iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

WikiLeaks' Iraq War Logs: Iraqi Deaths Higher Than U.S. Count

First Posted: 10/23/10 10:05 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:05 PM ET

Wikileaks Iraq Casualties

WASHINGTON — Military documents laid bare in the biggest leak of secret information in U.S. history suggest that far more Iraqis died than previously acknowledged during the years of sectarian bloodletting and criminal violence unleashed by the 2003 U.S.-led invasion.

The accounts of civilian deaths among nearly 400,000 purported Iraq war logs released Friday by the WikiLeaks website include deaths unknown or unreported before now – as many as 15,000 by the count of one independent research group.

The field reports from U.S. forces and intelligence officers also indicate U.S. forces often failed to follow up on credible evidence that Iraqi forces mistreated, tortured and killed their captives as they battled a violent insurgency.

The war logs were made public in defiance of Pentagon insistence that the action puts the lives of U.S. troops and their military partners at risk.

Although the documents appear to be authentic, their origin could not be independently confirmed, and WikiLeaks declined to offer any details about them.

The 391,831 documents date from the start of 2004 to Jan. 1, 2010, providing a ground-level view of the war written mostly by low-ranking officers in the field. The dry reports, full of military jargon and acronyms, were meant to catalog "significant actions" over six years of heavy U.S. and allied military presence in Iraq.

The Pentagon has previously declined to confirm the authenticity of WikiLeaks-released records, but it has employed more than 100 U.S. analysts to review what was previously released and has never indicated that any past WikiLeaks releases were inaccurate.

At a news conference in London on Saturday, WikiLeaks said it would soon publish 15,000 additional secret Afghan war documents. The group has already published some 77,000 U.S. intelligence reports about the war in Afghanistan in addition to the almost 400,000 alleged secret U.S. documents about the Iraq war.

Casualty figures in the U.S.-led war in Iraq have been hotly disputed because of the high political stakes in a conflict opposed by many countries and a large portion of the American public. Critics on each side of the divide accuse the other of manipulating the death toll to sway opinion.

Iraq Body Count, a private British-based group that has tracked the number of Iraqi civilians killed since the war began, said it had analyzed the information and found 15,000 previously unreported deaths, which would raise its total from as many as 107,369 civilians to more than 122,000 civilians.

It said most of the newly disclosed casualties included targeted assassinations, drive-by shootings, torture, executions and checkpoint killings.

A member of the organization, John Sloboda, said at the news conference that the war logs revealed an unprecedented level of detail about the day-to-day conflict, including the names of many victims.

"The new deaths are concentrated in small incidents, killing one or two people at a time, scattered all over Iraq, and occurring almost every day for the whole period," he said. "These are the small but relentless tragedies of this war that these logs reveal in unprecedented detail."

Al-Jazeera, one of several news organizations provided advance access to the WikiLeaks trove, reported the documents show 285,000 recorded casualties, including at least 109,000 deaths. Of those who died 66,000, nearly two-thirds of the total, were civilians.

The Iraqi government has issued a tally claiming at least 85,694 deaths of civilians and security officials killed between January 2004 and Oct. 31, 2008.

In July of this year, the U.S. military quietly released its most detailed tally to date of the deaths of Iraqi civilians and security forces in the bloodiest years of the war.

That U.S. body count, reported by The Associated Press this month, tallied deaths of almost 77,000 Iraqis between January 2004 and August 2008 – the darkest chapter of Iraq's sectarian warfare and the U.S. troop surge to quell it. The new data was posted on the U.S. Central Command website without explanation.

In August 2008, the Congressional Research Service said the U.S. military was withholding statistics on Iraqi civilian deaths. The Pentagon did publish in June 2008 a chart on civilian death trends by month that showed it peaking at between 3,500 and 4,000 in December 2006. But it did not release the data used to create the chart.

In 2006 and 2007, the Bush administration and military commanders often played down the extent of civilian killings from revenge killings, blood feuds and mob-style violence in Iraq, much of which had no direct effect on U.S. forces.

Administration figures repeatedly denied Iraq was sliding into civil war. The war did not begin to turn around in a lasting way until the 2007 "surge" of U.S. troops and the decision of key Sunni leaders to cut ties with the foreign-led al-Qaida terror group.

Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell called the release of the Iraq war material by WikiLeaks "shameful" and said it "could potentially undermine our nation's security."

"The biggest potential damage here, we think, could be to our forces," he said, "because there are now potentially 400,000 documents in the public domain for our enemies to mine, look for vulnerabilities, patterns of behavior, things they could exploit to wage attacks against us in the future."

He said that about 300 Iraqis mentioned in the documents are "particularly vulnerable to reprisal attacks" because of the documents' release and that U.S. forces in Iraq are trying to protect them.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange denied that claim.

Speaking to reporters in London on Saturday, he said the Pentagon allegations were "simply not true" and said he was confident Iraqis weren't named in the documents.

"I'm worried that the press credibly report statements like that from the Pentagon," he said.

A review of the documents by the AP found no names.

WikiLeaks gave the AP a censored version of the files, with some names of people, countries and groups redacted. Fuller versions were offered to other news outlets ahead of time, according to a WikiLeaks member at London's Frontline Club, where a handful of journalists was given last-minute access before the war logs were released more widely.

It was not immediately clear whether WikiLeaks released all the military records in its possession. In some cases, names and other pieces of identifying information appeared to have been redacted but it was unclear to what extent WikiLeaks withheld names in response to Pentagon concerns that people could become targets of retribution.

Allegations of torture and brutality by Shiite-dominated security forces – mostly against Sunni prisoners – were widely reported during the most violent years of the war, when the rival Islamic sects turned on one another in Baghdad and other cities. The leaked documents provide a ground's-eye view of abuses as reported by U.S. military personnel to their superiors and appear to corroborate much of the past reporting on such incidents.

The release of the documents comes at a pivotal time for the U.S. in Iraq as the military prepares to withdraw all 50,000 remaining troops from the country by the end of next year. The U.S. military had as many as 170,000 troops in Iraq in 2007.

Violence has declined sharply over the past two years, but near-daily bombings and shootings continue, casting doubt on the ability of Iraqi forces to protect the people.

The situation has been exacerbated by growing frustration among the public over the failure of Iraqi politicians to unite and form a new government. Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki is struggling to remain in power since his Shiite alliance narrowly lost the March 7 vote to a Sunni-backed bloc led by rival Ayad Allawi.

___

Associated Press writers Jill Lawless, Raphael G. Satter and Michael Weissenstein in London, Kim Gamel in Cairo, Lynn Dombek in New York and Bushra Juhi in Baghdad contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

WASHINGTON — Military documents laid bare in the biggest leak of secret information in U.S. history suggest that far more Iraqis died than previously acknowledged during the years of sectarian b...
WASHINGTON — Military documents laid bare in the biggest leak of secret information in U.S. history suggest that far more Iraqis died than previously acknowledged during the years of sectarian b...
Filed by Alexander Belenky  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 721
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:55 PM on 12/08/2010
While it is reassuring to read that Iraq Body Count (the most frequently cited source in regard to Iraqi deaths) added 15,000 unreported deaths to its tally of civilian casualties, the true number is actually much higher. The Iraq Body Count website asks, “what do the Wikileaks records add to the already known death toll?” The answer, according to the site, is that “a precise and final answer to this question can only be gained after a detailed reading of each individual log to discover whether or not what it contains has already been documented.” Well, this is exactly what my colleagues and I did during a graduate seminar at Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health.

Collectively, we looked at over 13,000 individual logs in Wikileaks and compared them to the records in Iraq Body Count, assessing for matches. We found that at least 2/3 of the deaths documented in Wikileaks were missing from Iraq Body Count. The 15,000 deaths that Iraq Body Count added to their tally, is then, a gross underestimate. The article notes that the previously unreported deaths include targeted assassinations, drive-by shootings, torture, executions, and checkpoint killings. These records begin to tell the very real and very sad story of what the U.S. military calls “collateral damage.” As civilians continue to get caught in the crosshairs of this war, the “hearts and minds” of Iraqi’s will never be won over.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
sviolette
Hug a vet!!!
06:23 PM on 10/25/2010
Why isn't anyone talking about this?

In the wake of the release of 400,000 documents by Wikileaks, the United Nations has called on U.S. President Barack Obama to order a full investigation of crimes committed against the Iraqi people following the invasion and occupation that was directed by George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld.


http://www.impeachbush.org/site/PageServer?pagename=homepage
04:46 PM on 10/25/2010
It's war! Civilians always pay the price. This is small potatoes compered to the fire bombing and nuking we did in WW2. Nations lay in ruins. The so called greatest generation. Not making light of it but this seems to be forgotten by the people who start the wars. If the elites children had to fight the wars they start all the time the planet would be a much more peaceful place. When you can use the poor as pawns and canon fodder they don't give it a second thought.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
sviolette
Hug a vet!!!
06:25 PM on 10/25/2010
We also executed Germans and Japanese soldiers for war crimes after WWII. There are rules even in war.

http://www.impeachbush.org/site/PageServer?pagename=homepage
02:43 PM on 10/25/2010
I think Iraq and Afghanistan will be remembered, by future generations, as one of our biggest failures at nation-building and one of our most spectacular violations of human rights in our history as the United States of America.
06:01 AM on 10/26/2010
I understand what you're trying to say though i'd have a slightly different take on it... I would rephrase the first sentence as

"I think Iraq and Afghanistan will be remembered, by future generations, as one of our most duplicitous and callous attempt at empire-building and one of our most spectacular violations of human rights in our history as the United States of America."
12:59 PM on 10/25/2010
Who else is reports false body counts? Glenn Beck, the media the list goes on and on. Lies lies lies till everyone dies. Dont let a simple body count get in the way of your re-election bid haha
12:59 PM on 10/25/2010
Remember that these are only the documented deaths.

These articles reference a more realistic study.

http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/1-over-one-million-iraqi-deaths-caused-by-us-occupation/

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/sep/16/iraq.iraqtimeline
12:28 PM on 10/25/2010
It's becominng increasingly clear that Wikileaks has an agenda. This information is not new, nor is it particularly revelatory; for years the British Medical journal The Lancet has been reporting Iraqi casualty figures much higher than the "official" US supplied count.

Even in 2002 it was perfectly obvious that:

A. Iraq under Saddam had a secular constitution, and Saddam was a curb, not a spur, to Islamic fundamentalists and extremist organizations, as he regarded these as a threat to his regime.

B. An American attack and invasion of Iraq would lead to massive civilian casualties and, while leading to an easy victory over Iraq's conventional armed forces, would precipitate a bloody, lenghty and ongoing insurgency not solvable through military force alone.

C. The removal of Saddam from power would start a bloody Shia-Sunni conflict resulting in the former (representing the majority) coming to power and the installation of an Islamic and theocratic regime. It was virtually certain that Iran's regime would benefit strategically and politically from this.

D. The war would degrade American military power and have a demoralizing effect on service members, leading in many cases to the atrocities that inevitably accompany an insurgency against an occupation force.

E. Iraq, under Saddam was no threat to the US.

It seems pretty clear that the intent of these documents is to embarras the Shia led government of Maliki, which is close to forming a coalition with Muqutada Al Sadr and cast Iran in the worst possible light.
06:03 AM on 10/26/2010
Well.. Wikileaks does downplay the number of "actual" deaths even if it expands upon the number officially given by the Admin.... I do smell something too...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lawrence of america
12:17 PM on 10/25/2010
they hate us for our freedom.
those darn Islamofaschists.
11:28 AM on 10/25/2010
We must continue pestering Eric Holder with calls and emails and demand that he arrest Bush and Cheney for war crimes. We must pester him CONSTANTLY. CONSTANTLY!
06:04 AM on 10/26/2010
Doubt that'll work. He has the rest of his career and compensation for deeds to look forward to...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
charon
Earth, love it or leave it!
01:55 AM on 10/25/2010
Nothing new here, yes the Empire lies, it lies all the time to cover up its murders by its troops and its proxies and mercenaries. This article, though, is misleading. It implies that the "surge" was what ended the Sunni uprising, when in fact that was only a minor part of it.

Mostly the insurgency was calmed with payoffs of the billions of dollars that "disappeared" in Iraq in those years, the "Salvadorization" of the conflict, i.e., the US organizing Shia death squads and extensive use of torture by those squads, and certain backroom negotiations with Sadr and the Iranians that got them out of the game.

One thing the Empire hates more than resistance is sunlight. It prefers to operate under cover of darkness, out of sight, like a vampire.
09:03 AM on 10/25/2010
fanned charon . . . . the empire loathes sunlight . . . . that is why they are upset about the leaked information . . . .
06:06 AM on 10/26/2010
Agreed and fanned...
photo
MajorKong
If the pilot's good, see, I mean if he's reeeally
10:16 PM on 10/24/2010
If some foreign power somehow killed 66,000+ American civilians I rather doubt that we would just shrug it off as "collateral damage".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:58 PM on 10/24/2010
Iraqis are going to kill each other even when USA leaves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mlm4420
Liberal progressive
10:19 PM on 10/24/2010
That doesn't make it better;
08:08 AM on 10/25/2010
They weren't before USA invaded....
08:33 AM on 10/25/2010
the Sunni's and Shi'ites were friends and neighbours before the illegal invasion
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ghostoftompaine
07:11 PM on 10/24/2010
Al Contraio (?) nailed it, we the people need to get control of our system, Obama never stood a chance, The real world indicator of power is disposable wealth, Our system is corrupted by people who make money off war, while innocent Americans are off doing the dirty work of war the Military Industrial Complex (see Eisenhower), or whatever you need to call it, are fixing the politics here at home so all us poor folks can keep paying into the war expenses and keep sending our youngest and bravest. (whom trust the rest of us to elect people who make constitutional decisions). Meanwhile we are giving more of our taxes to support the banking industry which owns the Oil fields the military is protecting. OUR NUMBER ONE EXPENDITURE AS A GOVERNMENT IS DEBT SERVICE, ALL OF THE WAR IS EXTRA BUDGETARY I.E. DEBT EXPENDITURE= HIGHER DEBT SERVICE=GOOD BUSINESS. The Federal Reserve is a private institution which is owned by the same commercial banks who own the oil companies, the media outlets, the war contracting companies, the smaller banks, your house, etc...., this war has been great for certain people's business, and if you look at the reports you will see clearly what those people think of the rest of us not in the club. If you are poor, it doesn't matter if you are conservative or liberal, you are looked at as property.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Denis Higgins
02:35 AM on 10/25/2010
Ain't that the truth,ghost...fanned!
08:36 AM on 10/25/2010
fanned ghostoftompaine . . . corporatism, gop, mic, aipac/israel/ the neo cons . . . . they are all the same people . . .if they win in November . . it will be a successsful coup . . . of American democracy . . .and why for perpetual war to feed their greed and dreams of domination . . . be afraid very afraid . hold your nose and vote Dem
06:32 PM on 10/24/2010
So the Pentagon demands of the press and citizens the return or destruction of these documents. No one has complied because its an un-constitutional threat. Never the less, Obama has prosecuted more people for leaks to the public than all other presidents combined. The truth really messes with the war mongers plans, it might even mean the shortening of wars that have already been way too long.
08:37 AM on 10/25/2010
well said m2b . . . time to bring the culprits to trial stating with cheney, rumsfeld, baby bush, tony bliar . . . etc
08:11 PM on 10/25/2010
Put 'em all on trial. Wait, who's going to put them on trial? They run the courts. They have veto powers over the international court so until we elect serious social and political change (not corporate sponsored "change") nothing's gonna change.
06:23 PM on 10/24/2010
The death count discrepancy is emblematic of the entire Iraq fiasco - a pack of lies from start to finish.
08:37 AM on 10/25/2010
great blog Grim Al . . wish I could fan you again