iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Stonehenge Skeleton Proves Site's Prehistoric Importance

RAPHAEL G. SATTER   09/29/10 04:41 PM ET   AP

Stonehenge Skeleton
This image provided by Wessex Archaeology on Wednesday shows the remains of an early bronze age burial.

LONDON – A wealthy young teenager buried near Britain's mysterious Stonehenge monument came from the Mediterranean hundreds of miles away, scientists said Wednesday, proof of the site's importance as a travel destination in prehistoric times.

The teen – dubbed "The Boy with the Amber Necklace" because he was unearthed with a cluster of amber beads around his neck – is one of several sets of foreign remains found around the ancient ring of imposing stones, whose exact purpose remains unknown.

The British Geological Survey's Jane Evans said that the find, radiocarbon dated to 1,550 B.C., "highlights the diversity of people who came to Stonehenge from across Europe," a statement backed by Bournemouth University's Timothy Darvill, a Stonehenge scholar uninvolved with the discovery.

"The find adds considerable weight to the idea that people traveled long distances to visit Stonehenge, which must therefore have had a big reputation as a cult center," Darvill said in an e-mail Wednesday. "Long distance travel was certainly more common at this time than we generally think."

The skeleton, thought to be that of a 14- or 15-year-old, was unearthed about two miles (3 kilometers) southeast of Stonehenge, in southern England.

Clues to the adolescent's foreign origins could be found in the necklace, which isn't a recognized British type. But he was traced to the area around the Mediterranean Sea by a technique known as isotope analysis, which in this case measured the ratio of strontium and oxygen isotopes in his tooth enamel.

Different regions have different mixes of elements in their drinking water, for example, and some of those are absorbed into a person's tooth enamel as he or she grows up. Analysis of the isotopes of oxygen and strontium carried in the enamel can give scientists a good but rather general idea of where a person was raised.

The teen, whose necklace suggests he came from a rich family, is one of several long-distance travelers found near Stonehenge. The "Amesbury Archer," so-called because of the stone arrowheads he was found with, was buried three miles (5 kilometers) from Stonehenge but is thought to have come from the Alpine foothills of central Europe. The "Boscombe Bowmen," also found nearby, are thought to have come from Wales or possibly Brittany.

It isn't clear precisely what drew these people to Stonehenge, a site which has existed in various forms for some 5,000 years. It clearly had an important ceremonial function, and the area around it is dotted with the remains of prehistoric monuments and tombs. Some say it was at the center of a sun-worshipping culture or that it served as a kind of astronomical calendar.

Others, like Darvill, also say it might have been an important healing site, drawing pilgrims from across Europe like a prehistoric version of Lourdes.

___

Online:

Stonehenge:

http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/daysout/properties/stonehenge/

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

LONDON – A wealthy young teenager buried near Britain's mysterious Stonehenge monument came from the Mediterranean hundreds of miles away, scientists said Wednesday, proof of the site's importan...
LONDON – A wealthy young teenager buried near Britain's mysterious Stonehenge monument came from the Mediterranean hundreds of miles away, scientists said Wednesday, proof of the site's importan...
Filed by Curtis M. Wong  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 194
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
Gregor53
Remembering your past gives power to the present.
06:06 PM on 10/02/2010
A pilgrimage by individuals in the Stone Age, similar to those in the Middle Ages to Rome and the ones that continue today towards Mecca.  Interesting how things change but really do not change.
10:24 AM on 10/02/2010
I'm always amused by the amazement we exhibit when we discover that our remote ancestors were not very different from us. Well....why should they be? the more we find out about the past, the more we find out that people have never really been very different than they are now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TedEjr
How can they be Right when they are wrong so much
02:30 AM on 10/03/2010
Very astute. Of course, it has to be. It agrees with my position.

:-)

And you can add to that, the amazement when we discover that what people complained about in their lives 10,000 years ago, or so, was really no different than what they complain about today. Same crime issues, same teenager issues, etc., etc.

I have said more than once that there is really no difference between then and now. The only difference is that technology informs us more quickly.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
mjeffn
Freedom's just another word 4 nothing left to lose
10:19 AM on 10/02/2010
It's so similar to Carhenge. If the travel theory is correct, that people 3,500 year ago travel more and father than we though, was Carhenge built by the same people?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:19 PM on 10/01/2010
Gee - I thought those big rocks proved the site's importance...
06:16 PM on 10/01/2010
Sounds a lot like the Athenian tribute to Minos of Crete, at first blush.
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
05:15 PM on 10/01/2010
Well, if it was less than 6,000 years ago, the Krishchunz will accept it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:12 PM on 10/01/2010
Fascinating. I hope that they are able to find more of this fellows tribal members, learn as much as they can, then build a proper memorial to entomb the remains for posterity.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PlayTOE
Morals evolved due to cooperative group living
10:56 AM on 10/01/2010
Stonehenge dates back to 5,000 BCE when we see the beginnings of agriculture in many different places. The surrounding area shows that this time involved the introduction of forest clearing and animal grazing, and the introduction of various domesticated grains. The design of Stonehenge shows that it would have made a great tent frame.

1550 BCE was just after the time that Pharaoh Ahmose of Egypt pushed the Hyskos out of Egypt (this was the only time a large group of people left Egypt, and most of them went to the Levant).
It was a time of rising Egyptian power and also a time when the Minoan civilization on Crete had reached it's height as a shipping and trading nation.

It is interesting to see a Mediterranean connection to Britain at this period.
03:00 PM on 10/01/2010
do you really think stonehenge was tented?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PlayTOE
Morals evolved due to cooperative group living
01:03 AM on 10/02/2010
Yes, I really think Stonehenge was tented.

There are over 200 similar circular areas that show up on Google earth near Stonehenge. Most were wooden framed, not stone framed, but had similar architecture. These must have been useful structures which would require roofs. The area and structures were in place and inhabited for over 1,000 years as people went from the neolithic age to the bronze age. It seems unreasonable to expect that they were all just ceremonial with no actual purpose.

At the time (introduction of cattle) there would have been plenty of hides to use, and lacing these into a large flat circular sheet would make a fine roof. The inner circle could be a nice 100 ft diameter tent, held with an cord tensioned around the inner circle. The outer 300 ft sloped berm and ditch would have permitted perimeter weights to hold an extended 300 ft diameter tent, and also collect runoff water for cattle to drink

Could they have done it? Yes.
Did they? We have no evidence, but it would be fun to make a full size model and see how well it worked.
01:24 PM on 10/02/2010
I have heard about a structure covering stonehenge too, But I also have heard of accoustic studies done at the site that point to the stones echoing sound back into the center of the site and that chanting would have been amplified in a positive way, They have also done accoustic sound checks at the Mayan sites in chitzen Itza and the reverberation is incredible.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PlayTOE
Morals evolved due to cooperative group living
01:35 PM on 10/02/2010
Any circular structure has internal acoustic properties that redirect sound towards the center.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
seegray
Nobody can bring you peace but yourself (Emerson)
11:10 PM on 09/30/2010
Very cool stuff. They've been doing a lot more research there in the last decade or so, and all sorts of scientific developments make it very likely that there will be a lot more "new discoveries".
photo
maslin
At 6 bn km, it's mostly small stuff.
02:21 PM on 09/30/2010
A little context:

The body was dated to 1550 BC. This was about 750 years before the legendary founders of Rome were whelped by a wolf.

Here's what was going on in the world in 1550 BC:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1550_BC

This was about 300 years before the Trojan War. History is a bit spotty from that period. Some areas we know a lot, eg Egypt, some areas we know not too much.

The idea that a Mycenean or similar prince might have come to Stonehenge is beguiling in its implications.
03:04 PM on 10/01/2010
did you know there is a legend that london was founded by survivors of the trojan war?

http://www.historytimes.com/fresh-perspectives-in-history/pre-and-ancient-history/575-did-trojan-brutus-found-london
photo
maslin
At 6 bn km, it's mostly small stuff.
04:04 PM on 10/01/2010
Interesting theory. To me, the idea that court historians and thinkers from two great empires should both claim Trojan descent seems most likely to be a sort of allegorical pedigree concocted to bestow an aura of divine purpose on messy human events. Virgil and Monmouth both reached back to the coequal antagonists of antiquity to argue that Rome and London had a special destiny. I think the point is more likely that they were constructing a kind of heraldic argument, not actual history as we understand it.

Similarly, there's a story about a Welsh prince named Madoc, who supposedly sailed into the setting sun and founded a Welsh colony in the Americas.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madoc

You can actually see this argument being made as a way of justifying Elizabethan colonial efforts beginning at least by the late 16th century. Since Wales was part of England, then England could claim a right to some part of the Americas (you can see part of this argument in the etymology of the word "penguin", strangely enough).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
mjeffn
Freedom's just another word 4 nothing left to lose
10:16 AM on 10/02/2010
Did America rule back then too? ;)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Angel Whitebird
Invest in America..Buy a Congressman!
01:58 PM on 09/30/2010
I always wanted to take an adventure there myself..I hope I can someday!
03:07 PM on 10/01/2010
get yourself a youth hostel card, and you can go for 2 weeks for about 2k. very easy to do it cheaply.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rougebaisers
01:39 PM on 09/30/2010
Dear old fellow human.
12:42 PM on 09/30/2010
Others, mainly myself, believe it to be the place that dolphins evolved into humans.

For the naysayers, I present to you the fact that there are no dolphins around Stonehenge. This proves my theory.
photo
Lahonda
Bynocent Instander
02:00 PM on 10/02/2010
You're just saying that on porpoise.
12:59 PM on 10/04/2010
HAH! Amazing...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Woods Shade
11:25 AM on 09/30/2010
Amazing find. So much more there waiting to be discovered.. Old secrets given up. Love this.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:57 AM on 09/30/2010
Very exciting!