iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Pew: Growing Cell Phone Poll Bias Favors Republicans

First Posted: 10/13/10 06:41 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:00 PM ET

Does it matter that many polls -- including the vast majority that we are currently watching at the state and congressional district level -- do not call Americans who use only a cell phone and thus lack landline telephone service? Yes it does. It creates a growing bias that appears to benefit Republican candidates. That's the message of a new analysis released this afternoon by the Pew Research Center.

Since 2006, a rapidly increasing percentage of American households lacks landline phone service. The most recent government estimates find that one in four American households is reachable by cell phone only. Pollsters have been reluctant to sample and call Americans on their cell phones, partly because it costs more and partly because federal law requires hand dialing any call placed to a cell phone, which makes such calls less efficient and puts cell phone polling off limits to automated survey methodologies.

For the last four years, the Pew Research Center has conducted public opinion surveys involving separate, parallel samples of both landline and mobile phones. Their design allows for a comparison between combined samples of landline and cell interviews and samples based only on landline calls.

Before the 2008 election, they found that calling only landline phones introduced a "small but real" bias in favor of John McCain, an average bias of 2.3 percentage points on the margin on nine national surveys conducted between June and October of that year.

This year, according to today's report, the Pew Center finds that sampling only landline phones creates an even bigger bias -- "differences of four to six points on the margin" - in favor of the Republicans. The most recent survey in the study, conducted in late August and early September, also involved comparisons based on a subgroup of "likely voters" chosen using a traditional seven question turnout scale (similar to the classic Gallup likely voter model):

The combined landline and cell estimate produced a seven-point Republican advantage: 50% supported the GOP candidate for Congress in their district while 43% backed the Democratic candidate. The Republican lead would have been 12 points if only the landline sample had been interviewed, a significant difference from the combined sample of five points in the margin.

The impact such a bias may have on this year's pre-election polls depends in part on the polls involved. At the national level, many organizations now routinely sample and call both landline and mobile phones. These include, in addition to the Pew Center, ABC News/Washington Post, AP/GfK, CBS News/New York Times, Gallup (both their daily tracking and the surveys in partnership with USA Today), Kaiser Family Foundation, McClatchy/Marist University, NBC News/Wall Street Journal and Newsweek.

At the statewide level, however, more expensive cell phone interviewing is far more rare. Except for a single experiment conducted by SurveyUSA this summer (involving live interview calls to cell phones) we have not seen any cell phone sampling or calling by the pollsters that use an automated, recorded voice methodology. The organizations we know of that are currently calling samples of both cell and mobile phones include California's Field Poll and Public Policy Institute of California, the University of Cincinnati Ohio poll, and the Marist Poll's statewide surveys. While the Quinnipiac University announced plans to begin calling cell phone samples earlier this year, polling director Doug Schwartz tells the Huffington Post that they "decided to suspend cell phone calling, which is much less efficient than calling landlines," until after the election.

It is also worth noting that while the Pew Center found a modest bias for landline-only samples in their survey experiments in 2008, their post-election analysis found that other national surveys that called on both cell and landline phones were no more accurate than national surveys that called only landline. Moreover, at the statewide level where virtually all polls were landline only, the errors were "still relatively small" and favored Republicans more often than Democrats.

Related: see the archive of reporting on cell phones and surveys from Pollster.com.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Does it matter that many polls -- including the vast majority that we are currently watching at the state and congressional district level -- do not call Americans who use only a cell phone and thus l...
Does it matter that many polls -- including the vast majority that we are currently watching at the state and congressional district level -- do not call Americans who use only a cell phone and thus l...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,862
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (39 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:33 PM on 11/01/2010
Poll numbers are all over the place, depending on which one you use. One minute Harry Reid is ahead. The next minute a pundit on MSNBC is declaring Sharon Reid ahead "according to ONE poll out there".

Democrats, do not get disheartened by poll numbers. Polls are a joke. They fall just under lobbyists for what I would like to see gone forever.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:36 PM on 11/01/2010
Oops. I meant to say Sharon Angle.
08:01 PM on 10/20/2010
I have a land line and a cell, but the majority of the younger guys I work with only carry a smart phone of some sort. Occasionally I will receive a call on the landline from a pollster. The way they word their questions often makes it easy to answer in favor of the data they are trying to prove.
09:30 PM on 11/02/2010
I end up hanging up on pollsters because halfway through it's clear to me that no reasonable understanding of my POV can be achieved from the questions. It's gobbledeegook.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
forty8r
Gerrman Freethinker
04:25 PM on 10/20/2010
I think it was Truman that they predicted in the polls would lose. The opposite occured because the polls were taken over the phone and a substantial amount of Democratic voters did not have phones.. This may also produce a similar result. If so the pollmasters might have to rethink their methodologies if this occurs.
07:56 AM on 10/20/2010
Forget the polls. More accurate than any poll--or all the polls--are the political futures markets:

www.intrade.com

They have Republicans slamming Democrats out of the House with a WIDE margin of probability. And they have Angle giving Harry Reid the boot by a respectable margin.

Ready for more Change?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rounder421
Atheist Cabbie
06:41 AM on 10/18/2010
Of the 20 people I work with, 2 people i know have landlines. One of them is the owner, in his 80's, the other is a newer higher, in his late 40's.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JessWonderin
01:03 PM on 10/20/2010
we area 6 cell phone DEMOCRAT VOTING household with a "land line fax" which is "ignored" for ALL unless a KNOWN Caller ID . . . . and all our childrten live "cell only" household . . vote Democrat

Let the results speak in November . . .
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
grovestand12
E Pluribus Unum...O, 2012!
02:49 PM on 10/15/2010
I have been wondering about the validity of these polls for a while now. It appears that the strategy is to make the Dems feel defeated before we even vote!
09:46 PM on 10/14/2010
About time you figured this out. Mostly older people have landlines in addition to the cell phone. Younger people have rid themselves of the landline.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
indjoe
Keep our Constitution; Do not mix church & State
11:22 PM on 10/14/2010
it all about money some can not pay for both . like the working poor . it not all about age
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Dunkleberger Karl
Historian,Humanitarian,Hedonist.
02:04 AM on 10/15/2010
Better a phone in your pocket for soo many reasons!
03:44 PM on 10/15/2010
It may not be all about age but if you look at the studies the younger population is getting rid of landlines. About half of those between the age of 25 and 29 only use cell phones and have no landline. This is compared to 5.2% of those over age 65 with no landline. 26% of children now live in homes without a landline. While you cannot blanket all, this is certainly a reality and it is the older population (who tend to be more conservative) that have the landlines.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeLawson
Still to the Left, still Right for it
08:11 PM on 10/14/2010
I don't want them calling my cell phone. And since they are getting land-lines only, they are more likely to get old people and morons, and morons and old people are more likely to vote Republican, so the already skewed polls skew more.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Dunkleberger Karl
Historian,Humanitarian,Hedonist.
02:17 AM on 10/15/2010
I beg to differ, Old peaple in Pa. are upset with the effort the republicans are attempting to Alter and privatize social Security, and elderly peaple accross the Nation are freakingout, that the republicans want to privatize The Veterans Administration,As well as Accepting Cash Money from the Communist Party of CHINA, and the Bein Laden Family of Saudi arabia! Republicans never hold live,Town hall meetings,any More! The Youth of pa are very Liberal leaning because of the Internet issues! Charge me to look up "Butterflys", or Dungeons and dragons! Slow down up loads from Huff post or TMZ because my access provider dont like those sights? Net Neutrality is where its at ! Joe Sestak is very Pro net Neutrality! Dan Onarato is pro Net Neutrality! Corbett believe Comcast should charge what it wants to, Toomey thinks the internet is tubes conected with glue!
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JessWonderin
01:15 PM on 10/20/2010
"Older people" with access to real information ARE progressively active against the GOP agenda of economic suppression of Senior Rights and Programs . . the issue is GETTING to them . . . and Sestak's rise in the polls is a joy to watch.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
indjoe
Keep our Constitution; Do not mix church & State
07:39 PM on 10/14/2010
we put the landline on a fax a long time ago. used to get polled not any more . we all use the cell
now. The poll do not work anymore almost a joke . It takes more time and money to poll cells and cuts in the bottom line . Maybe this time it could it well show . I know I will vote thanks joe
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:25 PM on 10/14/2010
If you listen real closely, you will know how your fax machine will be voting.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Dunkleberger Karl
Historian,Humanitarian,Hedonist.
02:18 AM on 10/15/2010
in2008 the polls predicted Pa and wva for MCCain , take a look at how Pa. and wva voted?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JWW33
If we cannot dig ourselves out, we must go deeper
05:49 PM on 10/14/2010
25% of Americans don't have internet access, do you think they have cell phones? I've been saying from the very beginning, these pollsters are skewed. It's not difficult to get a hold of demographic information to call and seek out higher SES locations. Obviously, it's easier to get a more conservative vote from a more affluent neighborhood.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Dunkleberger Karl
Historian,Humanitarian,Hedonist.
10:28 AM on 10/22/2010
Not 25% but 2.5% of american dont have cell phone service! That 2,5% Probley make their own beer,and dnt vote , Often!
09:31 PM on 11/02/2010
Um, yes. Internet access and cell phone access are entirely different things. One requires a computer or smartphone, an ISP, some technical knowledge or education. The other one I can by at 7/11 and turn on.
02:46 PM on 10/14/2010
We got rid of our landline almost 3 years ago and my husband and I have felt for a long time that phone polls are totally inaccurate. We know so many other people who only use cell phones and don't ever seem to get contacted for polls. Just another way the GOP can fool itself and others that their numbers are stronger than they actually are.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
studmoose
This Micro-Bio Intentionally Left Blank
09:37 AM on 10/15/2010
That just helps to scare more Democrats to get out and vote.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Aerows
02:09 PM on 10/14/2010
This is nothing new, we've been knowing this for a while, now.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sloreader
writ this down
01:59 PM on 10/14/2010
The Census Bureau didn't hesitate to contact me on my cell phone, why should the pollsters? Why even have polling if it is so transparently unscientific? Perhaps bias is their true motivation?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Aerows
02:09 PM on 10/14/2010
Bias is their motivation.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sloreader
writ this down
08:01 PM on 10/14/2010
78% of those surveyed agree!
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Dunkleberger Karl
Historian,Humanitarian,Hedonist.
02:20 AM on 10/15/2010
goverment surveys, goverment money, Goverment rates! Much , much Lower for those who work and serve america!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sloreader
writ this down
03:26 PM on 10/15/2010
Completely unscientific and skewed polling results serve America? I get the part about inaccurate polling helping some Americans but I don't think it's good for the country as a whole. Do you?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
antonymous
How could hell be any worse?
01:57 PM on 10/14/2010
Well, I don't want pollsters calling me on my cell, and if that translates into a nasty election day surprise for the Republicans then so much the better.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
American In Chicago
01:13 PM on 10/14/2010
This study seems to confirm an impression I have gained from my family's circumstance and experience (or lackof) with telephone polling. And, reading other responses, I see that I am far from alone.

I posted the following in response to Mark Blumenthal's article of October the 5th.

"I have not maintained a landline for several years. In the age of mobiles, I don't see the point and don't want the expense. I am 44, politically liberal, and a registered Democrat who votes in every election. I have never been asked to participate, over my mobile phone, in an opinion or voting survey.

Meanwhile, my dear old dad, at 70, is retired, at home all day with Fox news on and still has his landline, is besieged by polltakers. And he participates in those polls eagerly. He enjoys making his opinion known. Dad has voted Republican in every election except '08 when he didn't vote at all.

My point is, those polls may be inadvertently sampling people with disposable income to maintain a landline, and people with the time and the inclination to participate in a poll. Those people may be more likely to be Republican."

Let's make certain, today, we are properly registered to vote and November the 2nd get to those polls early.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Todd Crickmore
03:18 PM on 10/14/2010
Well articulated Point, American. A brief examination of history reveals that this was exactly the same faulty research methodology utilized by pollsters and journalists who almost unanimously predicted an overwhelming landslide defeat of the incumbent president, Democrat Harry S Truman, by New York Governor Thomas Dewey, the Republican nominee, prior to the 1948 presidential election. Most Americans during this time did not own telephones, so naturally most respondents reached via telephone tended to be core members of the Republican base. Combined with Truman's plummeting approval ratings, this fueled the perception that Truman did not stand a chance at winning the election. Fortunately for us though, his plucky never-say-die attitude combined with his prior experiences of overcoming tremendous electoral odds enabled him to see right through the veneer of the pollsters' predictions and motivated him to conduct the most aggressive 'whistlestop' campaign ever witnessed up to that point. The picture of Truman holding up a copy of the Chicago Tribune's inaccurate "Dewey Defeats Truman" headline on the morning of November 3, 1948 has become one of the most iconic images of the 20th century.

Polling has become more sophisticated in the 60-plus years since that election, especially with the advent of the internet age. The growth and proliferation of media outlets has led to such fragmented viewership though, that individual entities tend to have homogenized core followers. . .increasing the difficulty of acquiring diverse polling samples.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hearmeloudandclear
12:22 PM on 10/21/2010
"American in Chicago" --- you are absolutely right. I've NEVER trusted the predictions in polls.

DO VOTE --- DEMOCRATS -- GET OUT THERE AND VOTE !!