More

Israel Flotilla Raid Violated International Law, U.N. Council Says

FRANK JORDANS   09/22/10 06:14 PM ET   AP

Israel Flotilla

GENEVA — A report by three U.N.-appointed human rights experts Wednesday said that Israeli forces violated international law when they raided a Gaza-bound aid flotilla killing nine activists earlier this year.

The U.N. Human Rights Council's fact-finding mission concluded that Israel's naval blockade of the Palestinian territory was unlawful because of the humanitarian crisis there, and described the military raid on the flotilla as brutal and disproportionate.

The Israeli Foreign Ministry responded late Wednesday by saying the Human Rights Council, which commissioned the report, had a "biased, politicized and extremist approach."

The Islamic militant group Hamas that controls Gaza, meanwhile, praised the report and called for those involved in the raid to be punished.

The 56-page document lists a series of alleged crimes committed by Israeli forces during and after the raid, including willful killing and torture, and claims there is "clear evidence to support prosecutions." ure.

"A series of violations of international law, including international humanitarian and human rights law, were committed by the Israeli forces during the interception of the flotilla and during the detention of passengers in Israel prior to deportation," the experts found.

Examining the circumstances of the raid, the panel concluded that a humanitarian crisis existed in Gaza on the day of the incident in Gaza and "for this reason alone the blockade is unlawful and cannot be sustained in law."

Israel imposed a blockade on Gaza after Hamas militants violently seized control of the coastal territory from the moderate Palestinian Fatah party in 2007. Israel allows humanitarian aid and goods into Gaza via land crossings after inspection for weapons.

"The conduct of the Israeli military and other personnel toward the flotilla passengers was not only disproportionate to the occasion but demonstrated levels of totally unnecessary and incredible violence. It betrayed an unacceptable level of brutality," the report said.

It described the Israeli raid on May 31, in which eight Turkish activists and one Turkish-American aboard the Mavi Marmara were shot and killed, as "clearly unlawful."

"The report published today is as biased and as one sided as the body that has produced it," the Israeli Foreign Ministry said in a statement.

Israel says its troops opened fire after coming under attack by activists wielding clubs, axes and metal rods.Soldiers rappelled on to the deck armed with non-lethal paintball guns as their primary weapons. They said they only resorted to using their handguns after they were assaulted.

The activists said they were defending their ship after it was attacked by Israeli soldiers in international waters.

The raid sparked an international outcry and forced Israel to ease its blockade of Hamas-ruled Gaza. Israel, along with Egypt, imposed the embargo in June 2007 after Hamas militants took control of the area.

Since then, Israel has lifted virtually all restrictions on food, medicine and consumer goods, but still maintains its naval blockade, saying that Hamas could sneak weapons into Gaza.

Israel indicated early on that it wouldn't cooperate with the panel and roundly rejected its conclusions on Wednesday. "The Human Rights Council blamed Israel prior to the investigation and it is no surprise that they condemn after," said Andy David, a spokesman for the Israeli Foreign Ministry, referring to the 47-member body's resolution in early June condemning the raid.

Israel has instead been working with a separate U.N. group under New Zealand's former Prime Minister Geoffrey Palmer and Colombia's former President Alvaro Uribe that is also examining the incident but has yet to publish its findings.

"Israel is a democratic and law abiding country that carefully observes international law and, when need be, knows how to investigate itself," the Foreign Ministry said. "That is how Israel has always acted, and that is the way in which investigations were conducted following Operation Cast Lead, launched to protect the inhabitants of southern Israel from rockets and terror attacks carried out by Hamas from Gaza."

Fawzi Barhoum, a spokesman for Hamas – the Islamic militant group that controls Gaza – said the report emphasized that Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories violates human rights "not only against Palestinian people but against innocent people who came to show their sympathy."

"Now it's required to be a mechanism in order to translate this report into action and to bring the occupation commanders to trial for the crimes they committed," Barhoum said.

The Human Rights Council's report was compiled by former U.N. war crimes prosecutor Desmond de Silva, Trinidadian judge Karl T. Hudson-Phillips and Malaysian women's rights advocate Mary Shanthi Dairiam. It is scheduled to be debated in the council on Monday.

The body, which is dominated by African, Asian and Latin American countries, has in the past repeatedly singled out Israel for criticism. Its resolutions carry little weight in law but are considered an important indicator of global opinion on human rights issues.

___

U.N. report http://bit.ly/FlotillaReport

____

Associated Press Writer Ian Deitch in Jerusalem contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

GENEVA — A report by three U.N.-appointed human rights experts Wednesday said that Israeli forces violated international law when they raided a Gaza-bound aid flotilla killing nine activists earlier...
GENEVA — A report by three U.N.-appointed human rights experts Wednesday said that Israeli forces violated international law when they raided a Gaza-bound aid flotilla killing nine activists earlier...
Filed by Nicholas Sabloff  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,673
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (25 total)
photo
YafoDalet
a secular Jew
06:50 PM on 10/25/2010
In the meantime, here is a report about the recent "peace" flotilla "cargo": http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3974911,00.html (yes it is from an Israeli newspaper; give it some time, i am sure you'll find it elsewhere).
08:13 PM on 10/16/2010
So is the blockade of Gaza illegal or not?
12:18 AM on 10/07/2010
yet another important piece of news you will never hear on FOX, CNN, CNBC, MSNBC...

I wonder why??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eileenflemingWAWA
http://www.wearewideawake.org/
03:12 PM on 10/02/2010
On Sept. 19, 2010, I met Ken O'Keefe and traveled with him for the next 13 days.

The ex-Marine and Mavi Marmara survivor, began a two week non-stop speaking tour through Oregon, Washington State and Victoria, Canada, stating, “I see this world as a move-able object and any sane person can see the world needs to be changed and I believe we can do it."

http://wearewideawake.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1846&Itemid=237

On the ninth day of the tour, we traveled to Dr. Bill Dientz', lake front cabin on Sun Lake. Bill has been to Gaza five times and was aboard the first Freedom Flotilla. That night Ken shared his favorite movie with us, "V For VENDETTA".

The most memorable scene for me, was at the end when V says "Ideas are Bulletproof."

And inspired by Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert, I imagined people of many homelands raising their flags all over the world on 30 October 2010, for THE ENGAGEMENT FOR EQUAL HUMAN RIGHTS and an End to All Occupations.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpKc6DhWwJk
03:54 PM on 09/28/2010
And pray tell, didn't Turkey violate Israeli territorial rights or am i mistaken that they were an invading armada bent on confrontation. So as points go 1 for the OOM CLUM (UN) 0 for the Israelis, nothing unusual......
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:22 PM on 09/28/2010
Yes, you are mistaken.
10:14 AM on 09/30/2010
yes very mistaken... they were not in Israeli waters, they were an aid flotilla and they were a multinational crew that just happened to have used a Turkish ship
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hmp49
I....have a mole?
10:26 AM on 09/26/2010
I have repeatedly posted how the UN has "special rules" that apply only to Israel. Even important UN insiders admit it:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/hmp49/israel-flotilla-raid-viol_n_735447_61374550.html

"CAN ISRAEL IMPOSE A NAVAL BLOCKADE ON GAZA?
 
Yes it can, according to the law of blockade which was derived from customary international law and codified in the 1909 Declaration of London. It was updated in 1994 in a legally recognized document called the "San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea."

Under some of the key rules, a blockade must be declared and notified to all belligerents and neutral states, access to neutral ports cannot be blocked, and an area can only be blockaded which is under enemy control.

"On the basis that Hamas is the ruling entity of Gaza and Israel is in the midst of an armed struggle against that ruling entity, the blockade is legal," said Philip Roche, partner in the shipping disputes and risk management team with law firm Norton Rose.

Under the law of a blockade, intercepting a vessel could apply globally so long as a ship is bound for a "belligerent" territory, legal experts say.

CAN ISRAEL USE FORCE WHEN INTERCEPTING SHIPS?
 
Under international law it can use force when boarding a ship.

Legal experts say proportional force does not mean that guns cannot be used by forces when being attacked with knives.

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE65133D20100602
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Palspal2
10:51 AM on 09/26/2010
No. The UN deems Gaza to be occupied by Israel, and Res 242 declares that Israel cease hostilities against the WB and Gaza. The blockade/siege is a manifestation of the occupation and hostilities against Gazans.

If we turn the tables and have one or several nations blockade Israel, we'd see how few 'experts' would side with the blockade. There would be outrage and the US Congress would vote to go to war.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hmp49
I....have a mole?
11:36 AM on 09/26/2010
242 specifically addresses a requirement for exchanging land for peace.

Hamas is dedicated to the destruction of Israel, regardless of how much of the WB they end up with. Which means that discussion of 242 is irrelevant.

Hostilities against the WB? you must be joking.

http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Terrorism-+Obstacle+to+Peace/Palestinian+terror+since+2000/Victims+of+Palestinian+Violence+and+Terrorism+sinc.htm

One attack on the US and we killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, and bombed Afghanistan enough times to turn every square inch of dirt 4 times. By comparison (not just to the US, but every country of the world) Israel is a paragon of restraint.

"If we turn the tables and have one or several nations blockade Israel, we'd see how few 'experts' would side with the blockade."

There was no blockade in 2005, no blockade until Hamas (sworn to the destruction of Israel and actively working towards that end) was elected. That made attacks on Israel state sponsored, i.e. war.

Let all the nations Israel has declared war on go ahead and declare a blockade.
11:40 AM on 09/26/2010
> Yes it can, according to the law of blockade

No it can't.

Got to love the sea lawyers who pull out part of a one hundred year old law while the Israelis IGNORE more recent laws, such as laws that forbid machine gunning life rafts from sinking ships.

International waters. Not hard to understand.

Blockade illegal.  Having some hasbara hump declare legal does not make it so.

Collective punishment:  ILLEGAL.

Way past time for US taxpayers to foot the bill for this state parasite.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hmp49
I....have a mole?
12:05 PM on 09/26/2010
Having a rabid hater of Israel declare it illegal does not make it so.

Blockades have ALWAYS been enforced in international waters. But of course you have your own version of history. Look up "US Blockades"

You talk about US taxpayers? You are so far out of the mainstream of "US taxpayers" it hardly merits responding to you.

But the fact is, Israel is one of the 5 countries in the world the majority of Americans believe we should be willing to defend militarily.

Israel is viewed more favorably than almost any other country, the Palestinian Authority among the least.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/126116/canada-places-first-image-contest-iran-last.aspx

So please tell me you're holding your breathe waiting for US taxpayers to turn against Israel. I LOVE that image.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jgarbuz
01:49 PM on 09/25/2010
When will the conversation ever turn to the total ethnic cleansing of nearly 1 million Jews out of the Arabs countries after 1948? Why are the Arab countries today virtually "judenrein" whereas nearly 6 million Arabs live in Israel, Judah, Samaria and Gaza? The truth is, that the Muslims  are the great ethnic cleansers! Israel is innocent!
photo
Kramerica-Industries
And with Darren’s help, we’ll get that chicken
03:47 PM on 09/25/2010
When ever you try to mention those kind of facts you will find response such as stop trying to change the subject this is a discussion about Israel.
Here is a story Alan Dershowitz told:
in the 1920's, then Harvard President A. Lawrence Lowell decided that the number of Jews admitted to Harvard should be substantially reduced because "Jews cheat." When a distinguished alumnus of Harvard, Judge Learned Hand, pointed out to President Lowell that Protestants also cheat, Lowell responded, "You're changing the subject, we're talking about Jews now."
For some reason or other we are always talking about the Jews.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:47 PM on 09/25/2010
Word gets around. The Arabs knew what the Zionists were doing in Palestine. The entire problem then, and the entire problem now, was and is the result of the european Zionists coveting the land of Palestine. They started a concerted effort to claim it as their own in the late 1800's. The Zionists are now bringing in people without any blood ties as they take ancestral Palestinian lands and bulldoze their family homes. Check out this story in the Atlantic.
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/03/did-netanyahu-know.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jgarbuz
04:09 PM on 09/25/2010
Still doesn't answer the question how the Arab population INSIDE ISRAEL ITSELF (not the "territories") have grown from 145,000 to 1.4 million today, nor the spread of tens of thousands of Arab settlements INSIDE the "green line."  The fact remains, that since 1948 the total Arab population grew from 1.2 million to nearly 6million west of the Jordan river. All while the Jewish population in the Muslim countries went from nearly a million down to a handful.

My point is, if Arabs can live and rapidly expand INSIDE ISRAEL ITSELF why can't Jews live in Judah Samaria and Gaza?  Or perhaps we might suggest another population swap, where hal a million Jews leave the territories back into Israel, and a million and a half Arabs leave Israel and to to the PA?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hmp49
I....have a mole?
10:14 AM on 09/26/2010
If you have no problem with the Arab confiscation of many billions of dollars of Jewish property, and land equal to 4x the current landmass of Israel, then I'm sure you have no problem with any claims of Israeli expulsion or confiscation.

How does confiscating the land and property, and 4x the landmass of Israel, "deal" with "what the Zionists were doing in Palestine?" The Arab countries knew that the Jews they expelled had nowhere to go EXCEPT Israel.

The Andrew Sullivan article has nothing whatsoever to do with jgarbuz's post.

Deflection
06:27 PM on 09/24/2010
Jew is based on a religion not a race, thats a fact. Ashkenazi are Jewish converts and are European
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jgarbuz
07:47 PM on 09/24/2010
Jews are  a nation whose origins are in the Kingdom of Judah, later called Judea, until the Romans in the 2nd century decided to "wipe Judea from the pages of history" renamed it Syria-Palestina. Of course, like virtually every tribe in human history, the Judeans had a religon with a temple, sacrifices, priests, etc. IN exile, they were called "Jews." Without their land to hold onto, they had to emphasize the religious aspect of their national culture in order to remain a distinct people and not disappear "from the pages of history." As luck would have it, the Roman empire eventually chose to make a religion based on a Jewish man who supposedly was the son of God, and who had been crucified and rose from the dead, the official religion of the Roman state. And so the national and religious books of the Jews became widely known and even revered .

As for the racial and ethnic composition of the Israelite people, they were  a mixed multitude very early on, but as time went on, closed their ranks and made membership in the tribe more difficult so as not to let foreign idols and ways to take over. Recent DNA studies have essentially proved the majority of Jews are of Middle Eastern, rather than European or other origins. YEs, JEws lived all over, and there were some foreign peoples who chose to convert en masse, but the overwhelming majority of those converted yet again to either Christianity or Islam, as remaining a Jew was a very difficult and perilous thing to do. 
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Palspal2
09:53 PM on 09/24/2010
DNA studies show that as much as half of the female mitochondrial DNA of Ashkenazis is not regional in origin. In other words, European. All of the Palestinian DNA is indigenous. Palestinians are more related to Mizrahi Jews than either are related to Ashkenazis. Besides mass conversion, Jews prosyletized until forbidden to do so by the Roman Empire. This is why Jews may look like freckled redheads, or like Netanyahu or like a Palestinian.
11:54 AM on 09/26/2010
> Jews are  a nation whose origins are in the Kingdom of Judah

Jews are not a nation, they are members of a religion. As much as many in Israel like to believe, they do not get special rights-  except, of course, in Israel.

Israel did not exist before 1948,  and Jews abandoned the Middle East many hundreds of years ago for Europe.

The world has enough problems without religious zealots declaring that they have the rights of lands according to their holy scripture.
photo
funserious
I have not yet BEGUN to procrastinate
11:43 AM on 09/25/2010
Judaism.....not "Jew"..........
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:03 PM on 09/24/2010
Haaretz finally talks to a flotilla participant.

http://www.haaretz.com/weekend/magazine/rough-passage-1.315481
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:02 PM on 09/24/2010
Thanks for the link. If anyone reads the story take a look at the comments that follow, they will give some idea of what seems to be the overall mentality of the Israelis. I'm sure there are many Israelis distressed by the reality of all of this, but they too would understandably be affraid to speak out for obvious reasons.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jgarbuz
11:14 AM on 09/26/2010
Israelis AFRAID to speak out??? Ha. You obviously know NOTHING about Israel!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:02 PM on 09/24/2010
This thread's discussion of entitlement, blame, historical truth, and hermeneutics of these Hatfields and McCoys ignores their effect on the rest of the world. You would think that eight years of international wars of attrition were due to immaculate conception. Remember, the current peace talks effect everyone directly or indirectly.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:25 PM on 09/24/2010
The Palestinian side of the story has not been told. The Zionist coming from europe were a sophisticated lot with an understanding of political lobbying, media control and propaganda. Their intention from the beginning was to claim the Holy land as their sole possession. Contrary to their claim of a desire for peace, their actions have been saying they want all the land first and peace second. That reality is evident today as they continue the illegal settlements in defiance of the Forth Geneva convention of which they are a signator.
For a 60 second easy to read set of maps showing land changing hands over time click the link below.
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/03/did-netanyahu-know.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:08 PM on 09/24/2010
The underlying issue is the nuclear arms race in the region similar to the US/Soviet epoch in the 1950's. The failure of the Truman/ Eisenhower administration to embrace containment and bilateral nonproliferation by example, verses intimidation, targeted , planned annillation of civilians was predicted and highly cynical endeavor.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Phranquenstew
04:42 PM on 09/25/2010
Well stated. The one aspect that's continually ignored is the "convenience" to the Allies at the end of WW2. The British had an albatross around their neck that was not considered potentially profitable, they had a huge number of refugees displaced from their homes, the allies were harboring enourmous feeling of guilt for having failed so many during the rise of the nazis, the indigenous population of the Palestinian Territories were easily dismissed by all parties as accustomed to subservience, and the clincher... there was a nascent diaspora movement called zionism, started in the late 19th century, which happened to covet the very land Britain was trying to wash its hands of.
Any arguments about this being a "liberation movement" are disingenuous, and based on selective fact searching.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Majed Mazin
11:52 AM on 09/24/2010
in the last 10 days i made 27 comments.

24 were deleted.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Json
Cynical dreamer, sarcastic idealist...
01:30 PM on 09/24/2010
In the last three days, I see over 60 comments from you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Majed Mazin
02:05 PM on 09/24/2010
''I see over 60 comments from you. '' in the last three days.

i said in the last ten days (not today).

click on the comment to see if it was deleted.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Majed Mazin
02:27 PM on 09/24/2010
400 comments in 58 days.
that is an average of > 7 comments per day.

however, you want to believe i made 60 comments in 3 days ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BcemXAHA
Yerushalaim shel zahav
01:51 PM on 09/24/2010
Ask yourself why!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Majed Mazin
02:08 PM on 09/24/2010
since i am the centerpiece of your blog.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Majed Mazin
11:30 AM on 09/24/2010
the world knows.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:52 AM on 09/24/2010
Much is being said on this issue regarding Israels rights to self determination and the right to exist. The people proclaiming these "rights" often refuse to acknoweldge the same and specific rights regarding the Palestinians.

If Israel must deny the same rights to others, in order to excersize it's own "rights," then those rights by Israel's own definiton are illegitimate.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jgarbuz
11:55 AM on 09/24/2010
Jewish rights to self-determination in "Palestine" was settled by the League of Nations at the San Remo conferences that culminated with the 1922 LoN's Mandate over Palestine given to the British for the purpose of facilitating the reestablishment of the "JEwish National Home."
04:02 PM on 09/24/2010
Why jgarbuz you missed out the rest of the sentence. Now what did it say about the rights of the people already living there?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:24 AM on 09/25/2010
From a previous Huffpo article here are a couple of quotes.
"We Jews should never, ever become like our tormentors -- not even to save our lives. Even at Auschwitz, I sensed that such a moral downfall would render my survival meaningless.
Since 1967 it has become obvious that political Zionism has one monolithic aim: Maximum land in Palestine with a minimum of Palestinians on it.
I cannot help but hear echoes of the Nazi mythos of "blood and soil" in the rhetoric of settler fundamentalism which claims a sacred right to all the lands of biblical Judea and Samaria. The various forms of collective punishment visited upon the Palestinian people -- coerced ghettoization behind a "security wall"; the bulldozing of homes and destruction of fields; the bombing of schools, mosques, and government buildings; an economic blockade that deprives people of the water, food, medicine, education and the basic necessities for dignified survival -- force me to recall the deprivations and humiliations that I experienced in my youth. This century-long process of oppression means unimaginable suffering for Palestinians."
Hajo Meyer holocaust survivor.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/hajo-meyer/an-ethical-tradition-betr_b_438660.html

You see Israel has only been able to exist by denying the inalienable rights of the Palestinians. You should consider reading the entire article, there are many truths within from a man who lived through it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
namdlogd
02:12 PM on 09/24/2010
nice try but .... no. israel isn't going anywhere, you'd like to delegitimize it's existence in favor of the rights of plaestinians. not going to happen. not now. not tomorrow. not ever. you prolong the agony of everyone involved by extending such tactics and are part of the problem, not the solution. you know this though you steadfastly refuse to recognize the right of existence. well we steadfastly hold to this right. and there you have it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:01 PM on 09/24/2010
Yes, your view of your rights at the expense of the Palestinians. Thanks for expressing your view.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Phranquenstew
03:53 PM on 09/25/2010
Surrendering his lunch money to bullies amy keep your kid from getting beat up, and undoubtedly will save time if you accept the result as inevitable.
Paying a bigger bully to inflict disprapportianate harm on the bully may also work.
Catching the bully unaware and using disprapotionate means to render him incapable of recovery would also secure his lunch money in the future, as well as possibly provide a psychological "boost".
Fighting it out on the spot to the best of his ability might result in a temporary "loss", but maybe the bully will think twice next time... perhaps even learn to respect him.
Which would you have your own kid do? Would your advice take into consideration the "law", or would it be different if the roles were reversed? Which do you think has the most beneficial, long-term result?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
08:29 AM on 09/24/2010
Now can we stop sending billions of our tax dollars to Israel and also military equipment? It is time that Israel stop counting on our continued support of its endless wars and crimes and violations of human rights.

If AIPAC and others wish to fund Israel, fine - but stop sending our tax dollars.
07:34 AM on 09/24/2010
Yesterday at the UN Israel was absent during Obama'a speech. I guess he did not kow tow enough. Israel has lost any credibility in the world with its ethnic cleansing in Gaza. Israel will go on building settlements, bulldozing Arabs off lands, whining and playing the victim, and behaving in a way that makes narcissism seem like a mild diagnosis for a country that has lost its bearings.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jgarbuz
08:08 AM on 09/24/2010
Yesterday was a Jewish holiday, Simchat Torah, the anniversary of receiving the Torah on Mt.Sinai. We Jews have a Law from a higher source than either from Obama or the UN, that clearly states that the Land of Israel is Israelite land and that is for what we give thanks and celebrate, and not in wasting time listening to harangues that would tear our rightful homeland into pieces and feeding it to mortal enemies. Those who advocate that course will find their own homelands torn to pieces by higher forces instead, IMO.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cliffhammond
Onward through the fog!
08:22 AM on 09/24/2010
You have a holy scripture too? What a coincidence! I have a deed given to my grandfather in the 1930s and signed by the Mountain God at Ararat in eastern Turkey. It says that in 2012 God has ordained that the city of Jerusalem shall be given over by His deed to the issue from his loins. There are 35 grandchildren. I'm wondering which townhouse I will claim.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cliffhammond
Onward through the fog!
08:30 AM on 09/24/2010
Jgarbuz, you comment amounts to a supremacist justification for crimes against humanity.