iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Gulf Corals In Oil Spill Zone Appear Healthy

BRIAN SKOLOFF   10/22/10 12:32 PM ET   AP

Gulf Coral

ON THE FLOOR OF THE GULF OF MEXICO — Just 20 miles north of where BP's blown-out well spewed millions of gallons of oil into the sea, life appears bountiful despite initial fears that crude could have wiped out many of these delicate deepwater habitats.

Plankton, tiny suspended particles that form the base of the ocean's food web, float en masse 1,400 feet beneath the surface of the Gulf of Mexico, forming a snowy-like underwater scene as they move with the currents outside the windows of a two-man sub creeping a few feet off the seafloor.

Crabs, starfish and other deep sea creatures swarm small patches of corals, and tiny sea anemones sprout from the sand like miniature forests across a lunar-like landscape illuminated only by the lights of the sub, otherwise living in a deep, dark environment far from the sun's reach.

Scientists are currently in the early stages of studying what effects, if any, BP PLC's April 20 oil well blowout off Louisiana and the ensuing crude gusher has had on the delicate deep sea coral habitats of the northern Gulf.

So far, it appears the area dodged a bullet, but more research is needed. Some of the deep sea corals near the spill site were only discovered just last year.

"Originally, when we saw the trajectory for the oil spill and where it was going, we were very concerned that these habitats would be impacted," said researcher Steve Ross of the Center for Marine Science at the University of North Carolina at Wilmington.

Ross and others are conducting research from a Greenpeace ship in the Gulf, using a two-man sub as they work to determine if the corals have suffered damage, or may take a hit from long-term impacts, such as stunted reproduction rates.

"We thought certainly that ... we would see signs of damage," Ross said. "And we're very pleased to say so far, that in these locations, we haven't seen a large scale damage to the coral habitats. We're still looking, but so far, it's good."

Ross was part of a team of researchers that studied deep sea corals in the Atlantic Ocean between North Carolina and Florida. The research eventually helped lead to added federal protections for a roughly 23,000 square-mile network believed to be among the largest continuous distribution of deep water corals in the world.

Ross and others have now turned their attention to the Gulf.

While fishermen have for centuries dragged up corals from the deep sea, it wasn't until the early 1900s that scientists discovered these extensive cold-water reefs. And it wasn't until the 1970s that researchers were able to use subs and cameras to reach the sea floor to document them. It had long been thought coral reefs only formed in shallow, warm waters.

Deepwater reefs and pinnacles are much more slow-growing and can take several million years to form. Science is only now beginning to understand these underwater "frontier zones." Researchers are looking to these regions for the development of additional pharmaceuticals since these cold-water critters have adapted to live in such unique environments void of sunlight, they possess unusual qualities that federal scientists say could aid in creating new drugs for cancer, heart disease and other ailments.

"We are very interested in any potential damage to deep sea corals," said Steve Murawski, chief fisheries scientist for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which is currently conducting research into oil in Gulf sediments, among other studies.

The federal government maintains much of the oil is now gone from the Gulf, but some studies indicate it remains in significant amounts on the sea floor. Microscopic particles have also been found in the water column.

It is now a prime time for coral spawning in the Gulf, when the corals release tiny larvae that eventually form new corals.

"It could alter the reproduction of these animals," Murawski said. "Even though the adults may survive the event, did we lose the opportunity to have more juveniles produced?"

Sandra Brooke, coral conservation director at the Marine Conservation Biology Institute, who is also participating in the research, agreed. The corals' reproduction rates will be studied over the coming weeks, she said.

"We have to be careful with our conclusions about this kind of data," Brooke said, noting it will take more than just a few dives to determine the extent of the damage. "We'll take further analysis but from what we've seen so far, it seems like they've dodged a bullet."

Long-term impacts, for instance, from 1989's much smaller Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska took years, even decades to understand.

"We're just going to have to continue watching," said Margot Stiles, a marine scientist with the conservation group Oceana.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

ON THE FLOOR OF THE GULF OF MEXICO — Just 20 miles north of where BP's blown-out well spewed millions of gallons of oil into the sea, life appears bountiful despite initial fears that crude coul...
ON THE FLOOR OF THE GULF OF MEXICO — Just 20 miles north of where BP's blown-out well spewed millions of gallons of oil into the sea, life appears bountiful despite initial fears that crude coul...
Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 23
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
LeFlaneur
does nuance.
04:24 PM on 10/26/2010
I guess it would depend on your yardstick.

If you define "healthy" as "30% dead but not much worse than they were last year," then yeah, they're "healthy."
photo
Rosewren
The power of kindness is infinite
02:07 PM on 10/24/2010
Are any of these scientists in the employ of BP? They signed on many scientists after the spill so I would have to know this before I "believe". Also, the Nat Guard has said the oil is pretty much gone but lo and behold it is not. I don't trust much of any of the reports coming out of the gulf unless it is someone who is out on those waters all the time fishing and living down there.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ChaCubed
Fabulously Liberal
07:20 PM on 10/23/2010
The picture is an AP file shot. Could be from anywhere and taken at anytime.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
B Kleitz
ghost hunter grammy DeadHead
05:59 PM on 10/23/2010
And really? 14 comments on this story, which is of ENORMOUS importance to the health and welfare of our country, and THOUSANDS, if not TENS OF THOUSANDS of comments on The Funniest Unintentionally Sexual Album Covers Ever, Clarence Thomas Sex details, and Glee soft porn photos.
I really worry about all of us.
I really really do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThomasPaine1776
Left is right; Right is wrong
01:26 AM on 10/25/2010
We are bacteria in a petri dish, doomed to die in our own filth.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
B Kleitz
ghost hunter grammy DeadHead
05:56 PM on 10/23/2010
Is the picture accompanying the story a picture of a healthy reef?
Cos, it looks kinda green to me. Like algae is covering it. I didn't think a healthy reef looked like that.
09:18 PM on 10/23/2010
It's Fire Coral which is usually a phosphorescent green. It's an old AP file photo from who knows where or when.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Bogstomper2
Secular conservative
05:32 PM on 10/23/2010
Bad headline, bad intro. To someone skimming this story, the message is that the Gulf is okay. It's only when you actually read it that you see that this finding, even though it's positive, is tentative.

It's not an "all clear."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:42 AM on 10/23/2010
"but more research is needed" a phrase that corporate-owned media declined to state.
06:06 AM on 10/23/2010
the oil spill was a myth
02:56 AM on 10/23/2010
Yes and corexit is good for you! Oil is good for the reefs! yes, we need to drill more and it's ok if we spill oil.

Riiiight....
photo
booboo111
micro-bio
02:36 PM on 10/22/2010
"You see?" ......said the troll, "Sea life loves oil!"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vesaversa1
Stupid is forever, ignorance can be fixed.
02:10 PM on 10/22/2010
If there anyone out there who believe this bogus report of the gulf sea floor being clean and full of aquatic life 6 mounts after the worst oil spill in country happen . I have some ocean front land that i would like to sell them in Arizona .First off the gulf is murky water where they got these pics is beyond me probably on the Atlantic side of Florida.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ItsBarranti
05:27 PM on 10/22/2010
See, there's these things called currents in the Ocean.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joffan
Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so.
12:57 AM on 10/23/2010
You're definitely right about the photo - that's a shallow water shot and the article is about deep water corals. But that's journalism for you.

On the more important point of the amount of oil and health of the marine life, don't you think that this evidence deserves some respect? Actual people going out and actually investigating the area? Not everything is doomed to be worst case and I'm glad it's better than it could have been - your post gives the impression that you wish it was worse.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Papa Swamp
Apex predator, ocean freak.
11:54 AM on 10/22/2010
So they are studying benthic habitat at 1400 ft and the oil on the bottom is at 35,000 ft.....hmmm
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ItsBarranti
05:27 PM on 10/22/2010
The Marianas Trench is barely 35,000 feet deep. The Gulf of Mexico at its deepest is not even half that. Where the oil spilled is barely 5000 feet. Most of the Gulf Floor, particularly 20 miles north of the spill where the article states, is between 1000 and 3000 feet.

Hmmm indeed.
Ifeomamn
When MSM report Facts, USA thrives.
10:35 AM on 10/22/2010
So the Obama administration was right all along with their scientific assessment. I remembered reading here that they were hiding DATA and were not allowing independent scientists to see their DATA. Where is James Carville, that lackadaisical mouth piece?

Interesting, this administration is always condemned first, then when it's a different story, hardly the same fanfare to correct the erroneous initial reporting. The BP oil Golf Gush was 6 months 2 days ago. The well has been capped over 3 months ago.

Who gives this administration their reputation back? Would the media go back and report that it wasn't the 10 Obama's Katrina meme?

Calmly, methodologically, meticulously, and infuriatingly for some, they got it done. EMOTE, MSM?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Papa Swamp
Apex predator, ocean freak.
12:01 PM on 10/22/2010
checking the impact at 1400 ft is important...but the spill occurred at 35,000 ft....heck the rig is laying in 5000ft of water. Deeper water benthic habitat needs to be checked. Additionally, fish and shrimp are showing up with high levels of contamination.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rocky-kistner/post_1096_b_769149.html