More

Government Spending Hypocrisy: Some Candidates Against Spending Get Tax Breaks, Government Contracts

Dino Rossi Rob Portman John Raese

First Posted: 10/30/10 08:57 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:10 PM ET

Kimberly Leonard, The Huffington Post Investigative Fund, and Aaron Mehta, The Center for Public Integrity

In his quest for West Virginia's Senate seat, Republican John Raese frequently attacks "professional politicians' out-of-control spending spree" as he promises voters that he'll rein in the federal budget.

What the businessman-turned-politician leaves unspoken is that his own company has benefited from taxpayer spending. Greer Industries Inc. sold $2.7 million of products to the federal government and $29 million in raw materials to the state in the last five years.

Raese is among roughly two dozen Republican and Democratic candidates in this fall's congressional elections who attack federal largess but have benefited from it through companies, employers or relatives who got contracts, grants or tax breaks, the Center for Public Integrity and the Huffington Post Investigative Fund have found.

Discrepancies between statement and deed, of course, are nothing new in politics. Because candidates assume that the public loathes excess federal spending, they rail against it. But the ubiquity of federal largess means there's so much money out there, even those who hate it seem to benefit from it.

"Despite red-faced anger about government, it plays an increasingly important role in the lives of all Americans," noted Lawrence Jacobs, a University of Minnesota political science professor. "A country that is now increasingly dependent on government is now increasingly hostile to government."

The most common target of criticism has been the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Passed in February 2009, the stimulus promised to revitalize the economy by sending $787 billion around the country to create jobs and spur economic activity. Twenty-one months later, the role of government spending -- and especially the stimulus -- has become a flashpoint in elections around the country.    

Stimulus in Wisconsin, Missouri, Kentucky

In Appleton, Wis., Republican House candidate Reid Ribble bashed the stimulus even though a construction firm owned by members of his family won a contract for $130,000 in stimulus funds to repair the roof of a local elementary school, the candidate's nephew and new owner of the company, Troy Ribble, confirmed.      

Democrats critical of stimulus program effectiveness also had family members who received benefits. In Missouri, Senate candidate Robin Carnahan has called for a halt to expanded stimulus spending proposed by President Barack Obama. But her opponent points out that a company owned by Carnahan's brother, Wind Capital Group, received $107 million in stimulus funds last year. Carnahan's campaign did not respond to requests for comment.    

In some races, the discrepancy has drawn attention. The operator of a restaurant owned by the family of Rob Portman, the GOP Senate candidate in Ohio, had requested tax credits for a historic restaurant and hotel Portman's family owns. Portman's campaign said that the request for aid was later withdrawn.

In Washington state, Republican Senate candidate Dino Rossi owns a share of a minor-league baseball team; state government tax breaks have supported construction at the stadium where the team plays. A spokeswoman for Rossi said the stadium received the money, not the team itself.

Controversy has also beset Democrat Ben Chandler, who represents the 6th district of Kentucky.

Chandler came under fire last year when it was revealed that the state hired his wife, at a salary paying nearly $80,000 a year, to help administer stimulus funds for Kentucky transportation projects.  Now in a tough re-election race, Ben Chandler's ads emphasize his independence and seldom identify him as a Democrat. His campaign did not respond to requests for comment, but Chandler has previously said he had nothing to do with his wife's hiring.

While hostility toward Washington is the hallmark of this election season, government "is still where Americans look in times of a crisis," whether it's an oil spill in the gulf, a bank failure or a broader economic crisis, says the University of Minnesota's Jacobs.

Second Thoughts by Auto Dealers

Other candidates say that at the time their private firms took government money, they thought the initiatives might help the struggling economy and decided only later that the programs had been a mistake.

Republican businessman Tom Ganley, running a well-funded campaign for Ohio's 13th District, south of Cleveland, is one of several auto dealers seeking congressional seats who now denounce the "cash for clunkers" program but earlier took advantage of part of it.

Before he ran for Congress, Ganley's auto dealership received almost $3.7 million in "cash for clunkers" funds. He was initially in favor of the program, but later came out against it. Asked about the switch during the campaign he said, "Initially the program looked to be a success. ... But the next few months showed we were wrong," as sales dropped and the industry continued to struggle.

What was learned from cash for clunkers is that "we cannot rely on big government to fix the private sector," Ganley said.
   

In southern Virginia, House candidate Scott Rigell, who has decried the stimulus and other government spending, participated in the program with his auto dealerships netting $568,500 for 137 sales, according to data from the Transportation Department.
   

Rigell said his company and its 240-person staff would have been at risk if he had not participated in the clunkers program. Customers would have sought business elsewhere, cutting company revenue and putting employees at risk, he said. "I resent the government for putting our family business in that position," Rigell said, adding that he eliminated his own pay in December 2008 to avoid layoffs.    

The situation was even more dire for Jim Renacci, a Republican candidate who owned Renacci-Doraty Chevrolet in Wadsworth, Ohio. Though his business received $168,500 for 39 transactions under the clunkers program, according to the Transportation Department, his dealership was eliminated by General Motors earlier this year as part of a government-mandated restructuring. Forty employees lost their jobs.
  

State Film Tax Credits

In Connecticut, Republican Senate candidate Linda McMahon has also faced criticism. She is running a campaign tirade against big government with ads blasting "reckless spending, bloated bureaucracy and ... unthinkable debt."

But in 2009, McMahon's high-profile company, World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc., reaped $9.8 million in state film tax credits from the two previous years. This year, the company took $5 million in state infrastructure tax credits. McMahon says that the company has been run solely by her husband since she stepped down as CEO in September 2009 to run for office. In any case, she says that the publicly traded company had a responsibility to shareholders to seek the credits.
 

Candidate Congressional Race Business Relationship Government Funds
John Raese (R) Senate, West Virginia Greer Industries, Inc. Owner State purchased $29 million in raw materials during the last 10 years. $2.7 million in federal contracts.
Reid Ribble (R) House, Wisconsin The Ribble Group Inc.
Former owner; now owned by nephew Troy Ribble $130,000 in stimulus funds
Dino Rossi (R) Senate, Washington state AquaSox Part owner Stadium where the team played received $433,000 in state funds
Rob Portman (R) Senate, Ohio The Golden Lamb
Owner $10,000 in building waivers from the city government. Former operator requested funds from the city to offset rehabiliation costs but withdrew application.
Robin Carnahan (D) Senate, Missouri Wind Capital Group Owned by brother $107 million in stimulus funds
Ben Chandler (D) House, Kentucky n/a n/a State paid his wife $80,000 to help coordinate distribution of $421 million in stimulus funds.
Tom Ganley (R) House, Ohio Ganley Automotive Group Owner $3.7 million from "cash for clunkers"
Scott Rigell (R) House, Virginia Freedom Automotive Owner $568,500 from "cash for clunkers"
Jim Renacci (R) House, Ohio Renacci-Doraty Chevrolet Owner $168,500 from "cash for clunkers." Dealership eliminated by GM as part of a government-mandated restructuring.
Linda McMahon (R) Senate, Connecticut World Wrestling Entertainment Former co-chairman and CEO; husband now fills roles $9.8 million in state film tax credits and $5 million in state infrastructure tax credits.
FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Kimberly Leonard, The Huffington Post Investigative Fund, and Aaron Mehta, The Center for Public Integrity In his quest for West Virginia's Senate seat, Republican John Raese frequently attacks "prof...
Kimberly Leonard, The Huffington Post Investigative Fund, and Aaron Mehta, The Center for Public Integrity In his quest for West Virginia's Senate seat, Republican John Raese frequently attacks "prof...
Filed by T.J. Ortenzi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 631
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (14 total)
  1 of 5  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
TXfemmom 09:51 PM on 10/30/2010
Yack, yacking out of both sides of their mouths. We should realize that all these candidates from red states are doing just that, because they are all beneficiary states, in that they receive far more from the federal government than they send to it.

The Dems, and Obama should come back after the election, propose a law which would limit all forms of assistance, including earmarks, etc. to  Read More...
11:38 PM on 10/31/2010
Send in the clowns. I mean the GOP. I'm sorry, actual clowns, to equate you with these [fill in the blank]
11:22 PM on 10/31/2010
My my,.. if you folks could just try to remember the basic economics of America: We always
have enough money for death and destruction,... but never for life and building.
10:30 PM on 10/31/2010
If republicans had done anything meaningful in the last ten years of their power:

Guess what!

They'd be talking about it right now.

If republicans had made even the most tiny difference in moving this country forward:
Guess what!

They'd be talking about it right now!

Only thing they can talk about?

Obstruction.

After what?

Two failed catostrophic wars.

And an economy they almost burnt to cinder, on their watch.

Republicans. Bad for America. Bad for the entire world, actually.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:24 PM on 10/31/2010
Of course they are! What people dont get is they can do one thing and say another and people dont care whats fact, they are lazy and only want to be told whats fact.
The "tell me lies tell me sweat little lies" song should be Americas motto from now on, not land of the free and the home for the brave!
09:10 PM on 10/31/2010
Typical republicans: take advantage of what they can't produce themselves.

Fact: Bush attempted to bail out his banker buddies.

Fact: Obama attempted to bail out the middle class.

The decision is clear.

Repulicans bail out their cronies to the tune of billions! (bank bail out Signed: George W bush)

Republicans are simply not for a strong middle class.

A strong middle class weakens their power structure.

I say we weaken their power structure a lot more on Nov 2nd.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
diverssant
"I wanna go outside, in the rain..."
08:29 PM on 10/31/2010
Sure, why not? If they can get away with such over the top ironies in the face of a dunder head American voters unable to see past the hype and the lies!

Hey, this is America- the only thing that counts is the final result-if you win, even though you are a swine and won underhandedly, nobody cares! Forget about honor, virtue or decency, this is so old century, let alone odd notions like shame or truth, win whatever it takes... and as long as they, the voters, let you get away with it...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bluegigi
06:39 PM on 10/31/2010
Ironic isn't it that those who RAIL against are looking for a government job, with government benefits, and everything that entails? And continue to talk about the evils of government while continuing to use and abuse it of its many benefits?
Those militia guys, while I don't support them or their radical policies, they have a truer sense of self and purpose that isn't easily compromised.
These Republicans talk about welfare and social benefits and how detrimental those things are - unless it's coming to them.
05:46 PM on 10/31/2010
The last 10 years have shown me that there is no form of hypocracy that you will not find republicans involved in!
If there are dollars or votes to be had you will find a dozen of them there!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Longtimeliberal
04:44 PM on 10/31/2010
It is easy to see who to trust. This year 53 Dems voted to close tax loophole encouraging outsourcing to give tax relief to American business doing business here! All 41 Repbulicans, 4Dems and lieberman voted NO
05:47 PM on 10/31/2010
Before you vote remember!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QlBOv8m_Xa8
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bluegigi
06:34 PM on 10/31/2010
That was awesome jrnratiff. F&F
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bronncohowie
Everyone register to vote.
04:25 PM on 10/31/2010
As usual, the GOBP/teabagger hypocrisy knows no bounds. Rail agains the Stimulus while raking in $ Millions. And you want these Robber Barons back in office ?? Please !!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
montn2
04:23 PM on 10/31/2010
Politicians are always in it for the monetary benefits.Why else would a billionaire, Meg Whitman, spend millions for a job that pays in the 6 figure range? Why Bloomberg? Why Fiorinna? Why Raese? Ultimately most have to answer for their double standard. Unfortunately not enough light has been shed on this practice during this election cycle.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Longtimeliberal
04:49 PM on 10/31/2010
To control where and how our money is spent. Every since Reagen the big corp have gotten more and more a grasp on our govt money. Now the Dems are trying to take back control of govt for the people thru consumer protections instead of corporate welfare. Big Corp who outsource jobs want to keep their no-hold barred control of us and want to continue to pay no taxes and outsource jobs. As a result of closing some loopholes already and realization that some more are coming it appears some of the business are going to come back according to the Financial Times. Also, lack of quality and lawsuits due to no controls on medications, food, etc are casuing them to rethink the moves.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
montn2
01:48 PM on 11/01/2010
Totally agree -- we are no longer a democracy. We are a corporatocracy. You might like this link: www.silverbuzzcafe.com/?p=14119
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:18 PM on 10/31/2010
Yes!! I would like to see articles like this plastered all over. Frigging hypocrites. Government contracts suck down huge amounts of local, state, and federal money. There are also many of those anti-government people who depend on people who get government money. Any northern Virginia neighborhood is full of those types begging to do work for government workers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kurt Mundt
Interesting world we live in, eh?
03:07 PM on 10/31/2010
Must be nice to have no conscience or ethics.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:59 PM on 10/31/2010
Have you thought this through?
05:51 PM on 10/31/2010
You must prove the absense of ethics, and conscience to be republican!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
b525
02:59 PM on 10/31/2010
2/3rds of the 50 billion dollar PER MONTH U.S. trade deficit is caused by the IMPORTATION OF FOREIGN OIL.

The part of the trade deficit caused by importing 20 million barrels of oil into the United States EACH DAY is 400 BILLION per year).

This OIL deficit has been growing and accumulating since the 1970's when U.S. domestic supplies of easily extractable oil in the ground peaked and began declining.

Much of the rest of the U.S. trade deficit is caused by the Chinese government MANIPULATING THE VALUE OF THEIR CURRENCY.....undervaluing it, to give them trade advantages and to give the U.S. and other countries trade disadvantages.

China is now one of the most polluted nations on earth. Many of China's citizens must filter their water and wear face masks to prevent becoming poisoned by the dirty air and water in China.

The Chinese E.P.A. has only 230 full time employees to regulate the polluting of 1.3 billion citizens and various national and multinational corporations.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bronncohowie
Everyone register to vote.
04:28 PM on 10/31/2010
Jimmy Carter cut foreign oil importation in half during his four years in office. It's now doulble what it was before he cut it in half. China's "MANIPULATING OF THEIR CURRENCY" does not matter because the monetary standard is U.S. dollars and we can print any amount we want any time we want.
photo
tploomis
when I'm dogmatic, I'm usually wrong
02:51 PM on 10/31/2010
Cry all the way to the bank.