iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Progressives Fault Economy, Corporate Sell-Out For Election Wipe-Out

First Posted: 11/03/10 02:58 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:10 PM ET

Alan Grayson

In the face of a plummeting economy and escalating foreclosure crisis, Democrats compromised their principles with corporate interests and failed to persuade voters that the government was working on behalf of the middle class, progressive activists are concluding in the wake of Tuesday's electoral wipe out.

The anger over the economy, directed at the party in power, overwhelmed even Democrats who fought for progressive values. There had been hope that House members such as Tom Perriello (D-Va.), Alan Grayson (D-Fla.), Mary Jo Kilroy (D-Ohio) and Carol Shea-Porter (D-N.H.) would be able to hang on despite the sagging economy and voter rage and in the face of mountains of corporate spending. But all four went down with the ship.

Perriello is a thoughtful, charming, hard-working freshman whose progressive values are deeply held. He worked as hard as anyone in Congress, passionately articulated and defended his controversial votes, raised a ton of money and held endless townhalls while running a flawless campaign in his rural House district. Yet he lost to an country-club Republican who refused to take positions. He was swamped with corporate money. Shea-Porter, Kilroy and Grayson met similar fates, undermining the idea that running as a passionate and principled progressive-populist is enough to carry a candidate to victory. If voters are losing their jobs and their homes, it's simply not enough.

In a statement to his supporters, Perriello noted that his campaign outperformed many other Democrats who are in "safe" districts, despite the conservative lean of his own. "Because I come out of faith-based justice work instead of politics, I can see last night as a victory for conviction and hard work for the idea that when you fight for the people, the people win," wrote Perriello. "Consider this. We won Danville, Martinsville, Charlottesville, Albermarle, Prince Edward, Brunswick, Buckingham, and Nelson with stronger than expected turnout. Over 110,000 voters had our back last night. And when you compare us to other races across the state and nation, we dramatically outperformed others in "safer" districts and those where members had either dodged the tough votes or run away from them after. And we did not back away from this President when it would have been convenient, because in politics, I will stand with the problem solvers over the political game players any day."

Justin Ruben, the head of MoveOn.org, which fought to protect progressive members, put out a statement Wednesday explaining the devastation.

Last night was devastating, no question. Our members spent months working tirelessly for our progressive heroes and to help Democrats keep the House--and the results are far from what we wanted.


We are glad our progressive hero, Barbara Boxer, will be returning to Congress, but we're deeply saddened at the losses of Russ Feingold, Tom Perriello, and Alan Grayson--all of whom have fought hard for progressive principles and the American middle class. These folks ran proudly on their records, but in the end, as Democratic incumbents, the combination of voter discontent and corporate cash was just too much for them to overcome.

We have seen significant accomplishments over the last two years --more children have health care, more Americans are protected from predatory practices on Wall Street, and more students can afford to go to college. But Republicans and corporate front groups like the Chamber of Commerce, aided by FOX News, systematically misled the American people about the nature of those gains.

And then voters, desperate for a majority that would fight for the middle class instead saw lobbyists successfully protect Wall Street bonuses, strip the public option out of the healthcare bill, protect the insurance companies' antitrust exemption, kill "cram-down" legislation that could have helped homeowners, and mire the energy bill in gridlock. And whether they were motivated by self-interest, a genuine belief in their ability to strike a compromise, political calculation, or fear, far too many Democrats were willing to go along.

Democrats who decided to play ball with corporate interests found themselves friendless: not only did voters turn their backs on them, but so did the industries they sought to mollify. From Glenn Nye to Blanche Lincoln, play-it-safe Democrats have been sent packing. Corporate interests and oil billionaires poured unprecedented cash into political attack ads hitting not only front line Democrats, but turning previously safe seats into bitter fights for survival. This means we now have a Republican majority in the House of Representatives that owes its majority to big corporations and a small handful of wealthy donors. And, it suggests that claiming to support Democratic principles while quietly pandering to corporate interests is no longer a winning political strategy.

Our country still faces many challenges as we try to recover from the worst economic downturn since the 1930s. Last night's election was not a mandate for the Republican vision of America, which is built around tax cuts for the super-wealthy and privatizing Social Security and Medicare. Instead, last night we saw an anxious and frustrated electorate rejecting the status quo in the only way possible: by voting out those in power. And we saw their frustration effectively exploited by corporate front groups whose sole interest is promoting their own political agenda.

The problems our nation faces are not small, and neither are the solutions we need. Democrats do not hand over the reins of power today. They still have time to accomplish big things to help move our country forward before the Republicans takes control of the House. Now is not a time to cower. Now is a time for Democrats to show that they are truly committed to fighting on behalf of the middle class. Before turning over the gavel, Democrats must end the Bush tax breaks for the super-wealthy, and pass legislation to stem the flood of cash from corporations and anonymous billionaires that is corrupting our elections. If Democrats abandon their responsibilities and leave town without accomplishing these goals, they will not have learned the real lessons of this election.

Our members worked for change in 2004, in 2006, in 2008. Our members will now work to hold this new Congress accountable, and are more determined than ever to work again for change in 2012.

Adam Green, whose Progressive Change Campaign Committee backed a number of progressive Democrats who were swept away, released a similar statement Tuesday night:

Democrats lost because party leaders never truly fought for popular progressive reforms like the public option and breaking up the big banks, leaving voters uninspired to come to the polls and vote Democratic. What the average voter saw of Democrats was weak, watered-down change -- and weak Democratic leaders who cut deals with the very Wall Street banks and insurance companies they are supposed to be fighting.


It's unfortunate that bold progressives like Russ Feingold got dragged down in a national rejection of Democratic Party weakness. Progressives will be stepping up and insisting that the Democratic Party be bolder, not weaker. We will demand boldness, reward bold leaders, reject 'leaders' in name only, and hold Democratic politicians accountable when they don't fight for popular, progressive change.

In short, these next two years, progressives will push Democrats to fight strongly for popular progressive reforms -- and save the Democratic Party from its own incredible weakness that savaged Democratic candidates in 2010.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
In the face of a plummeting economy and escalating foreclosure crisis, Democrats compromised their principles with corporate interests and failed to persuade voters that the government was working on ...
In the face of a plummeting economy and escalating foreclosure crisis, Democrats compromised their principles with corporate interests and failed to persuade voters that the government was working on ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,566
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (19 total)
02:48 PM on 12/07/2010
Of course Progressives think they would have won the election if congress and the President had only listened to them and gone farther left. In truth, had they done so, the debacle would have been even deeper and more widespread. The perceived leftist moves made by Obama and congress did the trick in frightening the electorate into voting for Republicans.

Politically, Progressives and liberals command only 20% of the population. If Progressives really think the nation's majority honestly backs them then they're all just whistlin' Dixie.
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
06:10 PM on 11/06/2010
"And, it suggests that claiming to support Democratic principles while quietly pandering to corporate interests is no longer a winning political strategy."

NEWS FLASH: It never was, it's just that today, with the Internet, etc, we can now find out more and react better to Republican Lite "democrats."

Adam Green said: "Democrats lost because party leaders never truly fought for popular progressive reforms like the public option and breaking up the big banks, leaving voters uninspired to come to the polls and vote Democratic. What the average voter saw of Democrats was weak, watered-down change -- and weak Democratic leaders who cut deals with the very Wall Street banks and insurance companies they are supposed to be fighting. "

God Damned Right, Adam!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:33 PM on 11/04/2010
A mere 1% of Progressives were defeated.

47% of Bluedogs were defeated.
06:20 PM on 11/04/2010
What gives me a warm and fuzzy feeling is that these bastages have no idea why they lost. If you can’t see the target, you can’t hit it.
07:24 PM on 11/04/2010
Why did they lose Nostradamus??
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:34 PM on 11/04/2010
As usual, no answer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ran6110
Mac, iPhone & iPad developer.
11:14 AM on 11/07/2010
Really, in you opinion why did they lose?
03:02 PM on 12/07/2010
Answers:

Obama & the Dems focused on the wrong objectives - climate change, health care, banking regulation.

Inherited bad economy and it continued to deteriate while focusing on the above.

Question by the people: Why weren't Obama and the Democrats focusing in on job creation? Again they were busy focusing in on the above. That angered voters.

Too far left too fast. That frightened the electorate.

Too much governmental spending translating to unsustainably high deficits without enough reward to warrant them. Again Obama and Dems were frightening the voters.

Democrats passed and Obama signed legislation the people clearly did not support.

After all this, it was clearly only a matter of time before the shellacking experienced would be administered.

Any more questions class?
06:15 PM on 11/04/2010
Liberal "progressives" (lol) are just not getting "it" ! The dem party lost the Independent and dem "centrists" vote because of their progressive socialist policies. The majority of American's are conservative and have watched these policies fail and destroy economy's in Europe. The progressive movement can win races here and there in very liberal areas but need the entire dem base and Independents to win a national election. Most of this group voted for the pres because they believed he was a "centrist". Most people seem to love smaller government and personal responsibility. (thank goodness !) This vote said "NO" to "hugo" world and yes to freedom and liberty.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:34 PM on 11/04/2010
Wrong, fool.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Payned
Card carrying member of ACLU
08:36 PM on 11/04/2010
Take a look at Germany's economy then explain to me how they have health care for everyone, 6 weeks vacation time, are the second largest exporter in the world (China with their slave labor being number one) have a generous pension plan that kicks in long before our paltry Social Security.

I'll be awaiting your thoughtful and fact based (not opinion) response.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Uggg
06:12 PM on 11/04/2010
The progressives need to blame themselves for the defeats not All of the People wants their idea of America their big government ideas do not work out of control spending
Progressives in the 1900's were responsible for Prohibition Income Tax and everybody's favorite bank the Federal Reserve
Yes they did give the Women the right to vote
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Salvador Doggy
hi.
06:05 PM on 11/04/2010
Hoping one day to figure out what it is to be Progressive.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:34 PM on 11/04/2010
That's okay. You'll never get it
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Salvador Doggy
hi.
07:46 PM on 11/04/2010
You might be right. But I'll keep trying. That's one of the main reasons I hang out here at HP.

One of the other main reasons is of course that you guys are so gosh darn entertaining.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chevy706
Fighting Liberals' Attack on Liberty.
09:51 PM on 11/04/2010
Hilarious the arrogance of the so called "progressive."
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Joe The Nerd Ferraro
Group IQ is inversely proportional to group size.
05:50 PM on 11/04/2010
it is the fault of the progressives who sat on their hands
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:36 PM on 11/04/2010
Hardly, with a 1% Progressive loss.

Independents were lost by Dems.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
eyelashviper
In wilderness is the preservation of the world
05:41 PM on 11/04/2010
Russ Feingold, a long term senator whose efforts to be a good public servant and serve the best interests of his constituents and the country, was defeated by a billionaire spending obscene amounts of money to buy the seat, and ultimately make public policy that will enhance himself and other corporate interests; this epitomizes what is wrong in the political realm, and eventually will undermine our very civilization and culture.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
eyelashviper
In wilderness is the preservation of the world
05:13 PM on 11/04/2010
Howard Dean has been marginalized by this administration, likely the work of Rahm and Gibbs, who have made their negative views about him quite apparent.
Now is the time for bi-partisanship within the Democratic party, including liberals, progressives, and any others who dwell under this "big tent". We all share many of the same views, just need to tweek, push, and work together to get a strong vision and real actions moving.
04:47 PM on 11/04/2010
Where Obama & the Dems went wrong:
1. Blaming all past problems on one source - Bush. This would lead one to believe if a president can cause all the problems, another president with majorities in both houses should be able cure all the problems. Unfortunately this is a gross misconception created through the blame game.
2. Stating that the stimulus would keep unemployment under 8%. No matter how many jobs created/saved/touched, if the unemployment level went above 8%, the massive spending program would be viewed as a failure.
3. Failure to work with the Repubs on bipartisan legislation. This exonerated the Repubs from any blame in the failure of the new policies to turn around the economy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gerald Ward
05:26 PM on 11/04/2010
"Failure to work with the Repubs on bipartisan legislation" ? I think there's something wrong with your newspaper. whose rear did you pull that bromide from? If you want I'll tell you why you are so wrong on that point.
photo
pdsimdars
Steel spine and golden aura.
05:29 PM on 11/04/2010
You drank too much kool aid.
1. all the problems DID come from Bush. Obama should have talked about it ALL THE TIME.
2. Obama should have fought for a big enough stimulus that WOULD have done the job, but he caved and got the worst of all possibilities
3. You are delusional on this one. Obama bent over backwards for them. It was the Repubs who said "H ell no". He should have steam rolled them. You don't negotiate with a screaming, spoiled infant in the store . .. you take matters into your own hands and do the adult thing. Once they filibuster THEIR OWN proposals, you should have learned they are not serious adults. Then they should have just shoved their own agenda.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lee Johnston
Just my opinion I could be wrong
06:38 PM on 11/04/2010
What a load of crap. Obama did everything but wear a shirt that said "It's Bush's Fault." After a while people get tired of hearing excuses and need to see performance. Obama has not solved any problems. He just keeps throwing money at every issue he thinks is important. Wall Street -Give them Money, GM - Give them Money, Fannie and Freddie - Give them Money. Health care - More Money. If you ran as business the way he runs the country, you would be bankrupt and standing in line for government money. Oh wait that's what Democrats want, everybody waiting for a government handout or as Obama puts it " A REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH"
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
MCWAY
10:33 PM on 11/04/2010
1. He did; IT DIDN'T WORK!! (Bush didn't have 10% unemployment; Obama does).
2. He didn't have to fight. He had the power squarely in his hand. The stimulus just flat-out DIDN'T WORK.
3. Obama has a large majority in the House and a SUPERMAJORITY in the Senate. The GOP COULD NOT stop him on anything, until they got Scott Brown.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Equinator
Shovels manure daily
04:01 PM on 11/04/2010
The Democratic party needs someone with as much fight and spirit as Grayson. I officially nominate him as the next DNC Chairman.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
eyelashviper
In wilderness is the preservation of the world
04:53 PM on 11/04/2010
Excellent idea, boot Tim Kane to the curb now, as he has been mute and ineffective since taking the position.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drgrph
06:06 PM on 11/04/2010
As a conservative I'd love a flaming idiot running the DNC. Anyone who is as hateful as this, this, Mr. Grayson will only result in the consolidation of conservatives - both D and R - and a conservative President in '12. No one other than Progressives respect him. That's the honest truth. So in all seriousness you should rethink this one for your own good. You've got to have a reasonable, spirited Progressive to turn to. Wouldn't a man as respected as Senator Feingold be a better choice?
03:41 PM on 11/04/2010
Maybe Grayson can get a job at White House? That should help with the independents.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Justan Olfrend
Liberal, Progressive, Independent, American
03:16 PM on 11/04/2010
Grayson gave it a valiant effort considering an entire Party machine was against him (just like Feingold).
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Justan Olfrend
Liberal, Progressive, Independent, American
03:15 PM on 11/04/2010
I am a Progressive. I don't fault the economy on its own. I fault weak knee Democrats and blue dogs.
03:55 PM on 11/04/2010
Absolutely.
photo
Lefty08
but I bat the right
04:02 PM on 11/04/2010
I am a progressive too. HealthCare reform is a joke for many of us. Wall street reform is a joke too. Absolutely no consequences for any of these thugs....no enforcement of even existing laws. Nothing but a growing disparity between rich & poor. Obama hasn't done a damn thing to lift DADT or DOMA. We're still spending billions on a war & "post-war" in the middle east. We're absolutely no closer to being oil independent, and our environment is still filthy.... with no goal in sight. Our education system is still ranked among the lowest in the post industrial world...So how have things really changed since Bush? We've never left the conservative nightmare. Except that maybe the right is more radicalized and our president the the democratic congress have lost their ba//s.
photo
pdsimdars
Steel spine and golden aura.
05:32 PM on 11/04/2010
Don't forget the unions and card check . ... they fought for Obama and that was their top issue and all they got was lip service too.
Not to mention, Bush only took away your civil rights, Obama pushed it farther to ordering the execution of an American citizen without trial, jury or judgment.