More

HuffPost Social Reading

Danforth Centers Hopes to Set Tone for Civil Religion

First Posted: 10/29/2010 8:49 am Updated: 05/25/2011 6:10 pm

Danforth Center

By Tim Townsend
St. Louis Post-Dispatch

ST. LOUIS (RNS) Just across from the Gephardt Institute for Public Service at Washington University, employees are moving into a new center named for another legendary Missouri politician.

The John C. Danforth Center on Religion & Politics, launched last year with a $30 million gift from the Danforth Foundation, officially opened its doors on Tuesday (Oct. 26) with an inaugural speech at the university's Graham Chapel by journalist and historian Jon Meacham.

The proximity of two centers named for former Democratic Congressman Richard A. Gephardt and former Republican Sen. John C. Danforth is emblematic of what Danforth anticipates the new center will do for the tenor of political conversation in the country.

"My hope is that this is a place that both illuminates the relationship between religion and politics, and also encourages respectful but vigorous debate," Danforth said. "Respectful does not mean wishy-washy. It means respectful."

Danforth's vision is for an academic center whose scholars can respond quickly when religion enters the political news cycle. Through conferences, debates, panel discussions, lectures and publications, Danforth hopes that as the 2012 presidential campaigns begin revving their engines next year, the center can have a calming effect on a debate that some say has devolved from thoughtful to thoughtless.

"Two things we're told to never discuss at the dinner table are religion and politics, but a lot of us grew up doing exactly that," said E.J. Dionne, a Washington Post columnist and author who often writes about both topics. "I think the Danforth center is trying to reproduce those dinner table discussions and replace the shoutfest."

Officials say the political atmosphere of next week's midterm election illustrates the need for the new center.

"What is called political commentary is, by most standards, entertainment -- a circus atmosphere, fight night, who can shout the loudest," said Wayne Fields, a Washington University professor of English and American studies and the center's founding director. "There's something profoundly boring about it."

Danforth -- an ordained Episcopal priest -- wrote the blueprint for the new center in his 2006 book, called "Faith and Politics."

In it, Danforth said it would have been "worse than inappropriate," and "divisive and wrong" to "foist" his own religion on the electorate.

"Because the task of government is to hold together in one country a diverse public, my interjection of religion into politics would have been a profound disservice to my state and my country," Danforth wrote. "It would have sown division where there should be unity."

Danforth also called out Republican Party operatives and conservative Christian pastors, writing that in recent years "the wisdom of our Founding Fathers has been challenged as the Republican Party has identified itself with the political agenda of Christian conservatives."

Washington University officials have been careful to portray the new center as nonpartisan, using terms like "unbiased," "ideologically neutral," "diverse" and "academic."

One of the center's first hires, assistant director Lenora Fisher, was a religious outreach coordinator and Midwest operations director for the 2008 Obama presidential campaign.

Fields and Fisher have been busy with center infrastructure and putting together search committees to find faculty and Fields' permanent replacement as director. The plan is to have a new director in place by next summer, and the goal for the center is to be "a significant voice" during the 2012 presidential election cycle, Fields said. The center could get a profile boost if St. Louis beats out three other cities vying for the 2012 Democratic convention.

Fields said the center will use religious, political, journalistic and educational voices in its programs. It will react to national headlines with an electronic publishing arm that will allow its scholars to analyze the news on a more journalistic timetable.

It will host national conferences during presidential election years, Fields said, "to assess the role religious issues are playing in the life of the campaign and in the life of the culture at that moment."

The center plans to keep tabs on the politico-religious zeitgeist by also holding meetings with religious leaders and believers of diverse backgrounds throughout the country. The center also plans to hold regular lectures and offer classes in religion and politics.

The center, while based in St. Louis, will have a major presence in Washington through its partnership with the Brookings Institution. Fields said scholars from each organization would travel back and forth for lectures and visiting appointments.

"I think it's helpful that the center is based in the middle of the country," said Dionne. "That the center is outside of Washington may give it credibility for some in the country that a center in Washington would not have."

Dionne, who is also a senior fellow at Brookings, and others there will help organize the Danforth Dialogues, a series of conversations among experts about religious-political issues other than hot-button topics like abortion and gay marriage. Those conversations will eventually be published by the Danforth center.

Danforth said that when Americans vote, they're participating in decisions about the country's future.

"It deprives people of that choice, and that participation, if an election campaign is cheapened to the point of focusing ... on name-calling," he said. "One thing religion can offer politics is a
sense of humility, an understanding that political opinions are not divine."

Tim Townsend writes for The St. Louis Post-Dispatch in St. Louis, Mo.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST RELIGION

By Tim Townsend St. Louis Post-Dispatch ST. LOUIS (RNS) Just across from the Gephardt Institute for Public Service at Washington University, employees are moving into a new center named for another l...
By Tim Townsend St. Louis Post-Dispatch ST. LOUIS (RNS) Just across from the Gephardt Institute for Public Service at Washington University, employees are moving into a new center named for another l...
Filed by Josh Fleet  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 17
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
dubbleplusgood
turned off CNN, turned on CurrentTV
11:12 PM on 10/29/2010
the last thing America needs is more religion mixed with politics. I think it's fair to say religion is NOT a personal issue because it always seems to snake it's way into everyone else's affairs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ioan Lightoller
Proud Married Gay Pagan Man
04:41 PM on 11/02/2010
Fanned and faved. We definitely do NOT need more religion mixing with politics. I don't want ANY religion trying to cram its tenets cown my throat or attempting to enact them into law
09:24 PM on 10/29/2010
"One thing religion can offer politics is a sense of humility, an understanding that political opinions are not divine."

Really? The involvement of religion in politics has been "humble"? So....political opinions are not "divine". I get that. What I don't get is the subtext that religious opinions ARE divine.

How divine......
08:24 PM on 10/29/2010
This from a man who promised to set term limits if he was elected then stayed in for 20 years. What was Missouri thinking? Danforth and Ashcroft....Tweedledee and Tweedledum.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DomainDiva
Aviation SaaS Entrepreneur and Technical SME
06:23 PM on 10/29/2010
I have never heard a debate that contained both politics and religion that was 'respectful. If these people are looking for a first, don't hold your breath.

Yeah I already know I am moderated out of here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OtayPanky
You're welcome
05:20 PM on 10/29/2010
It sounds like a worthy effort that will largely be ignored by those who should pay the most attention to its ideas.
04:17 PM on 10/29/2010
Sadly, many of those who believe they have God on their side believe that they can therefore dispense with humility.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Forester
Foresters do it in the woods.
02:52 PM on 10/29/2010
I remember Danforth gushing like a teen aged girl over Clarence Thomas and ridiculing Anita Hill.

That's some kind of ch ri sti an there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
InfinteShibumi
Just breathe...
04:47 PM on 10/29/2010
This might be his penance.
photo
dubbleplusgood
turned off CNN, turned on CurrentTV
11:13 PM on 10/29/2010
hardly, Danforth has been a twit for the entire 25 years I've heard from him.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:15 PM on 10/29/2010
"It deprives people of that choice, and that participation, if an election campaign is cheapened to the point of focusing ... on name-calling," he said. "One thing religion can offer politics is a
sense of humility, an understanding that political opinions are not divine."

Yet every candidate professes a religion, many the same one. Some deeply religious people may show humility, but the rhetoric of these religious candidates shows no humility.
11:37 AM on 10/29/2010
The problem with the religious right is that if you do not agree with their religious views then you are un-american and are not fit to live in this country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cranmer1549
Fear is your only god on the radio.
11:11 AM on 10/29/2010
Does civil religion exist anymore? It's gone down the path of politics.
squat6971
59 *was* divine -- 60? not so much
10:19 AM on 10/29/2010
Religion should be private -- unseen and unheard.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
InfinteShibumi
Just breathe...
04:47 PM on 10/29/2010
That's my view. Then again, it's just my view...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Weirdwriter
06:47 PM on 10/29/2010
Opinions should be private -- unseen and unheard.

Right? Because all beliefs are an opinion....
09:53 AM on 10/29/2010
Its greatest challenge will be traditionalists with fixed views on:
(1) women in the church,
(2) abortion and
(3) homosexuality.

Traditionalists will demand people to say where people stand, thus bringing and end to dialogue.