By 24/7 Wall Street: Alternative energy is big business -- and getting bigger. The industry includes hundreds of companies that make a piece of the continuously expanding jigsaw puzzle that is the alt energy space.
Rather than trying to pick winners and losers -- which at this point is probably impossible -- we've tried instead to identify the 25 companies we think will shape the alt energy industry for the next three to five years.
To make this determination, we've looked at a number of characteristics we think will play an important role in shaping the industry's future. First, we chose companies we think are market leaders based on their market capitalization, revenues, and technology leadership.
Second, we tried to assess the longer-term opportunities a company has based on its current influence, the strength of its competitors, how much influence government policy will have on its success, and how likely it is and how quickly the company's products can be implemented at a reasonable scale.
Third, we tried to assess a company's access to capital. Some of the questions we asked were: Is it publicly traded or privately held, how strong is its balance sheet, and, perhaps most important, how much support can it expect from government?
Fourth, we looked at a company's customers, their size, and their influence in their own industries. Finally, we tried to assess how high the barriers are to competitors entering the same sector. Likewise, how well can a company fight off competition that's already in the sector?
Not every company has a top rating in each category, but the ones we've picked have a good many of them.
In addition to looking at the companies, we've also identified a few issues that are going to provide the context for alt energy companies in the years ahead. Perhaps the most important of these, from a commercial standpoint, is what policies China and the US will adopt. China plans to spend aggressively on its own domestic alt energy initiatives, and it is pouring enormous amounts of money into the coffers of several of the country's manufacturers.
Other areas that bear watching are consumer acceptance for electric vehicles and plans for infrastructure investments in the electricity grid and in smart-grid technology.
SunPower Corp. (NASDAQ:SPWR) currently boasts the highest conversion rate of sunlight to electricity of all the solar PV makers. The company’s components business accounted for 61% of all its revenues in 2009, up from 40% in 2007. The company’s components include solar panels and inverters. SunPower’s systems business declined from 60% in 2007 to 39% in 2009. To turn that back around, SunPower has acquired a downstream company with a good project pipeline. That acquisition should start the turn-around in 2010, and continue to improve in 2011.
SunPower’s international business accounted for 71% of its 2009 sales, and it has a strong position in Germany, which is expected to install about 6,700 megawatts of solar PV in 2010. One megawatt generates enough electricity to power 800 households for an entire year. SunPower, however, is not among the low-cost providers and must depend on its superior (for now) conversion rate to differentiate itself from its competitors. For SunPower to live up to its place on our Top 25, it needs to maintain its technological leadership and become more competitive on downstream projects.
Read More at 24/7 Wall St.
(Pictured: CEO Thomas Werner)
SunPower Corp. (NASDAQ:SPWR) currently boasts the highest conversion rate of sunlight to electricity of all the solar PV makers. The company’s components business accounted for 61% of all its revenues in 2009, up from 40% in 2007. The company’s components include solar panels and inverters. SunPower’s systems business declined from 60% in 2007 to 39% in 2009. To turn that back around, SunPower has acquired a downstream company with a good project pipeline. That acquisition should start the turn-around in 2010, and continue to improve in 2011.
SunPower’s international business accounted for 71% of its 2009 sales, and it has a strong position in Germany, which is expected to install about 6,700 megawatts of solar PV in 2010. One megawatt generates enough electricity to power 800 households for an entire year. SunPower, however, is not among the low-cost providers and must depend on its superior (for now) conversion rate to differentiate itself from its competitors. For SunPower to live up to its place on our Top 25, it needs to maintain its technological leadership and become more competitive on downstream projects.
Read More at 24/7 Wall St.
By 24/7 Wall Street: Alternative energy is big business -- and getting bigger. The industry includes hundreds of companies that make a piece of the continuously expanding jigsaw puzzle that is the alt...
By 24/7 Wall Street: Alternative energy is big business -- and getting bigger. The industry includes hundreds of companies that make a piece of the continuously expanding jigsaw puzzle that is the alt...
Here's an eco-friendly Christmas option that you probably won't be trying at home. The Aqua Toto Gifu Aquarium, found south of Tokyo, Japan uses eels...
When the religious community speaks out about the importance of protecting the environment and conserving energy, people are surprised to hear the clergy advocating for these issues. They should not be.
While smart grid technology presents an opportunity for Democrats and Republicans to work together, energy efficiency remains the more promising option.
Our planet will be running out of fossil fuel within 10-20 years. As it does there will be more wars and hardship. The fuel we use today came from ancient green algae. We need to grow more now. Certain strains of green algae can reproduce every 24 hours and can contain 50% oil. It can not be cultivated in open ponds, because of cross contamination. www.algalsolution.com in conjunction with www.solarpriceindex.co.uk have patented a solar powered bioreactor that will save the planet.
algalsolution: Our planet will be running out of fossil fuel within
A California-based company is building a $120 million biofuels plant near Reno Nevada.
They expect the plant will create more than 50 full-time and 450 temporary jobs.
The plant is expected to produce over 10 million gallons of ethanol AND 16 megawatts of
electricity annually by processing MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE.
This plant will create clean energy and reduce dependence on foreign oil by
processing HOUSEHOLD GARBAGE.
Clean, sustainable alternative energy --- that is what we need --- local energy, local
jobs
If every garbage dump in the country co-located an ethanol plant we could go a
long way toward producing local energy and local jobs.
Why do we keep pushing oil, coal and nuclear when there are clean, sustainable
alternatives? At the very least we should diversify our energy sources.
Kenz300: A California-based company is building a $120 million biofuels plant
This is one of the most fascinating companies I have investigated. This is the first company to really be effective. Many have tried but until now it was not perfected. It would be free of electrical lines and free us from blackouts from storms and I suspect cyber attacks due to this. This company was founded by a NASA scientist who developed this to create oxygene on Mars and when that mission was scraped he used the technology for use on this planet. Once fully implemented as a homebuyer I would jump to pay $3,000.00 for a source of energy that is energy efficient and would pay for itself in 3-5 yrs by much lower utilitiy bills.
Longtimeliberal: This is one of the most fascinating companies I have
Didn't Siemens admit to massive corruption in 2006 and have to pay huge fines both in Europe and the U.S. - so is Siemens now one of the good guys again???? Can we really trust any of these big companies? SunPower, A123, and Bloom seem to be on the right track though.
Truth-Seeker: Didn't Siemens admit to massive corruption in 2006 and have
Am I the only one who gets bummed by these articles?
China is clearly going to either force American companies to turn over proprietary technologies or do what they have always done and counterfeit them outright, giving China a huge advantage over American adoption of these technologies. They are essentially leap-frogging the American development stage and all of the costs associated.
And yeah. I would rather see the cost per KW brought down by competitive market forces to the point that I can afford to install an array on my home and go off the grid. Instead, I have this nagging feeling that self-sufficiency is going to be the auslander of the burgeoning brave new world.
3neuticals: Am I the only one who gets bummed by these
It's incredibly frustrating to see American companies essentially giving up their future and main competitive advantages just for short term profits via access to the Chinese market. GE has been selling out for years now; now it sounds like the same will happen to A123 and, unless (hopefully) the deal between First Solar and China breaks down, First Solar will be giving up it's primary competitive advantage to get into the Chinese market.
America doesn't ask companies like Siemens to joint venture and hand over proprietary technology to an American company for access to the American market; our trade relationship with China is absurd.
JamesJerico: It's incredibly frustrating to see American companies essentially giving up
World leading companies like GE should not act in what they consider to be the best interests of their shareholders. Rather, they should take the advice of people like you.
rw111: I agree it's frustrating. World leading companies like GE should
You underestimate the impact nationalist tendencies and government infrastructure programs will have. Particularly with our state contracting demands.
Companies like Aone don't have much choice but to deal with china at the moment as at least temporarily they also have a monopoly on vital raw materials for the technologies they need to produce their product. THeir government is intelligent and doesn't want to increase demand for imported oil subject to theoretical blockade by a US fleet etc... China also has the structural advantage of building it's grid from infancy vs refurbishing. Hmm build with 19th centruy technology or 21st century? not a really hard call.
Meanwhile our grid is privatized and modernizing impacts short term profits and shareholder return. CEO's get bonuses on stock performance what do you really think they will do.
AJH: You underestimate the impact nationalist tendencies and government infrastructure programs
"...like every other clean-tech company that wants a piece of the Chinese market, A123 is very likely going to have to part with some its proprietary technology to meet the Chinese government’s rules for technology transfer."
I've heard about this before. The Chinese government can easily show the foreign company's technology to a Chinese company, who will then copy it and sell it at a lower price. Given how quickly other technologies have been copied by Chinese businesses, it would not surprise me to learn that the government has already done this.
The world really does need a single standard for intellectual property rights.
SolarPowerGuy: "...like every other clean-tech company that wants a piece of
I wonder how many of these have controlling shares own by oil companies or individuals with oil ties, both of which will do whatever necessary to hamper the evolution of alternative energy sources.
Also, SunPower's ticker has changed to SPWRA.
Jason_Osburn: I wonder how many of these have controlling shares own
Bright Source does. They are Big Energy, bigtime! They are killing off thousands and thousands of acres of healthy ecosystem, which will kill off dozens of endangered desert tortoises and waste tens of millions of gallons of water every year, just to make sure that WE aren't allowed to use OUR tax dollars to install solar power on OUR rooftops where the power is needed.
BP, Chevron and StatOil (the tar sands people) each tossed a few bucks in the pot, alongside Morgan Stanley, Google and a few Venture Capitalists. Even though the taxpayer is funding 94% of the project and taking 94% of the risk, these mercenaries are taking 100% of the equity for the IPO planned for next year.
There is NOTHING green about Big Solar except the cash we are hemorrhaging to enrich these old-style Big Energy robber barons. we would be MUCH better off with rooftop solar owned by US! It is cheaper, faster, cleaner and doesn't kill our wilderness.
Bright Source is a scam with massive political connections and very deep pockets for lobbyists. They are being frantically greenwashed by people like the NRDC, mostly because their founder, John Bryson IS NOW CHAIRMAN OF BRIGHT SOURCE. That's ONE way to make sure that NRDC doesn't object to the violations of CEQA and NEPA, the tortoise slaughter and the total WASTE of nature.
sheila: Bright Source does. They are Big Energy, bigtime! They are
They are energy companies. BP, Chevron, Petrobras, and so on are only looking to stay relevant in the energy market. They do not care how they do it. Gazprom is the exception now not the rule when it comes to stance on "alternative" energy.
thereisonlyoneparty: There are no oil companies. They are energy companies. BP,
I have worked with A123 in the past, they are a very smart bunch. their battery technology is similar to valence tech. in austin, tx, but is definitely superior. i think that they will really help out in a lot of areas going forward. i would like to see them develop lithium polymer batteries for my laptop, i think that their technology would improve calendar life and extend useable time as well!
king_friday: I have worked with A123 in the past, they are
A few Unicorns, pictures of fuzzy baby animals, a sappling of a pine tree, a couple of Smurfs...
It's so easy to seperate suckers from their money.
How many of those companies pictured here are "Not for profit"?
Bytown: A few Unicorns, pictures of fuzzy baby animals, a sappling
By the time we see real 'green' energy here the last dinosaur will have been burned up and the alternative energy industry will be dominated by the same multi national power companies we are paying our money to now.
The GE's and PGE of the world, not to mention the BP's and Exxons, will have wrested control of the lines and power generation systems from these pioneers and set it up like the cable tv or phone companies, controlling production all along the way.
Why do you think they're taking their sweet time about this?
Our only workable solution is to make our homes as energy minus as possible, install our own solar--both active and passive, and wind where possible. Small community power generation is also an option, along the lines of mutual water districts.
The more all of us go 'offline' the more difficult it is for the Oligarchs to continue calling the shots in our lives.
peaceandfreedom: By the time we see real 'green' energy here the
And grow as much of your own food, can, dry, freeze it, and buy the rest locally. Transportation of our food is one of the biggest costs in it. Install rain catchment systems for roof runoff to water your garden ( a booming biz in the southwest and west coast right now!) This cuts your water bill and puts it back in the ground rather than ending up as runoff.
There's lots we can do folks.
peaceandfreedom: And grow as much of your own food, can, dry,
Bright Source is Israeli. They just opened an office in Oakland to be closer to the government officials who would be looking for donations. It worked. Taxpayers are footing 94% of the bill and getting nothing in the IPO they are planning for 2011.
sheila: Bright Source is Israeli. They just opened an office in
Don't worry. BP owns Bright Source, alongside Chevron and StatOil (the tar sands people). They are getting billions in taxpayer dollars to kill taxpayer land so that taxpayers can be overcharged for power they could produce on their own rooftops.
Big Energy is Big Energy. It is the problem and will never be the solution.
sheila: Don't worry. BP owns Bright Source, alongside Chevron and StatOil
First Posted: 10/26/10 12:13 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:05 PM ET