More

Dems Struggle To Build 'Firewall' Against House Losses

JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS   10/ 9/10 12:40 AM ET   AP

House Democrats Firewall

WASHINGTON — Struggling to build a firewall against a Republican takeover, congressional Democrats are pouring money into roughly two dozen tight races around the country in the campaign's closing weeks while pulling it back from others where their chances seem slimmer.

With polls showing Republicans increasingly well-positioned to seize control of the House, the Democrats are planning TV ad blitzes to shore up their best-positioned incumbents and a handful of challengers in races they believe they can still win.

At the same time, they're scaling back advertising plans to help a number of lawmakers including Reps. Betsy Markey of Colorado, Harry Teague of New Mexico and Steve Driehaus and Mary Jo Kilroy of Ohio. They've also cut back on ad campaigns to defend Democratic-held open seats in Indiana and Kansas.

The party strongly denies it's abandoning these candidates, some of whom are benefiting from Democratic-leaning outside groups that are spending on their behalf. And advertising plans are changing daily at this critical juncture.

But the shifting of resources – along with analysis of the parties' spending and interviews with Republican and Democratic strategists – paints a clear picture of the damage-control effort.

Officials and operatives in both parties spoke to The Associated Press about the strategy on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to detail the plans.

At stake is control of the House – where Democrats hold 255 seats, Republicans 178, and there are two vacancies – and the power to press or block key elements of President Barack Obama's agenda midway through his term. All 435 seats are on the ballot, and more than 75 are competitive, the vast majority now held by Democrats. Republicans need to gain 40 seats to win control.

Rep. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, head of the Democrats' House campaign arm, said his operation is supporting all Democrats and he's confident of maintaining control. But he acknowledged that an aggressive strategy is needed to stop Republicans from reaching deep into Democratic territory.

Republicans are "going to try and run the table, but they're going to run into a hard wall of reality that a lot of these members are in very strong positions," Van Hollen said.

Not likely, Republicans say.

"Throughout the summer and now into the fall, the playing field has continuously expanded, pulling once-safe Democrats into the fray to join their endangered colleagues," Rep. Pete Sessions of Texas, the head of the party's House campaign committee, wrote in a memo this week.

Van Hollen's Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has reserved at least $52 million of TV advertising in 65 districts, slightly more than it had planned to pour into races around the country. The National Republican Congressional Committee now plans to invest $45 million in 62 districts – more than double what it had initially budgeted – to make a play for more than 20 additional seats beyond those the party first envisioned.

Democrats said they were focusing on stopping the bleeding where possible, including trying to salvage the seats of several threatened lawmakers who earlier this year looked like safe re-election bets. They include Colorado Rep. John Salazar, Georgia Rep. Sanford Bishop, Illinois Rep. Phil Hare, and Indiana Rep. Joe Donnelly, and Armed Services Committee Chairman Ike Skelton of Missouri.

For now, the party is also spending to try to preserve the jobs of Democrats in conservative or swing territory, including Rep. Frank Kratovil in Maryland, Mark Schauer in Michigan, Scott Murphy, Bill Owens and Mike Arcuri in New York, John Boccieri and Zack Space in Ohio, and Glenn Nye and Tom Perriello in Virginia.

The party also is fighting to keep Democratic-held open seats in Arkansas, Washington and Wisconsin, and to claim two now held by the GOP in Illinois and in Miami, Fla.

Much can change in coming days, as officials watch internal polls to determine whether candidates in these tight contests still have a chance to win. Even after significantly paring its TV purchases in Kilroy's race recently, the DCCC this week bought $15,000 worth of cable advertising there.

Republicans plunked down more than $45,000 this week for advertising in Democratic-leaning Massachusetts district being vacated by retiring Democratic Rep. Bill Delahunt, and Democrats shelled out almost twice that to try to keep the seat in their column.

There are also a plethora of high-stakes games of cat-and-mouse between the two parties unfolding across the political map, with each side trying to prod the other into gambling with limited resources.

Republicans are reaching into districts Democrats were counting on winning – such as Rep. Ben Chandler's in Kentucky and Murphy's in upstate New York – and spending heavily, forcing Democrats to follow suit. They've also reserved $800,000 to advertise against Space, goading Democrats into answering them or pulling out altogether.

The Republicans are trying to capitalize on Democratic weakness, spreading their cash to create a wave to sweep into power. As the majority seeks to build a dam, the GOP is focused on creating new trouble spots, daring Democrats to divert resources from districts where they trail to defend seats they once thought of as safe.

___

Associated Press writers Jim Kuhnhenn and Liz Sidoti contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Struggling to build a firewall against a Republican takeover, congressional Democrats are pouring money into roughly two dozen tight races around the country in the campaign's closi...
WASHINGTON — Struggling to build a firewall against a Republican takeover, congressional Democrats are pouring money into roughly two dozen tight races around the country in the campaign's closi...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,967
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (30 total)
  1 of 5  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
Marcospinelli 05:40 PM on 10/09/2010
Democratic voters have mistakenly believed that Obama&Democrats want what they want. The DLC-controlled DemocraticParty gives lip service to all populist issues (like civil rights protections, restoring habeas corpus, ending the wars, PublicHealthcare, WallStreet reform, environmental & energy issues, etc.).

If the Bush years taught us nothing else, it's that anyone can sell anything to  Read More...
10:22 AM on 10/11/2010
Is Steny Hoyer real or did his character fall out of a bad movie about corrupt politicians?
09:53 AM on 10/11/2010
Paychecks or foodstamps, which do you want?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
TeaLady005
09:22 AM on 10/11/2010
Hey Nancy! Get ready to hand that big gavel over to John!

And since you failed to pass a budget that is required of you by our Constitution,,why not use all that extra time to start packing up your office?
photo
guveqzero
Inventor and Innovator
08:40 AM on 10/11/2010
Had the Democrats fought the right battles, it would be a much different story. What happened to jobs, and why did they fail in recognizing the scope of the problem? Biden nailed the coffin shut with his pollyana predictions on job creation.

Washington DC does not represent the people anymore, because problem solvers don't get a chance to run. The elections are filled with bogus politicians speaking nonsense or repeating the same old political tripe. The seriousness of the problem still escapes them, even today. How many politicians today even have the confidence of their own party? It holds true for both conservatives and progressives.
08:32 AM on 10/11/2010
If able, this time I hope Our President does not try to gain rep approval on anything and just goes for the rest of the things he wants to do for the country and its people.
.
Dem in '10 !!!
.
Get out and vote!!!
.
10:20 AM on 10/11/2010
Most of what he did the people didn't want. Now he wants us to come under the authority of the UN. In another few weeks he will be a lame duck and Pelosi will be packing up her office. Oh happy day!
photo
JDM73
male, 38, writer/draughtsman/ex-musician
01:02 AM on 10/11/2010
I wish Democrats had something stronger to run on than "Hey, at least we're not the Republicans." Even that is a painfully flimsy foundation on which to run for re-election, since Democrats haven't proven that they can--or will--do anything significantly different than the other party. If Republicans regain control of Congress, our insane two-front war will assuredly continue, the private insurance industry will face no competition from a public, government-run health insurance option, Bush administration officials will not be prosecuted for torture, and Guantanamo will remain open. And what has happened during the last four years with a Democratic majority in Congress, and in the last two years with a Democratic president? Our insane two-front war has continued, the private insurance industry faces no competition from a public option, Bush administration officials have not been prosecuted for torture, and Guantanamo remains open.
I don't like the GOP's agenda. I won't vote for Republicans. But tell me again *why* we're still supposed to get amped up about voting for this crop of spineless Democrats?
sarabono
Oldie but Goody
12:22 AM on 10/11/2010
Is Alvin Greene part of the new Fire Wall ?
10:33 PM on 10/10/2010
Democrats should remember this: independents may have voted for them but progressives elected them. Progressives gave them money, blogged for them, walked the streets for them, made phone calls, attended rallies. The almighty independents are fickle and may or may not show up for them next time. The progressives are who the Democrats need to keep close and they haven't done that.
10:25 AM on 10/11/2010
Progressives were dumb enough to do most of the hard work thinking they would be remembered. But they just got used and thrown away. And while they worked hard there is not enough of them to make any difference at the polls. We will see if they have learned anything when 2012 comes around.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BigAbner
12:07 PM on 10/10/2010
To: Julie Hirschfeld Davis

From: Brick Sykes

WTF are You? Are you a Democrat who is actually "Struggling?" WTF did you get that information? WTF told you that he was 'struggling' along with the rest of the Democrats?

Brick
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Randy Wetzel
10:56 AM on 10/10/2010
I think the best firewall would have been for the Dems to stop using the (R)'s as an excuse for getting less done then they should have.
That might have helped a bit more during the elections.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
HST
Conservatism = selfishness
07:16 PM on 10/10/2010
"I think the best firewall would have been for the Dems to stop using the (R)'s as an excuse for getting less done then they should have."

Yeah they should just ignore the truth:


GOP Wins Filibuster Gold Medal

"when it comes to political obstructionism, it's no contest. The AP is just the latest to document the Republicans' runaway gold medal in the filibuster. On track to easily shatter their previous record, the GOP has made obstructionism the new normal in Washington.

As the chart above cited in January by The Atlantic's James Fallows shows, the number of cloture motions requiring a Senate supermajority of 60 votes is simply unprecedented in American history. And with 290 bills stalled in the Senate, Republicans have made sure that the route to passing legislation is more blocked than Dick Cheney's arteries."

"The political scientist Barbara Sinclair has done the math. In the 1960s, she finds, "extended-debate-related problems" -- threatened or actual filibusters -- affected only 8 percent of major legislation. By the 1980s, that had risen to 27 percent. But after Democrats retook control of Congress in 2006 and Republicans found themselves in the minority, it soared to 70 percent."
http://crooksandliars.com/jon-perr/gop-wins-filibuster-gold-medal
10:34 PM on 10/10/2010
The R's obstructed everything the Democrats proposed, and when the Democrats accomplished a thing or two without them, the R's complain about "ramming it through" - as if Dems had a choice! Do you expect Democrats to just sit there and not do their jobs - to legislate - until Republicans decide to start working?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
SPQR1052
VET & GLBT - http://www.ryanvouchercare.com -
04:01 AM on 10/10/2010
I blame President Obama for his efforts of seeking the high ground , bi-partisanship. He sould have swated the vermin o the firsst instance whereas there suggestions were included in legislation such as health care and fianacial reform then they did not vote accordingly.

But at least he has two more years and can crush them and end the American nightmare of the racists, xenophobic, homophobic insurgent Republican Taliban.

All is not lost if he grows a bigger pair.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rotorhead1871
who are you jivin' with that cosmic debris?...
12:27 AM on 10/10/2010
the dems will take losses, just the way it is. the obama miracle has not really materized and that makes people look the other way..the longer the dems have all the majorities...and cant make it happen, the more people get fed up.....a change is coming.....
10:35 AM on 10/11/2010
You mean the Obama curse
11:33 PM on 10/09/2010
Wonder how many of those people voted for hope and change?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lifer2006
11:15 PM on 10/09/2010
Mr hoyer is one guy that is so disconnected with what people are living.
I hope he looses in his district. He is not a representative of the people. He is a hack of a grand order.
10:39 PM on 10/09/2010
Good luck my fellow Democrats. Thanks to John Roberts and the supreme court ruling Citizens United vs. FEC, it's gonna take an awful lot to combat the mega millions flowing in from major corporations to the Republican candidates. Then again, it was Democrats like Pelosi and Reid who backed down to the Republican congress by not fighting to the end against the appointments of Alito and Roberts onto our supreme court under Bush. Now this is what they get for wimping out.
07:08 PM on 10/10/2010
“Good luck my fellow Democrats. Thanks to John Roberts and the supreme court ruling Citizens United vs. FEC, it's gonna take an awful lot to combat the mega millions flowing in from major corporations to the Republican candidates. Then again, it was Democrats like Pelosi and Reid who backed down to the Republican congress by not fighting to the end against the appointments of Alito and Roberts onto our supreme court under Bush. Now this is what they get for wimping out. “


It’s called the Constitution, not the Robert’s Court.

The redefinition of a “Corporation” is within the prevue of Congress. Until then, it is what it is.

Don’t be a bad sport.

You’ve had hundreds of millions of dollars “flowing in from” your union pals for decades. I’m sure George will make up any shortfall. What’s the commitment this year, $250 million? Money better spent to shore-up the pension plans if you ask me.

It’s about time the unrestrained labor movement got slapped. I feel sorry for union members who are required to pay dues to thugs and politicos.

Just like a Lib to whine about fair competition.

Oh and about Supreme Court appointments, what about Obama’s recent appointment of a totally unqualified ideologue? That’s ok, right?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
HST
Conservatism = selfishness
07:23 PM on 10/10/2010
"Just like a Lib to whine about fair competition. "

Unions Try To Combat Lopsided Election Spending

"But organized labor is expected to spend $100 million or more — a number that's likely to be matched by just two pro-business groups, Club for Growth and the U.S. Chamber, before counting any other business groups or individual corporations."
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=129674967&ft=1&f=1001

Just like a con to not know what they are talking about.

If something favors their side, it's fair