iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Liu Xiaobo Wins Nobel Peace Prize

CHARLES HUTZLER and KARL RITTER   10/ 8/10 07:06 PM ET   AP

Liu Xiaobo Nobel Peace Prize
Liu Xiaobo won the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize.

BEIJING — China has long wanted a Nobel prize. Now that it has one, its leaders are furious. The Nobel committee awarded its peace prize to imprisoned democracy campaigner Liu Xiaobo on Friday, lending encouragement to China's dissident community and sending a rebuke to the authoritarian government, which sharply condemned the award.

In naming Liu, the Norwegian-based committee honored his more than two decades of advocacy for human rights and peaceful democratic change – from the Tiananmen Square demonstrations in 1989 to a manifesto for political reform that he co-authored in 2008 and which led to his latest jail term.

President Barack Obama, last year's peace prize winner, called for Liu's immediate release.

Anticipating the award, Chinese circumvented Internet controls and called friends overseas to learn the news. Supporters and friends gathered outside Liu's central Beijing apartment, where his wife was kept inside by police. At a park, a civil rights lawyer, a retired official-turned-blogger and a dozen other people cheered and waved placards saying "Long Live Freedom of Speech." The demonstrators were later taken away by police.

A buzz of congratulations coursed through Chinese instant messaging sites before censors scrubbed postings and blocked cell phone text messages that contained the characters for Liu's name. Exiled Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama, who won the prize in 1989, joined Obama and other leaders in congratulating Liu.

"Last year, I noted that so many others who have received the award had sacrificed so much more than I," Obama said. "That list now includes Mr. Liu, who has sacrificed his freedom for his beliefs."

The president praised China for its stunning 30 years of transformative economic growth. "But this award reminds us that political reform has not kept pace, and that the basic human rights of every man, woman and child must be respected," Obama said.

Two years into an 11-year jail term for subversion at a prison 300 miles (500 kilometers) from Beijing, the slight, 54-year-old literary critic was unlikely to have found out about the award. Prisoners are restricted to state media, which mostly ignored the news. His overjoyed wife, Liu Xia, said she hoped to give him a hug and tell him if police allow her to travel to the prison on Saturday.

The contretemps points to the sticky predicament the prize poses for the communist leadership. Liu is the first Chinese and first member of the much persecuted group of political activists to be given the peace prize, but he is virtually unknown among ordinary Chinese. The award is likely to carry his name and his call for democracy to a wider audience, especially among young Chinese who are avid Internet and cell phone users but due to censorship know little of the rights camp's past struggles with the government.

"They are going to want to know who Liu Xiaobo is and why he won this prize. They are going to learn who he is and this way they are going to learn more about freedom, democracy, justice and about the Tiananmen generation," said Ai Weiwei, a prominent artist who has become a fierce champion of human rights.

"It also sends a message to China and the Chinese government, that while the international community recognizes the economic achievements of today's China, it still cannot forget that China is falling behind in terms of some basic values and human principles, such as human rights and freedom of speech."

A Nobel for a Chinese dissident is one prize not wanted by a government usually hungry for international approval. It has launched a deep-pocketed campaign to win science prizes. And the peace prize lands squarely in the middle of a brewing debate among the Chinese leadership and the elite over whether to begin political reforms, and if so, how quickly.

In recent weeks the premier has called for changing the political system to safeguard China's stunning economic achievements while the powerful Politburo member overseeing law enforcement has urged officials to resist "erroneous Western political and legal perspectives."

Chinese Foreign Ministry officials in Beijing and Oslo lodged protests. The agency's spokesman issued a stinging condemnation, branding Liu a criminal, warning Norway that relations would suffer and accusing the Nobel committee of undermining the prize's mission to promote international understanding.

"Liu Xiaobo is a criminal who has been sentenced by Chinese judicial departments for violating Chinese law," spokesman Ma Zhaoxu said in the statement. "The Nobel committee's decision to award such a person the peace prize runs completely counter to the principle of the prize and also desecrates the prize."

Jonas Gahr Stoere, foreign minister of wealthy, oil-rich Norway, said any punishment would backfire. "I think that would be negative for China's reputation in the world, if they chose to do that," Stoere told National Broadcaster NRK.

In announcing the prize in the Norwegian capital Oslo, the Nobel committee issued a challenge to China to live up to responsibilities as the world's second-largest economy and a burgeoning diplomatic and military power.

"China cannot only demand to have political and economic power, without being exposed to the same kind of discussions as other superpowers have been," committee chairman Thorbjoern Jagland said. He called Liu the "foremost symbol of Chinese human rights activists," adding: "So it was natural to give the prize only to him as a symbol of the whole Chinese society's wish for more democracy."

Liu is the first peace prize winner chosen while still in prison, although several laureates, including Myanmar democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi (1991) and German pacifist Carl von Ossietzky (1935) were in custody. Still others, like Soviet dissident Andrei Sakharov (1975) and Polish Solidarity leader Lech Walesa (1983), were prevented by their governments from going to Norway to accept the prize.

Liu's wife, prevented by police from mixing with the nearly 100 Chinese and foreign reporters outside her apartment, said by phone and messages that the award would give Liu encouragement. She hoped to go to Norway to collect the medal and its prize money of 10 million Swedish kronor (about $1.5 million), if he cannot.

"I think this prize doesn't only belong to Liu Xiaobo one person, but also for all the people in China who advocate democracy, freedom and peace and for all the prisoners of conscience in jail," Liu Xia told Hong Kong's Cable TV.

In a statement issued by the Washington-based group Freedom Now, she thanked former Czech Republic President Vaclav Havel, the Dalai Lama and South African Archbishop Desmond M. Tutu, also a Nobel laureate, for nominating her husband.

Havel, who never won the prize but whose own human rights petition Charter 77 inspired Liu's tract Charter 08 and helped bring about the end of communist rule in then Czechoslovakia, said Liu "is exactly the kind of a committed citizen who deserves such an award."

Liu's Charter 08 called for greater freedoms and for the Communist Party to give way to gradual, democratic change. "The democratization of Chinese politics can be put off no longer," Charter 08 says.

The government arrested Liu hours before the document's release in December 2008. It was the most programmatic in the hundreds of essays Liu wrote. Jailed for two years after the Tiananmen protests – when he helped persuade student protesters to leave the square before a military assault – and again for three years in the 1990s, Liu found a computer and the Internet at home on his release in 1999. "God's present to China," he called the Internet.

Thousands of Chinese – civil rights campaigners, professors and young professionals – signed on to Charter 08, which circulated by e-mail and on overseas Internet sites after being expunged from web pages in China.

The ability of Chinese to surmount censorship barriers using proxy servers and coded language kicked into high gear in the hours just before the Nobel announcement.

Excitement pulsed among students at Beijing Normal University, where Liu earned a degree in the '80s, and at Peking University. They passed word via the popular QQ.com instant messaging site.

When messages with Liu's name became blocked and online searches for him or "Nobel Peace Prize" failed – a usual tactic of censors – people began posting oblique congratulations to an unnamed Chinese for winning a Nobel.

Some curious students also said they did not know why Liu won and, echoing an oft-stated government line, wondered whether it was not a backhanded plot to shame China.

"The impact he has made is not Nobel Prize-level so far," said a Peking University English major, who would only give his English name, Eric Zhang. "People abroad know him better than we do. This is not us choosing him. They chose him, so I'm a bit suspicious. But maybe this is an opportunity to get more freedom so we don't have to go to Twitter to find out about him."

The government blacked out reports on CNN, which can be seen in tourist hotels and places where foreigners work and live, and kept the news off the main nationwide TV newscast. China Central Television-4, which is aimed at Chinese overseas, read the Foreign Ministry statement, providing a back door for Chinese to learn about Liu.

"Millions and millions of ordinary Chinese people, government employees, party cadres, students ... are going to want to know who is Liu Xiaobo and why he was sentenced to prison," said Nicholas Bequelin, Asia researcher for Human Rights Watch. "They are going to discover Charter 08, which will spread uncontrollably."

The decision to jail Liu, he said, "has backfired spectacularly, and at a very critical juncture when China is coming out in the international community. Was jailing Liu worth the price of the current predicament?"

___

Ritter reported from Oslo. Associated Press writers Bjoern H. Amland in Oslo and Cara Anna, Scott McDonald and Alexa Olesen in Beijing contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

BEIJING — China has long wanted a Nobel prize. Now that it has one, its leaders are furious. The Nobel committee awarded its peace prize to imprisoned democracy campaigner Liu Xiaobo on Friday, ...
BEIJING — China has long wanted a Nobel prize. Now that it has one, its leaders are furious. The Nobel committee awarded its peace prize to imprisoned democracy campaigner Liu Xiaobo on Friday, ...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,579
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (24 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Obama cares about all of U.S.
12:50 AM on 10/12/2010
Good night China,
God Bless China,
God Bless Liu Xiaobo.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GPTP
01:20 AM on 10/12/2010
Thank you for your good intention. But we Chinese will rely on ourselves to create a better future for China, we do not need God and most people in China do not believe in God.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrBlueBoyBlitz
04:12 PM on 10/11/2010
We are not trying to influence or control china's government or its people. We judge country's including our own by a ethics and moral compass. We have seen what happens when governments suppress its people, it has happened almost everywhere but it is happening much much less in the west and we have learned that, that freedom on a human history scale is extremely precious. That freedom, of speech, expression etc is what we respect, when it is repressed by small minded fearful (but very powerful) rulers (who are dictators because they dictate how everyone in their country shall live) then we will speak up, when china becomes more powerful than America (which most I think expect to happen) then if they try to force us to believe in their one view it will lead to great calamity. I don't think anyone underestimates the Chinese government or people's intelligence (although all this puffing up and nationalistic defensiveness does lead me to wonder) but being so extremely nationalistic will be a barrier to how far that intelligence counts meaningfully.
I/and I think we don't see the Chinese as bad but the bottom line is lack of freedom of press/speech etc and using propaganda to maintain that by any government is very BAD, wrong, unethical, not good for humanity regardless if it temporarily helps one government keep power.
10:26 PM on 10/11/2010
Wow, I'm almost driven to tears - except at a critcal time the lesson we are teaching the Chinese is we don't really care about the things we harp about.

Like rule of law. We outlaw foreign sponsorship of domestic political activity with FARA, then we turn around give Liu Xiaobo nearly a million dollars to advocate abolition of China's constitution. When he is caught and sentenced to 11 year (same crime under FARA is 25 years), we say we don't care where he got the money (and by extension we don't care about rule of law) and give him the Nobel Peace Prize.

We talk about peace but we wage war with DU munition. When we lement oppression yet torch Falluja with white phosphorus weapon. With such shining example of democracy, is it any wonder why it will not flourish in China?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anitaj
01:23 PM on 10/11/2010
Congratulations to Liu Xiaobo for this well-deserved honor.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Obama cares about all of U.S.
01:01 AM on 10/11/2010
Good night China,
God Bless China,
Bod Bless Liu Xiaobo.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Obama cares about all of U.S.
12:53 AM on 10/11/2010
OH MY! the tr011s get up to mischief late at nite.
See below.
12:17 AM on 10/11/2010
2. From your comment, i found Most Huffings are innocent, they do not know about the real CHINA, they just judge CHINA by one-side media, not by there eyes, there real-brain.
3. China is a big machine and has a long history, its people is not as simple as you think. We know history, politics and techs, we all know the GOV is not perfect, but the GOV is trying to feed and improve our life.
4. The Chinese know the only way to improve the big machine is to impove it step by step and from inside, not outside. The GOV is doing it in this way. Anyone knows that a sudden change may shock a big, complex system.
12:17 AM on 10/11/2010
Being Chinese, i would like to say something to you guys:
1. Let me tell you why CHINA GOV does not accept the western-so-called "Human rights" request.
A country is the the same as a family, a simple story.
You mantain and support your family while your neighbour mantains his. Someday your neighbour knock your door and tell you that you should FK your wife 2 times a week, not 3 times a week and also tell you the reason is that he himself FK his wife 3 times.
What do you think about this, do you really think the neighbour is trying to improve the quality of your family life?
Unfortunately, the Chinese GOV and most chinese are not as stupid as you, they know what the game they are playing.
What the western care is not the "Human rights" itself, they just want to interfere your family, trying to destroy your stability, and then benefit from it. No one give you the "Human rights" when thousand of your people starving to death. We all see the "Human rights" the west gave from the 1840s, and also from the current Iraq and Afgan.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anitaj
01:21 PM on 10/11/2010
"A country is the the same as a family" (sic)

So does that make Tibetans abducted children?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GPTP
10:35 PM on 10/11/2010
Tell that to Native Indians
05:39 PM on 10/10/2010
Prosecution of Liu on subversion charge is based on state’s right to perserve sovereignty. We have the same law ourselves (Foreign Agent Registration Act) forbidding foreign sponsorship of domestic political activity.

Here’s the court doucment on Lu’s conviction:

http://www.liuxiaobo.eu/images/stories/lxb-Verdict.pdf

Allow me to highlight parts of page 4, item 1 & 2:

1) Liu Xiaobo had no significant income other than payment from abroad for his political commentary, and authoring of "Charter 08".

2) Liu set up a bank account under his wife’s name, and Bank of China records show Liu’s wife withdrew foreign remittance from this account.

Seems to me, establishing Liu’s status as a foreign agent, based on financial sponsorship by foreign entity (the same criteria as uner FARA), is part of the evidence that convicted him.

Would someone on the take from China advocating abolition of the US constitution ever win the Nobel Peace Prize? This, is double standard.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anitaj
12:55 PM on 10/11/2010
Earning a living can be tricky when one is incarcerated.
10:10 PM on 10/11/2010
It's obvious you didn't read the verdict I cited, Anita. Most of the $650,000 was taken between 2004 and 2008, prior to his arrest for subversive activity (conducting domestic political activity under foreign sponsorship, illegal is most countries.)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Obama cares about all of U.S.
12:54 AM on 10/11/2010
Disgusting behavior.
Not worthy of a 'so called' great nation.
A sad day for China.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
witsendster
Flabergasted by Republican Stupidity!
10:44 AM on 10/10/2010
I am very pleased that the Nobel Committee was not bullied by the Chinese warning not to award the prize to the dissident. How embarrassing for a govt.who has accomplished as much as the Chinese Govt. to block even his Lui's name from CNN at the tourist hotels - I hope in time the Chinese Govt. will embrace true greatness and honor those from Tienanmen Square, who, like the Polish dissidents of Walesa's time have spurred much of the positive things that have happened in their country. Even though oppressive govt's crack down mercilessly on dissidents, they cannot erase that these protests have happened, and the stories stay alive - and often, gradually, concessions are made....change occurs.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Benover de Viros
07:58 AM on 10/10/2010
your act will make the difference
06:15 AM on 10/10/2010
Interact live with authoritarian propagandists! Ah, the digital age is so interesting!
10:27 AM on 10/10/2010
hi!
photo
mudkitten
Can't we settle this over a bowl of kibble?
03:21 PM on 10/10/2010
I don't know which is more amazing. That there are so many of them or that they are so bad at what they do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Obama cares about all of U.S.
12:56 AM on 10/11/2010
A few of them are fairly proficient in English language.

None of them understand American culture well enough to be convincing.
05:51 AM on 10/10/2010
For Zhuubaajie and his co-workers,

In case you were not aware of it, because Zhuubaajie sure wasn't, foreign governments regularly pay Washington lobbyists to advance their interests:

http://www.thegovmonitor.com/americas_features/de-facto-government-in-honduras-pays-washington-lobbyists-300000-to-sway-u-s-opinion-8579.html
05:26 PM on 10/10/2010
Can you cite anyone taking money from the Chinese to advocte abolition of US constitution and overthrowing of current/past US administration?
06:07 PM on 10/10/2010
Well said.
12:07 AM on 10/11/2010
Just ignore them. As Camron said, "You Mad!" (Cause Liu Xiaobo won a Nobel Peace Prize.)
03:30 AM on 10/10/2010
Repressive governments are like cockroaches. They hate it when you turn the light on.
12:55 AM on 10/11/2010
Sounds like congress
10:36 PM on 10/11/2010
Or the $650,000 of our tax dollar that went to finance Liu political activity in China.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Obama cares about all of U.S.
12:57 AM on 10/11/2010
So very well said.
03:16 AM on 10/10/2010
It's interesting to read the apologists for China on this message board. Some of them are so overboard they rant and rave about "vikings" trying to repress the glorious government of China!
03:33 AM on 10/10/2010
Not glorious, just effective, as measured by ability to make the lives of the Chinese people better.

Perhaps it should be glorious, as Beijing was the only polity in human history that actually lifted over 500,000,000 out of poverty in a single generation. Made in China goods also made the lives of billions of the world's denizens so much better, they forgot about strife. No strife, no war, peace.

If a peace prize is to award and honor efforts to bring peace to the world, Beijing is much more deserving than anyone who took substantial sums from a foreign government, and then attacked his mother nation's constitution, thus agitating unrest and instability.
03:49 AM on 10/10/2010
You forgot to mention that it was this same government that kept A BILLION people in poverty... and for well over a generation. Maybe if they'd done a better job earlier, they wouldn't have so much catching up to do.
02:39 PM on 10/10/2010
You have to realize that these people are being paid by the Chinese government to propagandize. You can see articles about this here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/usha-haley/chinas-fifty-cent-party-f_1_b_749989.html and here:
http://www.thomascrampton.com/china/oiwan-lam-chinas-50-cent-twitter-censors/
06:14 PM on 10/10/2010
Blup: You care to explain why your statement is not actionable libel? What factual support do you have for your statement here?
01:00 AM on 10/11/2010
The same way Liu Xiaobo is being paid by the United States to fight the Chinese Government.