iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Mullen Restates Hope For DADT Repeal: We're Asking Members To 'Basically Lie'

First Posted: 09/29/10 11:45 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:50 PM ET

Mullen

The decade-long campaign to repeal Don't Ask Don't Tell gained both real momentum and cultural symbolism last February when Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen announced that he favored ending the military's policy banning openly gay service.

One of the most revered military officials in the country, Mullen's position was supposed to quiet the critics who insisted that the top generals were not in favor of revising the 17-year policy. But political progress, as is often the case, comes in spurts and setbacks. And while the House of Representatives moved relatively quickly to pass a repeal of DADT, the measure languished and then faltered in the Senate.

This past week, the upper chamber declined to pass a defense authorization bill that included DADT's repeal. And at a breakfast sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor on Wednesday, Mullen registered disappointment, stressing again that he believes the policy needs to end.

"I am very clear where I was on February 2 and where I am today," he said. "This is my personal view. I struggled greatly with the fact that we asked people in an institution that values integrity, which is who we are, that we would ask individuals to show up everyday and basically lie. So my position on that hasn't changed at all."

The Joint Chiefs chairman acknowledged that both he and his staff are subject to the whims of the congressional process. But he did offer a preference for legislative action that will likely be cheered by those seeking to slow down DADT repeal. The military brass, Mullen said, would prefer to get the results of a yearlong survey of service members and their families (set to be done on December 1) before revising its policies towards gay members.

"We were hoping the law doesn't change before we have that," said Mullen. "If I could pick, and I can't, the way this would happen, I would like to finish the review and have the review then inform the legislative process. I'm not in charge of the legislative process. It has, and I have said this many times, it is very difficult to predict that and it is really up to Congress to move that through. I certainly, from a perspective of some time ago, I expected there to be ups and downs and I think there will continue to be. But in terms of what I said before, what happened last week had no impact on me."

Whether the Pentagon review should be completed before Congress acts or vice versa is a slightly moot debate. At the White House's urging, lawmakers wrote repeal language that would effectively overturn DADT only after the review was completed and certified by the president. If, for some reason, it is determined that lifting the ban would have a damaging effect on troop morale, the Pentagon would have a 60-day period to request or make revisions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
The decade-long campaign to repeal Don't Ask Don't Tell gained both real momentum and cultural symbolism last February when Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen announced that he favored ending the ...
The decade-long campaign to repeal Don't Ask Don't Tell gained both real momentum and cultural symbolism last February when Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen announced that he favored ending the ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 483
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
KenClay
REPEAL DOMA
09:49 PM on 09/29/2010
Gay and Proud To Serve!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
KenClay
REPEAL DOMA
09:34 PM on 09/29/2010
Gay And Proud!
09:17 PM on 09/29/2010
Actually, I can understand, and having spent 10 years in it myself, even sympathize a little with Mullen's point of view about the Dept. of Defense bureaucracy. You don't turn around something the size of the DoD on a dime or in a week. It's one of the dirty little secrets military apologists don't want you to know, but the Dept. of Defense can be just as hidebound, muddleminded and obsessed with red tape as any other branch of the government.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Jdaddy1951
09:15 PM on 09/29/2010
Gay and gay supportive people should vote against the Republican Party in November.
photo
baxtron
tek phlarpt
04:10 PM on 09/29/2010
at my workplace its Don't Ask Don't Smell. my butt wreaks.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:04 PM on 09/29/2010
These top-level dinosaurs we have running the military today, ought to explain to us why the best trained, best equipped, best paid military on the planet cannot defeat a bunch of illiterate tribesman. The top brass is too busy discriminating against both openly gay and older citizens, who could be serving this nation honorably, to successfully prosecute a war that has now become America's longest. We defeated the Germans and Japanese during WWII in less time than we've been in Afghanistan. That's a great testimony to the failed leadership of dinosuars like Admiral Mullen
photo
pleblian
One smart as meɪtər futūtor
03:56 PM on 09/29/2010
Worth repeating

"We were hoping the law doesn't change before we have that," said Mullen. "If I could pick, and I can't, the way this would happen, I would like to finish the review and have the review then inform the legislative process. I'm not in charge of the legislative process."

No you're not. And the review has already been done for you General.

Countries that allow homosexuals to serve in the military

Albania Argentina Austria Belgium Canada Colombia Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Ireland ISRAEL Italy Lithuania Luxembourg Malta The Netherlands New Zealand Norway Peru Philippines Poland Romania Russia Slovenia South Africa Spain Sweden Switzerland Taiwan United Kingdom Bermuda Uruguay

And DADT is NOT a law, it's a presidential directive
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LynnW49
"A great democracy must be progressive." TR
07:28 PM on 09/29/2010
. . . and countries who do not allow homosexuals to serve in the military: Cuba, Iran, Pakistan, and North Korea. Do we really want to behave like them on this issue? So far, yes.
02:37 PM on 09/29/2010
"It's Not The Policy!", by John McCain (2010)

It's not the policy!
It's not the policy, it's not the policy.
It's not the policy... it's not the policy, it's not the policy, it's not the policy.
Its... not... the... policy.

CHORUS:

It's not the policy!
It's not the policy!
It's not the policy,
It's not the policy!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jorge Montijo
02:31 PM on 09/29/2010
Truth and fairness should be the basis for policy. It's an unfair policy and should be repealed right now.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:28 PM on 09/29/2010
Just REPEAL the damn thing already!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
KenClay
REPEAL DOMA
02:27 PM on 09/29/2010
We Will Never Give Up!
photo
Blak
Yes..I know my Micro-bio is empty.
02:24 PM on 09/29/2010
Exactly which "military leadership" was that old goon McCain waiting to hear from so that he could proceed and take up the DADT repeal?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joelb5000
02:09 PM on 09/29/2010
Harry Truman never polled the military to see whether they would be comfortable with African Americans integrated. And the military wasn't polled when women were allowed on aircraft carriers and submarines. This polling business is nonsense.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Rand
02:46 PM on 09/29/2010
Actually, the military WAS polled during the period leading to Truman's decision. Polls were cvonducted afterward as well
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joelb5000
04:59 PM on 09/29/2010
Perhaps I stand corrected. A more accurate comment would have been "Truman didn't base his order on a poll." Apparently in a Gallup poll one month before Truman's order, 26% of Americans favored integration while 63% favored segregation in the military. Four out of five enlisted men did not favor integration. In the end, the President did the right thing, the military complied, and our armed forces are the better for it. Truman wasn't guided by a poll and neither should the current President or Congress be influenced by a poll. They just need to do what's right.
01:43 PM on 09/29/2010
If the democrats REALLY wanted DADT repealed, they would put it up for vote on its own. Bundling it with another completely unrelated bill and forcing a single vote on them instantly dooms it to failure.

They don't really want this to pass, not yet. Once it does they won't be able to use it to say how big bad and evil the republicans are being for not voting on it.
photo
Blak
Yes..I know my Micro-bio is empty.
02:00 PM on 09/29/2010
Dont try and find political cover for the repubs. They are not in the business of voting for any bills that this Democratic admin puts forward. Reid could put forth a bill declaring St Raygun as lord and savior and the repubs would still not vote for it.
02:01 PM on 09/29/2010
Huh?

Putting it into a defense appropriations bill that would have otherwise received wide bipartisan support "dooms it to failure"? It seems to me that they tried their best to pass it, although I would have appreciated a little "won't support the troops" backtalk like the Dems used to get all the time.
02:56 PM on 09/29/2010
It's not so much the NDAA as the DREAM act, which was also lumped in said bill.

You want a different argument? Fine. Take the DREAM farce out of the NDAA, and leave the repeal of DADT in. If the same thing happens then, I'm more inclined to let the dems off the hook, but as long as they are bundling it with immigrant amnesty, something that has nothing to do with gays serving in the military, they are dooming it to failure.
photo
CanisLatrans
Progressive/2nd Amendment Jewish Iraq war vet.
01:41 PM on 09/29/2010
My theory has always been that the reason there are entrenched interests fighting against allowing gays in the military is because once one gender-based segregation is struck down (discriminating against gays is a discrimination based on gender issues, in this case, same-gender issues) then it becomes more difficult to justify another gender-based discriminatory policy: females in combat arms.

I think in the long run, that is what they want to avoid.