iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Colbert's Congress Testimony Sparks Debate About 'Expert' Celebrities

LAURIE KELLMAN   09/28/10 08:15 AM ET   AP

Colbert Congress
Comedian Stephen Colbert, host of the Colbert Report, testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Friday, Sept. 24, 2010, before the House Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security and International Law subcommittee hearing on Protecting America's Harvest. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

WASHINGTON — There are congressional hearings and there are comedy shows, and the twain rarely meet.

So when a House panel on immigration combined them on purpose last week with testimony from Stephen Colbert (kohl-BEHR') and his "truthy" alter ego, debate broke out on the proper roles of the many celebrities – from Angelina Jolie to Bono to Elmo – who advocate in Washington.

In Colbert's appearance, there was profit to be made from the public, taxpayer-funded forum on one of the nation's weightiest issues, the plight of migrant workers. Immigrant advocates won national news coverage; Colbert helped generate material for his show; politicians scored live coverage of themselves during a brutal election year; and the media bagged a widely viewed story.

Witness Carol Swain, the law school professor who testified before Colbert, was ticked at being overshadowed by a fictional talk show host. But she scored, too. Before the hearing was over, Swain's Twitter and Facebook followings soared. People e-mailed her at Vanderbilt University Law School. A guy recognized her the next day in the grocery store.

"It's increased my visibility in a number of ways," Swain said Monday. "I don't think it would have gotten that much attention had he not been on the panel."

United Farm Workers President Arturo Rodriguez, who also joined Colbert at the witness table on Friday, said he, too, has seen an increase in e-mails and Facebook followers. Inquiries to the United Farm Workers "Take Our Jobs" website also jumped, he said.

"The last big media attention we had like that is really going back to when Cesar passed away in 1993," Rodriguez said, referring to UFW founder and farm worker Cesar Chavez.

Celebrities frequently beat a path to Capitol Hill to raise awareness of issues and bills that otherwise stand little chance of news coverage. Lawmakers crowd into the shot when Jolie advocates for refugees. They hang out publicly with rock stars Bono and Jon Bon Jovi when they're in Washington on official business. Even Sesame Street's Elmo, a fuzzy red puppet, has received coverage for his "testimony" – in 2002 about the benefits of music education.

Likewise, this news story will be more widely read because it mentions the Twitter partnership between Lady Gaga and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on behalf of the effort to repeal the ban on gays serving openly in the military.

Colbert's celebrity is a commodity that California Democrat Zoe Lofgren, who chaired the subcommittee hearing, and the other witnesses that day sought to leverage. Lofgren joked at one point that the last time the hearing room was so crammed with audience members and cameras was for President Bill Clinton's impeachment hearings a dozen years ago.

But for all of the attention Colbert might have brought to immigration reform, his testimony also chafed lawmakers of both parties who are engaged in a brutal campaign season.

Republicans, not all of whom apparently were familiar with the character, did not appreciate being satirized on their own turf. And some Democrats cringed at "testimony" from a comedian's alter ego on an issue that for so many is a matter of life and death.

Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers, D-Mich., asked Colbert to leave because he had no experience with farm labor issues or immigration policy. Lofgren urged him to stay. He stayed.

Outside the hearing room, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who had not yet heard or seen Colbert's testimony, said she had no objection to it.

But House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer on Sunday called Colbert's appearance "inappropriate" and "an embarrassment." A spokeswoman on Monday said the Maryland Democrat still believes celebrity endorsements generally can be a good thing.

Swain said she agreed with that, if not Colbert's testimony or the Democrats' approach to the plight of migrant workers.

"I have testified before," Swain said. But this time, because she spoke before Colbert and people had to sit through her remarks to hear his, "people heard my testimony."

___

Associated Press writer Suzanne Gamboa contributed to this report.

___

Online:

Take Our Jobs: http://tinyurl.com/32kn58v

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — There are congressional hearings and there are comedy shows, and the twain rarely meet. So when a House panel on immigration combined them on purpose last week with testimony from ...
WASHINGTON — There are congressional hearings and there are comedy shows, and the twain rarely meet. So when a House panel on immigration combined them on purpose last week with testimony from ...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 693
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (17 total)
photo
toxicshock
Sassy, snarky, smart
08:10 AM on 10/02/2010
If congress had such a problem with Colbert, why was he even invited to speak? They should have done some research on him beforehand so the blame lies with them. As though "in character" wasn't a big enough give-away that Colbert would be speaking as someone other than himself. This "offensive" testimony could have been completely avoided had they watched the "Colbert Report."

Those offended need to stop taking themselves so seriously, and realize that people (especially comedians) all deal with these tough times differently. It just so happens that some deal with it through comedy. That doesn't mean they aren't seriously affected by current events.

On a side note, I find it funny that conservatives are always yelling at liberals to get a sense of humor (e.g. feminists, gay rights advocates, environmentalists and other "liberal" groups) when jokes are made at their expense, but get all up-in-arms when they're mocked. Looks like they can dish it out but not take it.

As a conservative would say: lighten up and get a sense of humor!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LonosCurse
Some may never live, but the crazy never die
05:15 PM on 09/30/2010
Congressman go on his show, why can't he go on theirs?
photo
AlexNYC
Pumps dont work cause the vandals took the handles
02:16 PM on 09/30/2010
But Congress is always willing to listen to "experts" and "lobbyists" that are sanctioned by the corporations to support their views. If Cobert were there to sponsor a corporate issue, they wouldn't have an issue with it. Why? Double standard because his parody was bringing to the national light the injustices of living the life of a migrant worker. John Steinbefck would be proud.
photo
markie G
...all 6's, 7's + 9's
01:14 AM on 09/30/2010
stephen colbert is an aging, immature frat-boy with a recently found loud microphone for his mediocre-ly clever shtick that he has held onto for so long that he's confused as to whether he's created a character or it has created him---he is just as pathologically self-absorbed, self-aggrandising, and attention-seeking as limbaugh, beck, palin, o'donnell, et.al., just in a slightly different way---i, for one, will be thrilled when i no longer have to see his fake, mannequin-max-headroom face, or put up with the idea that he's either funny, clever, or well-informed
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
patriciacaldwell
Yes, this keeps me awake at night.
03:25 PM on 09/30/2010
I get it. You're upset that he makes fun of you.
09:55 PM on 09/29/2010
No greater argument against televising the Supreme Court is what Comedy Central/Colbert did in front of congress testifying as an expert 'witness'. If there's a camera, someone will want to act for it.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
patriciacaldwell
Yes, this keeps me awake at night.
03:27 PM on 09/30/2010
Testimony before a congressional committee is not the same thing as arguing a case before a court.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
TheOuroborus
It's NOT paranoia if they really R out to get U.
08:08 PM on 09/29/2010
Stephen Colbert is more informed on virtually every issue before Congress than all it's members combined save maybe Franken. Funny that, huh? Not.

If somebody wants to come up with a test for qualifying, I'm sure Colbert would ace it and the Senators would flunk. Just because some slack-jaws in yee-haw-ville voted in some numbnuts, doesn't mean that person is actually worthy of the seat. The media and right-wing-nut Congress are afraid of people like Stephen. He's sharp and quick, something that's been missing from those chambers for a long, long, long time.

I mean, just look at the POTUS. If I had the equivalent background resume applying for a managers job at McDonalds, they'd pass on me. So, give it a rest ya'll.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
samtee
Shankapotomus.
09:35 AM on 09/30/2010
OMG all he does is read a script
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
patriciacaldwell
Yes, this keeps me awake at night.
03:28 PM on 09/30/2010
OMG, your IQ is on full display.
07:22 PM on 09/29/2010
I'm very much in favor of immigration reform and would love to see some kind of amnesty or work visa program but, I've got to tell you, this Colbert thing was stupid. It's great that he wanted to use his celebrity status to bring attention to the issue but couldn't he put aside the silly joke/irony/satire for a moment and really address the issue? I saw the hearing and I just had to scratch my head and wonder what these people were thinking. It's all right to have celelbrities present at hearings but they need to be straight. This is not a joke. This is not a forum for a routine. Do your homework. Present facts and figures. Save the sketches for your showbiz outlet. This just trivialized the cause and gave fodder to the opposition.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
patriciacaldwell
Yes, this keeps me awake at night.
03:42 PM on 09/30/2010
Everybody has an opinion today, and some of you posters either didn't watch Stephen's testimony or you misunderstand how congressional hearings work. There have been movie stars without a clear thought in their heads appear before Congress and testify for years. They usually read something prepared for them. In this case, Stephen did some research and brought attention to bear on the problems of migrant workers. I've explained on another thread how his testimony worked, but I'll repost. He did not deliver his testimony in character, as he does on his show. Although humorously written, he read it straight. His final statement to a question asked was answer from his heart and was an ad lib. He may have thought about it beforehand, but it was not read. I believe that some posters don't like the premise of Stephen's show or don't favor helping migrant laborers. I thought his appearance was entirely appropriate. We can't keep hiring migrant workers and telling them to leave simultaneously.
04:06 PM on 09/29/2010
Celebrities are no different than you, me, or anyone else. They too would be posting their opinions on message boards if there were not 50 cameras in front of them every second of the day. Since they are in the spotlight, why not try to bring attention to things they believe in. You may not believe in their causes, but being a celebrity doesn't mean they don't have the right to speak out. Believe it or not, they are all not no-knowthings. Many of them do take a sincere effort to learn about their cause through reading and talking to experts in the field.

Colbert was poignant and articulate in showing the paradox of American immigration and labor policy: that we want the labor of Mexicans, but we don't want their lives. Also the way we treat the lowest paid workers has a ripple effect on the lives of American workers with better paid jobs. Colbert proved HST right, sometimes fiction gives more facts than the truth.
07:29 PM on 09/29/2010
When the messenger gets more attention than the message there is a problem. Here we all are discussing whether a comedian should do a routine at a Congressional hearing when we should be discussing the issue at hand: the plight of the immigrants. He ahs not braought attention to the issue so much as he has brought attention to himself.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
patriciacaldwell
Yes, this keeps me awake at night.
03:44 PM on 09/30/2010
You are wrong about Stephen Colbert's intention. How convenient. I doubt that you will be going to the rally on 30 October in DC.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jeremyfive
11:51 AM on 09/29/2010
The trouble is, when Colbert took a feigned "pot-shot" at Mexicans, everyone thought he was just GOP--they are used to "pot-shots" at Mexicans from the GOP up there. Repugnants are very particular about skin color. Ever counted the people of color at a Tea Party?
Clevelandinwi
Progressive is good; regressive, not so much.
08:23 AM on 09/29/2010
Mr Colbert was accused of 'wasting the of Congress'. If that wasn't so sad, it would be funny. Nobody can waste the Congress's time lik Congress - they have perfected the art of 'wasting time'.
photo
WiltonDiary
JoeMcNamara
09:08 PM on 09/28/2010
Gee maybe if would have had this debate when the Republicans invited Elmo to testify and Newt Gingrish brought the "Power Rangers," to Congress we wouldn't be here today.
photo
Bushwhacked
Stay active, informed and VOTE in 2014!
06:47 PM on 09/28/2010
Live Obama Rally underway in Wisconsin, watch it here: http://www.barackobama.com/live/#volunteer
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cloudminder
06:05 PM on 09/28/2010
does anyone remember humorist Will Rogers - didn't anyone take a history class?

Oklahoma leaders asked Rogers to represent the state as one of their two statues in the Capitol, and Rogers agreed on the condition that his image would be placed facing the House Chamber, supposedly so he could "keep an eye on Congress." Of the statues in this part of the Capitol, the Rogers sculpture is the only one facing the Chamber entrance. According to guides at the Capitol, each President rubs the left shoe of the Rogers statue for good luck before entering the House Chamber to give the State of the Union Address.

Will Rogers was a HUMORIST a vaudeville guy - and his statue is in Congress.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
M Cubed
The most interesting poster in my tree
08:09 PM on 09/28/2010
Here is an interesting compilation of Roger's comedic bits:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OniJIna__M&feature=related

He was a much-loved comedian at a time when folks needed a bit of relief.
04:52 PM on 09/28/2010
Oh give me a break! So what is Steven wasted a little of congress' time! As if they are actually accomplishing anything right now.
holyghostie
Spiritus est qui vivificat
04:43 PM on 09/28/2010
Congress invited a comedian to testify....
photo
WiltonDiary
JoeMcNamara
09:07 PM on 09/28/2010
So?