More

Fed Leans Toward Two-Step Plan To Boost Economy

JEANNINE AVERSA   10/12/10 06:39 PM ET   AP

Fed Plan

WASHINGTON — The Federal Reserve is leaning toward taking two steps to boost the economy: Buying more Treasury bonds to drive down loan rates, and signaling an openness to higher prices later to encourage more spending now.

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and his colleagues appeared to be nearing consensus on those ideas at their September 21 meeting, according to minutes of the closed-door deliberations that were released Tuesday.

Economists predict Fed officials will approve the bond purchase program at their Nov. 2-3 meeting.

Fed policymakers also spoke at their last meeting about setting a higher inflation target, hoping that would get people to spend more money in short run.

The minutes showed the Fed was concerned that the economy was growing slower than they had expected. While Fed officials didn't see the economy slipping back into a recession, they worried it had become vulnerable to "potential negative shocks." They expressed concerns that unemployment, which has been at 9.6 percent for the past months, would stay elevated.

Fed officials said they were prepared to provide additional relief "before long," according to the minutes. Economists and investors took that as a sign that they are ready to act.

"The Fed is close to introducing a second round" of stimulus, Paul Ashworth, economist at Capital Economics, said the minutes showed.

Wall Street has been eagerly awaiting the Fed's decision to purchase government debt, known officially as quantitative easing. The Fed minutes signaled that move is near and lifted all major indexes.

Fed policymakers didn't settle on how big the debt purchase should be or how to structure the program. Such details are what they are wrestling with as their prepare for the November meeting.

The Fed's purchase aims to drive down interest rates on mortgages, corporate debt and other loans. It hopes that this will spur Americans to boost spending, which would strengthen the economy and ultimately chip away at the stubbornly high unemployment rate.

Public remarks by Fed officials since the September 21 meeting suggest the program will be smaller than the $1.7 trillion one it launched during the recession. Under that program, the Fed purchased a mix of mortgage securities and government debt. The effort was credited with forcing down mortgages rates and providing support to the weakened housing market.

Two Fed officials in recent remarks have suggested the new purchases shouldn't exceed $500 billion.

At the September meeting, some Fed officials thought the economic benefit of the debt purchases could be "small." A smaller program isn't expected to lower rates as much as the Fed's crisis-era program did, economists say. Moreover, there's concern that even cheaper loans will fail to get people and companies to ramp up their spending. Thus far, they haven't been confident enough in the economy or their own financial prospects to do so.

Bernanke said last week that another round of securities purchases would likely help the economy.

So far, five of the Fed's 11 voting members, including Bernanke, are leaning toward additional aid or are at least open to it. Fed Vice Chairwoman Janet Yellen, whose duties include building support for Bernanke's position, is likely to vote with the Fed chief. Fed Governors Kevin Warsh, Elizabeth Duke, Daniel Tarullo and Sarah Bloom Raskin also are likely to back Bernanke. Thomas Hoenig, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, however, has dissented from the Fed's decisions all year and is likely to oppose additional aid.

Speaking Tuesday in Denver, Hoenig said he isn't confident more debt purchases "will work in the real world."

William Dudley, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, has estimated that a $500 billion program would provide the same amount of stimulus as a half-point or three-quarter point reduction to the Fed's main interest rate. That rate is already near zero and can't be cut further. That's why the Fed is weighing buying more government debt.

Another option to help the economy also was discussed extensively at the September meeting, according to the minutes. That deals with the Fed trying to raise people's expectations of where they think inflation is heading in the months ahead. If the Fed were to communicate that it will tolerate a higher-than-normal rate of inflation, that could make companies feel more inclined to nudge up their prices. Shoppers – thinking prices would be rising even further down the road – would be more inclined to make purchases sooner. That would lift inflation, which is now running at very low levels.

Such a move would push "real" or inflation-adjusted interest rates, down, which could spur more spending. Fed officials at the September meeting noted that there are different ways it could try to influence people's expectations of inflation. One way was to include information in the minutes of the Fed meetings to try to shape people's expectations about inflation.

It's a controversial idea that Bernanke called "inappropriate" in August, given the country's current economic circumstances. However, at the time he said such a step "might make sense" if the country were mired in a situation of prolonged deflation that weakened the public's confidence.

According to the Fed minutes, officials "saw only small odds of deflation." Deflation is a widespread drop in prices, wages and the values of stocks and homes.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON — The Federal Reserve is leaning toward taking two steps to boost the economy: Buying more Treasury bonds to drive down loan rates, and signaling an openness to higher prices later to...
WASHINGTON — The Federal Reserve is leaning toward taking two steps to boost the economy: Buying more Treasury bonds to drive down loan rates, and signaling an openness to higher prices later to...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 73
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
06:15 PM on 10/15/2010
I do not see how quantitative easing is going to solve our economic problem. Debt purchases from banks will remove risk from their books without substantially increasing their reserves and additionally will provide them with the means of replenishing the debt instruments that had been purchased by the central bank. Little accomplished.
The problem is how to get companies to hire new employees, thereby reducing unemployment and how to provide the means for the public to buy products from these companies.
03:13 PM on 10/15/2010
Please explain to me how making more money available to the banking system will make people want to purchase products. Are all of these unemployed people going to go to the bank and borrow money so that they can buy products? The only logical answer is to reinstate the unemployment extensions.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:19 AM on 10/14/2010
bernanke is a crim inal to humanity and America. he just wiped out 5% of the USDollars value in the past few weeks. i guess no Americans care. i guess they like being slaves. there is no other reason.

btw, bernanke told all of his friend a few weeks back about the QE2 coming up, so they shorted the dollar and made even more money. more cri mes from your mas ter

on a lighter note, the queen threw her commonwealth games, the entire Indian country boycotted, they had 80 fans for a track meet, 60 for a swimming competition (most were family) and the media wont report it . welcome to 1984^2
11:41 PM on 10/13/2010
Step 1: QE1. Step 2: QE2. Step 3: QE3
nothingchanges
too soon old, too late smart
10:45 PM on 10/13/2010
If one were to accept the premise that supply and demand determines the income of Americans in general, then one could assume that since the financial sector pays so extravagantly, they reward the greatest minds in the country for their sterling efforts to create wealth from paper.

The "greatest minds" in the country, bankrupted it. How can lesser minds (government employees) fix a broken system when supposedly the best and brightest labored so intensively to break it?

Classic paradox. Can God create a stone so heavy that even He can't lift it?

Can greed create a financial mess so large that no amount of money or effort can resolve it?
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
06:10 PM on 10/14/2010
I'll take Elizabeth Warren over the "greatest minds" any day. And YES, she CAN fix it.
photo
halfpricefaustian
Voted for Obama. Waiting for Godot.
12:23 PM on 10/13/2010
That's your plan, Ben? Do the same thing you've done before, that hasn't worked yet, but more of it will work? How about this: by driving interest rates down again, you convince people who do want to borrow for a house to put it off because you'll drive rates down again if they just wait. People aren't going to start spending because they are afraid for the future. You probably will manage to set off a speculative bubble in junk bonds and commodities like gold and oil, neither of which is a positive for the economy and may well result in another crash and round of bailouts. Further debasement of our currency is not the answer.
03:53 PM on 10/13/2010
Well, it definitely is good for gold which took off today with the DOW. But it looks like the China commodity hunger is driving that in large part. Through into all this the foreclosure iceberg and things are going to get nasty I think.
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
06:12 PM on 10/14/2010
Read the article. He is increasing inflation, not lowering it. See, we are in a situation where deflation is still a real issue. Basically he is creating more "headroom" to borrow a sound-engineer phrase.
11:50 AM on 10/13/2010
by quantitative lending they mean inflating the dollar in an last ditch effort to spur banks to start lending and in also to lower our debt? problem is this will create low interest rates inititally and then drastically they will increase as there will be to many treasury bonds, hence the yield goes higher. Also, expect gas price to raise with this move. oil is sold in American dollars. If we inflate the dollar on purpose, those countries who sell it will simply increase their cost to offset the inflated dollar.

We need job growth. Banks are not going to lend to individuals/ entities if they think they wont get the money back. this is the bottom line Unfortunately, none of Obamas policies are helping increase jobs. His administration is making it worse.

This is such a dicey move. do not have anything in savings, because the dollar could be worthless. I almost think they are trying to collapse the dollar on purpose to move us to a new global currency. I don't know what to think anymore because what the government is doing does not make any sense
12:09 PM on 10/13/2010
I meant to say quantitative easing not lending
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
06:32 PM on 10/14/2010
It isn't that it makes no sense it is that you don't personally understand it. Economics is a complex subject, especially as it relates to interest rates, banking, etc. I find it interesting that you find a way to blame Obama. "bottom line none of Obama's policies are helping increase jobs." You must not be aware of all the jobs that would have been lost without Obama's policies. I imagine your prescription is another round of tax cuts for fat cats, then? What you fail to realize is that our economy was left in SUCH bad shape by those foolish republicans that it will take a LONG time to clean up their mess. You are correct that if we inflate the dollar then other countries will adjust their cost ratio to offset the inflated dollar. But by increasing inflation, the Fed is DEFLATING the value of the dollar. Think of it like this: say that today's money value of $1 equals $1. Now if we increase inflation by 2%, then tomorrow's dollar will purchase 2% fewer goods to a value of $.98. What this means is that you must pay $1.02 tomorrow for $1's worth of goods in today's dollars. Basically, when you talk about inflation you aren't talking about the price of money. What you are talking about is the value of a basket of goods that a specified amount of money will buy.

I got MY economics degree at Boise State.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:12 AM on 10/13/2010
Buying up debt is merely another siphon of taxpayers money and yet another element for the Shock Doctrine against our once great country.

Get ready for massive inflation, shortages and more Americans out of work while China and India prosper.

Get Bernanke out of there.
09:22 AM on 10/13/2010
the fiat swindle has run its course
08:30 AM on 10/13/2010
Step 1....Big GOP win in November
Step 2....GOP president elected in 2012
photo
Simple Living
Stand for something
08:53 AM on 10/13/2010
You have got to be kidding !!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bluepond
person
08:55 AM on 10/13/2010
Step 3...complete paralysis of government
Step 4...complete takeover of the country by business
Step 5...removal of all social safety nets, minimum wage, voting rights
Step 6...final destruction of American middle and lower classes, reduction to below 3rd world status

People, business needs us neither as workers or as consumers. We are nearly finished. Wake up now!
09:21 AM on 10/13/2010
3 and 4 have already been accomplished

I agree 5 would be a likely outcome

6 is inevitable either way --

Nearly finished? The economic destruction of the USA began in earnest some 40 years ago -- but you are right the primary destruction is nearly finished -- now the real pain and suffering begins -- unless of course you live in ivory tower of "finance" or Washington D.C.
08:25 AM on 10/13/2010
Institutional bailouts do not help we the people.
To actually end the crisis, I think we have to go back to the root problem - the housing crisis.
If we offer tax incentives & can increase housing demand, the foreclosure and unemployment problems would lessen dramatically. This would also create many private sector jobs.
TRY THIS:
Instead of borrowing and increasing our national debt, let those 50 and over withdraw their retirement savings TAX FREE if:
1. Funds are used to pay CASH for a primary or second home costing less than $250,000.
2. They must keep the home for at least 3 years or pay back the tax free incentive.
3. Renting to a foreclosure victim would be a plus!

NO NEW DEBT & a 100% American incentive (unlike the clunker program).
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
06:38 PM on 10/14/2010
And what would those people do for retirement savings if they blow it all buying up a house worth a quarter of a million dollars?
08:06 AM on 10/13/2010
Keynesian Economics vs. Austrian Economics

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MnekzRuu8wo

lets compare economics to mental health.

Austrian = tip top condition

Monetarists = factor two psychosis

Marxist = factor one psychosis

Keynesian = insane
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
06:40 PM on 10/14/2010
The last time our country used Keynesian economics we were sailing through the 1950s as the hottest economy in the world. Our middle class expanded to include more people than ever before or since. You obviously have no clue what you are talking about. All "Austrian" economics is, is a completely hard-line libertarian position. If you want to see how well libertarianism works in practice, put down that Ayn Rand fantasy and take a look at Somalia.
07:09 AM on 10/13/2010
Fed spends $2-trillion on QE2, creates maybe 2 jobs. What's wrong with this picture? Even Keynes must be rolling in his grave.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bluepond
person
09:00 AM on 10/13/2010
You aren't counting the tax breaks to 95% of country and the jobs saved (resulting in savings on unemployment benefits, and revenue from continued income taxes from the saved jobs).
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
06:40 PM on 10/14/2010
Show me the math.
06:49 AM on 10/13/2010
I'm trying to understand why the fed thinks ppl will go out and buy stuff now with the prospect that if they don't buy now, others will buy and drive prices up. Inflation will erode unspent dollars, but only for those that HAVE dollars.
05:15 AM on 10/13/2010
History repeats itself; we just need to listen. Cutting government spending at a time like this could be dangerous. Read George Soros’s article “Premature Virtue,” http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/soros61/English.
photo
halfpricefaustian
Voted for Obama. Waiting for Godot.
12:35 PM on 10/13/2010
Yet Britain, France, Germany, pretty much every country in the Eurozone think some real fiscal discipline can be accommodated. They seem to be doing better than we are. Of course, they are counting on us to be profligate, and all the new dollars will go to Europe chasing the better rates there.
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
06:44 PM on 10/14/2010
One reason why Europe is doing better than us is because they have actual safety nets so in a downturn like this people aren't being ruined left and right. The more people that are ruined in an economy the fewer people can perform their roles as consumers. I imagine consumption isn't at an all-time low in Europe like it is here.