More

Los Angeles World Cup? Football Stadium Developers Tweak Plans To Suit World Cup Rules

JACOB ADELMAN   10/11/10 08:41 PM ET   AP

Majestic Realty
In this Wednesday, Jan. 7, 2009 photo, John Semcken, a partner in Majestic Realty with billionaire developer Ed Roski, stands on the site of Roski's proposed new $800 million National Football League stadium, in Industry, Calif. A key part of the plan goes to voters Tuesday, Jan 20, 2009, when the 82 people who live in the city of Industry cast ballots on a bond measure that would provide $150 million to pave the way with infrastructure improvements

LOS ANGELES — Developers of a new NFL stadium on a hilly strip of land east of Los Angeles are sketching out plans for a second high-profile use for the venue: World Cup soccer.

Architects for Majestic Realty Co. said Monday they were tweaking the design of the stadium to incorporate field measurements and bleacher configurations based on guidelines from World Cup organizer FIFA, which wants a width of 68 meters (75 yards).

The news came amid possible competition from sports and entertainment powerhouse AEG, which is deciding whether to build a stadium in downtown Los Angeles to lure an NFL franchise.

Dan Meis, principal stadium architect for Majestic, said he can adjust his plans further to include additional guidelines FIFA may release ahead of the 2018 and 2022 games that are being sought by the United States.

"Because we're building a new stadium, we could incorporate anything FIFA could want," said Meis, who also designed Staples Center in Los Angeles, Manchester Evening News Arena and Japan's Saitama Super Arena.

Los Angeles is among the 18 U.S. cities proposed as sites if FIFA's executive committee votes on Dec. 2 to give the 2018 or 2022 tournament to the United States.

The Rose Bowl in Pasadena, site of the 1994 final, is among the proposed venues, and U.S. bidders say there is plenty of time to consider new stadiums in they are built in Los Angeles or the San Francisco area.

Majestic's plan could improve the odds of the U.S. landing the games because the popularity of soccer in Southern California would make its stadiums major World Cup sites, said David Carter, a sports marketing professor at the University of Southern California's Marshall School of Business.

"It certainly couldn't hurt based on the quality and the magnitude of the venues that are already in play, and to add to it an impressive Southern California venue, that would help," he said.

Carter, however, said the revamped plans wouldn't necessarily give Majestic, primarily a developer of industrial projects, an advantage over AEG, which also would likely design a downtown stadium with the World Cup in mind.

The USA Bid Committee for the World Cup includes AEG owner Philip Anschutz, who also owns the Los Angeles Galaxy soccer team and co-founded Major League Soccer in the United States, and AEG president and CEO Tim Leiweke.

Also on the committee is sports management mogul Casey Wasserman, who was named as a possible investor in AEG's plan.

Messages seeking comment from AEG, FIFA and the USA Bid Committee were not immediately returned.

John Semcken, Majestic vice president in charge of the stadium effort, stressed the project in the city of Industry, was approved and ready to go.

"It will have all the amenities necessary to create the ultimate fan experience for the NFL and soccer," he said in a statement, declining further comment.

Majestic has the necessary approvals to build its 75,000-seat stadium about 15 miles east of Los Angeles but has said it will not begin construction until it secures a team.

AEG officials have not released a formal proposal but have mentioned the possibility of an NFL stadium in public remarks.

The two companies collaborated in the late 1990s on the development of Staples Center.

Meis said Majestic chief Ed Roski tapped him several years ago to design the NFL stadium in Industry then asked him to optimize the design for use as a possible World Cup arena about eight months ago, when the U.S. bid was gaining momentum.

The architect said the primary change would involve a seating configuration that allows spectators to see more of the field than currently possible in NFL stadiums modified for international soccer matches.

Meis said Majestic's difficulty in securing an NFL team during a year when the league was preoccupied with labor negotiations was partly a blessing, since it gave him the chance to adjust his design.

"It's been a bit of a luxury," he said. "It gave us time to think about it."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST LOS ANGELES

LOS ANGELES — Developers of a new NFL stadium on a hilly strip of land east of Los Angeles are sketching out plans for a second high-profile use for the venue: World Cup soccer. Architects for ...
LOS ANGELES — Developers of a new NFL stadium on a hilly strip of land east of Los Angeles are sketching out plans for a second high-profile use for the venue: World Cup soccer. Architects for ...
Filed by Jen Sabella  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 23
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
bigdaveh
if you want rainbows, you have to put up with the
01:22 PM on 10/13/2010
No, please, put the new stadium in an area that nobody will go to even for World Cup. I mean, City of Industry???? It's 30 minutes from downtown ON A GOOD DAY. How are you going to lure people out there to waste a Sunday watching football?
photo
DRaymond
Network administrator, voiceovers
02:10 PM on 10/12/2010
The thing is of courst that Los Angeles does not need to build a new stadium to host the World Cup. We already have the Home Depot Center (where our two MLS teams play) plus the Colosseum (which regularly has well attended international exhibition games) and the Rose Bowl.

There is ZERO need for an additional stadium to host the World Cup here. The whole motive here is to use LA's love of soccer (note, two MLS teams and zero NFL teams) to milk public support.

To be honest AEG has the better site. It blends into the fabric of Staples Center and downtown including mass transit. Majestic Realty's site is surrounded by industrial parks (yawn) and suburban residential (hostile to it). The only mass transit is a Metrolink station on the least traveled Riverside line, which at present schedules no late or weekend service.
09:12 AM on 10/12/2010
The last think we need is the World Cup and the hoodlum fans that come along for the ride.
photo
1logicalthinker
with occasional humorous overtones :)
03:05 AM on 10/12/2010
Wow! In 2009, only 82 people lived in the City of Industry. My next door neighbor has more cousins than that :)
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JScott
John Galt's last name is McGuffin-Smithee
11:50 AM on 10/12/2010
It's one of those fiefdom cities like Vernon and Bell, run by a small coterie of cronies.
Watch them build it and then go bankrupt and have to demolish it.-anyone remember Ontario Motor Speedway?
photo
derrickhoyle
...it's a league game, Smokey.
12:07 PM on 10/12/2010
Or the Riverside International Speedway.
photo
1logicalthinker
with occasional humorous overtones :)
03:41 AM on 10/13/2010
Yes, I remember OMS very well. I was at the first 500 mile race there on Labor Day 1970. One 500 mile they ran (I don't remember if it was the first) had only seven cars finish--it was very hot.

Let's just hope those 82 residents don't get stuck paying for the stadium, 'cause Ontario bonds took a bath on OMS ;)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LiberalBuzz
Voting republican is voting against America.
01:00 AM on 10/12/2010
Anyone know if taxpayer money was being used for this thing?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JScott
John Galt's last name is McGuffin-Smithee
11:51 AM on 10/12/2010
Ya just know they are going to try the public till somewhere in the process.

So much for 'free markets'.
photo
DRaymond
Network administrator, voiceovers
02:14 PM on 10/12/2010
The COI project is not planning on using state money however the City of Industry did float a half billion dollar bond to fund street improvements around the site if built (bear in mind that the City of Industry is essentially a fiefdom of Majestic Realty). On the other hand the state legislature did give Majestic the first ever exemption to California's environmental laws (so that the surrounding homeowners had to drop their lawsuits) and AEG is lobbying for a similar exemption for its plans.
07:46 PM on 10/12/2010
That will never happen in Los Angeles proper. I think City of Industry is a great site but can you imagine the traffic along the 10 freeway...yikes.
photo
llozano
Live and let live...
11:08 PM on 10/11/2010
If I recall there was very little infrastructure built for the 94 World Cup. The same with the 84 Olympics. Los Angeles has adequate facilities to handle such events. What we don't need is a taxpayer giveaway to build more stadiums. Talk about waste. Anyway we already have two very good college football programs in town. The return on pro sports is not shared by the general community. If they are please show me.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JScott
John Galt's last name is McGuffin-Smithee
11:52 AM on 10/12/2010
Indeed.

Most of the 84 infrastructure was what was left from the 1932 Olympics.
07:49 PM on 10/12/2010
I'm all for increasing infrastructure through ther use of private/public funds. I dont think we need another stadium. Choose the Coliseum or the Rose Bowl. This way both cities Los Angeles and Pasadena can leverage funds to increase infrastructure....definitely expanding the freeways...buses and metro link. Possibly the the subway as well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dgoshilla
09:46 PM on 10/11/2010
Just what we want, an atrocity of a "stadium" in the middle of nowhere aka the city of industry, without access to public transit for all the world to come and see.

The stadium will happen. AEG will build it downtown where it belongs.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JScott
John Galt's last name is McGuffin-Smithee
11:54 AM on 10/12/2010
Why there's already Dodger Stadium, Coliseum Rose Bowl there's plenty already, dunno where they would put it anyway-something else would have to be demo'd to build it.
07:51 PM on 10/12/2010
Ohh Maybe demo Dodger stadium and upgrade to Base ball and football stadium like Oakland Coliseum. That would be awesome. Plus I think the McCourts could use new partners
08:56 PM on 10/11/2010
England 2018


USA 2022
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:05 PM on 10/11/2010
LA needs no more stadiums. USC
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:11 PM on 10/11/2010
LA had WC in 1994 and it was not very successful relative to other world cups. the same city shouldn't host such an event until half a century at least considering most of the world's major metropolisi would love to have it.
08:58 PM on 10/11/2010
***LA had WC in 1994 and it was not very successful relative to other world cups****

Wrong

The 1994 World Cup was the highest attended World Cup in history, with 3.6M people and had a lasting legacy on the presentation and television coverage of football which continues to this very day.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dgoshilla
09:47 PM on 10/11/2010
The 94 US world cup was the most successful in the history of the World Cup. When we host it again it will once again be the most successful.