iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

WikiLeaks Docs Raise Questions On Obama Policies

RAPHAEL G. SATTER and PAISLEY DODDS   10/25/10 10:44 PM ET   AP

Obama Wikileaks
President Barack Obama steps down from his helicopter to board Air Force One at Andrews Air Force Base, Md., Monday, Oct. 25, 2010. One week before the crucial midterm elections, Obama is traveling to Rhode Island for Democratic Party events in Providence and a speech in Woonsocket where he will tour the facilities of American Cord & Webbing. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

LONDON — President Barack Obama stepped into the White House pledging to end George W. Bush's gloves-off approach to interrogations and detention – but a flood of leaked documents suggests that some old habits were hard to break.

Field reports from the Iraq war published by WikiLeaks show that, despite Obama's public commitment to eschew torture, U.S. forces turned detainees over to Iraqi forces even after signs of abuse.

Documents also show that U.S. interrogators continued to question Iraqi detainees, some of whom were still recovering from injuries or whose wounds were still visible after being held by Iraqi security forces.

"We have not turned a blind eye," U.S. State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley said Monday, noting that one of the reasons why U.S. troops were still in Iraq was to carry out human rights training with Iraqi security forces. "Our troops were obligated to report abuses to appropriate authorities and to follow up, and they did so in Iraq."

Crowley added, "If there needs to be an accounting, first and foremost there needs to be an accounting by the Iraqi government itself, and how it has treated its own citizens."

Obama signed three executive orders shortly after taking office, vowing to return America to the "moral high ground" in the war on terrorism.

The implication was that the United States would do more to make sure terror suspects weren't tortured or abused – either at the hands of U.S. forces or by governing authorities to whom the detainees were handed over for detention or interrogation.

WikiLeaks recently published almost 400,000 U.S. military logs, mainly written by soldiers on the ground, detailing daily carnage in Iraq since the 2003 U.S.-led invasion: detainees abused by Iraqi forces, insurgent bombings, sectarian executions and civilians shot at checkpoints by U.S. troops.

In one leaked document from a U.S. military intelligence report filed Feb. 9, 2009 – just weeks after Obama ordered U.S. personnel to comply with the Geneva Conventions – an Iraqi says he was detained by coalition forces at his Baghdad home and told he would be sent to the Iraqi army if he didn't cooperate. According to the document, the detainee was then handed over to Iraqis where he said he was beaten and given electric shocks.

U.S. interrogators also cleared detainees for questioning, despite signs that they had suffered abuse from Iraqi security forces, the documents show.

One report by a U.S. interrogation detention team based in Baghdad on April 2, 2009, summarizes claims made by a prisoner who said he was hog tied and beaten with a shovel as part of dayslong torture ordeal at the hands of the Iraqi army. The report noted he had a catalog of "minor injuries," including "rope burns on the back of his legs and a possible busted ear drum."

A second report from April 2009 describes an Iraqi detainee as being covered in bruises and a scar from being bludgeoned with a pickax.

In both cases, the men were still cleared for U.S. interrogations, which international lawyers say is a violation of the Geneva Conventions.

A fourth report in May of 2009 goes even farther. "There are indications of abuse. Detainee has been medically cleared for interrogation," the document reads.

The field reports also showed that there were signs of abuse upon regular inspections of Iraqi police stations and holding facilities, raising questions about whether detainees were still turned over to the same authorities.

A U.S. military police brigade filed a report in May last year saying they had discovered two wounded Iraqi prisoners, one of whom said he had been so badly beaten he was urinating blood. An American officer tried to get the men some medical attention, but the Iraqis allegedly refused.

One report, filed in September of 2009, described how American forces inspecting an Iraqi army facility found a detainee with two black eyes, scabs, bruises, and what the report described as a neck that had turned "red/yellow."

The report said the detainee was given electric shocks to elicit a confession. The Iraqis claimed he suffered the injuries while trying to escape.

The Pentagon has condemned WikiLeaks for publishing the documents, saying that U.S. and Iraqi lives could be put at risk – an allegation that WikiLeaks has dismissed. On Monday, founder Julian Assange defended his decision, swatting away suggestions that the leaked intelligence was of historical interest.

"Certainly for Iraqis this war is not history," said Assange.

Iraq's Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki on Saturday attacked the leak as an attempt to malign him and stir tension.

While there's no proof in any of the files that the U.S. or its allies directly mistreated detainees, there were at least four allegations where coalition troops were accused of prisoner abuse after Obama signed his executive order.

One of those incidents occurred last year in Mosul, Iraq, when a soldier allegedly choked a detainee and threatened to kill his family. A fifth report states that a detainee was "kicked around for several moments" while awaiting transfer from U.S. custody.

In Washington, the Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment on whether Obama's 2009 executive order banning torture resulted in any different instructions to U.S. forces in Iraq.

"This is official evidence that there was a cover-up of crimes, either by turning suspects over or torturing them directly," Dan Ellsberg, who is credited for leaking the 1971 Pentagon Papers that exposed secrets about the Vietnam War, told The Associated Press on Monday night.

But Ellsberg said he wasn't sure the leak would have much of an impact – either in Iraq or in the United States. Coverage of the documents has been widespread in Europe where public opinion against the Iraq war swelled for years.

"The truth is the Pentagon Papers did affect public opinion. It did not affect Nixon's policy," Ellsberg said. "I don't have confidence that even a massive change of public opinion will have an effect, but even if there is a small chance it could change policy it is worth it."

___

Associated Press Writers Anne Gearan and Matthew Lee contributed to this report from Washington.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

LONDON — President Barack Obama stepped into the White House pledging to end George W. Bush's gloves-off approach to interrogations and detention – but a flood of leaked documents suggests...
LONDON — President Barack Obama stepped into the White House pledging to end George W. Bush's gloves-off approach to interrogations and detention – but a flood of leaked documents suggests...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 219
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:06 AM on 11/01/2010
This is exactly the reason why I am upset at Obama. I did not expect Obama to turn the economy around, or convince Republicans to be patriotic and serve the country, but I did expect Obama would place morality above political convenience. Either Obama is a classic neocon warhawk or Dick Cheney is still in charge of Washington, or more likely its a bit of both. Either way, its becoming apparent that another term of Obama will be just as injurious to America as another term of Bush. The most stark difference between Obama and Bush is skin color, and Obama is fairly light skinned. It appears that we will have two presidents we can blame for the trainwreck happening in America. Our illustrious president, Barack Huscheney Ohalliburton.
01:58 PM on 10/28/2010
Your President has 48 ex Goldman Sachs employees that make up his Administration. One sits on the USSC, several sit on the Federal Reserve Bank of NY board. Some are installed on the NSA, and are members of the NSC. Many were installed as ambassadors of the nation they were heads of Goldman Sachs in Germany, Japan, China, France, and the UK.

So wall street has bought and paid for your President.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:26 PM on 10/27/2010
What moral high ground? This administration is no different from the last. Shame on the media for its part in putting them there!
photo
Whinger
I'm Just Me!
03:06 AM on 10/27/2010
The moral high ground is in a very deep dark hole, alongside the truth, principles, honor and integrity. The present administration should hang its head in shame!
12:56 AM on 10/27/2010
Dave Lindorff:

"As the author of The Case for Impeachment (St. Martin’s Press, 2006), I never thought in my lifetime that I would see a president reach the depth of moral decay and depravity of President George W. Bush, but sad to say, our current president, Barack Obama, has managed to do it, and what makes it worse, as a former Constitutional law professor, he knows better.

This president’s moral nadir was hit yesterday, when he allowed a military tribunal based at Guantanamo to pressure Omar Khadr, a Canadian captured, gravely wounded, and arrested at the age of 15 in Afghanistan, and held at at Guantanamo now for nine years, to plead guilty to murder."

http://www.thiscantbehappening.net/node/271
09:11 PM on 10/26/2010
The Obama administration is using the exact same tactics as Bush did, except for waterboarding. Which is I guess not a problem unless you believed his campaign promise on the issue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GuiltD
11:03 PM on 10/26/2010
Agreed. Its the permanent government . Its an elite agenda and it doesnt change with administrations. They groom their people to become president and offer a false concept of choice. Plus I highly doubt they have stopped waterboarding. You should check out Obamas speech when he renewed the patriot act, ( which if anybody has read, it automatically created america into a dictatorship) So I think the trust in Obamas Administration is obviously gone there. People have to understand that the permanent government exists
09:00 PM on 10/26/2010
WikiLeaks Show WMD Hunt Continued in Iraq – With Surprising Results

Read More http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/10/wikileaks-show-wmd-hunt-continued-in-iraq-with-surprising-results/#ixzz13W4nepzk
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GuiltD
11:07 PM on 10/26/2010
Interesting how wikileaks releases recently have bits and peices that support the neo con globalists. I think wikileaks has been intercepted. They have been around for a while before they got a lot of media notice, and Im sorry but if you are hacking government files from around the world, they would take you out way before you get media spotlight. Now the ceo is all over talk shows and "news -laugh-" networks. I think something happened.
photo
climbing panda
there's a log in my cabin
06:25 PM on 10/26/2010
the world of theory that exists on the campaign trail and the reality of the world don't always align.
04:08 PM on 10/26/2010
US [policy is not going to change--War atrocities have increased since Vietnam to a scale never imagined by anyone except the Neocons, war profiteers, and war lovers who are dancing in the streets. Or, more likely drinking $500 dollar a bottle champagne and eating rare caviar. Public opinion was already against the war, but that is not getting us out as we are ignored. As for torture, it has never stopped and the US military knows it. Prisoners have been tortured, turned over, witnessed and tortured more. Those serving have become psychopaths, sociopaths and deranged with the power they carry and have at their fingertips. It's a video game, and a free fire zone across the board. Only those who have blown the whistle, refused orders, have put down their weapons have any humanity left. All others have become murderers and sadists. This is what mercenaries do the world over, and our "soldiers" have become mercenaries.
02:41 PM on 10/26/2010
Obama is Bush Lite. He's no different in substance - except he smokes.

Blaming Wikileaks for US war crimes is like blaming a light bulb for showing roaches in your kitchen.
05:35 PM on 10/26/2010
I don't know about Bush Lite, but I agree with the wikileaks take. You cant complain that the leak jeopardizes lives, when the leak is reporting loss of life. The current media take on this makes my brain hurt.
fuzzychickens
The higher the power, the bigger the lies
05:39 PM on 10/26/2010
The media is just doing what it's told.

I doubt any major media source is truly independent and unbiased anymore.
photo
NorCalSurfer
Sometimes, truth hurts.
02:11 PM on 10/26/2010
For al lthe BS said to the fault of the POTUS, this is one I gree with in being his to own from here on in. Thank you very much Mr. President. I voted for Obama, one for his words of change and two for it not being another GOP SOP. I have zero hope for any pol to stand behind what hey say during campaign, and now I have zero want to vote Dem, I certainly will never vote GOP. We are getting more of what we didn't want over this past decade, not to mention, the future of Americans throughout the world is not looking good. Mr. I-hate-Americans have always been around in my lifetime, now they will be even more zealous then ever before. My children thank you Mr. President, I thank you, we all thank you, for doing absolutely nothing but more DC SOP. The POTUS is the POTUS via historic landslide victory, that landslide was meant to create change. Nothing changed. We now have more black prisons, more secret wars, more lies and less future.
Mr. President, with all due respect for the office of the President of the USA.go away and make a hole for somebody with a backbone.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:17 PM on 10/26/2010
norcalsurfer. wow. you said it.
F&F from so cal hodad!
photo
NorCalSurfer
Sometimes, truth hurts.
03:41 PM on 10/26/2010
Thank you. Fanned from htenorth. #438
photo
NorCalSurfer
Sometimes, truth hurts.
03:41 PM on 10/26/2010
"htenorth" My daughter fans you also. Unofficial fan #439
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tbone99
cruisin' duality
04:06 PM on 10/26/2010
yep, we seem more interested in creating more terrorists than anything else . Of course their existence &activities ensure unending profits to the MIC and their investors , mostly Fortune 500 companies .
01:49 PM on 10/26/2010
The Pentagon has said that Wiki has blood on it's hands... but the blood is on the hands of those who would implement our insanely homicidal foreign policy. The blood is on the hands of the Bush administration. The blood is on the hands of President Obama, and truth be told, the blood is on the hands of the American taxpayer, many of whom, though they may have never been to an anti war rally, will make a pilgrimage to DC this weekend to attend a rally held by a comedian asking us all to just take a deep breathe, get along and restore some sanity.

and that is crazy.
02:49 PM on 10/26/2010
Hey, this sounds like something Davis Fleetwood would say! Today, on YouTube, for instance.

But I take issue with DT/DF's contention that the blood is on my hands. I was against the Iraq wars in both 1991 and 2003 - the whole scenario reeked of a naked land grab, just like the Mexican War of 1845-48. "Manifest Destiny" = "whatever you can steal"!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tnlcallen
03:40 PM on 10/26/2010
Yet we haven't stolen anything?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:33 AM on 10/27/2010
The blood is on our hands. We are so cowardly that we keep paying them to commit crimes across the globe.

They could not do it without our support, whether that's economic or otherwise.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kye154
01:46 PM on 10/26/2010
If our troops were reporting these atrocities, then they should have put a stop to it, but did not. That makes them equally guilty.

All of this is an ugly truth Americans need to face up to, instead of condemning Wikileaks, or saying we went to war for the cause for "freedom", or for any other pathetic excuses or buzzwords for justification. It never was! Good Lord, it was Americans own military documents that revealed this! So why pretentiously deny it?

If we are so worried about harm coming to Americans because of Wikileaks releases, then why in the world did Americans engage in such outrageous atrocities, to have something to worry about?

President Obama is certainly the "Commander-in-Chief", and he can, and should, be demanding heads to roll, within DOD, for allowing these atrocities to happen, even if the majority was on George Bush's watch. If he is not demanding accountablility from the military for not doing something to stop the atrocities, (or even encouraging it), then he has no business being president, much less, Commander-in-Chief. But, Obama needs to get his military under control, otherwise, how does he think he will ever regain international respect for the country?

The US military needs to learn some decency and respect too. What honor is there in the military simply by observing and compiling reports of atrocities, and not doing anything about it? Where are their core values? Same goes for controlling mercenary armies they hire too.
02:55 PM on 10/26/2010
Sounds like the troops did report these atrocities - and nothing happened. For years, until somebody found this Pandora's box of closeted evil and released it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tbone99
cruisin' duality
04:07 PM on 10/26/2010
some troops did. but most used the pictures as "trading cards" among themselves
01:41 PM on 10/26/2010
It's easy to talk in moralistic platitudes but when you finally get the job and you become privy to all of the information that is available you start to think that maybe your predecessor had something on the ball and continuing at least some of those policies is appropriate.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:21 PM on 10/26/2010
wheres the line drawn for violence? where is the line drawn to find out who is guilty or not? we have washed away all of these things. obamas pre emtive detention and no right to have your case heard, no right to a trial, legal counsel , nothing. we paid people bounties of 10k to turn in terrorists, but what we got we neighbors with grudge matches who never saw so much money in their life.
i hope you dont own animals
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tnlcallen
03:42 PM on 10/26/2010
That really is the only plausible explanation. People Vilified President Bush, yet he was a good man. Our current President is a good man. The only conclusion I can come to is that good men sometimes have to make tough decisions to protect their citizens.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tbone99
cruisin' duality
01:40 PM on 10/26/2010
Basically Obama got the Nobel Peace Prize for brokering a beer between Henry 'skip" Gates and Boston police officer Justin Barret .

In every other way he's outdone Bush in promoting violence as a Middle East solution.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:22 PM on 10/26/2010
can i fan you twice?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tnlcallen
03:44 PM on 10/26/2010
In his defense, the two men obviously didn't get along. It was a big deal having them sit down for a beer. Maybe next he can broker a peace between Juan Williams and NPR.