More

Enrique Chagoya Work Won't Return To Loveland Museum After Controversy

10/ 7/10 08:50 PM ET   AP

Loveland Art

LOVELAND, Colo. — A piece of artwork denounced as obscene by church members and allegedly ripped up by a Montana woman using a crowbar won't be returned to display because of safety concerns, city officials said Thursday.

"The incident yesterday was very troubling and also very impactful on the city staff, volunteers and the public at the venue," said Rod Wensing, acting city manager.

Kathleen Folden, 56, of Kalispell, Mont., was arrested Wednesday on a charge of criminal mischief. Witnesses told police that she used a crowbar to smash glass shielding the print at the Loveland Museum Gallery and then tore part of it up.

Folden, a truck driver, told police that she drove from Montana and bought a crowbar in Loveland before going to the museum to destroy the artwork, according to an arrest affidavit obtained by The Coloradoan in Fort Collins.

Police said the damaged part includes what critics say was a depiction of Jesus Christ engaged in a sex act.

Museum visitor Mark Michaels told the Loveland Reporter-Herald that Folden screamed "How can you desecrate my Lord?" during the incident.

The artist, Stanford University professor Enrique Chagoya, told The Associated Press on Thursday that the work has been mischaracterized. He said while the part in question is suggestive, it's not graphic.

The panel includes figures cut out from a comic book, a head resembling Christ and a skeleton with a pope's hat.

"This is not Christ. It's a collage," Chagoya said. "What I'm trying to express is the corruption of the spiritual by the church."

The print was taken by police as evidence.

Folden was released on a $350 cash bond during a court appearance Thursday. Another hearing is set for Oct. 15.

The work that was damaged, "The Misadventures of the Romantic Cannibals," is a 12-panel lithograph that that includes comic book characters, Mexican pornography, Mayan symbols and ethnic stereotypes. It is part of an 82-print exhibit by 10 artists that have worked with Colorado printer Bud Shark that opened in mid-September.

Members of a local church have been among those peacefully protesting outside the city-owned museum for most of the week. A city councilman and some residents had demanded that Chagoya's work be removed, but the council decided Tuesday to leave it on display.

Some of the outspoken critics have condemned the attack on the artwork.

The museum has seen a significant increase in visitors since the controversy started, said Maureen Corey, the museum's art curator. Visitors include supporters and opponents of the piece.

"In my opinion, it's rather sad taking away people's freedom to see the art," Corey said.

Loveland police originally got reports of gunfire at the museum, but said it appears people mistook the banging of the crowbar against the glass for shots. No firearm was involved, police said.

Chagoya said he was sad and disappointed that the work, one of 30 limited prints, won't be on display again in Loveland.

"It will be a loss for everybody, not just for me, but for everybody that believes in the First Amendment," Chagoya said. Suppression of art and ideas is something that happens in totalitarian regimes, not this country, he added.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST DENVER

LOVELAND, Colo. — A piece of artwork denounced as obscene by church members and allegedly ripped up by a Montana woman using a crowbar won't be returned to display because of safety concerns, ci...
LOVELAND, Colo. — A piece of artwork denounced as obscene by church members and allegedly ripped up by a Montana woman using a crowbar won't be returned to display because of safety concerns, ci...
Filed by Ethan Axelrod  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 108
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
awlff
biker,photographer,dog lover
04:35 AM on 10/14/2010
Everyone's a critic!
11:49 AM on 10/12/2010
I know Kalispell is in the "bible belt" but most who live there aren't quite like Kathleen. Many are even non-believers.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Weirdwriter
06:23 PM on 10/12/2010
And nobody seems to know her, not even the churchgoers. She may have been simply a very lonely, unhappy person with some mental issues.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Albertmum
Did IQ's just drop dramatically?
06:30 PM on 10/11/2010
If your faith is so fragile that a picture angers you to this extent, then maybe you've got deeper issues to deal with.
04:03 PM on 10/11/2010
The artist got the reaction that he wanted and exhibited extremely poor taste in the first place.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Weirdwriter
04:13 PM on 10/11/2010
And you know this, how? Have you seen the work for yourself? Have you evidence the artist was lying when he said it was not meant to be a depiction of Jesus having oral sex?
08:56 AM on 10/11/2010
God bless the religious. They always such peace to the world.
12:45 PM on 10/10/2010
POSTSCRIPT:

Keemo's focus on the property value in this crime is the dead giveaway that he is NO

PROGRESSIVE. Reducing attacks on American values to property is the slippery slope to a

price on everything and a value on nothing. That's big business talking, baby.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Weirdwriter
04:02 PM on 10/10/2010
Besides his/her gratuitous, irrelevant rudeness and spiteful claims posted about "libs," yep.
12:39 PM on 10/10/2010
The destruction of property is important, but not the real crime. That's hypocrisy.

You have the right to believe whatever twisted nonsense your parents and talk radio have inflicted upon you, but you cannot:

1. Demand we treat that twisted nonsense as if it is real, and that we respect the crazy.
2. Demand that your right to believe the twisted nonsense extends beyond your bent head bones.

We were all very critical of the Islamic to Salman Rushdie. At least TRY not be hypocrites, please?
08:55 PM on 10/09/2010
Are we not allowed to see an image of the piece of art or something? Difficult to have a view without even seeing what's causing all the hoopla.....
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Weirdwriter
04:03 PM on 10/10/2010
I hope the artist posts this on a web site. Perhaps he has one but haven't looked, myself.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LisaCACO
someone ate my micro-bio!
08:39 PM on 10/09/2010
so now the terrorists have won.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Weirdwriter
04:08 PM on 10/10/2010
One lone, disturbed woman does not "terrorists" make.
04:08 PM on 10/11/2010
We are all entitled to be justifiably disturbed at one time or another regarding that issue, whatever it may be, that we personally hold dear to our hearts and beliefs.
I'm a liberal artist and an art gallery owner and would have no problem drawing the line where I see fit.
Once we lose our sense of protecting what is decent is when we lose our respect for humanity......and we can all see how disrespectful humanity already has become.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LisaCACO
someone ate my micro-bio!
10:27 PM on 10/11/2010
she was part of a larger group of not so bright folks protesting. she may have "acted alone" but she was part of a larger group who wanted the art to disappear and she made that happen. I'd call that terrorism.
photo
MyFatCat
Slacktivist no longer
01:21 PM on 10/09/2010
The piece should be viewable--damage and all--it is important visual testimony about the state of art to reveal truths, and a wake-up call to religious people about why they can't endure the expression of others.

I'm not totally unsympathetic to the Montana woman's reaction. I didn't like Serrano's "P.i.s.s. Christ" (ultimately removed by Mayor Bloomberg) with the cross dropped in urine. The distinction I would draw is that depositing excrements on a religious symbol is wantonly offensive in any culture. It's a lot stronger than the offensive equivalent language.

Collage is different. It makes a statement in visual language. And frankly, that should be OK.

Thoughts?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Weirdwriter
04:01 PM on 10/10/2010
Someone else suggested the same thing, display the vandalized work as a statement. Hope the museum decides to do so.

And I agree on what distinguishes a genuine attempt to offend people as a gimmick for attention, versus what the artist of this piece said he was trying to do. Wish that had been pointed out more clearly by the various news media that reported on this controversy.

To me, this is another example of how the uber-conservative mouthpieces that are in the business of ginning up outrage for profit are hypocritical in their disavowal of any responsibility when some less-than-reasonable soul takes them seriously enough to react accordingly.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:36 AM on 10/09/2010
Soooo.....Ms. Nutbag wins and art we can no longer see gets hidden away?......What a country. Hello Denmark? I'd like to apply for citizenship please?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patman77
08:36 AM on 10/09/2010
wonder what her view on the muslim center vs strip club is.
09:12 PM on 10/08/2010
Jesus' bedrock, Number One, no-confusion-about-it teaching and Message was/is deceptively simple:

Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.

The Fringe Theocratic Right effs that up countless times every day. Talk about a bunch of apostates. A bunch of double-agents and moles filling up lotsa pews!

Here's another oldie-but-goodie: Whatsoever you do tho the least of my brethren, that you do unto Me".

Any "Christian" who repeatedly violates these basic tenets in order to abuse and hurt their Fellows is a stone-cold fraud and is simply (ab)using Jesus/God/Religion to promote their intolerance, inhumanity, and ugliness.

(And, BTW, I just spoke with the Lord, personally. He gave me the nihil obstat on this post, so this won't need any further discussion, thank you.) ;)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:05 PM on 10/08/2010
This may surprise you, but I agree wholeheartedly with your above post. I think you wish to place me in the ranks of the right, but as a progressive I reserve my right not to walk in lock step with every progressive or even most of them. I prefer to think for myself, if you please.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Weirdwriter
04:05 PM on 10/10/2010
As a progressive, then, I hope you'll agree that stereotyping a group of people and assuming they do things and think things as a group is wrong.

That goes for Christians as well as "libs."
photo
GlobalCtzn
WE are creating our world
02:09 AM on 10/10/2010
Fanned Orge!
08:53 PM on 10/08/2010
Let's see here: "Hate Speech" --and I'm looking at you keemo-- is a legal term, and luckily doesn't simply mean "stuff you dislike/stuff you feel like making a big deal about". (Alas, there was a time when "hate speech" referred to the enfranchised Powerful violating the downtrodden and Powerless--NOT as a duckblind for Fringe Wingers to excuse illegal *and* un-American actions. Matter of fact--I've been seeing the term "bigot" being misused a lot lately by true Bigots as a sick defense when being rightfully called out as such. Do you all think we can make all language and action utterly absurd and meaningless? Can we? Ya think?)

And all this "incitement to riot" stuff? Please (and I'm praying here: Please, Lord please...make the stupid stop.) Intent, Setting, Liklihood, Immediacy--these are all hurdles (Legal, again--and not based on your whims) that must be surmounted. What if someone blows a vein and runs amok at a "Peanuts" gallery show and destroys Charles Schultz' work because it violated his deeply, religiously held, personal Worldview-Mojo and it made him *feel* like freaking out and rioting? Uh...that's not Incitement, etc. That, buckaroo, is mental illness and/or just plain, crappy behavior.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:43 PM on 10/08/2010
If you want to invoke legal matters here...I am in full support of whatever restitution the court orders. I am sure the original sacred "art" icon you wish to enshrine as free speech is hidden somewhere safe. I'm not so sure the author can find such a hiding place from Muslim extremists who may not be so tolerant as you or me. Perhaps he should reach out preemptively to explain how his "art" should not offend anyone. Perhaps he should do it with enough rigor to explain why no one should get upset about this mysterious icon of his. This would be much better than all of us outsiders trying to plumb his intentions, his wit or his depravity.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:50 PM on 10/08/2010
Let's examine another legal issue. Have patience...it is obvious to all that I'm no lawyer or aspire to be one. Perhaps someone should prosecute the "artist' for exhibiting prurient sexual behavior in a place accessible to minors without any posted warning. I know there are laws against such behavior and as the woman is prosecuted, so too should the "artist" be held account for breaking the law that protects minors from such exhibition. Perhaps your sacred "art" relic should have been within an "adults only" section?
photo
SteveDenver
Progressive and liberal, just like Jesus Christ.
08:41 PM on 10/08/2010
I find the Bible offensive and I have a crowbar
11:55 AM on 10/09/2010
You also have one more fan. 645
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Weirdwriter
04:06 PM on 10/10/2010
I await your announcement that you will now publicly burn a pile o' Bibles.