iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

John Boehner At GOP 'Pledge For America' Unveiling: Privatizing Social Security Is Still On The Table (VIDEO)


First Posted: 09/23/10 01:11 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:50 PM ET

Republican leaders were short on specifics at the unveiling of their much-anticipated governing agenda today at a hardware store in Virginia, stressing that the document is not comprehensive and meant to just outline "first steps" of what they would do if they take back the majority in Congress.

One item noticeably missing from the Pledge is an explanation of how the party would cut spending, particularly by dealing with Social Security and Medicare, which many Republicans have publicly said need to be cut and privatized, although they've been reluctant to embrace such measures as an official party position. (Social Security is mentioned just twice, and Medicare mentioned eight times.)

In today's "Pledge for America" press conference, Boehner refused to answer reporters' questions with specifics about how the party would cut spending -- saying instead that the country needs to have an "adult conversation" about the issues -- although he eventually admitted that cuts to entitlement programs are still on the table:

Q: What are you actually going to cut? Are you willing to go in and cut entitlements, which of course is where the real money is?


BOEHNER: If we're going to deal with deficits and we're going to be honest with the American people, we have to cut spending and we need real economic growth in America that puts more Americans back to work caring for themselves and caring for their families. And you can't have real economic growth in America if you insist on raising taxes on the American people. [...]

Q: There are not very many specifics in here about how you would actually get to the balanced budget if you do plan to extend all the tax cuts and expand defense spending. Again, just to follow up on the previous question, there's really no specifics on what you would do about Social Security and Medicare, which are some of the biggest drivers of deficit spending. So could you give us more detail on exactly how you could fulfill these pretty big promises, and spending caps don't seem like they would do it?

BOEHNER: Well, I think it's pretty clear that by having the spending cap at 2008 levels, we can save $100 billion a year -- that's one $1 trillion over the next 10 years. When it comes to dealing with the entitlement programs, I've made it pretty clear: It's time for us to have an adult conversation with each other about the serious challenges that face our country. I don't have all of the solutions, but I believe if we work with the American people, the American people will want to work with us to come to grips with these challenges that face our country. [...]

Q: What are we to think of ideas that are not included in here, for example, private accounts for Social Security? Since it's not in here, is that to say it's off the table?

BOEHNER: No. If you look at the Pledge, it's not intended to be a party platform. It's not intended to cover everything under the sun. ... It's about what needs to be done now -- first steps toward real fiscal sanity in Washington, D.C. and real steps about getting our economy moving again and getting people back to work.

When the reporter followed up and asked what "percentage of the problem, in terms of our deficit, is being taken care of by this plan," Boehner said, "What we intend to do is take first steps, and those first steps would be to reduce spending to 2008 levels, saving $100 billion a year, our commitment to put ourselves on a course to balance the budget and to pay down the debt."

One provision in the GOP's Pledge is a requirement that every bill contains "a citation from Constitutional authority," picking up on the conservative complaint that health care reform is unconstitutional. At the press conference, a reporter asked Boehner, "Would you speak for a minute about the pledge to give a sort of constitutional test to all legislation, and talk about where in the Constitution is states that Congress should have to follow that test for legislature?" Boehner didn't really have a reply for this question, just saying that he believes most Americans "believe Washington is involved in far too many things." "And so I believe, if we're going to bring a bill to the floor, cite the specific constitutional authority that allows it to come to the floor," he added.

WATCH:

As ThinkProgress's Pat Garofalo pointed out, notably absent from the press conference was Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Ohio), who is the author of a budget roadmap that many GOP leaders have been reluctant to publicly endorse because it includes sharp cuts in just about all government spending -- Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, defense, education, the FBI, etc. But according to Boehner at today's event, the GOP may still be open to such measures. Indeed, Ryan has stated that privately, Republican leaders are supporting his proposals.

Some Republicans are even criticizing the new Pledge to America, saying it doesn't go far enough to address the deficit. "It's not taking us where we ultimately have to go as a country, dealing with entitlements and permanent tax changes," said Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), who wanted a plan that dealt specifically with Social Security. "But I can't fault the [Republican] leadership, because it is political season and they are putting out the best possible thing."

*************************

What's happening in your district? The Huffington Post wants to know about all the campaign ads, debates, town halls, mailings, shenanigans, and other interesting campaign news happening by you. E-mail us any tips, videos, audio files, and photos to election@huffingtonpost.com.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Republican leaders were short on specifics at the unveiling of their much-anticipated governing agenda today at a hardware store in Virginia, stressing that the document is not comprehensive and meant...
Republican leaders were short on specifics at the unveiling of their much-anticipated governing agenda today at a hardware store in Virginia, stressing that the document is not comprehensive and meant...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,752
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (72 total)
photo
bmwracer
In the LEFT lane.
07:50 PM on 10/27/2010
This is the closest I've ever seen Boehner smile... Happiest man on the planet, he is. :P
10:46 PM on 09/26/2010
It couldn't be plainer
It's a no-brainer
The fat cats own Boehner
He's on a retainer

Calvin Trillin. The Nation, Oct 4, 2010
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
jemiltd
Writer,author,thinker,creative
11:50 AM on 09/25/2010
“How long will you sit on the sidelines watching crazy? This -- Boehner, Angle, O'Donnell, Paul, Bachmann, et al -- is one big trainwreck for the US. Fun to watch, but when it runs over you remind yourself that you chose to stand there when you saw it coming. http://tl.gd/657jb7
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sassys
07:13 PM on 09/24/2010
I wonder if Boehner has ever said to himself as I did today "Hmm, I managed to go through the whole week broke"? Nah..
photo
Hillrick
Still inconceivable...I'm just not smiling anymore
06:19 PM on 09/24/2010
I heard this Ryan fellow talking a few nights ago on NPR. Apparently he's all for changing the system he just has no idea and is putting it out there so we can talk about it. Somehow he also feels that if your over 55 your SS is safe. Under that you better have an alternate plan.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:00 PM on 09/24/2010
yes-we-tan vs. the stupor mundi
Boehner is no match for Obama
photo
one1byke
Easy no Man.
02:01 PM on 09/24/2010
I think Jon Stewart was his HuckleBerry on this one:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/24/stewart-gop-pledge-america_n_737812.html
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Cheryl2
real Americans celebrate diversity
01:02 PM on 09/24/2010
Since social security and medicare are a separate tax will they end that tax when they end those programs? I would chose not to be in a privatized social security program or medicare voucher system since they will be set up to provide huge profits to those corporations that give the largest amount to Boehner. I personally, unlike republicans, do not believe government should be in the business of providing huge profits at the taxpayers expense, nor should the government provide huge amouts of money to those who give themselves bonuses. I know the republicans disagree, they are all about pitying the rich and having ":adult talks" with the rest of us, about how THEY CANNOT AFFORD TO PAY BOTH THE BENEFITS WE PURCHASED AND INVESTED IN AND STILL HAVE ENOUGH MONEY TO MAKE THE VERY RICHEST RICHER.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
henrypapillon
Put a Psychiatrist in every NRA meeting.
12:21 PM on 09/24/2010
Hey, Orangbird, ask all the people who have less in their IRA's and 401K's than they did in 2000 if they think that is a good idea.
12:10 PM on 09/24/2010
Are u people serious? Who’s forcing anyone into stocks? Put all funds in CDs, MMAs or a SmartyPig account (never less than 2.15% interest, even in these pathetic rate days) and you’ll still obliterate the government’s anemic return on the fictional SS trust fund. Do that starting in your 20s, die whenever u must (before or after so-called retirement age), and leave your heirs what’s left.
The alternative is to continue a program that can’t fund its liabilities (we paid out more benefits this year than we paid in), putting “all” future recipients at risk of getting “nothing.”
Grow up already, and help save SS for everyone, not just current recipients.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
henrypapillon
Put a Psychiatrist in every NRA meeting.
12:26 PM on 09/24/2010
Where were you when there was more going in than coming out? That was for times like this. We just went through 45 years of employment of babies boomers during a period when they should have been putting more in than is coming out. Now they are retiring and more should be coming out than going in. That is the way retirement plans work. I put into my IRA's and 401K for the last 24 years of my career when it became available. I guarantee that more is going to come out from here on in than goes  in. But that is the idea.
12:32 PM on 09/24/2010
I repeat . . are u unable or unwilling to place your same contributions in better yielding financial instruments that are inheritable by your heirs? CDs, MMAs and most online savings accounts (all FDIC insured up to 250k) outperform the government's paltry 1.45% average
10:48 AM on 09/25/2010
I read your post and I had to look at my yearly Social Security statement, and my recent paycheck stub.

Guess what? You're wrong.

This year I have paid into Social Security a little over $3,600....according to my check stub.

Meanwhile if I was to become disabled today, Social Security would pay me over $2,300 a month.

Wthout even using very, very, very simple math, I see that my $3,600 invest this year gives me a great return starting in month number two.

BTW, Social Security can pay it's liablities, it's just that the politicans in Washington needs to do two things. 1) Stop raiding the Social Security Trust Fund every time they see money setting there. 2) Pay back the over $6 TRILLION they have STOLEN from the Social Security Trust Fund since 1982 when that "fiscal conservative" Ronnie Reagan decided it was ok to run debt by by having deficit laden budgets.
01:34 PM on 09/25/2010
sorry, dog, that's not a "great return," that's the exact problem . . u/I/no one has contributed enough to fund the liabilities they've agreed to fund . . the fact that u don't see the "very, very, very simple math" there is another problem . . always comes down to your side not wanting to sacrifice anything to save our national solvency.
and please don't tell me u actually believe there's a trust fund . . even the CBO tells us it's an "accounting term." Sorry, pal. With our debt, there ain't nothin' sittin' in no investment instrument.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
phlegminglib
11:49 AM on 09/24/2010
GOP: If we take back Congress and then the White House, you can get a few trillion dollars to manage as you please! Just think of the BILLIONS of fees you can collect from managing that money!
Wall Street: Let me get my checkbook out. Oh wait, what will happen if we squander away that money?
GOP: Well then we'll just have to cut benefits and bail you out, silly!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jeremyfive
10:38 AM on 09/24/2010
"Open to it?" The GOP is drooling to get its paws on the Social Security trust.

Stop 'em!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
henrypapillon
Put a Psychiatrist in every NRA meeting.
12:28 PM on 09/24/2010
Fanned. Don't fall for the "You are getting sleepy " trick from the Orangebird.
photo
dmsdzinr
Progression wit a twist of sarcasm.
10:07 AM on 09/24/2010
Then let the PRIVATE Sector pay their salaries, OOPS, I forgot, they already DO!
photo
GiveUsFree
Teapublicans are destroying America.
09:40 AM on 09/24/2010
Vote for A Democrat today to keep the CRAZY away!
ladyearth
Give birth to your dancing star
09:40 AM on 09/24/2010
Not only Social Security, also Medicare and now the Veterans Administration, the GOP is after all of them. The GOP also wants to do away with unemployment insurance. The GOP does NOT support our troops. The GOP supports defense contractors. Evidence the pledge calling for missile defense systems and not one mention of our troops and the benefits a grateful nation is morally called upon to provide for them. Morally, the tax cuts for the wealthy should be allowed to expore. Use that 700 billion dollars for our active duty troops and our veterans and their benefits.