iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Nobel Economics Prizes 2010 Announced; 2 Americans Win

JEANNINE AVERSA, LOUISE NORDSTROM and KARL RITTER   10/11/10 09:54 PM ET   AP

Peter Diamond

WASHINGTON — Peter Diamond's research on unemployment is good enough to earn him the Nobel Prize in economics – but not to get him on the Federal Reserve.

Diamond, an economist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and two other economists were honored Monday for their work in explaining why unemployment can remain high despite large numbers of job openings – a trend that is playing out today.

The other economists were Dale Mortensen, an economics professor at Northwestern University, and Christopher Pissarides, a professor at the London School of Economics. The three men will share the $1.5 million prize.

President Barack Obama nominated Diamond to the Fed in late April. But Senate Republicans have blocked his nomination, questioning his practical experience, as well as the conclusions of his research.

In the early 1980s, Diamond wrote a paper that found federal unemployment insurance helps companies land job seekers with the right skills by allowing the unemployed to hold out for the right opportunity.

Some Republicans argue that extending unemployment benefits – as Congress has done on multiple occasions since the recession – can actually make unemployment worse by taking away the incentives to finding work. Liberal economists dismiss that.

Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama, the senior Republican on the Senate Banking Committee, has been blocking Diamond's nomination to the Fed for months. Shelby says Diamond lacks expertise in so-called monetary policy – the setting of interest rates and other tools that are used to influence the nation's economic growth, employment and inflation.

"While the Nobel Prize for economics is a significant recognition, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences does not determine who is qualified to serve on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System," Shelby said Monday.

Obama said Monday he hopes the Senate will confirm Diamond. The president said he tapped Diamond for the Fed job to "help bring his extraordinary expertise to our economic recovery."

The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences said it chose Diamond, Mortensen and Pissarides for work that helps economists and others "understand the ways in which unemployment, job vacancies and wages are affected by regulation and economic policy."

The New Deal for Young People, a British government initiative aimed at getting 18- to 24-year-olds back on the job market after long spells of unemployment, "is very much based on our work," said Pissarides, 62. "The ways of dealing with this need not be expensive training – it could be as simple as providing work experience," he said.

Dating back to the 1970s and 1980s, their work gave economists a new way to look at unemployment trends. They focused on factors such as the skills job seekers have, how they hunt for jobs and the needs of employers. Their work challenged the classical view of markets, where buyers and sellers always find each other. In the real world, sometimes they don't, the Nobel winners found.

Job seekers and job providers, for instance, can encounter obstacles along the way. The skills workers have may not match the skills employers want. Job seekers may not be able to move to a new city for work. Some applicants may jump at the first offer they get, even though it's not the best match.

Their work resulted in the so-called Diamond-Mortensen-Pissarides model, a frequently used tool to estimate how unemployment benefits, interest rates, the efficiency of employment agencies and other factors can affect the labor market.

Taken together, their work has suggested, for instance, that unemployment benefits can have the unintended consequences of prolonging unemployment. That's because the aid can make it less costly to be out of work – even as it improves employers' chances of finding the right workers, as Diamond's research concluded.

Diamond wrote that workers "become more selective in the jobs they accept" because of the employment aid. In the long run, he found, that makes for better matches and increases the economy's efficiency because companies and workers are better suited to one another.

An authority on Social Security, pensions and taxation, Diamond, 70, was a mentor to Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke while he was a student at MIT.

Mortensen, 71, is a visiting professor at the University of Aarhus in Denmark.

"Diamond is a giant in economics," said Anil Kashyap, professor of economics and finance at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. "To argue that he is not qualified to be a member of the Federal Reserve is just crazy,"

___

Associated Press writers Malin Rising in Stockholm; Jan M. Olsen in Copenhagen, Denmark; Raphael Satter and Jane Wardell in London; Mark Pratt in Boston; and Menelaos Hadjicostis in Nicosia, Cyprus, contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Peter Diamond's research on unemployment is good enough to earn him the Nobel Prize in economics – but not to get him on the Federal Reserve. Diamond, an economist at the Mas...
WASHINGTON — Peter Diamond's research on unemployment is good enough to earn him the Nobel Prize in economics – but not to get him on the Federal Reserve. Diamond, an economist at the Mas...
Filed by Ryan McCarthy  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,749
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (27 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AxelDC
04:46 PM on 10/12/2010
Unemployment insurance allows the unemployed to look for work without starving. Otherwise, we would have highly educated people racing out to work at Walmart, shouldering out lesser skilled employees who would then be on the streets. Those without jobs would be forced to severely cut back on spending, worsening the economic situation by reducing demand, creating a deflationary cycle that could last for years.

Republicans seem to look at very narrow microeconomic decisions without looking at the larger macroeconomic picture. Their solutions are pro-cyclical, encouraging inflationary policies in good times and encouraging deflation and greater unemployment in bad.
03:43 PM on 10/12/2010
Will you take a look and pass it on? The best way to stop these corporate front groups from stealing our election is to make sure as many people as possible know they're trying to do it—and we created this chart as a fun way to spread the word. ~ moveon.org

Check out the full interactive "RepubliCorp merger" plan to take over our government here:
http://pol.moveon.org/republicor­p_orgchart/?id=24068-13493133-Qbg8M5x&t=1
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ryan Magdangal
Pirate Satellite
02:50 PM on 10/12/2010
The republicants are shameless! Obstruction precedes the nations health for progress. I hope they are obliterated this Nov 2nd when we have our say. ie: 1934 mid-term elections.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TW77429
The best GOV money can buy!!
12:56 PM on 10/12/2010
Not long ago I was rejected for a job opening because my credit rating didn't meet the company's hiring criteria - doesn't it seem so very 'catch 22ish' that if you loose your job and let some bills slide for awhile - then you're not hire-able to get any job to catchup on your bills - this was a janitorial job I was applying for. That might account for some of the openings that go unfilled.
photo
TexasMike
No False Equivalence Here
11:06 AM on 10/12/2010
The funny thing was Republican's never hated the Nobel Peace Prize until they were "told" to hate it from their open minded pundits screaming on blogs, TV and radio.....and by "open minded" I mean that they have a big hole in their heads.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AxelDC
04:47 PM on 10/12/2010
Their biggest complaint is that their guys never get it, but why should Bush get a Peace Prize for starting 2 wars that he couldn't finish?
photo
TexasMike
No False Equivalence Here
05:28 PM on 10/12/2010
Well said.

By the by, Republicans = Daleks
09:31 AM on 10/12/2010
How ironic that the nation that caused so much of the economic disaster the world is in yields two Nobel winners for economics. I know, I know, it was the evil Republicans that caused it all, and these two are Democrats, but they still are the offspring of a uniformly greedy society.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AxelDC
04:48 PM on 10/12/2010
American researchers have been on the forefront of economics for decades. The most prominent economic researchers in the 20th C. were either British or American.

Just because policy makers routinely ignore them doesn't mean we don't have a very bright class of economists.
10:06 PM on 10/11/2010
Thanks yet again to the "Party of No".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Robert Masters
To take my property is to take my means to live
09:46 PM on 10/11/2010
At this stage the Nobel Prize is a reason to reject him. These guys lost credibility when they gave the peace prize to Arafat and rejected Von Mises for economics.
Henri101
There is nothing more dangerous than sincere ignor
05:29 PM on 10/11/2010
Conservatives seem to be anti-intelligentsia.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stape45
No brag, just fact.
05:44 PM on 10/11/2010
And rightfully so. It goes totally against the grain.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
theprogressiveanalyst
Ignorance is a dangerous thing
06:31 PM on 10/11/2010
They don't like what they can't understand. Explains a lot.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stape45
No brag, just fact.
05:29 PM on 10/11/2010
It's pathetically funny how the Repubs spend half of their time b!tching about how scewed-up things are, and the rest of their time doing all they can to maintain the staus quo.Tells me everything I need to know about them.
photo
Skunkman
old & decrepit
05:18 PM on 10/11/2010
Shelby's new spin will be that the Nobel Prize is an award given out by socialists, and just confirms that Diamond's a member of the global commie "new world order" elite, out of touch with ordinary folks; obviously, then, the spot on the Fed's board should go to a real American who wouldn't truck with such highfalutin' foreigners.

Mike:
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
super
07:26 PM on 10/11/2010
furriners
05:14 PM on 10/11/2010
The integrity of the Nobel Prizes has been swirling in the toilet bowl for a very long time now. $1.5M to the guy who come up with an answer to "How do we tax the unemployed!". Anybody
still wondering why the African children are still starving to death at the rate of 25000/day?

Nobel Prize!? What a joke, a big joke on us all. Hardy, har, har!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
asdusty
Remember Milne Bay!
05:17 PM on 10/11/2010
African children are still starving because we are following an ideology called neoliberalism. Until we can develop past that then the rich will get richer and the poor will get poorer.
06:29 PM on 10/11/2010
The Prize for Economics was shared by three recipients. That means that each of them will receive $500,000, the same amount as the genius awards of the MacArthur Foundation. Their cooperative study has been used by others to do further research in the field. I think the Nobel people got their money's worth. Now all we have to do is convince Sen Shelby. Don't I wish ...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JFaye
My micro-bio is not empty. Thank you.
05:03 PM on 10/11/2010
Other than having to read about the stupidity and narcissist behavior of Republicans, this was definitely a feel good story and with all the craziness in the body politic of our country, we need, at least "I" need feel good stories.

Wondering if these Tealiban Rethugs have enough mental or cerebral stretch to find this situation a bit embarrassing??? "Senate Republicans have objected to what they see as Diamond's limited experience in dissecting the inner workings of the national economy."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nofir2
04:58 PM on 10/11/2010
Gotta Run....later DT10 Its been fun
But you really should get back to the clinic now
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ddemos
my micro-bio is none of your business
05:02 PM on 10/11/2010
DT has really gone of his meds...something tells me he knows he is ridiculous...and enjoys his ig norance immensly...no one is really that st upid...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DT10
05:05 PM on 10/11/2010
when a liberal thinks i'm ignorant i've done my job.

better luck next time gentlemen (or ladies). LOL
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DT10
05:03 PM on 10/11/2010
byeeeeee
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ddemos
my micro-bio is none of your business
05:10 PM on 10/11/2010
Back to the drudgereport...one can only hope...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
T4
Entreprenuer and financial consultant
04:43 PM on 10/11/2010
interesting research that is totally nonsencial inthe real world where revolving vcred it and cash flows detremine consumer confiednce not some mythingcal meeting of reatil prices and WTP.. thatis total crap.. the fact that Obama's ,megabanks control the eocnomy and economyis wrecked - could there be a connection - not if your Ben and the Obama posse - just a conincidencethat after $2 trillionin goveways the banks make aprofit everyday and the american people are inshell shock. This is only possiblt if you understand the connection between econmic dominace, credit and cash flows. the megabanks control everything. and Obama has given them this control and the distrotion that goes with it - no more money into the eocnomy. break up the banks and frre the $2 trillionthat Obama had given away.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lizt
former Army officer/lifelong liberal/pdx biker
04:59 PM on 10/11/2010
Whenever I see a post full of misspelling, no capitalization, no punctuation, poor grammar and run-on sentences, I know that I'm dealing with a bagger-publican. There is an abundance of all this in your post which means your ideas are not clear cut and easily accessible for reading. But at least you saved me the time of having to puzzle out your lack of logic.