iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Blythe Project: Biggest Solar Power Plant On U.S. Public Lands Approved By Obama Administration For Mojave Desert, California

MATTHEW DALY   10/25/10 10:11 PM ET   AP

Solar Plant

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration has approved a thousand-megawatt solar project on federal land in southern California, the largest solar project ever planned on U.S. public lands.

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar hailed the $6 billion Blythe Solar Power Project, to be built in the Mojave Desert near Blythe, Calif., as the start of a boom in solar power on federal lands.

"Today is a day that makes me excited about the nation's future," Salazar said Monday at a news conference. "This project shows in a real way how harnessing our own renewable resources can create good jobs here at home."

The Blythe project, being developed by Solar Millennium, a German solar developer, is slated for more than 7,000 acres of public land near the Arizona border, some 225 miles east of Los Angeles.

The project is the sixth solar power development approved by the Interior Department this month – all in California and Nevada. Approval of a seventh project – also in California – is expected in the next few weeks. All could start transmitting electricity by the end of 2011 or early 2012.

At full capacity, the seven projects would generate more than 3,000 megawatts of power and provide electricity for up to 2 million homes. The projects are expected to create more than 2,000 jobs during construction and several hundred permanent jobs.

A spokeswoman for the solar industry said the flurry of announcements shows that efforts made by the Obama administration and California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to promote solar power are beginning to pay off.

"We're finally going to see solar energy produced on public lands in the United States – and this is something the public wants," said Monique Hanis, a spokeswoman for the Solar Energy Industries Association, a Washington-based trade group.

The announcements come about five years after solar developers began asking the Bureau of Land Management for rights to develop hundreds of solar plants on millions of acres of federally owned desert in the Southwest.

The bureau opened federally owned lands in 2005 to solar development, but an examination of records and interviews of officials by The Associated Press showed the program operated a first-come, first-served leasing system that quickly overwhelmed its small staff and enabled companies, regardless of solar industry experience, to squat on land without any real plans to develop it.

To expedite environmental review and bureaucratic red tape, the Interior Department identified 14 of the most promising solar projects among the more than 180 current permit applications covering about 23 million acres of federally owned desert in the Southwest.

Those 14 "fast-track" projects alone would produce more than 6,000 megawatts, enough to power 4 million homes for a day at peak usage, officials said.

Hanis, the industry representative, said that even after the 14 fast-track projects are approved, solar energy will remain a tiny fraction of overall energy production on U.S. lands. The projects approved this month are the first ever approved by the land management bureau, compared with more than 74,000 oil and gas permits issued in the past two decades.

Final approval by the end of the year qualifies the solar projects for federal funds under the economic stimulus law approved last year. Solar Millennium is eligible to secure $1.9 billion in conditional loan guarantees from the Energy Department for the Blythe project.

The company will be required to mitigate the project's effect on more than 8,000 acres of habitat for the desert tortoise, western burrowing owl, bighorn sheep and Mojave fringe-toed lizard, as part of an agreement with federal officials.

___

Online:

http://www.doi.gov

http://www.seia.org

(This version CORRECTS name of project to Blythe Solar Power Project.)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration has approved a thousand-megawatt solar project on federal land in southern California, the largest solar project ever planned on U.S. public lands. Interio...
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration has approved a thousand-megawatt solar project on federal land in southern California, the largest solar project ever planned on U.S. public lands. Interio...
Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 123
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aligatorhardt
Cut on the bias
02:44 PM on 11/05/2010
This project is good news in an area that is not utilized for anything else. This is much better than nuclear or fossil fuel power plants. The ability to run without fuel will become increasingly valuable in coming years as fossil fuel prices continue to rise and pollution from traditional power plants becomes more costly in health care needs. The accommodations for wildlife preservation should satisfy those requirements. Keep in mind the guarenteed wildlife losses that result from coal or nuclear power.
12:58 AM on 10/28/2010
Finally!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bleedingheart9
one small step for man...
12:07 AM on 10/28/2010
/Thank Gawd, Houston, this is one small step for man, let's hope it catches on and we can make giant leaps for humanity and the planet. And the California economy could use very job they can get right now. These plants are great as long as they don't use too much water. It's a good kick off to (hopefully, people) a cleaner energy age, however, we should focus on where a majority of the energy is required: living centers, homes, businesses. Photo-voltaic those rooftops, and start making the technology a national security investment. Invest in clean energy now, or spend countless trillions securing dirty energy in some sand trap or 30,000 leagues under the sea. Go Big Green.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:41 PM on 10/27/2010
The official BLM site follows, which has all the draft papers for viewing.

http://www.blm.gov/ca/st/en/fo/palmsprings/Solar_Projects/Blythe_Solar_Power_Project.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:11 AM on 10/28/2010
I highly recommend folks read the appendage on comment letters. There is detailed concerned from most environmental groups about the "fast track" nature of the proposal and the scope of the proposal (i.e. they believe it should be reduced by about half to the eastern side of the proposed area).

Please read the details of this project.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:36 PM on 10/27/2010
Seems that there are always complications to these projects. Many groups allege that the sites will destroy ancient geoglyphs and have irreparable harm to the noted species. Need to find the EIS on this project and read it thoroughly. Sounds great for green energy but only if the above mentioned variables are dealt with properly.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blood1
10:01 AM on 10/28/2010
"There is no such thing as a free lunch". A quote from decades ago and still applicable. Just my opinion, but there will always be trade offs and so what is the option? drill baby drill? What is "dealing with these issues "properly"?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:43 PM on 10/28/2010
The FEIS has several alternatives that are noteworthy and the stakeholders who commented on the application almost all recommend an undocumented alternative. It seems most groups invested in green energy without undo impact request the application be denied as present but approved to about 1/2 the size and the other half sought out near local abandoned farm land and brown fields. Seems a fair compromise that honors the ESA and cultural antiquities laws that are applicable. But the fast tracked option A seems the least desirable for regional native tribes and the affected policies.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:48 PM on 10/28/2010
"Dealing with these issues" means: not depleteing local populations of endangered species as required by NEPA and FLMPA according to the ESA; not destroying or reducing the quality of experience at cultural sites; reducing long term impacts as much as possible. It apears the fast tracked Option A does not deal with these issues properly. This is not a black and white issue between "drill baby drill" and "green energy" but is instead a nuanced issue that has valid solutions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
momofvegasgirls
My bio is not for sale !
04:49 PM on 10/26/2010
Did this make the front page yesterday? I've barely heard a blip about this project. Seems interesting. Of course, it would have been nice if it was done by an American company. Hopefully they will be able to mitigate the environmental impact to the wildlife in the area.

http://www.energydigital.com/sectors/renewables/environmentalists-oppose-world-s-largest-solar-power-plant-calif
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Navy Chief
04:23 PM on 10/26/2010
I only have one problem with this endeavor. The project is being outsourced to a non-U.S. firm. We need projects like this to break our dependence on fossil fuels, but why do we have to outsource the work to foreign corporations?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bleedingheart9
one small step for man...
12:17 AM on 10/28/2010
Americans don't do solar, remember. We do Big Oil. The Saudi's, of all people, showed us how to do solar with a plant installed by 4-corners about 12 years ago. It is hydro-dependent, meaning it derives energy from the steam it can generate. We need non-hydro systems because water is in short supply everywhere, especially the southwest. I just installed solar photovoltaics panels on my house to take advantage of the tax incentives offered by President Obama. Local companies employed workers and benefited the local economy. However, the panels were sold by Sharp, but manufactured in Germany. This is a national security issue, as declared by President Carter over 30 years ago and then ignored by the following administration. We should be investing more in clean energy R&D more than we spend on blood and bullets in the ancient sands of Persia.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:20 PM on 10/26/2010
Building a renewable energy infrastructure is great but I am a little confused as to why we don't have an American company doing something like this. With the use of solar, wind and hydro power we could stop send 1 billion a day to countries that hate us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Guitarsandmore
devoted father, community activist, musician, reti
12:32 PM on 10/27/2010
Because we elected Ronald Reagan who took the solar panels off the roof of the White House and said "we don't need to do that". He was a shoot from the hip no nothing cowboy actor and now we are paying for it.
11:04 AM on 10/26/2010
BigEnergy wants to centralize all power economies through a central "smart grid" hub built and operated oddly enough right near NSA headquarters in Virginia by "GridPoint", an open conspiracy outfit started a few years back by a senior Microsoft wonky and already stuffed with HUNDREDS of MILLIONS of dollars of fat cat institutional investment.

BigEnergy (read: Goldman Sachs) is NOT going to let the green energy revolution dry up their profits. At all costs, and against what will become a growing tide of consumer resentment, centralized command, control, and tiered pricing of electricity is about to become cemented in as Big Business' third leg of fascist control. First is banking - done. Second is health care - done. Last, and certainly not least, is every last penny you have for your electricity. When you get it, how much you get, and what you have to pay are all controlled by private, for profit, Mega Corps - and further de-regulation is coming. The "Smart Meters" are already being installed. Why, they don't even have to come to your home to turn you off.

Its true that leased space commercial enterprise, heavy industry, and multi family/ inner city users require centralized line voltage - but for anyone else that can - PERSONALIZE YOUR OWN ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION -

the sooner you get off the grid, the better....for your freedom's sake.
11:19 AM on 10/26/2010
I mean really. High use hours like dinner time priced so high only the affluent can afford to eat @ 6:00 p.m.? The rest of us have to cook our meals and do our laundry at 3 or 4 in the morning? C'mon, our home lives are about to be metered like cell phones.

And the MegaGridCorp communicating with and controlling my refrigerator, HVAC, and car charging. If I consent (just like computers and software tech have given us the age of the "I Agree" button) I "get" to enjoy regular affordable pricing. If "I Don't Agree", its price gouging for me.

Some energy wonks are preaching this as the New Age of energy conservation; and that argument on its own has some merit. But unfortunately most of those wonks are academics that underestimate the insidious enterprises of BigEnergy and how it is using the argument to gain absolute control of our private energy needs.

Remember, in America, wherever a Goldman Sachs apprentice discovers a smidge of your money or freedom that can be exploited to suck funds from you to them, it WILL happen.

Be prepared.
11:23 AM on 10/26/2010
Did you all think charging your electric car instead of buying your gas from a cartel was going to be cheap forever? Ha!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rougebaisers
09:35 AM on 10/26/2010
Finally. But, will it ever be realized if/when the repubs start taking control of all of Washington?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:03 AM on 10/26/2010
This thing is supposed to provide 1,000 MW of electricity? We are talking about something that will provide more power when the sun is shining than the San Onofre nuclear power plant here in Southern California. I am impressed.

The highest demand for electricity in the Southwest is in the daytime, in the summer, the same period when this plant will have the highest output. It sounds like it will provide a much needed additional electrical resource, safely and cleanly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
momofvegasgirls
My bio is not for sale !
04:46 PM on 10/26/2010
This piece says they can put out as much as 3,000 MW.

http://www.energydigital.com/sectors/renewables/environmentalists-oppose-world-s-largest-solar-power-plant-calif
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MAJK
Economic Democracy > Capitalism
08:17 AM on 10/26/2010
This is fantastic news for combating climate change... but one of the companies that will run the Solar Plant is Chevron... Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:57 AM on 10/26/2010
Let's keep our fingers crossed. I remember reading somewhere that Chevron is the largest single provider of geothermal electricity in the whole world, so maybe they will come through for us on this one.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MAJK
Economic Democracy > Capitalism
10:28 AM on 10/26/2010
It does help to solve the growing climate crisis, but doesn't really address the issue that giant corporate monopolies can still hold our utilities hostage (ala Enron)

I'd rather a non-profit run it, or something similar. However, I know I can't have my cake and eat it too and I'll take what I can get. :)
photo
Amadahy
loves peanut M&Ms and Whippoorwills
05:49 PM on 10/27/2010
On a post many months ago now, I replied to Alec Baldwin when he said that we need to take steps to help bring down the energy companies, that this doesn't make any sense. BP Oil today will be BP Solar tomorrow. Chevron Nuclear today will be Chevron Geothermal tomorrow. The oil companies aren't going anywhere. They're in the energy market after all, they aren't stupid, and they'll try to insure that they have a foothold on whatever energy is profitable.

Unfortunately.

With initiatives to make more green energy solutions profitable, let's hope they get the hint. Because doing the right thing and making less money doesn't seem to be an option.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:35 AM on 10/26/2010
Again an other multi-national, Mega Corporation getting big contracts. How about starting some new "All American" energy companies or using ones already here to provide "American" energy? We are still running down the same bad paths with the same wrong choices. Multi-national, Mega Corporations are a bad idea. They cost too much and are not loyal to any country only to money, power and greed for their club members. I'd rather put my own solar panels on my roof purchased from the guy I know down the street that sells them at his small company than be beholding to one more Mega Corp.
07:49 AM on 10/26/2010
Agreed 100%. Bravo!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:23 AM on 10/26/2010
Wherever the money and expertise for this project come from, the jobs and the "bricks and mortar" will be right here in the U.S.A., plus we will end up spending less money on imported oil, and we will be fighting global warming. Sounds great to me.
07:32 AM on 10/26/2010
Ahh...steps in the right direction. I love it when they finally do things that make sense!
07:17 AM on 10/26/2010
More centralized energy production. Let's all cheer that we will remain beholden to corporate fat-cats for our energy needs.

The answer would have been to retrofit roof tops and give the homeowner the break while creating many more jobs.
But that would be a Liberal/Left thing to do and God knows we must worship the Corporatists and their centralization wet dreams.
photo
Amadahy
loves peanut M&Ms and Whippoorwills
05:51 PM on 10/27/2010
I hear you. I'm hoping they take your excellent idea and make it a reality too.