iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

EPA Seeks To Regulate Toxic Chemical, Perchlorate, Under Safe Drinking Water Act, Reversing Bush Administration Decision

FREDERIC J. FROMMER   09/30/10 10:02 PM ET   AP

Perchlorate

WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency wants to regulate a toxic chemical used in rocket fuel that has contaminated drinking water supplies, reversing a decision made under the Bush administration.

A government official briefed by the EPA told The Associated Press on Thursday night that the agency has proposed that the chemical, perchlorate, be regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act. The official, who did not want to be named because a final decision has not been made, said the plan is now under interagency review.

Perchlorate has been found in drinking water in at least 35 states at levels high enough to interfere with thyroid function and pose developmental problems in humans, particularly for babies and fetuses.

The Defense Department used perchlorate for decades in testing rockets and missiles, and most perchlorate contamination stems from defense and aerospace activities.

In 2008, under President George W. Bush, the EPA decided against regulating the chemical, saying that setting a federal standard would do little to reduce risks to public health. That decision angered environmentalists and Democratic lawmakers.

The Pentagon and EPA have tussled over the issue for years, with the Pentagon potentially facing liability if the standard were to force water agencies around the country to undertake costly cleanup efforts. Defense officials have denied trying to influence EPA's decision and maintain that releases of perchlorate has been reduced as disposal practices have improved.

Some states, like California and Massachusetts, have set their own standards.

An EPA spokeswoman, Betsaida Alcantara, said in a statement Thursday that the agency is in the process of making a final decision on whether to set a drinking water standard for perchlorate.

"Last year, Administrator (Lisa) Jackson directed EPA to re-evaluate the science on perchlorate and to take into consideration the impacts on the most vulnerable populations, infants and young children," Alcantara said.

A report in August by the Government Accountability Office, Congress' investigative arm, said the primary federal users of perchlorate are the Defense Department, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the Energy Department.

The GAO said these departments told investigators that they have reduced the releases of perchlorate and that chemicals detected at their facilities stems largely from past disposal practices.

___

Online:

EPA Perchlorate site: http://www.tinyurl.com/rocketfuel

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 137
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:23 PM on 10/04/2010
It is difficult to understand the "seeks to regulate" language. Had the mandate under which the EPA was set-up changed? Would everyone involved feel better when, in the future that their grand children, or great-grand children suffer from the toxicological effects of constant exposure to this and certain other chemicals here. We are not talking about only the poor people's progeny, but the future generations of everybody where these chemicals have been allowed into the aquifers.

And, how long it would take to clean up the errors in sanity ?
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
07:08 PM on 10/06/2010
faved, the world is only 6000 years old, and will end in 2012, so our children won't have to worry about it. Or at least that seems to be the argument the religious right is making.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:01 PM on 10/06/2010
Maybe the ingestion of all of these chemicals is causinng the loss of the sanity, itself.
I can not fathom the narrow-mindedness of anybody who put the pursuit of fiat dollars above keeping the environment safe as possible for all!
05:17 PM on 10/04/2010
Wonder if this is linked to autism epidemic?
06:03 AM on 10/03/2010
Why did people think it was a good idea to take health advice from a man that can't pronounce the word nuclear?
05:28 AM on 10/03/2010
My view is this problem is as serious as the story about injecting innocents in Guatemala with venerial disease I guess we'll find out how brainwashed the country is...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:22 AM on 10/03/2010
FLOW
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=E82C2BFEBFCA013C

"Irena Salina's award-winning documentary investigation into what experts label the most important political and environmental issue of the 21st Century - The World Water Crisis.

Salina builds a case against the growing privatization of the world's dwindling fresh water supply with an unflinching focus on politics, pollution, human rights, and the emergence of a domineering world water cartel.

Interviews with scientists and activists intelligently reveal the rapidly building crisis, at both the global and human scale, and the film introduces many of the governmental and corporate culprits behind the water grab, while begging the question "CAN ANYONE REALLY OWN WATER?"

Beyond identifying the problem, FLOW also gives viewers a look at the people and institutions providing practical solutions to the water crisis and those developing new technologies, which are fast becoming blueprints for a successful global and economic turnaround."
---
click on the above YouTube playlist, then press the 'Play all' button to watch the documentary, which has been uploaded in 8 parts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kevman08
12:24 AM on 10/03/2010
The main page says "Rocket Fuel Chemical In Drinking Water Is No Longer OK, Says Government".....Geeeeee, ya think???
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:30 AM on 10/02/2010
Well, rest assured, if the GOP takes over, we can have rocket fuel back in our water. Those dirty liberals can't keep our water clean forever!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:53 AM on 10/05/2010
Those commies want to take the poisons out of our water!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MysticInd
02:04 AM on 10/02/2010
"In 2008, under President George W. Bush, the EPA decided against regulating the chemical, saying that setting a federal standard would do little to reduce risks to public health. That decision angered environmentalists and Democratic lawmakers"
photo
TggerJen
Protect at snowleopard.org
03:07 PM on 10/02/2010
I know. I read that part several times, shaking my head in complete and utter amazement. Wow, just wow. Of course, they really meant it. And considering that they were in charge at that time, it was essentially true because setting the standard with no enforcement, no cleanup, and lots of extra corruption would have actually done little to reduce the risks to public health.
Sheesh.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:54 AM on 10/05/2010
I'd be willing to bet that Dubya doesn't let anything but bottled water into his house!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MysticInd
12:09 PM on 10/05/2010
Actually he bought land in Paraquay that has a hugh fresh water lake....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
suzjazz
jazz pianist, composer, professor, author
10:07 PM on 10/01/2010
Is this headline some kind of joke?
Rocket fuel in drinking water not OK? Well, duh.
What's wrong with the EPA?
photo
TggerJen
Protect at snowleopard.org
03:08 PM on 10/02/2010
What's wrong with it is pretty much summed up in the amount of corruption and incompetence that Bush could load us up with in 8 long years.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
eyelashviper
In wilderness is the preservation of the world
08:33 PM on 10/01/2010
Reason # 948,782,043,554 to be happy that Bush is gone and Obama is here.
photo
TggerJen
Protect at snowleopard.org
03:09 PM on 10/02/2010
Not to be overly critical, but considering the effects of rocket fuel in our water, I have to say I think you low-balled that number.
04:45 PM on 10/01/2010
Has this been referred to the bad punctuation police?
04:36 PM on 10/01/2010
As I understand the air force disposed of most of their chemicals by tossing it on the ground until the 80s. The reason they did not want to regulate this chemical is because it is so widespread it would be amazingly expensive to clean up.
03:46 PM on 10/01/2010
The Bush regime saw the US populous as Sheep to be fleeced and then sent to slaughter. I'm so glad we have a man on the inside now...I'm talking of Obama. I'm glad he's on our side.
02:28 PM on 10/01/2010
Hey George, your bottled water is ready for pickup.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VINER
just another frog in the pot
01:54 PM on 10/01/2010
they can't even keep fluorosilicic acid, sodium silicofluoride, and sodium fluoride out! Yes they are added to our water now - as testified before Congress: http://www.fluoridealert.org/testimony.htm
-v
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
soisay
Angry? Scared? Thank a Republican.
02:33 PM on 10/01/2010
Thank you John Birch. Lyndon LaRouche in on the telephone for you.
04:02 PM on 10/01/2010
Do you even read the link he posted before you commented? The people who testified against waste fluoridation were" Our union is comprised of and represents the professional employees at the headquarters location of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in Washington D.C. Our members include toxicologists, biologists, chemists, engineers, lawyers and others defined by law as "professionals." The work we do includes evaluation of toxicity, exposure and economic information for managements use in formulating public health and environmental protection policy."
03:54 PM on 10/01/2010
Very interesting links, I am listening. Phosphate industry waste product, what surprise. Not like the natural fluoride at all is it that is found in nature. Do you know that the famous soap maker who made Dr.Bronner's natural soap was vehemently opposed to fluoridation of water with these waste products, he said it ruins people. And now as in your article professionals are opposing it in droves. Bone cancer findings and fluorosed teeth.

"We ask that you order that the two waste products of the fertilizer industry that are now used in 90% of fluoridation programs, for which EPA states they are not able to identify any chronic studies, be used in any future toxicity studies, rather than a substitute chemical"