel' to willingly cede such freedom in exchange for some 'bauble' or 'trinket'. Hence the origin of the slave-trader's "Patriot Act" and more recently, and relevantly, "The Internet Freedom Preservation Act of 2009".
12:34 PM on 09/24/2010
Bingo. But what are the "trinkets" offered in exchange? A false sense of security? Shiny internet access for "all"?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iblogleft
Certifiable
12:16 AM on 09/23/2010
Very Cool!
photo
slobone
We have met the enemy and he is us
11:45 PM on 09/22/2010
I love Bonnie Raitt. And I am definitely for net neutrality. But I have to say, this is one of the most peculiar causes ever for a celebrity benefit...
photo
FTracy3
My micro-bio is as empty as the rest of my life.
11:08 PM on 09/22/2010
I can't decide if I'm for or against net neutrality.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iblogleft
Certifiable
12:24 AM on 09/23/2010
Would you like to see your internet tiered like cable?

Basic web services $19.95, standard services (html and flash only) 29.95, Buyers package (Includes ebay and amazon) 49.95, Power user package (U-tube and Hulu included) 69.95,

Gamers package (allows access to game services on xbox and PS3, WOW and other approved) 99.95, Ultimate package (all services with a bandwidth limit of 100 gigabytes a month includes access to Vonage phone, unblocked torrent, and premium services like Netflix and DishOnline, 149.99.
Of course excessive use over 100gig a month will be one dollar per gigabyte, and we will reserve the right to block any internet sites or services that break our terms of service.

If you want that, vote against neutrality.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:39 AM on 09/23/2010
I think that was a joke. You know, he's neutral about it?
09:16 AM on 09/23/2010
Duh!!! Sheesh, you are some too/; on Angle's payroll maybe???
10:11 PM on 09/22/2010
good folks one and all
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stopgeorge
Paper Ballots WORK. Unverifiable e-voting doesn't
10:02 PM on 09/22/2010
Protecting innovation is great! This is a very good reason that we must preserve net neutrality. However, having information and the truth at our fingertips, I would reason, is even more important. Without net neutrality, the internet is destined to become another version of the idiot box.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
plages
Take a plunge
09:19 PM on 09/22/2010
From these names:
R.E.M.
The Roots
Rosanne Cash
Bonnie Raitt
Jackson Browne
MOBY
OK Go
Jamie Kitman
Writers Guild of America, East

We can see no members of our senate let alone any congress members!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mojo filter
Hikeeba.
08:55 PM on 09/22/2010
Hopefully O'Bama and his people don't wuss out again, like they've done on the public option, financial reform, etc.
10:12 PM on 09/22/2010
"O'Bama" sounds like you are a ........
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Omnix
Buddhist with an attitude...
01:33 PM on 09/23/2010
No, didn't you hear the Fox News report, the President's real name is Sean Barry O'bama. And he is a Neo-nazi, communist, socialist, pagan, muslim, anti-white radical, IRA terrorist, posing as a US president. Apparently Orley Taitz has revealed some documents, proving that someone with that name was born in North Ireland around the same time (it may be off by a couple of years)...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:20 PM on 09/22/2010
If CEOs could find a way to charge people for the air they breathe, it would be an instant monopoly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bertski
just a guy trying not to be part of the problem
09:43 PM on 09/22/2010
It's coming.... First it'll be potable water.
photo
FTracy3
My micro-bio is as empty as the rest of my life.
11:05 PM on 09/22/2010
Actually the government is charging people for the air they breathe, under the new cap and trade proposals. I really think being forced to hold your breath unless you offset the carbon dioxide with carbon credits is over-intrusive.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:14 PM on 09/22/2010
Great point!
F and Fd. ;)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iblogleft
Certifiable
12:28 AM on 09/23/2010
Actually no, they are paying to keep rain forest from being cut down and wildlife parks free of mining operations in nations that have no natural resources other than those in danger.

But I would not expect people to be smart enough to understand.
photo
ohiomark
Rush Geek
07:52 PM on 09/22/2010
There has never, in the history of the world, more ways to get and spread information because of Cable TV, Satellite TV and radio, celestrial radio, internet and cell phones.

This is NOT good news for the leftists who don't want their version of the "truth" to be challenged.

So called "Net Neutrallity" is the way that the leftists can control what is seen and heard on the internet under the guise of "fairness". Just like the so called "Fairness Doctrine", it will silence some speech to give others a "chance". It doesn't matter that it's a direct violation of the First Amendment, they will do it anyway.
09:19 PM on 09/22/2010
Your post makes no sense at all.
How are the "leftists" controlling anything at present?
You don't seem to understand the real issue here: Your ISP deciding what is priority and what can take the slow route to you. Decision made by how much the content provider is willing to pay to go on the fast lane.
Get it now?
photo
ohiomark
Rush Geek
09:50 PM on 09/22/2010
It's a free country (for now) and you can change ISP's anytime you want if you don't like how they "direct" you to web sites. Interferring with speech by the government is NOT permitted by the First Amendment. Private companies don't have to follow that the First Amendment. That's why HP can censor anyone they want on this site.
09:25 PM on 09/22/2010
it's the exact opposite. bushco. let murdoch bypass fcc rules so he could pipe their propaganda illegally to more areas. the article just said bushco reclassified the internet to information to allow the repugs and telecom to control the internet.
photo
ohiomark
Rush Geek
09:45 PM on 09/22/2010
The FCC has no power over Cable TV, only broadcast TV.

You should know that before you argue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trittydi
Special on pap smears at Walgreen's this week ....
07:10 PM on 09/22/2010
Please consider contacting the White House and asking them to fire Genachowski because he isn't doing his job.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/CONTACT/
*
06:58 PM on 09/22/2010
I loves me some Bonnie R. That much I can say. And since my wife does not read Huffpo, let me take this opportunity to say it again. I soooo loves me some Bonnie Raitt. No. No. No. I take that back. I loves all of her. Some is just not enough. Bonnie, do you wanna give 'em something to talk about with me?