iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

U.S. Subways Harness Kinetic Power To Recycle Train Energy

PATRICK WALTERS   10/ 6/10 04:10 PM ET   AP

Subway

PHILADELPHIA — For years, subway cars have been able to recycle some of the energy created when they brake, turning it into electricity to help power the train or others running on the rails at the same time.

The problem is it's a short-term benefit, with much of the energy wasted by the time the train stops braking. Now, transit agencies in Philadelphia and other cities across the country are hoping to harness that lost energy by storing it in batteries and putting it back into the system, something that could potentially save millions of dollars in energy costs.

"What we're wasting here is the kinetic energy of a moving train," said Andrew Gillespie, chief engineer of power for Philadelphia's transit agency, the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority. He estimates that 50 to 70 percent of that power is wasted.

The idea of storing the power is an enticing one for transit agencies, especially with ridership up and systems expanding. Many of their systems are getting overwhelmed and power costs are spiking.

The Metropolitan Transit Agency in New York is in the early stages of storing such power, while agencies in Los Angeles and Washington, D.C., are looking at doing so, too.

What some electric trains do now is take the resistance created by braking and turn it into energy that goes back into the train car's motor, or onto the third rail where other trains running on the tracks at the same time can use it.

But only about 30 percent of that power is captured, Gillespie estimated, with the rest dissipating, unharnessed.

Working with a private energy company and a $900,000 grant from the Pennsylvania Energy Development Authority, SEPTA is setting out on a pilot program along one of its train lines that would use a massive battery system to store the energy created. Then, that power could be used on the system later or possibly be put back into the grid.

The test run is slated for the Letterly power substation on the Market-Frankford line in Philadelphia's Kensington section.

After it's complete, likely sometime next year, the agency will start testing it and deciding whether to expand the effort to its other 37 electrical substations, Gillespie said.

Ultimately, SEPTA hopes to save up to 10 percent on power costs on a system that takes $22 million a year to power.

The American Public Transit Association is studying the potential benefits of what is known as "wayside storage," storing such energy somewhere other than the rails or the car itself, both of which have limited capacity, said Martin Schroeder, APTA's chief engineer.

"Instead of burning it up on top of the car, you put that additional current into battery storage," he said. The biggest challenge, Schroeder said, will likely be the costs of the batteries, which can be hundreds of thousands of dollars each.

In conjunction with Conshohocken-based Viridity Energy, SEPTA hopes to start construction on its storage devices in 2011.

SEPTA wants to see how it works at one substation first. It will gather data by the end of next year and monitor the energy savings to ensure costs aren't somehow subsequently going up elsewhere in the system, Gillespie said.

"SEPTA needs a storage device so they can avoid wasting energy that their trains produce," said Audrey Zibelman, president and CEO of Viridity Energy.

The project could also allow SEPTA to sell surplus energy to PJM Interconnection, which operates the regional grid, Zibelman said. That could potentially generate $500,000 from one storage battery.

"It has a double benefit," she said.

But Schroeder said that might also involve making more and potentially costly changes to the substation.

"There's some trickiness in how the substations work," he said.

That's just one of many things that still need to be studied before transit agencies can know how much braking energy can actually be recycled, and how much money can potentially be saved, he said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

PHILADELPHIA — For years, subway cars have been able to recycle some of the energy created when they brake, turning it into electricity to help power the train or others running on the rails at ...
PHILADELPHIA — For years, subway cars have been able to recycle some of the energy created when they brake, turning it into electricity to help power the train or others running on the rails at ...
Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 15
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:22 PM on 10/07/2010
In Montreal they built the subway track in such a way that the stations are higher up, thus conserving energy in acceleration and deceleration.
10:53 AM on 10/08/2010
That is way too smart an idea. I don't think it will become very popular.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
03:27 PM on 10/09/2010
It'd never happen in the US. Only a minority believe in the `theory' of gravity.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joeneri
03:25 PM on 10/07/2010
Every notion of energy efficiency is built around the twin propositions of reducing waste and recycling the remaining waste to produce energy. Frankly, what all these ideas are trying to accomplish is imitate Nature by closing the Carbon Cycle. If we can do that, we'll go a long way to reducing pollution, reducing energy consumption and stabilizing our economies and politics into something more rational.

And it will all happen as if by Magic.
02:29 PM on 10/07/2010
At last - the idea that saving energy is profitable comes to America.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
choot
I'm keeping the hope AND the change
02:19 PM on 10/07/2010
Now if we could only harness the "energy" of the teabaggers into something useful.
12:47 PM on 10/07/2010
Good step forward, but I am still waiting for escalators that harness kinetic power.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:26 PM on 10/07/2010
great idea....go lithium !!!!!!
01:04 PM on 10/07/2010
Actually, for this application, where the energy storage systems are stationary and weight is not a primary concern, lithium-ion batteries may not be the best solution.  

Lead-acid batteries are relatively inexpensive and have excellent high-power surge current performance.  Recent advances in lithium-ion chemistries such as LiFePO4 and LiMnO2 use nanotechnology to achieve very good high-power performance, but at a cost premium.

Electrochemical batteries in general may not be the best solution for stationary electrical storage systems capable of very high surge current.  Kinetic flywheel generators are an attractive solution to this problem.  The upcoming Ford-class aircraft carriers have electric catapults powered by flywheel generators that store up electricity from the nuclear reactors to launch aircraft.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:31 PM on 10/07/2010
good explanation...i was thinking what is good for cars is good for trains....still lithium probably has a place here....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OC4Obama4Pres
02:03 PM on 10/07/2010
F/F for undeniable intelligence.
photo
MajorKong
If the pilot's good, see, I mean if he's reeeally
09:35 AM on 10/12/2010
Sure, just don't ask me to haul the batteries on my cargo jet.

They have a bad habit of going explodey.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
08:13 AM on 10/07/2010
Why the need for additional battery-based storage? The trains are already connected to the grid.
12:45 PM on 10/07/2010
The grid can't efficiently consume transient supply peaks.  The supply side of the grid responds to demand, which varies significantly throughout the day but doesn't change very suddenly.  

The supply side can't respond to sudden changes in supply, and since there is no immediate demand for the excess supply, it can only be dissipated as heat.

The grid is not an energy storage system.  The electricity must be used right away or it is wasted.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
03:51 PM on 10/07/2010
That's true in principle, but the energy of a train is very modest compared to the total load. The trains also accelerate almost as many times as they brake without bringing down the grid.

Methinks someone's taking the transit board for a $0.9m ride.