More

GAO: Treasury Bailed Out 66 Banks With Known Financial Problems, Better Monitoring Needed

DANIEL WAGNER   10/ 4/10 10:39 PM ET   AP

Gao Treasury Bank Bailouts

WASHINGTON — Treasury Department officials sent bailout money to dozens of banks with known financial problems, and a growing number of bailed-out banks are struggling to stay afloat, a new government audit says.

Banks seeking money from the $700 billion financial bailout faced different standards depending on which agency regulated them, according to a report Monday from the Government Accountability Office. Some questionable banks got bailouts by persuading Treasury officials to overlook their problems. Others were blocked by regulators from making a case to Treasury.

Officials approved bailouts for 66 banks with known problems, the GAO found. Those banks have fared worse than the others in the program. They were twice as likely to miss dividend payments they owed to Treasury, the report says.

The report blasts Treasury for failing to track decisions by regulators about which banks could apply for money and which are strong enough to repay. It says the same problems could plague a new program that will send $30 billion to small banks. The new program aims to boost lending by offering banks government money at very low rates.

The report comes a day after the expiration of Treasury's powers under the 2008 bailout law. The GAO's findings highlight a key political challenge for the Obama administration. Officials must convince skeptical voters that the unpopular program was a success, and that it's over. Yet billions are still held by banks, an auto maker and an insurance company that can't afford to repay. Many banks need the money to survive.

One indication is the dividend payments that banks owe to Treasury. A growing number of banks can't afford them. Regulators say paying would leave the banks dangerously short of cash. One hundred and forty-four banks have missed at least one payment, according to the report, which analyzed the Capital Purchase Program, Treasury's main bank rescue.

Another worrying sign: The number of bailed-out banks on the government's confidential "problem list" is rising. As of June 30, 78 bailed-out banks had problems severe enough to threaten their survival, the GAO said.

Treasury spokesman Mark Paustenbach said that the bailout applications were approved by bank regulators. He pointed out that three-fourths of the bank bailout money has been repaid, and said the bank bailouts have yielded $16 billion in extra revenue.

"The initiative worked in stabilizing the financial system, and generated a profit for taxpayers," Paustenbach said.

Overall, taxpayers will lose about $66 billion on programs funded by the bailout law, according to the latest estimate from the Congressional Budget Office. Most of the losses are from the rescues of auto makers and the insurance conglomerate American International Group Inc.

Banks seeking bailout money applied first to their regulator – a different agency for each type of bank. Some banks were recommended for quick approval. Some were told to withdraw their applications, sparing them public criticism. Those in the middle were forwarded to Treasury.

Regulators had different standards for which applications should be withdrawn, the report says. It says Treasury didn't track those decisions. Treasury also didn't monitor the regulators' varying tests for banks seeking to repay the government, the GAO said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 38
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
blogisti
Approved Knowledge Only
11:45 AM on 10/05/2010
The problem isn't what we know, it's what we don't know. We don't know how much toxic assets they have because banks were allowed to hold toxic assets at the same price they were in 2007.
Prices have plummeted since then so the banks are holding unknown quantities of debt at inflated prices. The banks, the too big to fail banks, may be zombie banks in reality.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Y3rMawm
veni, vidi, bibi.
11:41 AM on 10/05/2010
The entire premise of this mess is to subsidize and reflate housing at unaffordable prices. It won't work.

More regulation is not the answer. We have sufficient fraud statutes on the books to prosecute every borrower, lender, and regulator, who has committed fraud. We just have to choose to take the pain.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ran6110
Mac, iPhone & iPad developer.
09:59 AM on 10/05/2010
In the story:
"Officials approved bailouts for 66 banks with known problems, the GAO found. Those banks have fared worse than the others in the program. They were twice as likely to miss dividend payments they owed to Treasury, the report says."

OK, so have they investigated why the 'officials' approved the 66 banks?

How about if they were known to have problems why didn't they have to replace their management or get taken over before they got the money?

We keep hearing stories where regulators did or allowed shady things to happen. Why haven't we heard of any investigations or arrests of any of these regulators? It seams that i many cases they were just as much to blame as the bankers!
photo
Bryan Boru
Engineer, Libertarian
06:01 AM on 10/05/2010
Of course there was a simple sure-fire solution to avoiding this problem: BAIL NONE OF THEM OUT! But no, Democrats just had to "come to the rescue," not realizing or not caring that they were being conned. The bailouts were the biggest con job in the history of the planet!
07:19 AM on 10/05/2010
The bailout occurred during the Republican administration==don't let facts get in the way of your stupidity.
photo
Bryan Boru
Engineer, Libertarian
06:32 AM on 10/07/2010
Bush screwed the pooch there, no doubt about it. But the Republicans in Congress opposed it every little step of the way. It was the Democrats in Congress who backed Bush up in the bailouts that happened under his watch. And once Bush was gone, it was Obama and those same Democrats who kept the bailout machine going. Fact.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:52 AM on 10/05/2010
Socialism for the rich, the rest of us are on our own. How these NY bankers must laugh at us common folk, grubbing around in the dirt for our dollars and shopping at Wa-Mart.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ronald Sloan
05:22 AM on 10/05/2010
When are the prosecutions going to start ??
If we keep giving these people passes on accountability
they will just keep on keeping on !!!
When a bunch of these bankers are turned into cell
mates a lot of this fraud will stop until then they will
just keep on stealing and making huge salaries.
07:33 AM on 10/05/2010
It is hard to prosecute when the prosecutors are part of a team being paid off through campaign contributions! Welcome to America,Pay to Play , Pay to Stay Away ect........Lobby ,Lobby Lobby!!!!!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
themodernleader
05:05 AM on 10/05/2010
    While the Treasury is wheeling and dealing in trying to bail out crooked finance, the real destruction of America is taking place in the Midwest and anywhere else there are factories and innovation.  Right now corporations of various sizes are buying up their competitors with the the cheapest money in history.  These same companies are taking their factory production  (plant and equipment) to China and India and elswewhere and leaving all American personnel to walk the streets of destroyed American citiies, once seen as the pinnacle of human achievement.
   The CEOs and a few subordinate administrators make millions as the stock prices go up and  up and they cash out  options worth a fortune.
   As one Corporate officier stated: " Why put our new plant in the state of(blank) when we can hire a hundred Mexicans for every American.  The costs of health insurance alone is prohibitive.  Soon all of our production will be outsourced to India, Mexico and elsewhere. 
    The laws and regulations reward the denuding of the rest of the manufacturing and technology for the benefit of the corporate managers and stock hloders and speculators who buy, dismantle and sell to foreigners. 
     This national destruction derives not from natural economic forces but from American government policies that encourage the short term affluence for a handfull of corporate leaders and stockholders as the entire American Republic collapses with the wipeout ot the American people.
      What we see play our in American decline and destruction results from greed and treason of unprecedented proportions.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:53 AM on 10/05/2010
And by the way it is the same TBTF welfare banks who are aiding and abetting the factory sell-uot with their mergers and acquitsition departments. Wheeling and dealing our jobs and livelihoods away.
02:03 AM on 10/05/2010
All the millions of Wal-Mart, McDonald's, UPS and other workers in low paying jobs that you can barely survive on paid for this out of the taxes from their paychecks. They don't have access to affordable healthcare, or any other "socialist" handouts.

Yet their money goes to save foolish corporations and banks whose myopic greed got out of control. A true socialist concept in operation. I hope every worker struggling to make it turns their back on the cheap ploys to use fear of the unknown, religion and morality to obscure the fact that we already have socialism in operation on a grand scale, helping those poor execs maintain their bonuses and lifestyle.
photo
Bryan Boru
Engineer, Libertarian
06:20 AM on 10/05/2010
And it's the Democrats that are doing all the bailing out of the corporations and the banks! How do you square that??? The tea party knows crooks when it sees them.
07:58 AM on 10/05/2010
Bryan Boru :

; Pres Bush originated TARP bailouts,then came Pres Obama;s stimulus!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tiggy
01:05 AM on 10/05/2010
AMEN! As a small business owner starting a company using USA made products, in the USA and hiring Americans...we have been unable to obtain a loan! We recently attending a meeting informing of us of the money that MAY be available with the recent legislation. We would have to collateralize 100% of the loan even if that required using our HOME! Yes, we would have to personally secure a business loan. And the hoops and fees...included a yearly fee, all closing cost and a 13% interest rate. In the end, we would pay more in fees and interest than we borrowed, if we were approved.
Wonder if the failing banks had to jump through these hoops. We know for sure they are not paying these fees. Why is it a failing banks gets a blank check yet a starting company is failed by the banks before they can open?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cmaurand
12:26 PM on 10/05/2010
Go to your community bank or economic development council. You'll probably have better luck.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tiggy
09:12 PM on 10/05/2010
Done both and they sent us to the above meeting as they currently offer nothing :-( Thank you for the reply and hopefully things will improve soon.
photo
SamEllison
I feel so clean!
12:39 AM on 10/05/2010
Can we hire a collection agency to call and bother
the officers of those one hundred and forty four banks
that have missed at least one payment?
Especially at dinner time!
Revenge is best served cold.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stewart Goss
11:15 PM on 10/04/2010
Government that hands out money, redistributes and plays favorites will always be in the pocket of special interests. Liberals will never understand this, I have to scratch my head as to why they don't like limited government.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:20 AM on 10/05/2010
"We" liberals understand it fine. Some of us would rather have not bailed out the banksters, but instead have used such money to create jobs and help people feed their families.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tiggy
01:04 AM on 10/05/2010
AMEN! As a small business owner starting a company using USA made products, in the USA and hiring Americans...we have been unable to obtain a loan! We recently attending a meeting informing of us of the money that MAY be available with the recent legislation. We would have to collateralize 100% of the loan even if that required using our HOME! Yes, we would have to personally secure a business loan. And the hoops and fees...included a yearly fee, all closing cost and a 13% interest rate. In the end, we would pay more in fees and interest than we borrowed, if we were approved.
Wonder if the failing banks had to jump through these hoops. We know for sure they are not paying these fees. Why is it a failing banks gets a blank check yet a starting company is failed by the banks before they can open?
photo
Bryan Boru
Engineer, Libertarian
06:22 AM on 10/05/2010
Well god damn it good for you! You are hereby an honorary member of the T party (whether you like it or not).
11:04 PM on 10/04/2010
I just want to foreclose on their property without actually owning it!

http://www.ywhcinc.org
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:42 PM on 10/04/2010
The Treasury Dept is a joke.
10:39 PM on 10/04/2010
check this out it really fits http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rGuTJmVSsM share it with your friends
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iam7545 r
10:20 PM on 10/04/2010
I thought Bawney Fwank was on top if this one

ooops
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChangingTimes
10:38 PM on 10/04/2010
So much for all of the "Accountability"...
08:05 AM on 10/05/2010
No,,,,,,,,, He was on top of your boyfriend !