iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Bernanke Preps Markets For Further Fed Action Despite Questions About Impact

First Posted: 10/15/10 11:42 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:00 PM ET

Bernanke

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke further prepped Wall Street on Friday for another round of Fed activity to lower interest rates despite the risks it poses and questions about its effectiveness.

In a morning speech delivered at a conference organized by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, the Fed chairman said that "[g]iven the [Fed's] objectives, there would appear -- all else being equal -- to be a case for further action."

Bernanke discussed the low rate of inflation, the "painfully slow recovery" in job creation and the "less vigorous" pace of economic growth. Combined, according to Bernanke's logic, these three developments warrant further Fed action like printing money to buy more assets, communicating to investors that rates will stay near zero for even longer than they anticipate or lowering the rate of interest the Fed pays banks to park their excess cash with the central bank.

Market participants aren't so sure. A chorus is beginning to develop against more Fed action, which has come to be known as quantitative easing (QE). The chiefs of several regional Federal Reserve banks have spoken out in recent weeks warning that not only would such action be unwarranted given the steady pace of economic growth and the choppy nature of post-financial crisis recoveries, but also that it could very well be ineffective.

"[G]iven the strong resistance to further QE from some hawkish Fed officials, the program that eventually emerges, most probably at the next [Fed] meeting in early November, will be too timid to have any real impact," said Paul Ashworth, senior U.S. economist for research consultancy Capital Economics. "At this stage, $500 billion or even $1 trillion is just not going to do it."

The whole point of further Fed stimulus is to lower interest rates so borrowers and those hoarding cash will spend. Those seeking loans will be enticed by record-low rates, while those stockpiling cash would be tempted to spend it because they may perceive elevated levels of inflation down the road (which would decrease the value of their current dollar holdings).

But the main interest rate, set by the Fed's policy-making body, the Federal Open Market Committee, is already hovering in the 0-0.25 percent range. The FOMC set it there in December 2008.

That in turn has depressed rates across the board.

Freddie Mac reported this week that the average rate on a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage fell to 4.19 percent, an all-time low. Last year at this time that rate averaged 4.92 percent.

The yield on Treasuries -- U.S. government debt sold to investors -- is also hovering near record lows, data show. Two-year Treasuries yielded 0.37 percent at the close of Tuesday trading, Fed data show. It was about triple that this time last year.

10-year Treasuries were giving investors 2.44 percent as of Tuesday, or about half the rate of return they received just three years ago. 30-year government bonds yielded 3.8 percent, a full percentage point less than only six months ago. And 5-year bonds were yielding just 1.14 percent, data maintained by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis show. Five months ago they were yielding double that rate.

The average yield on corporate bonds rated Aaa by Moody's Investors Service has dropped to 4.53 percent, according to Federal Reserve data through September. The rate hasn't been that low since 1965.

So fixed-income investors, like pensioners and other retirees, are getting hammered because their savings aren't generating the income they're used to. More Fed action could only serve to further depress those yields.

"Yes, it might lower long rates a little and juice stockmarkets a bit more," Ashworth said. "With mortage rates and corporate bond yields already close to record lows, however, we doubt that would have any meaningful impact on the wider economy."

Bernanke, though, reiterated his case for more monetary stimulus, raising the specter of low -- and slow -- growth.

"Although output growth should be somewhat stronger in 2011 than it has been recently, growth next year seems unlikely to be much above its longer-term trend," the nation's central banker said Friday. "If so, then net job creation may not exceed by much the increase in the size of the labor force, implying that the unemployment rate will decline only slowly.

"That prospect is of central concern to economic policymakers, because high rates of unemployment -- especially longer-term unemployment -- impose a very heavy burden on the unemployed and their families. More broadly, prolonged high unemployment would pose a risk to consumer spending and hence to the sustainability of the recovery."


*************************

Shahien Nasiripour is the business reporter for the Huffington Post. You can send him an e-mail; bookmark his page; subscribe to his RSS feed; follow him on Twitter; friend him on Facebook; become a fan; and/or get e-mail alerts when he reports the latest news. He can be reached at 646-274-2455.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke further prepped Wall Street on Friday for another round of Fed activity to lower interest rates despite the risks it poses and questions about its effectiveness. ...
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke further prepped Wall Street on Friday for another round of Fed activity to lower interest rates despite the risks it poses and questions about its effectiveness. ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 246
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:19 PM on 10/27/2010
Bernanke should resign. That’s all he has done is screw up the economy. That’s all he wants to do is give his banker buddies a golden parachute
05:59 PM on 10/24/2010
Gayson to Bernanke > " Which foreign Central Banks receieved the $ 500,000,000,000? "
Bernanke " I don't know"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0NYBTkE1yQ
05:56 PM on 10/24/2010
End the Fed.
On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order 11110, was signed with the authority to basically strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business. The Christian Law Fellowship has exhaustively researched this matter through the Federal Register and Library of Congress. We can now safely conclude that this Executive Order has never been repealed, amended, or superceded by any subsequent Executive Order. In simple terms, it is still valid. Then came Nov 22 1963.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hu.man
transformation through communication
12:30 AM on 10/18/2010
Bernanke believes he is thinking out of the box by taking into account a whole host of variables that may lead to economic instability. Constant tweaking of the economy to stabilize inflation at a 2% annual rate is not necessarily thinking out of the box.

We do need to think out of the box in order to smooth out the economic cycles. Current economic theories are woefully inadequate in the face of an enormous growth in international trade and rapid propensity toward creation of a global marketplace without borders.

The huge expansion of the monetary base in recent decades is necessitating new approaches to understand the impact of asset inflation on the economy and the need for central banks to set new standards in looking at inflation and create a greater understanding of erosion of confidence in the face of spiraling deflation in asset values.

We are in the age of rapidly increasing workforce productivity and again, the current economic theories fall short of factoring this emerging trend into the wealth creation process in capital-based markets.

Ultimately, we need to come to place of understanding that constant tinkering with fed funds rate and money supply isn't going to produce the desired stability and GNP growth. Economics isn't a religion and we shouldn't be living by the prevailing axioms.

I am hoping a brilliant economist like Bernanke will turn the discipline on its head and force it to produce new theories that deal with the realities of the 21st century.
06:09 PM on 10/17/2010
Obama has declared war on the business community and by that he is creating poverity throughout the country. People are unemployed because businesses are confused and bewildered by his polices, rules and executive orders. He has brought a black cloud over the White House and the country. He has brought socialists, communists and marxists to Washington and given them sanction to perform their deeds with resulting dire consequences.

We must prepare for the worst, hope for the best and pray for the country with never ending zeal. Brothers, join me in solidarity to save our country from the profound evil that is prevalent in the world today. If we stand together, goodness will prevail throughout the land.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:37 PM on 10/17/2010
The more I see markets and statements of Economists I get a feeling that these two are getting their advise from Astrologers. Somebody correctly said : 'Economists make Astrology look like a proper science'.
photo
halfpricefaustian
Voted for Obama. Waiting for Godot.
01:36 PM on 10/17/2010
Bernanke says he is afraid of deflation, yet he creates a defacto deflationary credit environment by driving interest rates to historic lows and then committing to lowering them further if credit flow does not pick up. People make rational decisions about investments. If you bet that interest rates are going to drop, you wait and you are rewarded. If he wants credit to pick up, he needs to convince people that he is going to start raising interest rates. Then people who are waiting for mortgage rates to drop some more will get off the fence and buy, assuming they can actually get a mortgage. Of course, even in this foreclosure-crisis environment, home buying is not going to pick up no matter what the Fed does. Most likely there will be no positive results from more QE, savers will be further hurt, and money will flow to Australia, Canada, Brazil, and India for better investment returns.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:51 PM on 10/16/2010
If Bernanke were wise, he would go to the President and tell him that monetary easing may cause a run on our currency and other negative consequences that could destablize our Nation. Then he would tell the President that he was going to protect the dollar with gradually raising the discount rate. He would be right.
Unemployment is a factor in a failing economic system of producing and commerce and trade. In our unemployment it is a result of decades of trade, fiscal, corporate and citizen deficits. The American capitalism is fractured. It can not be repaired through monetary policy as we are learning with our national decline.
We must repair to economic fundamentals of universial employment via government, saving, sacrifice, withdrawal from a toxic mercantilistic trade and failed imperalism. We must re-establish our great leadership starting with honor and integrity of our leaders. We must unite and work towards a common union. We must renew our allegiance to our Constitution and to one another. We must think and act cofidently and competently once again. We must once again act as a great people. We must not fail.
photo
Basharepublican
J.P. Walley says...
10:58 PM on 10/16/2010
ONLY ACTION I WONNA SEE YOU DO BEN IS PACK YER DAM CRAP!
09:40 PM on 10/16/2010
Notice how personal savings is framed as hoarding, stockpiling and holdings -- all decidedly more villainous-sounding.

Saving is not just the responsible thing to do, it represents independence. To thwart that by gigging rates is one thing, but to actually try to manipulate perception of savings as a negative and unhealthy byproduct of of the economy is ... so bizarre.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joe kim
10:26 AM on 10/17/2010
If you are a saver, and there are so few left that I guess that is why there is no uproar about any of this, you are also getting hit by the lower dollar. Did you know the dollar took a 7% hit against a basket of major currencies in the last month and a half? If you go back to may its closer to 13%. So every few months we lose 7% of our buying power? You may earn 1% if that in a savings accout.

Bernanke is doing his best to destroy what little we have left.

This is complete madness. And while he does this Obama cheers from the sidelines, because he gets to spend more on who knows what.

This government is out of control, and is doing its best to give what we have to the banks that are loaded up on assets like houses, stocks, and bonds.
08:20 PM on 10/16/2010
Good job Shahien
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
msjimmied
03:36 PM on 10/16/2010
Art Cashin has been one of those lone voices on CNBC since its inception. Old experienced hand with all his marbles, and able to give you a feel for what is happening as it is happening. This is what he had to say about Bernanke's devaluing our currency and the QE II he is determined to unleash. Worth listening to.

http://kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/Broadcast/Entries/2010/10/16_Stock_Market_Wrap_with_Art_Cashin.html
01:59 PM on 10/16/2010
The only way the Democrats can win the mid term elections is for Obama to force Bernancke and Geithner to resign. And then he needs to get on TV just before the elections and come clean with the American public and say he did fight hard enough the last two years. The masses have zero trust in the man and his so called financial experts. How can a devalued dollar and inflation help people? Sure, a portion of a person's debt may be devalued, but an equal amount of incremental debt will be needed to buy inflated commodities. QE2 and inflation only benefits banks. The masses continue to be bent over. Bernancke and Geithner are puppets of the wealthy elite. Bernancke, Geithner and Obama are all dupes who are screwing the middle class.
07:00 PM on 10/16/2010
diddle

Great post. Fanned.

Bernancke and Geither must go - or it's just plain OVER for Obama as far as the public goes.

Bernancke's proposal is ABSURD given the current conditions in this country. Once again, Geithner & Bernancke are propping up and dropping vast $$$$ into th hands of the top 1% . If Bernancke goes through with this he will unleash inflation on an already down and out country.

It is said banks & Corporations are sitting on trillions of $$$ - so cash availability - cheap, is not the problem. What Brenancke wants to do will drive yet another nail into the coffin of the beaten to hell middle class. On top of being jobless you will look forward to a steep rise in all core expenses - that'll be such a help.

Please Obama, fire these two before America is completely destroyed.

They just don't seem to get it - America isn't consuming because they don't have cheap credit - they aren't consuming because they are either unemployed, underemployed or have no confidence their job will be there tomorrow for them.

This government has a one track mind - keep throwing all the tax breaks and easy, cheap money at the top 1% and surely some jobs will come out of it. THIS JUST ISN'T TRUE!!!

We need jobs - millions of them - we need manufacturing - we need industry - nothing else will help.
01:42 PM on 10/16/2010
His economic logic is perverted. The Princeton grad is pushing on a string. Other than military equipment, jets, and construction equipment, we do not produce many products for export anymore. How is a devalued dollar going to really help exports when we do not export much? Will baby boomers who are near retirement, already satiated with products, and leveraged going to consume more because they believe prices are going up? With what? What is Bernancke thinking? He is so lost in his academic underwear he fails to see the obvious. And does anyone think that China is going to sit back and let their currency appreciate against the dollar? It is race to the bottom. Bernancke, like Greenspan, is a disaster. His inflation targeting scheme does not address realities. Commodity prices may go up, but incomes will not as there are millions of unemployed workers fighting for low paying jobs. And the world has a glut of capacity too. Bernancke's theory worked in the 70s, but will fail miserably today. How can he be so dumb and how can we be even dumber to let this idiot lead us?”
photo
WASanford
I think, therefore I am mad as hell!
08:35 PM on 10/16/2010
I find it ironic that these committed inflation fighters are not trying to create it. Seems their other theory didn't work either.
photo
WASanford
I think, therefore I am mad as hell!
08:42 PM on 10/16/2010
Let me try again! I find it ironic that these committed inflation fighters are "now" trying to create it. Seems that their other theory didn't work either.
01:38 PM on 10/16/2010
Benrnacke's is an imbocile. His economic logic is perverted. The Princeton grad is pushing on a string. Other than military equipment, jets, and construction equipment, we do not produce many products for export anymore. How is a devalued dollar going to really help exports when we do not export much? Will baby boomers who are near retirement, already satiated with products, and leveraged going to consume more because they believe prices are going up? With what? What is Bernancke thinking? He is so lost in his academic underwear he fails to see the obvious. And does anyone think that China is going to sit back and let their currency appreciate against the dollar? It is race to the bottom. Bernancke, like Greenspan, is a disaster. His inflation targeting scheme does not address realities. Commodity prices may go up, but incomes will not as there are millions of unemployed workers fighting for low paying jobs. And the world has a glut of capacity too. Bernancke's theory worked in the 70s, but will fail miserably today. How can he be so dumb and how can we be even dumber to let this idiot lead us?”