iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Charts Course For Next Two Years In Office

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 10/13/10 12:18 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:00 PM ET

Barack Obama 20 New York Times

With less than three weeks left before a midterm election that is looking likely to deliver heavy losses to Democrats, the New York Times Magazine has released an in-depth article, complete with presidential and staff interviews, about President Obama's reflections on the first two years of his presidency and his plans for the second half of this term. In the article, the president also shares some of his mistakes from his first two years in office.

According to excerpts from the Times, aides say that the president has been spending "a lot of time talking about Obama 2.0," brainstorming with administration officials about the best way to revamp the strategies and goals of the White House.

And despite the predictions that Democrats may relinquish a large degree of legislating power, including perhaps control of the House and even Senate, President Obama isn't thinking of the next two years as a period that will be marked with the same obstructive nature from the GOP.

"It may be that regardless of what happens after this election, [Republicans] feel more responsible, either because they didn't do as well as they anticipated, and so the strategy of just saying no to everything and sitting on the sidelines and throwing bombs didn't work for them," Obama says in the article. "Or they did reasonably well, in which case the American people are going to be looking to them to offer serious proposals and work with me in a serious way."

According to advance passages from Politico's Playbook:

Dick Durbin says Obama's post-election agenda "will have to be limited and focused on the things that are achievable and high priorities for the American people." Tom Daschle says Obama has to reach out more: "The key word is inclusion. He's got to find ways to be inclusive."

The president intimates much the same in the piece, saying that the second half of this term would be directed more heavily at buffering and improving the policies that his administration had passed in the first two years, and less on pursuing lofty goals for further broad legislation.

"Even if I had the exact same Congress, even if we don't lose a seat in the Senate and we don't lose a seat in the House, I think the rhythms of the next two years would inevitably be different from the rhythms of the first two years," Obama says. "There's going to be a lot of work in this administration just doing things right and making sure that new laws are stood up in the ways they're intended."

This is a similar tone to one the president took in a Rolling Stone interview last month when he claimed that he'd already accomplished 70 percent of his legislative agenda.

In the Times article, the president says he has regrets about allowing himself to be defined by some as "the same old tax-and-spend Democrat," was stricken too late by the reality that "there's no such thing as shovel-ready projects" and perhaps should have "let the Republicans insist on the tax cuts" in the stimulus.

Obama also says that his administration was perhaps too ambitious in chasing momentous policy initiatives while at times forsaking the more important parts of making that legislation more successful.

"You can't be neglecting of marketing and P.R. and public opinion," the president said.

Politico also provides some passages provided by White House aides that show points of disenchantment about Obama's presidency:

"We're all a lot more cynical now." "Arrogance isn't the right word, but we were overconfident." "He's opaque even to us." "It's not what people felt they sent Barack Obama to Washington to do, to be legislator in chief." "He's a little frustrated with the internal dysfunction."

Click here to see the entire article.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
With less than three weeks left before a midterm election that is looking likely to deliver heavy losses to Democrats, the New York Times Magazine has released an in-depth article, complete with presi...
With less than three weeks left before a midterm election that is looking likely to deliver heavy losses to Democrats, the New York Times Magazine has released an in-depth article, complete with presi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,995
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (22 total)
02:26 PM on 10/14/2010
The "legislator in chief" comment was pretty good. He does seem to have run his presidency as if it were a powerful senate seat. GB2 never had that problem. He did whatever he wanted, Cartman style, and it was up to the rest of us to catch up or go to hell. He wasn't a bright fellow, but he knew what being the top dog was and how to push it to its limits till it broke. Obama is coloring within the lines so carefully there's hardly a splash of color on the page.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MileHighCityMan
Fight Boldly or Lose
01:28 PM on 10/14/2010
I would love to see him forced to not run for reelection and let a true middle class warrior run as the Democrat in 2012. Progressives with spine need to take back the Democratic Party for it to survive. The strategy of appeasing those who will never vote for you at the expense of your own base of voters is a massive failure.

Prediction: He will learn the incorrect lesson from the election. He will move even farther to the right with corporatist pandering to appeal to conservatives and beg for their cooperation. The conservatives will laugh at him, put their thumb in his eye as usual, and perhaps try to impeach him. He will realize how lonely it is when you abandon your real friends and not even try to run in 2012. Democratic voters will be so enraged after two years of Tea Bagger government shut downs and spineless Democrats who do not fight back that they will have a record breaking primary sweep of strong progressives beating the turncoat Conservadem pansies. You heard it here first. I don't get these wrong very often, even when it sounds unlikely.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
RMorr2002
01:43 PM on 10/14/2010
The prediction is right, but the path is wrong. obama will learn nothing from the election and will continue with his same agenda. The Republicans in Congress will have the numbers to block him. obama will continue to whine and blame everyone but himself.

When he realizes that he has no chance to get re-elected, he will step aside. Not for the good of the Democrat Party, but because his ego can not handle getting defeated in a LANDSLIDE election. He will collect his pension, go on the speaking circuit and write some more books about himself saying that he was a wonderful President.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MileHighCityMan
Fight Boldly or Lose
02:36 PM on 10/14/2010
1.) There is no such thing as the Democrat Party

2.) Even though I am not the biggest fan, Obama would not lose in a landslide to a far right loon. He could lose if he neglects his base, but not in a landslide.

3.) He has no ego, although I wish he did.
02:09 PM on 10/14/2010
I would love to see (the good parts of) that happen. And I strongly agree that Obama seems to have mastered the ability to learn all the wrong lessons.

I'll add further that he has a genius for surrounding himself with all the wrong people.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:28 PM on 10/14/2010
The gloves will come off in the second half. Republicans put up or shut up, because your
words are going to be crushed by Democrats. A different side will awaken in the second half.
The planned strategy of President Obama from day one will emerge, President Obama will be the guy for the Democratic Party. Once you give a dog a bone they're yours for life...that is what he will do with the Progressives/Blue Dogs, give them a little or maybe a lot of what they want.

In the second half, Democrats will be fighting for the guidance of this Country for the next four year term, if it is to be Obama then the saner choice will prevail. It isn't over until it's over,
voting day...you walk in to the both and it will be the same as in 2008. Republicans will look at their choice, chuckle, shake their head and vote for Obama, again.

Unfortunately if this mid term election is any indication of the future of running for office in politics it is going to be a sad and disgusting display of American politics for the Country and the World.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JAGJR
12:11 PM on 10/14/2010
Does O really believe the Republicans are going to move toward him? That is almost laughable. He will be lucky if this election does not create a working 2/3 majority which will OVERRIDE his veto's, BOY then we are in for some FIREWORKS!
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
RMorr2002
11:52 AM on 10/14/2010
Obama's plan is to enjoy the next two years, party hardy and play some serious golf. After that, he will retire with the Presidential pension, get rich on the speaking circuit and write some more books about himself.

He will not run for re-election because he knows that there is a strong probability that he would face a LANDSLIDE defeat and his ego could not handle that.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:28 PM on 10/14/2010
Oh Brother!
photo
alan2a
Actual Progressive
11:35 AM on 10/14/2010
Is this man unbelievable or what? Is there any question that the DLC and Obama are actually Republicans and that his whole campaign and all the changey stuff was so much baloney. And it is pretty mind boggling that he'd do this a few weeks before the election. Could it be that he would actually feel more comfortable with a Republican legislature that would allow him to move further to the right and use it as the excuse for not being able to govern effectively or with any level of competence. Or maybe possibly he's not actually smarter than the previous dumby. This has to be the most disappointing Administration I've ever lived through and I've lived through a lot. So much hope and so much belief in their intelligence and rationality and soooo not so.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gammik64
Sometimes, I guess there just aren't enough rocks.
12:03 PM on 10/14/2010
I think your condemnation is a little premature, don't you?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:31 PM on 10/14/2010
Less than 2 years of a Presidency, during a World Wide Depression and you are running for the life boat, nice.
10:29 AM on 10/14/2010
I believe Obama is laying the groundwork for his capitulation of any ideas left of dead center. I don’t really think this is where he wants to go, but the pathetic performance of the Senate coupled with his horrific choice of advisors and tone deaf messaging really left him hung out to dry. If he wants to be reelected he has no other play.

The sad part is that Dems are about to see how you get legislation passed without having 60 members of your party in the Senate and Obama will likely sign quite a lot of what I anticipate will be some quite odious stuff.

I think you can count on the following and I don’t think Obama will fight against them:

Tax cuts extended and even deeper cuts for the investor class (i.e. capital gains).

Elimination of the estate tax.

Continued over-funding of the war machine.

Changes to the minimum wage laws in the name of job creation.

Reverse tweaking of the financial reform bill. (written by financial industry)

Reverse tweaking of the healthcare bill. (written by healthcare industry)

Raising of the Social Security Age.

Immigration legislation heavy on border issues and punishing the immigrants. Lip service to punishing employers or streamlining immigration process.

DADT will be left in a suspended status that states that they intend to eliminate it, but they need to take their sweet time getting it implemented.

I could continue , but it is too depressing……
photo
alan2a
Actual Progressive
11:37 AM on 10/14/2010
F&F. I'd bet you are almost 100% correct.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JAGJR
12:24 PM on 10/14/2010
IMHO NO WAY, to him it would be conceeding his policies were wrong.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:35 PM on 10/14/2010
Opinions will be strong, hopefully people will fact check and realize that there is another side
to Republican rhetoric, the truth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LucieLee
Stand up and be counted...
09:16 AM on 10/14/2010
This defeatist attitude that I feel coming from President Obama and this White House is beginning to bug me! At any rate it certainly isn't very helpful, and certainly isn't a great fuel to fire up the base of the Democratic Party, if this base indeed does need to be fired-up. I read a piece not to long ago in Newsweek, by Anna Quindlen, who was an early critic of this so-called "Democratic base", even before Robert Gibbs slammed the"professional left". She said these words, which I think supporters of President Obama, (which I am one) need to pay attention to~

"So if the American people want the president to be more like the Barack Obama they elected, maybe they should start acting more like the voters who elected him..."
< Anna Quindlen, Newsweek>

This article by Peter Baker from NYT did not need to be written, at least not right now. I fail to see what if anything constructive it has to offer anyone so close to the midterm election. . Every presidency is a work-in-progress, and they can psychoanalyze that progress within their own time. They don't need to have articles written about it after 2 years. In this "fast-food" society that we in the U.S. seem to always find ourselves living in, patience is a dirty word and certainly not a virtue. We cannot punish this President without first punishing ourselves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim303
09:28 AM on 10/14/2010
Nice one
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Billyguitar
Disgusted by politics since John Anderson lost. In
09:57 AM on 10/14/2010
I think it's more the writers working to make it seem like there is more of a defeatist atitude than there really is.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:57 AM on 10/14/2010
Cut the Military and let all the Bush Tax Cuts for the Rich Expire
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Golemaximus
10:11 AM on 10/14/2010
33Greeper - I am a Republican and totally agree with you on your statement! This would be a great start as long as when we cut DoD we end the wars! F&F
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ShanaJuly
08:48 AM on 10/14/2010
The tr0lls are here, the tr0lls are here...
08:37 AM on 10/14/2010
He just now realized some things that anyone with experience knew and tried to tell him. We've had a teenager loose with our credit card learning lessons.

Doesn't want to LOOK LIKE a tax and spend democrat...that's what he IS. But I guess LOOK LIKE is more important. How could he have hidden it?

As for failing to sufficiently "market and PR" his programs, is he saying 39 speeches about healthcare weren't enough? (Of course that means we're just too stupid to get it).
Marketing and PR is ALL his administration is about--they thought that's all that mattered.
08:03 AM on 10/14/2010
"The key word is inclusion. He's got to find ways to be inclusive."

He'll be forced to be, after trying to be...but then again, Republicans will want absolutely nothing to do with advancing the President's agenda. They'd take a victory as proof that their obstructionist agenda will bring them even greater success in 2012. Imagine both Houses, the Presidency and the Supreme Court once again in their grasp. God help the country...this time around.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Golemaximus
08:36 AM on 10/14/2010
Kap Hop - I think you're wrong but only because if Obama shows a willingness to work with the Republicans and do so from the center instead of the far left wing he will be successful. The Republican party could be the savior of his presidency much as he has of the Republican party. Professing doom and gloom is counterproductive and will only continue to alienate those Liberals and Tea Party that have it in them to compromise!
09:38 AM on 10/14/2010
I state what I do, Golemaximus, believing wholeheartedly that the climate today in both Houses and towards this President is such that no compromise can be tolerated. It is payback of a sort, for the manner in which the previous President was considered (justly by those who despise him, and unjustly by those who don’t). The bitterness from that time is now being repeated: an eye for an eye… That said, there are Republicans, and there are Tea Party representatives. The one has a history of working to craft compromises in the best interests of the country, the other is incapable of doing so, as its present-day incarnation is built on a rigid orthodoxy whose game plan does not come from right or left or center, it comes firmly rooted in a set of beliefs that transcend position, and are solely the purview of an ideology now corrupted by funders using the TP as a front to see their own interests realized. The TP is nothing but that now, and so there can - unfortunately - be no compromise with a group whose very existence is a veritable corruption of its original intent: to hold government accountable. You and I might find common ground, which I feel is possible by the tone of your post, but, honestly, things have gotten out of hand amongst the country’s representatives. And I fear for the country’s future.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ShanaJuly
07:44 AM on 10/14/2010
Too smart? Not enough lies about "feeling our pain?" One writer thinks so...

Gwyn: Obama too smart, too black for declining America

http://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorialopinion/article/858979--gwyn-obama-too-smart-too-black-for-declining-america
07:44 AM on 10/14/2010
Obama obviously still doesn't get it. The unhappiness that the electorate has and is expressing with him and the Democrats doesn't translate into support for more bi-partisanship efforts on his part to make things right. More bi-partisanship efforts that have already given us a string of bad and unsatisfactory bills will only translate into more dissatisfaction with him and his party virtually ensuring that he will be a one term president. If he wants to be a successful two term president then he needs to regain the support of the people who elected him by supporting and championing their vision that they elected him to implement rather than expecting them to support his
08:07 AM on 10/14/2010
Really well said. Agree entirely!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Golemaximus
08:44 AM on 10/14/2010
Lobo7Gris - according to everything I've heard it was the independent (moderates) vote therefore to "regain the support of the people who elected him" he will need to moderate. Forcing legislation without compromise and unsupervised spending are not acceptable to moderates. "championing their vision" is problematic unless you can articulate a vision that has Liberal and moderate milestones. Speaking only from observation of his performace to date, I'd say that is unlikely!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rory talbot
Former Dem but they r now wing of Corp. party
06:48 AM on 10/14/2010
Obama needs to start getting his impeachment defense ready. The GOP is front loaded with Tea Bagger crazies now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ShanaJuly
07:45 AM on 10/14/2010
They aren't going to impeach anything unless they start with the waterboarding, incompetent, service dodging, war mongering, liars Bush/Cheney...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ShanaJuly
07:56 AM on 10/14/2010
No number one Obama hater the only people who need to be concerned would be Bush/Cheney. They can't even travel overseas for fear of arrest for war crimes--it's Canada or Mexico for them. At least this president will have no such problem.

Keep on dreaming about that impeachment...republicans will pay a very dear price like they did for Bill Clinton's impeachment.