More

Bull Vs. Bear: David Rosenberg, Jim Paulsen Square Off (VIDEO)

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 10/06/10 06:31 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:55 PM ET

Bloomberg hosted the wonkish equivalent of the Ultimate Fighting Championship on Wednesday, which pitted a famously pessimistic economist against a famously optimistic one. Anchor Margaret Brennan played referee.

(Scroll down for video.)

Gluskin Sheff chief economist David Rosenberg had been speaking on Bloomberg TV when Brennan introduced Wells Capital chief investment strategist Jim Paulsen, whom she called a "bright, shining optimist." With the bull released into the bear's den, Brennan stepped aside and let them do battle.

Paulsen began with a qualification ("It's not like there aren't issues and problems") but soon launched into his main argument: The recovery only seems weak, and, compared to the previous two recoveries, in the early 1990s and early 2000s, it's right on track. He took a subtle dig at the pessimistic "new normal" idea championed by Bill Gross and Mohamed El-Erian of Pimco, and said that in terms of real GDP, this recovery has been the strongest in 25 years.

"I just think the attitudes are so much worse than the reality on the ground," he said. "And that differential leaves a lot of room for stock prices to go higher."

Rosenberg was quick to respond, saying Paulsen was ignoring just how damaging this recent recession has been. The previous two recessions, which were followed by recoveries that Rosenberg likened to "a blink of an eye," do not compare to this one. By focusing on GDP, Rosenberg said, Paulsen wasn't taking a broad enough view.

"Practically every single variable outside of exports is not anywhere even close to where it was in December 2007," Rosenberg said.

Paulsen again pointed to history, saying the GDP growth of the past 25 years has been slower than most people realize, so that the current seemingly weak growth isn't actually that weak -- relatively speaking.

Rosenberg, for his part, said the government has "injected" "steroids" into the economy with the "most aggressive monetary, fiscal and bailout policy of all time," and yet consumer confidence is anemic and unemployment is near 10 percent. Any positive development, Rosenberg said, has to be weighed against the fact that the economy currently does not "stand on its own two feet."

Brennan had to step in, and the session ended without compromise. When September's unemployment data is released early Friday morning, one economist will be vindicated.

This wasn't the first time Rosenberg and Paulsen had faced off. In July, the Wall Street Journal published an interview with both of them, in which they expressed largely the same positions they did Wednesday. Paulsen said a major drain on the economy was the widespread bad attitude, calling the current age the "era of 'irrational pessimism.'"

In one of his daily letters last year (hat tip to Business Insider), Rosenberg railed against Paulsen, whom Barron's had recently called "a favorite market strategist," claiming Paulsen had simply gotten lucky.

WATCH the video below:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Bloomberg hosted the wonkish equivalent of the Ultimate Fighting Championship on Wednesday, which pitted a famously pessimistic economist against a famously optimistic one. Anchor Margaret Brennan pla...
Bloomberg hosted the wonkish equivalent of the Ultimate Fighting Championship on Wednesday, which pitted a famously pessimistic economist against a famously optimistic one. Anchor Margaret Brennan pla...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 56
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
04:00 AM on 10/11/2010
The bulls are talking complete BS, consider this from Goldman Sachs: http://www.arabianmoney.net/us-dollar/2010/10/06/bearish-goldman-economic-report-job-cuts-sober-up-wall-street/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
johnny g locker
01:31 PM on 10/08/2010
The government figures on GDP and unemployment are absolute lies.

This country is screwed. The dollar is collapsing.

Buy pm's and food while you can.
argved
Less socialism (for the wealthy)
04:58 PM on 10/07/2010
Hey Paulson, the reality on the ground is that jobs are very hard to come by. Just because you are rich and getting richer doesn't mean on the aggregate things are better.
10:44 AM on 10/07/2010
In response to the lost jobs overseas the Govt is putting pressure on China and others to stop putting downward pressure on their home currencies thereby allowing overseas currencies to increase in value so it will no longer be cheaper to outsource labor overseas. This will also increase American exports. You have to thank Ronald Reagan and Bill "NAFTA" Clinton for the job lost, Rona1d was an elitist and B!ll was so vain he wanted to be successful at any cost.
08:52 AM on 10/07/2010
And here's my take on the economy. Don't listen to econ majors who have made a terrific living
by guesswork.
photo
uniquindividual
I'm unique and so are you
09:06 AM on 10/07/2010
Guess work and risk are what create inovation, new business and technological progress.
Guess work about the possibility of a different future for humanity is all over the pages of the constitution.
07:50 AM on 10/07/2010
I respect Rosenberg's arguments. But one has to wonder who's right when they both sound so convincing.

Check out this video: Kyle Bass on hyperinflation
http://www.planbeconomics.com/2010/10/06/kyle-bass-on-hyperinflation-video/
photo
uniquindividual
I'm unique and so are you
09:17 AM on 10/07/2010
There are elements of truth to both.

The pessimism in this recession is more accentuated than in past downturns due to the almost univerasal wealth distruction caused by the stock meltdown and the housing crash. Because the housing market,construction industry will never recover to its bubble of glory, a huge segment of the american workforce (That is less adaptable than others) has to find new skills as well.


The psychology of economic loss is similar to what has occured in the rust belt for more than a generation, but in this case it's on an almost national scale. No matter what the national statistics might reveal, there will be a national hangover of confidence associated with this recession that will rival the Great Depression's impact on the world view of generations.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheAntitheist
Four legs Good
12:33 PM on 10/07/2010
HYPERINFLATION?!! hahah What are you talking about? The risk is DEFLATION not hyperinflation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
johnny g locker
01:33 PM on 10/08/2010
With about $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities, it's about hyperinflation. Pretty simple.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nofir2
07:20 AM on 10/07/2010
Alexander Tabarrok also laid it out very clearly, back in 2003:
President Bush has neither proposed nor implemented a tax cut—only a tax shift. … sooner or later taxes must increase (or inflation, a type of tax, will go up). Milton Friedman, the libertarian-leaning Nobel prize-winning economist, has long reminded us to be suspicious of any tax cut not matched by a spending cut. … they have a secret Machiavellian argument held in reserve. The Bush deficits, they believe, will force future administrations—presumably of a more liberal bent—to cut spending. … conservatives seem to believe that the public does want big government and that the only way to curb government growth it is to fool the public with lower taxes today so that the costs of government will be so high tomorrow that no one will accept the offer. How cynical. … we have two political parties: the Tax and Spenders and the No-Tax and Spenders
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Simondj
С днем рождения, мой брат!
10:14 AM on 10/07/2010
All excellent points. F&F
05:31 AM on 10/07/2010
Less Big Government, more recovery.

Very simple.
photo
uniquindividual
I'm unique and so are you
09:19 AM on 10/07/2010
The simple part of your argument is right.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LawTalkingGuy
Rational human male.
05:24 AM on 10/07/2010
My father always used to say that he wanted a one-armed economist, who would therefore never say "on the other hand..."
photo
Lahonda
Bynocent Instander
04:33 AM on 10/07/2010
They're fighting Regulation.

It's just about over.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Francois Bergeron
seeking sense
04:24 AM on 10/07/2010
Strange that they call "Economics" a science.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LawTalkingGuy
Rational human male.
05:25 AM on 10/07/2010
Very few do - Economics departments are traditionally housed in the faculty of arts at most universities.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:25 AM on 10/07/2010
It is always about Wal Street - they don't consider and don't care for Main Street. Republican Parrots.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LawTalkingGuy
Rational human male.
05:26 AM on 10/07/2010
Exactly - if 1000 men made a billion each while the rest of the nation fell into homelessness and starvation, the GDP numbers would look great. And that's pretty much the direction America is headed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CPAwADD
My super power is sarcasm!
01:03 AM on 10/07/2010
I think this demonstrates how useful economics is.
photo
HowietheScreamer
Yes yes, I know my Micro bio is still empty
12:38 AM on 10/07/2010
The simple fact is that it's yet another jobless recovery. All the recoveries since 1974 have been very weak in jobs. Why? Because prior to 74, companies didn't send the job demand overseas when demand came back, they hired in the US. Since 74 companies use the recovery as a time to offshore more US production to low cost countries. It's cheaper to hire 10 Chinese than 1 American, and the government gave them (and still does) tax breaks for shipping those jobs to China.
Mildmannered
"Be excellent to each other"
12:50 AM on 10/07/2010
good comment
photo
Lahonda
Bynocent Instander
04:37 AM on 10/07/2010
...a supply-side tragedy.

Triple welfare.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
bascombe
Send the kids off to die, bleed their country dry.
12:37 AM on 10/07/2010
rosenberg is right.