iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

What Happens Next? The Complex Post-Election Landscape

First Posted: 10/25/10 01:23 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:05 PM ET

Congress

WASHINGTON - Two years ago, Barack Obama united American politics as no one had done in decades. Next week -- once the vote is in -- American politics will lay broken in at least five uneasy pieces.

The blame game for Democratic losses already has begun and the explanations include an intractable Great Recession, a legacy of rising public debt, Republican cynicism and the mistakes of the president.

But even before glancing back, it's worth looking ahead, because the landscape is clear. The simple, personal narrative of presidential hope, which won Obama the first semi-landslide in years and clear majorities in Congress, will be replaced by a complex, fragmented, parliamentary-style mess, with multiple, gridlock-inducing power centers -- of which the White House is only (barely) one.

Here is the list, with their leaders, outlook and centers of operation:

  • ROVIANS: The new conventional wisdom is that there is no GOP Establishment any more. As usual, the CW is wrong. Of course there is a Republican Establishment -- it's Karl Rove. An innovator technically, Rove is the past master of directing populist resentment against government and away from corporate business. Trained originally in the cut and thrust of direct mail (the precursor of attack tweets), and possessing a bulging list of high-roller contacts, he has been the de facto national manager of the GOP's 2010 campaign. Rove is at one with mainstream-conservative Hill leaders, who backed President George W. Bush's TARP bailout (and, in the process, spawned the Tea Party). The Establishment's goal now is to humor the Tea Party, but not at the expense of corporate America or at the risk of seeming too eager to dismantle Social Security. Rove won't sign on to a 2012 campaign early, but his history and his contacts suggest that he could go with former Gov. Mitt Romney, and may even have a ticket in mind: Romney and Mississippi Gov. (and Rove protégé) Haley Barbour. Headquarters: the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, with main auxiliary clubhouses in Dallas and Houston.
  • PALIN-PAULS AKA The Tea Party: While their final numbers in Congress are not known, this faction will be large enough, and infamous enough to be a force in Congress and in the 2012 campaign. Former Gov. Sarah Palin will almost certainly run, but, in the meantime, she will tweet herself into the role of goad and spokesperson for the rejectionist front of the GOP on the Hill. The other key players could well be the Pauls, father and son. Rep. Ron Paul of Texas is the proto Tea Partier, and already has indicated that he will run for president again, whatever Palin and company do. His son, Dr. Rand Paul, looks likely to be in the U.S. Senate and will either be a key ally of his fellow Kentuckian, Mitch McConnell, or McConnell's worst nightmare. The Palin-Pauls' goals include dismantling the new health-care law, cutting spending and privatizing the Social Security system. Other potential presidentials include former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee and former establishment dude Newt Gingrich. Headquarters: Wasilla, Alaska, Dick Armey's office and a Paul Family reunion.
  • BLOOMBERGERS: No one who has met New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg has any doubt that he would like to be president, or that he has any doubt that he'd be terrific at it. After all, he's worth at least $20 billion, he invented a form of communication and he has managed an ungovernable city reasonably well. He toyed with running for president as an independent in 2008, and has a core of people around him, led by Kevin Sheekey and Howard Wolfson, who are among the savviest national political players around. This time, he would run in the manner of the landed gentry of two centuries ago: as an American patrician above it all, thanks to his vast wealth, with no partisan allegiance, eager to strike a national, centrist consensus on the debt, on the environment and foreign affairs. He'd draw on what's left of moderate Republicanism (admittedly not much). But, more important, he'd draw on what's left of Clintonism, which is quite considerable. Pro-business Democrats, which Bill Clinton was, are about to become an endangered species. Blue Dog Democrats -- which Clinton was, sort of -- are about to become extinct. That would give Bloomberg a route into Democratic votes. Not coincidentally, Wolfson was Hillary Clinton's (excellent) 2008 spokesman. There has been plenty of parlor talk about whether Hillary Clinton might challenge Obama for the Democratic nomination in 2012, or wind up as his running mate. But that misses the point. She won't challenge the president and won't be on the ticket. But Bloomberg, if he runs, would get many of her supporters, financial and otherwise. Headquarters: Upper East Side Manhattan.
  • UNION-KRUGMANITES: Next week's results will decimate conservative Democrats, who won marginal districts in 2006 and 2008 in red or purple districts and states. As a result, the Left, or what's left of the Left, will be in charge of shrunken Democratic ranks in Congress. They still like the president, for the most part, but think he was ill served, or even duped, by former Clintonites such as Larry Summers. Disillusioned by the president, operating in a national conversation in many ways still dominated by conservatives, what's left of the Left has few true, visible operational heroes at the moment. One of them is columnist Paul Krugman -- not radical, except that in today's context a true believer in the Democratic tradition of the New Deal and John Maynard Keynes seems like one. While Krugman laments the lack of more government stimulus, the labor movement, especially the public-employee unions, are lining up within the party to resist what is sure to be a round of profound spending cuts. It was the public-employee unions who benefitted most directly from President Obama's stimulus package -- and it is they who are now most clearly in Republican gun sights. How will President Obama deal with them? That is a key question, if not THE key question, inside the Hill party in 2012. Headquarters: AFSCME and the NEA in Washington.
  • THE WHITE HOUSE: For reasons of calendar and cause, the Obama operational inner circle is about to change. Most of the original set of economic advisors is gone. David Axelrod will go back to Chicago and go back to what he is best at, designing a campaign theme. The president is going to need a new chief of staff, and will probably want to get one from the Hill again, only this time from the Senate. But more than acquiring new staff, the president needs to do something he has resisted. He has to become a Washington inside player and pretend to like it. Doing so will inevitably damage his "brand" (remember that "O" and that rising sun?), but so be it. The fact is, the simpler time that the symbol represented is over.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON - Two years ago, Barack Obama united American politics as no one had done in decades. Next week -- once the vote is in -- American politics will lay broken in at least five uneasy pieces. ...
WASHINGTON - Two years ago, Barack Obama united American politics as no one had done in decades. Next week -- once the vote is in -- American politics will lay broken in at least five uneasy pieces. ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,720
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (30 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
montestruc
War is the health of the state--Randolph Bourne
10:57 PM on 10/31/2010
Interesting ( and misleading) that you lump Palin and Paul together.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:54 AM on 10/27/2010
NO ONE EVER MENTIONS THE ROLL OF THE REPUBLICAN BOAT ANCHORS WHO CAUSED US NOT TO BE ABLE TO SALE FOREWORD AS WE WOULD HAVE LIKED. BOAT ANCHORS WHO NOW WANT TO BE CAPTAINS, BUT LEOPARDS DO NOT CHANGE THEIR SPOTS.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
05:19 PM on 10/26/2010
mr. fine man: reporting? (shouldn't you do some reporting then, to coincide with your title?) when is huff&puff going to get an editorial section/tab?????? would that require too much discipline to put into practice?
nice free verse and opinion-shaping, but not reporting.
08:07 AM on 10/26/2010
In order to aid the Tea Party and their fight for saner government, especially in the field of "tax and spend", the new rule should be that, barring a natural disaster, no state can take out of the Treasury more than it puts in. It will be interesting to see the reaction on the ground in welfare states like Alaska and Idaho when the blue devil liberal states like Connecticut and Massachusetts are no longer footing the bill to support their lifestyles.
08:18 AM on 10/26/2010
First of all....that money should stay in the state and not sent to DC to send it back.....how ridiculous....
08:25 AM on 10/26/2010
I agree - I want my state to keep its money and spend it on the people of my state.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pause4Thought
07:56 AM on 10/26/2010
At this point it really does not matter who will win...the Republican's have already made their platform to govern with President Obama perfectly clear! Obstruction,Distraction,Investigate! This was said out loud...they this will be the way it will be for the next two years...to make sure President Obama gets nothing done...so he will be a one term President!

http://thi nkprogress .org/2010/ 10/25/mcco nnell-obam a-one-term /
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pause4Thought
09:03 AM on 10/26/2010
Not to be a downer...I just wanted to get this information out...that no matter what the Republicans have not intentions in trying to help get this country back on track...but, it sure would be a lot better for President Obama if the (D)'s would win the both Houses...to at least stop the madness of investigate,close the Government down, and what ever else mischief they have in mind! The best thing we can all do to make sure this does not happen is VOTE! Vote for your local candidate,the state,county,city or town prepositions...like prop 23...which the Koch Brothers have donated $1million dollars to see that it goes through...sorry! That preposition is going down in flames!!! November 2nd! If we stick together there is a possibility that the worse will not happen...but if we don't vote...and the worse happens...the extremist Tea Party candidates...and the greedy Republican's!
07:54 AM on 10/26/2010
Will Americans go back to their corners and get along with their neighbors of different political views after this election? Will our elected officials reach across the aisle and work in the best interest of their constituents and the American people? Doesn’t seem likely does it?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:17 AM on 10/26/2010
My own uneasiness lies in the fact that the votes are not in yet. and while politics is all about looking ahead with at least one eye, the other eye has to be kept on the moment. I wonder if any "establishment" pundit, reporter or Politician is ready for the eventuality that no one seem to have covered. Suppose what we get is a more or less "Nominal" Off year election?
When all the horn tooting is over and the last returns ("dire" or not) are in, the cast of characters may change, as it always will, but some of the personalities will not. I remember the (for me awful) night in '94 when the world fell in on Democrats, and suddenly a sitting President became a "footnote." How wrong so many were then about so much. I just wonder how many in the media are ready, if not to eat crow, than at least snack on a few feathers, and what they might have prepared to fill the endless grinding, and yes, awful, hour of punditry to come if things don't turn out to fit most of the dark self-fulfilling "prophecy" that we have in part let the media write for us, while so deeply discounting our own ability to change the shadows of events that might be, but might not be just as much.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
texastrixie
I invented the internet.
10:44 AM on 10/26/2010
The media eating crow is your concern at this point? Who cares what the media thinks about this election. I care about its effect on everyone making the median family income (~$50k). Are we going to ever be able to retire? Are we ever going to able to send our kids to college? What about the poor, working poor, and lower middle class? Are they going to survive in anything that approximates a decent standard of living? Making people eat crow is not as much my concern as the fact that there may be people literally eating crow rather than starve.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:14 AM on 10/28/2010
All very good issues. Perhaps if the media in general spent more time on them, rather than "who runs the dirtiest campaigns" average Americans would have more of a sense of what matters so much about this and every election. I'm with you on that one. But once, just once (like they did while TV was young) I'd like to see these high-profile media types spend 7 hours on election night reporting returns and numbers and a half an hour "analyzing" them, instead of the other way around.The notion that they have to fill every single second "on air" during what is in essence a live event with some form of chatter when they "don't have anything to report" (How can that be with 435 members of the House being elected? Someone, somewhere wants to know how "Their guy" is doing) is not only a complete and total crashing bore, it insults the intelligence of the viewers. National elections are one of the very few times when covering a story that National media should report, and do nothing but report. Heaven forbid that the media ought to wait until all the polls have closed everywhere, report all the results, and then have a yak fest that everyone will turn off to watch an old movie anyhow.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgilley
Question Authority!
05:33 AM on 10/26/2010
This is what has caused this depression we are in plain and simple two words George Bush!

The Lost Decade
Census Data Out lines
Bush Era Set backs in
Poverty, Income, and
Health Coverage

• Income and Jobs: Inflation-adjusted incomes fell further under George W. Bush than
under any president since reporting began. Unemployment rose 81 percent.

• Poverty: The poverty rate jumped 17 percent from 2000 to 2008, with over 8 million
more Americans living below the poverty line.

• Health Coverage: The number of uninsured Americans increased over 20 percent
to an all-time high of 46.3 million, including a dramatic 157 percent increase in the
population of uninsured Americans over the age of 65.

http://www.dlc.org/documents/TheLostDecade.pdf

How can Republican Corporatist claim that we are not living in the economy that they left us just 18 months ago under Bush?
These are census beauru statisics taken by republicans and democrats alike!
And now they want back in power to finish off the middle class for their corporatist masters??
Throw these obstructionist bums out of DC so we can get out of this worst recession in history they left us with!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marijam
Independent
04:01 AM on 10/26/2010
It's going to get even worse. If Congress changes hands, don't expect Obama to veto anything.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:41 AM on 10/26/2010
Why should he veto anything? thus far he's proven to be a republican in democrat clothing. And he's not doing a good job at being either
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgilley
Question Authority!
05:35 AM on 10/26/2010
So what do we replace him with, anaother Bush Jeb maybey? American voters seem to be a bit masocistic after 30 years of conservative ideology being thrust on them.
Time to stand up and fight back people...make No mistake there IS a class war and "We The People" are losing!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:45 AM on 10/26/2010
re: palin running for office, i just can't imagine that she would really, seriously run. i may eat those words, but my gut on her is that she doesn't want the responsibility of being president.

rather, she wants to be a celebrity. she wants to make a ton of money, be on tv, speak before large crowds (especially if they are paying her), have a reality show for herself and her kids, be a big wheel in her special interest circles, and continue to be fox's darling.

i have a feeling she has found her niche. she's a politainer. a hybrid of the politician and the entertainer who stands wherever there is a camera and throws verbal rocks at others, while doing little to make any sort of real contribution to the issues for which she could later be held responsible. she wants attention and money. she wants to be a star, and politics was her inroad, and what she lists as giving her the creds to speak out on just about anything.

she's a politainer.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gr8abz
03:08 AM on 10/26/2010
You THOUGHT Obama united this country. Truth is, sad to say, it never really happened. Quite the opposite. A tidal wave of hate and determination to undermine his presidency at all costs was set underway from day one. Rush Limbaugh himself gave the order: "I hope Obama fails." In other words: "Attention all Republican congressmen, make sure the President fails." And so far they have succeeded in doing just that. And, thanks to the SCOTUS ruling giving huge corporations the power to essentially buy our elections, it's going to take an awful lot to stop the rise of the Far Right.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Marcospinelli
an old liberal Democrat, a 'New Deal'-Democrat
02:56 AM on 10/26/2010
I've asked Obama's 'most ardent supporters' a dozen different ways & they all keep dodging answering these questions. It looks like they all keep dodging even THINKING about these questions:

How do you think a win by Democrats next month will be interpretted by Obama, Democrats & the media? What do you think they will think they have a mandate to do?

Criticism & failing numbers in the polls have done nothing to persuade this president or this Congress to move to the left. What makes you think they're going to do in the next 2 years with less of a majority that they refused to do with a filibuster-proof senate?

Obama & Democratic leadership in Congress have already said that even with a Democratic victory in November, they're caving more to the right.

We've been doing it your way (the DLC's way) for 20 years now, & the government & the Democratic Party keeps moving farther to the right. If you & I are on the same side (as you insist) and want real Democratic policies, & going about getting them your way (protecting Obama, reelecting DLC Democrats) is getting Republican policies & NOT Democratic policies, when do you realize that maybe you don't know what you're talking about?

When do you realize that you've become that classic definition for 'insanity' ("Doing the same thing over and over again, expecting different results")?

Do you ever realize it?

http://www.huf fingtonpost.com/2010/10/13/obama-new-york-times_n_760774.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marijam
Independent
04:03 AM on 10/26/2010
Personally, I don't want a "Republican-lite" president. Right now, if Romney makes it to the nomination, I think I'll vote for him. First time ever I'll have voted for a Republican for president.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dhhh
01:32 AM on 10/26/2010
Obama lost the narrative when he bows to the Corporatists and walks away from his base...Those of us who prayed for change after 8 years of disaster from Bush Chaney.Did he make a real difference only within lattitudes that were in the end predictable.It goes like this:They said we couldnt do it but we did it>>>We gave 10& of the possible but it was a good start.. We gave a start to financial reform we will get to the 600 Trillion derivatives that Clinton helped setup..We started to deal with to big to fail but we couldnt finish the job. The health ploan was also a strat but we couldnt get the single payer or Govt option and we will deal with furthering reform later...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:31 AM on 10/26/2010
Over the next few years, I foresee a growing rift within the GOP between the plutocrat/libertarians and the fundamentalist/teabaggers as the former sees the latter's hysteria to be bad for business while the latter sees the former's permissiveness to be of the Devil.

I will begin my stockpile now in preparation for the inevitable popcorn shortage.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AlienPet13
04:58 AM on 10/26/2010
I got that very same feeling... don't skimp on the melted butter...[Chomp, chomp, crunch... chomp!]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
forty8r
Gerrman Freethinker
12:58 AM on 10/26/2010
Polarization and gridlock that is what the plutocracy wants in order to keep ripping off the consumer.