More

Rand Paul Refuses To Address 'Fair Tax' -- One Day After Supporting It

BRUCE SCHREINER   10/13/10 08:20 PM ET   AP

Rand Paul Fair Tax

HENDERSON, Ky. — Republican U.S. Senate candidate Rand Paul sidestepped questions Wednesday about revamping the federal tax code, a day after the tea party favorite took a stand to replace the income tax with a national sales tax.

Paul, a limited-government advocate, said he supports a "simpler tax code" but wouldn't offer specifics about his written comments to an anti-tax group supporting repeal of the 16th Amendment that created the federal income tax.

"I haven't really been saying anything like that," Paul told reporters following a speech in Henderson as part of his Kentucky bus tour. "I think it's probably better to go ... with what I'm saying on the campaign trail."

Paul, who is running against Democrat Jack Conway in a closely watched race, didn't mention the tax issue in his speech to about 100 supporters in this western Kentucky city. Instead, Paul kept to some of his main themes: criticizing President Barack Obama's health care and environmental policies that he characterizes as anti-business.

An anti-tax group on Tuesday released to The Associated Press a written statement from Paul saying he would support changing the federal tax code to get rid of the Internal Revenue Service, and he would vote to repeal the 16th Amendment. Paul's statement called the federal tax code "a disaster" and said he supports making taxes "flatter and simpler."

"I would vote for the FairTax to get rid of the Sixteenth Amendment, the IRS and a lot of the control the federal government exerts over us," Paul wrote in a statement verified by his campaign.

The FairTax proposal has been championed by the Texas-based group Americans for Fair Taxation and a newly formed affiliate, FairTax America Support Team. Paul's former campaign manager, David Adams, is a member of the affiliate's governing board.

Conway's campaign has said the FairTax proposal calls for a tax of nearly a quarter on every dollar.

"Working people are having a tough enough time making ends meet," Conway campaign spokeswoman Allison Haley said. "They can't afford Rand's plan to put a 23 percent sales tax on everything they buy – from groceries to gas to medicine."

When asked by a reporter about his written comments about taxes, Paul turned his focus on government spending.

"Right now the primary problem we have in our country is a spending problem," he said. "I am for a simpler tax code, and there are various ways you can get to it, but I think the first thing we have to address is ... spending."

He declined to answer further questions on the topic.

Conway spoke on Wednesday to about 50 people on the front lawn of the Old State Capitol in Frankfort and accused Paul of considering a litany of long-standing government initiatives unconstitutional, including Social Security and Medicare.

Conway also accused Paul of opposing laws to protect minorities and the disabled, as well as those setting standards for consumer protection, workplace safety and a federal minimum wage.

"Rand Paul on Monday night challenged me to step up and be a man," Conway said. "I'm going to step up and protect the Constitution of the United States."

Paul countered that Conway supported Obama's unconstitutional federal takeover of the health care system.

"Jack needs to read the Constitution," Paul said. "He needs to understand that ... there is no enumerated power for the current health care (law) to force people to buy insurance. He has a completely backwards understanding of this."

Conway, the state's attorney general, refused to join in a lawsuit by a number of other states challenging the law on constitutional grounds. Conway supports the health care overhaul but says it could be improved. Paul says he wants to repeal the landmark law and have Congress start over.

___

Online:

Conway campaign: http://www.jackconway.org/

Paul campaign: http://www.randpaul2010.com/

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
HENDERSON, Ky. — Republican U.S. Senate candidate Rand Paul sidestepped questions Wednesday about revamping the federal tax code, a day after the tea party favorite took a stand to replace the i...
HENDERSON, Ky. — Republican U.S. Senate candidate Rand Paul sidestepped questions Wednesday about revamping the federal tax code, a day after the tea party favorite took a stand to replace the i...
Filed by Whitney Snyder  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,248
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (30 total)
  1 of 8  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
Welib 02:32 PM on 10/14/2010
Dr. Mengele won't answer questions about his real agenda. Republicans, libertarians and baggers refuse to come right out in most cases and reveal their real agenda of dismantling our country some more.

For 8 long years the USA was dismantled by Republicans, every agency and program underfunded and unfunded so the GOP could get more war money.

Getting rid of the IRS would  Read More...
photo
HufferDave87
Give me the facts, then I'll decide...
02:11 PM on 10/21/2010
Oh, the Republican party: The religious fundamentals, the libertarians, big business, and the puppets of big business. What a wonderful, symbiotic relationship of deceit, hypocrisy, and self-imposed blindness
photo
HufferDave87
Give me the facts, then I'll decide...
02:09 PM on 10/21/2010
What I really would like to know is how mandating that everyone buy health insurance is unconstitutional, while mandating that anyone driving a car buy auto insurance is not. I guess the idea is that you have to buy auto insurance in exchange for the right to drive. Still, the principles seems to be contradictory.

Rand Paul would have us revert to a state of nature--the very state of nature that we were warned about by Hobbes--which we thought about, debated, and amended so that we could live in a civilization worthy of a social contract between citizen and government.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sean777
11:42 PM on 10/17/2010
IRONIC most Tea Baggers are retirees and blue collar workers and they are supporting Rand Paul who wants to eliminate Medicare and Medicaid for American seniors. Joe Miller who wants to lower the wages of American workers and eliminate unemployment benefits for all Americans despite the fact that his wife already collected unemployment from Taxpayers. Joe Miller and Christine O'Donnell are lecturing about expending but they are covering personal debts with their campaign founds. Sharron Angle who believes that government should not require insurance companies to cover autism or maternity care despite the fact she is using government health care for herself and her family and the list of anti-American proposals from Tea Baggers Candidates goes on and on. The biggest danger we are facing as Americans is the Tea Party, a movement that suppose to be about fiscal responsibility has emerged as an obstructionist force; instead of resourcing on economists to move a fiscal responsibility agenda the Tea Party is based on racism, hooliganism and predatorily politics we need to stop them on November.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:53 AM on 10/17/2010
Rand Paul looks so familiar! Was he an extra in John Waters' comedic flick, "A Dirty Shame?"
jerryatthebeach
Till Death Do You Barrier Island...
10:40 AM on 10/17/2010
A Physican "healer" or clown???
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
CarolinaYankee
09:24 AM on 10/17/2010
The Tea/GOP refuse to address any issues, they either run away or just refuse to speak at all. How can anyone vote for someone that will not speak to you about any issues.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:29 AM on 10/17/2010
If we truly put into place all the crazy ideas these tea partiers and right wingers have been spouting the last year, I don't think even they would want to continue to live in this country.

Not only is there idea of austerity dangerous, and this nonsense about "balancing the budget," (see Ireland, e.g.), but scrimping on public education, teachers, privatizing, but their determination in removing the safety nets from the poor, disabled and unemployed. They won't be satisfied until we are a third world country with beggars in the street and homeless children left to fend for themselves.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
henrypapillon
Mitt--free up the last 9 years' taxes
08:53 PM on 10/16/2010
It is in no way, "fair". That is why they have to dress it up and put lipstick on it like a pig they are trying to sell as a beauty queen.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
caseyblab
05:56 PM on 10/16/2010
Like most of the Tea Party non-articulated ideas, he wants this to be a "surprise".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
annlisa
this, above all...
01:58 PM on 10/16/2010
Everytime "Rant" Paul opens his mouth, I want to shout, "Give 'im the hook! What a crackpot!
01:48 PM on 10/16/2010
Again these guys are just opportun "istas" voting on the economy, distorting the big picture to get their slice of the pie. They could not make a real living outside politics right now. I think OBAMA should go ahead with the "SKYPE proposal" and see what he gets.
He could say: "If these guys are so hot-fired for state's rights and eliminating social security as many of them have said, they should stay home never come to Washington. They could SKYPE in their votes in front of their neighbors from their own sate houses."
DumbleGoat says, "-12 to the new Tea Bags (if they don't want to be a part of the Washington thing, stay home) for be the false prophets the age, +12 for them if they never meeting with a lobbyist which none of them have promised to do."
12:40 PM on 10/16/2010
Why Do People Vote Against Their Own Interests?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8474611.stm

Stories always trump statistics, which means the politician with the best stories is going to win: "One of the fallacies that politicians often have on the Left is that things are obvious, when they are not obvious.
"Obama's administration made a tremendous mistake by not immediately branding the economic collapse that we had just had as the Republicans' Depression, caused by the Bush administration's ideology of unregulated greed. The result is that now people blame him."
marka
A Purple State Progressive
01:53 PM on 10/16/2010
MrJohnSpeaks is 100% correct. The Republicans have been as partisan as possible since Inauguration Day, while Democrats unilaterally disarmed themselves and tried to play nice with their political adversaries. The Republicans laid on the lies and garbage and the Democrats, with the exception of Mr. Grayson, have sat quietly and accepted the abuse. Perhaps the Dems will learn from this experience.
01:34 PM on 10/17/2010
It's the era of "Wizard of Oz" politics. Tea partiers need a brain, Republicans need a heart, and Democrats need courage.
09:05 PM on 10/16/2010
An interesting article, but I can't help but be struck by one point...

The author identifies that voters may vote in the way that they do (opposed to certain politicians and policies) because they "resent having their interests decided for them by politicians who think they know best." This statement, combined with the premise of the entire article (that people vote agianst their own interests) implies that the politicians do know what is best.

But who is to say what is in the best interest of any given individual? A parent may think it is in a child's best interest to keep him from hurting himself in some way, but the injury may shape the child's life into adulthood, moulding him ultimately into a stronger person. Sometimes making "wrong" decisions and suffering the consequences offers a lesson that cannot otherwise be taught. If the programs being put in place are such that they provide too strong a safety net in the event that one falls on hard times, at some point those programs will incentivize risky behavior by reducing the risk associated with it - just like the existence of Fannie and Freddie reduced the risk to the original lender in making risky loans.
05:10 AM on 10/17/2010
There is a complex dynamic that molds a child into the adult he/she becomes. Your argument takes the opportunity away from the parent who generally should be the child's main source of developmental inspiration. Why should politicians decide what is in the best interest of a child. I live in an area which is approximately 98% Christian and I would be hard pressed to stay in this area if my children had to conform to Christian views shared by the politicians.
12:10 PM on 10/16/2010
That seems to be working for the Tea-Party candidates. The Dems are constantly being battered about 'transparency' [considering that Cheney ran the administration for Bush for 4 years, apparently it is do as I say, not as I do] - but TP candidates get away with running from reporters, refusing to answer questions, refusing any but friendly interviews - and they are going to be elected? Gee, isn't that big of a pig-in-a-poke my grandpa used to talk about - its not what you see, its what you DON"T see that should bother ya.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dr Phibes
Rise Rebel Resist
12:58 AM on 10/17/2010
As Ron Johnson put it, this election isn't about specifics. The sad part is he was proud of that.

F&F for telling it like it is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Titus
Bourbon, no ice
12:06 PM on 10/16/2010
"Jack needs to read the Constitution," Paul said. "He needs to understand that ... there is no enumerated power for the current health care (law) to force people to buy insurance. He has a completely backwards understanding of this."
-----------------------------------------------------------
So does Mr. Paul.

Article 1, section 8: subsection 1. "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts andprovide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States, but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States."

The phrase: "to promote the general welfare" allows Congress to do many things. It supports the funding of roads, bridges, social programs such as Social Security and Medicare. If the legislature passes it and the judicial system affirms it either by upholding it in a challenge or refusing to hear a challenge, Mr. Paul, it is constitutional.
09:07 PM on 10/16/2010
Is there anything that cannot be said to further the "general welfare" somehow?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Titus
Bourbon, no ice
11:38 PM on 10/16/2010
It's a decent point. There are many liberties that can be taken with that phrase. I believe certainly it can be abused. However, as your moniker indicates you as an attorney, you know very well that the constitution is an interpreted document that has been made to fit many different points of view by many different jurists..
photo
gumbo1049
polytechnician
10:29 AM on 10/16/2010
rand paul is a A$$HOLE.
05:12 PM on 10/16/2010
And yet, the people of KY will vote him into office. Doesn't say much for them, does it? Unfortunately, as a member of the US Senate, his actions could affect the lives of people in more civilized parts of the US.
photo
gumbo1049
polytechnician
09:22 AM on 10/17/2010
Thank You. Well Said