iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Will Seek BP Oil Spill Fines To Restore Gulf Coast According To White House Official

HARRY R. WEBER and DINA CAPPIELLO   09/28/10 10:35 PM ET   AP

Gulf Oil Spill

NEW ORLEANS — President Barack Obama endorsed a plan Tuesday to rehabilitate the Gulf of Mexico with some of the billions of dollars in water pollution fines expected from the companies responsible for the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history.

Navy Secretary Ray Mabus, the government's point person on Gulf coast restoration, also said some of the money could be used to repair sections of the Gulf ravaged by events other than the spill.

Mabus says it would be up to Congress to determine how much of fines to set aside for the overall restoration. Obama said he will ask Congress to dedicate the money.

"The Mabus report offers a commonsense proposal for a path forward, relying on the ideas and coordination of efforts at the local, state, tribal, and federal levels, as well as of nonprofits and the private sector," the president said.

Dedicating fines levied against BP and other companies involved in the Deepwater Horizon accident to restoration and directly to Gulf states, which the Mabus plan calls for, will require a change in law. Currently, Clean Water Act fines go into a trust fund to pay for oil spill cleanups.

An April 20 rig explosion in the Gulf killed 11 workers and led to 206 million gallons of oil spewing from BP PLC's undersea well.

Penalties can be levied against BP, which owned the well and was leasing the rig that exploded, under a variety of environmental protection laws, including fines of up to $1,100 under the Clean Water Act for each barrel of oil spilled. If BP were found to have committed gross negligence or willful misconduct, the fine could be up to $4,300 per barrel.

That means that based on the 4.9 million barrels released from the Macondo well, BP could face civil fines under the Clean Water Act alone of between $5.4 billion and $21.1 billion.

At a news conference in New Orleans to unveil the plan, Mabus said he envisions some of the money from the fines being spent on repairing wetlands damaged over the years by the construction of canals to serve coastal oilfields. With the equipment and manpower already in the Gulf repairing damage from the oil spill, Mabus said it would be cheaper and more efficient to also repair the coastline from other damage it has suffered over the years.

Mabus is proposing that a panel be set up to administer any money set aside from the fines for coastal restoration. He said there should be a federal and state chair on the panel.

In Washington, Richard Stewart, who led the government's prosecution of Exxon for the Exxon Valdez incident, told the national oil spill commission Tuesday that criminal charges and stiff civil penalties will likely drive BP to settle. Stewart now teaches law at New York University.

A Justice Department official said that no settlement talks are taking place between the Obama administration and BP over fines for the spill, contradicting a congressman's suggestion earlier that such talks were taking place. The Justice Department official spoke on condition of anonymity because criminal and civil investigations of BP are continuing.

Rep. Steve Scalise, R-La., who attended the news conference at the Port of New Orleans with Mabus, had told The Associated Press that BP and the Obama administration were discussing a possible settlement over fines related to the spill that would avoid a costly legal fight. He said his staff got information about the talks while working on oil spill-related legislation he is proposing.

Scalise and Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., support legislation that would require that at least 80 percent of the civil and criminal penalties charged to BP under the Clean Water Act be returned to the Gulf Coast for long-term economic and environmental recovery. The bill is still pending.

Even before Mabus announced his plan for the restoration fund, state and local officials were saying how it should be spent and managed.

"My view is that it should be specific to the injury and the subject that we are dealing with," Landrieu said during testimony before the oil spill commission Obama set up to investigate the accident. She named coastal restoration, ocean education, energy infrastructure and levee protection as possible projects.

Landrieu said the money should be used not just for "restoring what we had, but building what we need," something that she said had bipartisan support.

Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, a Republican, joined Landrieu before the panel Tuesday. He said that "anything that resulted from this oil spill should be the first priority" for the money.

He also was clear that he didn't want bureaucrats in Washington deciding how it was spent.

"Washington, D.C. is not going to tell the Mississippi Gulf Coast how to rebuild the Mississippi Gulf Coast," Barbour said. Obama has said repeatedly Gulf Coast residents should decide, and Mabus, a former Mississippi governor, has traveled throughout the region to gather information from local officials.

Obama is expected to sign an executive order soon to carry out another of the report's recommendations, setting up a Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Task Force, which would coordinate the money and help decide which project are funded until Congress sets up a council. Environmental Protection Agency administrator Lisa Jackson, a New Orleans native, will lead it.

___

Cappiello reported from Washington. Associated Press Writer Pete Yost in Washington contributed to this report.

(This version CORRECTS Corrects day in first paragraph to Tuesday. This story is part of AP's general news and financial services.)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

NEW ORLEANS — President Barack Obama endorsed a plan Tuesday to rehabilitate the Gulf of Mexico with some of the billions of dollars in water pollution fines expected from the companies responsi...
NEW ORLEANS — President Barack Obama endorsed a plan Tuesday to rehabilitate the Gulf of Mexico with some of the billions of dollars in water pollution fines expected from the companies responsi...
Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 33
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:37 AM on 09/29/2010
Typical Obama: change the rules after the fact, and have a keen nose for deep pockets and every cent you can wring out of evil business.
The worst consequences of the spill were from his policies. Billions lost in revenue and at least 20,000 jobs lost according to an LSU study as a result of the moratorium. Meanwhile tho, he's subsidizing mexico's gulf well drilling in places closer to our cost than some of our own rigs.
Brilliant.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stopthemadness69
Real Americans care more about people than profits
04:55 PM on 09/29/2010
Wrong.
The US import- export bank loaned money to oil drilling companies to drill in other countries but that is what the US import-export bank does, it loans money to other countries for projects and it has nothing to do with obama or congress as neither of them run or work for the US import-export bank.

20k jobs lost temporarily to prevent another oil gushing disaster is well worth it in my opinion
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
notalwaysfittoprint
08:26 PM on 09/28/2010
Most definitely oil fines should go to the restoration of Gulf areas devastated by BP.
05:48 AM on 09/29/2010
Certainly not to this.

"Mabus said he envisions some of the money from the fines being spent on repairing wetlands damaged over the years by the construction of canals to serve coastal oilfields."

I said, at the time, that the President shook down BP illegally. Here is proof from his staff.

Why? to set up an environmental slush Fund for activities unrelated to this incident.

'Robbing Peter to pay Paul' is wrong.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stopthemadness69
Real Americans care more about people than profits
04:59 PM on 09/29/2010
The money referred to in the article is NOT the 20 billion fund that bp voluntarily set aside.
The article is talking about future monies from the clean water fines that will be levied against bp and others at fault for the spill.

Do you live in the US?
Are under some illusion that the Gulf of mexico is not a part of the US?
Why is it wrong to use fine money to rebuild OUR gulf that has been destroyed by us?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RicoShay
I like big mutts and I can not lie!
06:29 PM on 09/28/2010
OMG!!! Damn that mean ol' Obama!!! He wants BP to be held accountable? How dare he!!!

/end sarcastic rant
10:37 AM on 09/29/2010
Should they be made to pay for all the jobs lost because of his moratorium?
That was actually the biggest consequence.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stopthemadness69
Real Americans care more about people than profits
05:00 PM on 09/29/2010
It was not. 22k jobs temporarily lost is nothing compaired to the fishing and tourism jobs that will be lost for years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tribilin219
A Proud progressive, and for the Green party,one o
05:23 PM on 09/28/2010
So what now? Are we getting a OIL CZAR?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stopthemadness69
Real Americans care more about people than profits
05:02 PM on 09/29/2010
Do you know that czar is a media term and it was first used like 30 years ago by a republican president, and that there actually is no one in our government whos job title is czar? Nice try though.
05:12 PM on 09/28/2010
I work in the gulf and as far as I can see there's nothing to left to clean up. It may be different on the shoreline in Placqumines parish or something but "restoring the gulf?" It's still there.
10:39 AM on 09/29/2010
Precisely.
04:56 PM on 09/28/2010
I'm all for investing money into the restoration of the Gulf region, however, I'm concerned that this approach will have the perhaps unintended effect of decreasing BP's ultimate financial burden. Why? Because BP could, and should, be held fully responsible for restoration. Fines should be in addition to that, as is the normal practice in environmental cases. If Congress amends the CWA to allow fines to be used for restoration BP will then turn around and use the amended statute to lessen or offset their payments to injured residents and companies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
maybealittlecommonsense
kick it root down
03:23 PM on 09/28/2010
I remember how ridiculous Libs thought it was when smarter people said Obama wanted to use this fund as his slush fund for specific pet projects. Well here we go.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Bogstomper2
Secular conservative
03:42 PM on 09/28/2010
"...when smarter people said Obama wanted to use this fund as his slush fund for specific pet projects."

If the pet projects involve cleaning up the mess BP made, where's the problem?
10:40 AM on 09/29/2010
Where's the mess (other than the jobs lost as a result of the moratorium)?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
davidpkronmiller
03:42 PM on 09/28/2010
Cleaning up the gulf is a pet project?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kenhamlett
03:04 PM on 09/28/2010
It would be a good thing, I'm sure. But, will BP pay the money, and will the government really ever collect it? After the manner in which the entire crisis was handled by both, I don't trust either!
10:42 AM on 09/29/2010
BP is already paying, and the govt is already collecting and redistributing it.
They apparently just want more from the deep pocket.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Bogstomper2
Secular conservative
02:37 PM on 09/28/2010
My first reaction to this story had nothing to do with the levying and spending of these fines, the specifics of how they would be used, or the benefits for the residents of the Gulf coast.

My first reaction was hoping that none of my fellow Republicans decide this would be a good time to apologize to BP again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
satanlite
Liberal blogger
02:36 PM on 09/28/2010
Call me when you do it prez. Not when you want to talk about, not when you want to make a press release. When it's DONE.

Until then....pffft.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vesaversa1
Stupid is forever, ignorance can be fixed.
02:17 PM on 09/28/2010
This will never happen if the Dem;s continue their weak leadership in letting the GOP obstruct on every issue . The GOP is already blocking the oil spill committee ,the subpoena power that they need to find out who and what cause this oil spill in the first place .
09:11 PM on 09/28/2010
1 of my teachers told me - mabe when the GOP loses more seats in november they will start geting the message. america is sick of their cr@p - i think he is right.
10:43 AM on 09/29/2010
The GOP hasn't had enough votes to obstruct anything for almost 4 years now. Minor detail.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vesaversa1
Stupid is forever, ignorance can be fixed.
11:19 AM on 09/29/2010
Take this BS back over to Faux nation to those low information 7 grade educated conservative constituents .Those peoples will believe anything Repub's tr0lls like you spread among the populist ,but it doesn't work here.The GOP have block or obstruct every pieces of legislation that the Dem's have brought to the floor for a vote .
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:09 PM on 09/28/2010
Sounds like a good plan. Keep the money away from the Governors. They are all hoarding the money BP gave them when this leak first happened.

There needs to be an investigation into how that original money is being spent.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChangingTimes
01:32 PM on 09/28/2010
A sort of Stimulus 3, this time just for the Gulf, without the hassle of a vote ...