iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

More Intellectually Disabled Youths Go To College

HEATHER HOLLINGSWORTH   10/16/10 10:11 PM ET   AP

Learning Disabilities College
In this photo taken Oct. 19, 2010, Gabe Savage, right, Alex Schaffer, center, and Mallory Graves, walk across campus at Central Missouri State University in Warrensburg, Mo. The three are part of a handful of students participating in a two-year program at the school tailored to students with mental disabilities. (AP Photo/Charlie Riedel)

WARRENSBURG, Mo. — Zach Neff is all high-fives as he walks through his college campus in western Missouri. The 27-year-old with Down syndrome hugs most everybody, repeatedly. He tells teachers he loves them.

"I told Zach we are putting him on a hug diet – one to say hello and one to say goodbye," said Joyce Downing, who helped start a new program at the University of Central Missouri that serves students with disabilities.

The hope is that polishing up on social skills, like cutting back on the hugs, living in residence halls and going to classes with non-disabled classmates will help students like Neff be more independent and get better jobs.

In years past, college life was largely off-limits for students with such disabilities, but that's no longer the case. Students with Down syndrome, autism and other conditions that can result in intellectual disabilities are leaving high school more academically prepared than ever and ready for the next step: college.

Eight years ago, disability advocates were able to find only four programs on university campuses that allowed students with intellectual disabilities to experience college life with extra help from mentors and tutors. As of last year, there were more than 250 spread across more than three dozen states and two Canadian provinces, said Debra Hart, head of Think College at the Institute for Community Inclusion at the University of Massachusetts Boston, which provides services to people with disabilities.

That growth is partly because of an increasing demand for higher education for these students and there are new federal funds for such programs.

The federal rules that took effect this fall allow students with intellectual disabilities to receive grants and work-study money. Because details on the rules are still being worked out, the earliest students could have the money is next year. Hart and others expect the funds to prompt the creation of even more programs.

"There is a whole generation of young people who have grown up under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, and the Americans with Disabilities Act, and to them it (college) is the logical next step," Hart said.

The college programs for these students vary. Generally the aim is to support the students as they take regular classes with non-disabled students. Professors sometimes are advised to modify the integrated classes by doing things like shifting away from a format that relies entirely on lectures and adding more projects in which students can work in groups.

One program in Idaho offers classes in drama, art and sign language. Students on other campuses can improve their computer skills or take child development classes.

Sometimes they're paired with non-disabled students and advocates say the educational coaches, mentors and tutors who help them often are studying to become special education teachers or social workers and learn from the experience too.

Disability advocates say only a small percentage of these students will receive degrees, but that the programs help them get better jobs.

Historically, adults with intellectual disabilities have been restricted primarily to jobs in fast food restaurants, cleaning or in so-called "sheltered workshops," where they work alongside other disabled people and often earn below-minimum wages, said Madeleine Will, vice president of the National Down Syndrome Society.

With additional training, Hart said participants can go on to do everything from being a librarian's assistants to data-entry work in an office.

Much remains to be learned about what type of program works best, but Hart said that will likely change.

Besides allowing for federal financial aid for these programs, Congress also has appropriated $10.56 million to develop 27 model projects to identify successful approaches.

The infusion of federal money has generated some criticism. Conservative commentator Charlotte Allen said it's a waste to spend federal tax dollars on the programs and insisted that calling them college dilutes the meaning of college.

"It's a kind of fantasy," said Allen, a contributing editor for Minding the Campus, a publication of the fiscally conservative Manhattan Institute. "It may make intellectually disabled people feel better, but is that what college is supposed to be all about?"

Oftentimes students with these disabilities stop their formal education when they finish high school, which is usually around the age of 21. Some districts have a partnership with colleges under which the district pays for their 18- to 21-year-old students to take higher education classes. In other cases, college costs are paid for by the parents.

Their children previously haven't been eligible for grants and work study money because they generally weren't seeking a degree and wouldn't have been admitted to college through the typical process.

These programs look "at higher education for what it's purpose in our community and our culture is – to provide opportunities for learning," said Meg Grigal, a researcher who works with Hart.

Back at the University of Central Missouri, Neff and another participant in the program for students with developmental issues, Gabe Savage, laugh with friends during lunch in their residence hall cafeteria.

Savage, a 26-year-old from Kansas City, is grateful for it all – new friends, the chance to try out for a school play, brush up on his computer skills and even take a bowling class with non-disabled students looking to earn a physical education credit.

"It's an answer to my prayer that I am here," he said. "I always wanted to do this."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST COLLEGE

Filed by Leah Finnegan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 46
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
03:19 AM on 10/19/2010
A lot of you are a real downer. When I read this I felt really good for this guy. Good for him- he's doing the best with what he's got, a lot of people can't say that. I wouldn't mind the Regents raising my tuition (which even at ucsc is bad) to pilot these programs, after finding room post-salaries. If money is being spent to give people who face a much harder uphill climb of life than I do a shot then I don't feel cheated. People need to get off the ''i'm a cynical pr*ck'' bus and be a little more down to earth.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:49 AM on 10/19/2010
Frankly, whether or not you feel 'cheated' is irrelevant. How exactly does this kind of thing give the moderately mentally disabled "a shot"? A shot at what? The UC system can hardly afford to give ordinary students a decent education, let alone the (mentally) disabled. The evaluations made aren't so much cynical as realistic. What you call "down to earth" most would describe as delusional.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Imhotep40
He who comes in peace
01:03 AM on 10/19/2010
I'm wondering if this program isn't a two-way street?

I've read comments regarding the viability, inappropriateness and wasted resources involved in bring intellectually disabled students into a University setting. What about research involving education of the intellectually disadvantaged? What about the development of unique approaches to assessing and evaluating learning potential?

I don't see this type of program diminishing the status or standards of undergraduate and graduate degree programs. I think it benefits both the disabled and the teaching professionals.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:04 AM on 10/19/2010
There is a difference between a formal study being conducted on education by academics who happen to be affiliated with a university, and the intellectually disabled being arbitrarily inserted into universities under the pretext of it being somehow beneficial for them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Imhotep40
He who comes in peace
10:47 AM on 10/19/2010
The arbitrary insertion of the intellectually disabled into an undergraduate college course still requires the minimum of 2.0 to obtain the credit hours, so what's the harm/adverse impact?

For decades autistic savants were and continue to be included in the "intellectually disabled" category. Some of these individuals could easily outperform the typical college student in the classroom, but fail in the socialized environment.

College/University study isn't just academics, it also involves social study, which isn't quantified through exams or classroom activities. As long as the overall standards are not diminished, wouldn't this socialization aspect be "somehow beneficial for them?"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
cheap politicians for sale
07:34 PM on 10/18/2010
I say put them straight into congress. They have more intellectual ability and would do a better job than the choices we have now. For that fact, they are probably better suited to run the colleges than most of the lazy pretentious people who are called deans ,administration and faculty these days.
05:12 PM on 10/18/2010
Why we should close at least half of our public colleges. A college degree has been made a worthless piece of toilet paper.
02:48 PM on 10/18/2010
"With additional training, Hart said participants can go on to do everything from being a librarian's assistants to data-entry work in an office."

I think that the intellectually disabled might be better suited to become Staff Associates at, oh I don't know, an Institute for Community Inclusion somewhere.

-a former library assistant
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jalowe1957
Poisonous epitaphs dished out periodically.
01:15 PM on 10/18/2010
I knew a man who has Asperger's who once attended a graduate program at USC. He told me many times he was treated so condescendingly as an outcast by the chair of the graduate program he studied in and tried to drive him out of the program by all means necessary. But no matter what they did, he still preservered.

The problem wasn't him. It was those naysayers who marginalized him and treated him less of an equal, and he could out-write and out-think them in his sleep.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:26 PM on 10/18/2010
Individuals with Asperger's are not 'disabled' in the same sense as those with, say, Down's Syndrome. I have yet to hear of a great philosopher or mathematician who was disabled in that sense, whereas there are numerous thinkers who were almost certainly autistic in some fashion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jebus Chris
The 2 party system is a joke that's not funny.
11:21 AM on 10/18/2010
I'm guessing they were inspired by all of the intellectually disabled adults that found success in politics as tea party candidates and Fox commentators.
photo
mlkx
occupy the overworld
02:02 AM on 10/18/2010
Well if Sarah Palin can graduate from college after three attempts and Christine O'Donnell after more than 20 years, anything is possible!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NoSandwiches
12:09 AM on 10/18/2010
Clearly these kids benefit from more opportunities to interact with a non-segregated population. The social life is offered to them, but the academic choices appear limited, and so likely not that intrusive. They are not taking physics courses. The opportunities for kids who are considering a career where contact with these "intellectually disabled" kids is part of the job clearly benefit from a partnership on campus. That's great.

There is always a matter of funding, however, and it is difficult in these troubled economic times when all the programs in the public schools get pared back or discontinued...except for the federally mandated programs for the disabled--the most expensive ones. It takes a lot of federal resources to meet these kids' medical needs, educational needs, and life skill needs and now we are spending more. (My personal experience with families with Downs' Syndrome kids is that they are anti-abortion and therefore vote Republican even thought the R's want no government mandates in education and don't like guvmint spending "their" money. Is it just those I've met? Or typical?) We all feel less generous in these times--a lot has been asked of us.

Perhaps having this contact on campus will help the students empathize instead of being resentful.

I have a lot of doubts that someone is going to hire a Down's Syndrome worker for data entry, even if they do learn to limit hugs. Are you kidding yourself? Not in this economy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Demarcus Jackson
Southern Psychology Professor
09:49 PM on 10/17/2010
I'm not entirely sure how I feel about this. As a psychologist, I want to support all individuals with special needs. I think intellectually disabled persons may be best served in specialized environments suited for their unique learning and training needs. I tend to believe that resources, especially financial resources, allocated for higher education should not be spent on programs like this. There is a very strong argument for pragmatism here that I believe is being ignored or blinded by uber-compassion and rose-tinted glasses. I think persons with intellectual disabilities that are the result of conditions like Down Syndrome or autism are capable of learning and capable to gaining useful skills. Moreover, such persons do often display tremendous insights and amazing abilities. But, is college/university the right setting for these individuals? At a time when America is trying to increase graduation rates among its colleges and trying to bulk up developmental/remedial programs because apparently a high school diploma is no longer an indication of college preparedness, is the use federal funds to support programs for intellectually disabled youth really a good use of resources?
photo
thereisonlyoneparty
more amazing than you
09:34 PM on 10/17/2010
"Disability advocates say only a small percentage of these students will receive degrees, but that the programs help them get better jobs."

So they are the head Walmart greeter instead of the assistant greeter?

Let's be honest here. This is not something that makes any sense and really is a waste of needed resources for educating people who can benefit from it. It is a nice thing to do, but nice is not always practical.
08:10 PM on 10/17/2010
College is not for intellectually disabled youths.
07:34 PM on 10/17/2010
This is just ridiculous. What contributions to academia are these "intellectually disabled" students going to make? Will they be able to provided detailed analysis about the relations between multinational institutions and the relationships NGOs have on sovereign states? Or can they shed ground breaking expertise on language syntax patterns and morphology? No.

It would be more ideal to put them in job training programs where they can flourish, not be left behind.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:24 PM on 10/17/2010
To be fair, most regular college students can't do these things either.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doublehappi
11:25 AM on 10/18/2010
you are a bad man - man
olddognewtrick
Half full or half empty...It's the same
06:56 PM on 10/17/2010
Many of the for-profit institutions have been doing this for years...
photo
thereisonlyoneparty
more amazing than you
09:27 PM on 10/17/2010
Well of course. You would have to r'ed to go to one of those "schools" in the first place.
photo
thereisonlyoneparty
more amazing than you
09:35 PM on 10/17/2010
oops. "...be r'ed..."
06:24 PM on 10/17/2010
This isn't really about disability vs. lack of disability. Anybody who meets the entrance requirements for college should have a fair chance at admission, regardless of their intelligence level or diagnosed disability. If they don't meet the requirements (again, regardless of any diagnosed disability) then it is not an efficient use of public money to enroll them anyway and spend even more on special services to help them through. We certainly shouldn't be encouraging students who don't meet the entrance requirements to take on student debt (however if parents would like to fund a college education for their child, regardless of ability/disability, that is entirely their business)