iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Gay Voters' Support For Republicans Nearly Doubled From 2008


First Posted: 11/05/10 09:28 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:10 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- Republicans made significant inroads among gay and lesbian voters in the midterm elections, with national exit polls for the House races showing that the GOP captured 31 percent of the vote of this group this year, compared to 19 percent in 2008.

The change from the last midterm elections in 2006 was not quite as large but an increase nevertheless. In 2006, 24 percent supported Republicans. Democrats' share of the gay vote rose from 75 percent in 2006 to 80 percent in 2008 and then dropped to 68 percent in 2010. Each year, approximately 3 percent of voters identified as gay, lesbian or bisexual.

"I have been very concerned over these last two years that the connection between the gay rights community and the Democratic Party is in danger of being broken, because I think expectations were set so high as a result of the 2008 election, and people are extremely disappointed," said Richard Socarides, a former assistant to President Clinton and senior White House adviser on gay rights.

Socarides said that the gay community recognizes President Obama has many pressing issues to juggle, but there's nevertheless frustration on his LGBT strategy.

"The president articulated in the early summer of 2009, when he had that event at the White House on the 40th anniversary of [the] Stonewall [rebellion] and had a couple of hundred people in the White House -- he said, essentially, give me two terms, and at the end of eight years, I will have accomplished for you what I said I would," said Socarides. "I think that some people come out of that as, we're not prepared to wait. And some people thought it was a bad strategy because they thought it was going to get harder not easier. You didn't have to be a rocket scientist to see this change coming in Congress a long time ago. So, I think that we as Democrats have a lot of explaining to do."

More conservatives have been speaking out in favor of gay rights as the issue becomes more mainstream amongst the general public, and Republicans perhaps sense some vulnerability and dissatisfaction with Democrats.

Of course, one of the central figures pushing for marriage equality is conservative attorney Ted Olson who, along with David Boies, argued the case seeking to overturn California's Prop. 8, which bans same-sex marriage. Former Republican National Committee chair Ken Mehlman made headlines recently when he came out as a gay man and signed on to help raise money for the marriage equality fight.

The Log Cabin Republicans have also been taking on a more visible role, bringing the suit arguing that Don't Ask, Don't Tell is unconstitutional. R. Clarke Cooper, executive director of the Log Cabin Republicans, is proud of the fact that 12 of the 17 candidates the group endorsed went on to win their races. He said he believes that the reason Republicans performed better with the gay community in this election is because of the focus on the economy rather than social issues.

"Yes, Don't Ask, Don't Tell should be repealed, so we can have open service," said Cooper. "But if people can't pay their bills or there is concern about their investments, then there could be some overriding points there."

"We want Republicans who respect individual liberty and individual responsibility and champion that as conservatives," he added. "So that's the ideal, right? But knowing there are members of the party that don't fall under that definition -- or, as I like to say, we're working on them -- our guidance was, during this campaign cycle, if you have nothing nice to say about the gay community, say nothing at all. Just shut up. And talk about issues that do affect all Americans, like the economy. Everyone needs a job -- doesn't matter if you're gay or straight."

Darlene Nipper, deputy executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, agreed that the struggling economy and larger political trends likely played a major role.

"There is enormous fear and frustration among people all across the nation, and a factor is a rocky, stalled economy and high unemployment rate," said Nipper. "When the party in power doesn't seem to be making it better, some people make their anger known at the ballot box. Is that the case here? It's tough to know for sure without people actually saying why they voted the way they did."

Socarides also said that some people who identify as gay may have been "voting more on economic issues rather than rights issues."

Among Republican elected officials, there has so far been basically no activity. Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) attended a fundraising event for the Log Cabin Republicans in September, but received flack from the religious right for doing so. Besides this move, Republicans have shown little interest in making gay rights a major part of their agenda, and one of the few Republicans supporting the repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell (DADT) -- Rep. Charles Djou (Hawaii) -- lost his seat on Tuesday.

Cooper, who had just returned from meetings on Capitol Hill before speaking with The Huffington Post on Thursday, had more hope for progress. He said that Republican leadership staff had told him the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) would likely be taken up during the lame-duck session in the House, although the calendar had not yet been set. He added that his group was pitching ENDA -- which prohibits workplace discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity -- to Republicans as a "pro-jobs piece of legislation."

"No one should be denied access to employment," said Cooper, "and that is a conservative talking point. I think we may have some opportunity there to gain some potential support or votes we haven't had in the past. And of course it helps we have some folks who are already in Congress, who are incumbent, who will help message that."

In the next Congress, he said the Log Cabin Republicans would be pushing a tax equity bill, to be introduced by Republican members. He also expected more Republicans and conservative Democrats to support the 2011 defense authorization bill -- which contains a provision to repeal DADT -- when it comes up, since the Pentagon will soon be finishing its review of the implications of open service for gays and lesbians.

UPDATE, 2:33 p.m.: Several readers have written in to point out that the sample size of gay, lesbian and bisexual voters for this poll was small. Liz Goodwin of The Upshot spoke with Hunter College Professor Ken Sherrill, who studies the gay electorate and said that after reviewing the full data, there was "a disproportionate drop in Democratic support among LGB voters compared to Hispanic, black, and young voters." "Though the sample size is still very small and thus there's a large margin of error, Sherrill now says the drop may be attributed to 'dissatisfaction with the pace of change on LGB rights over the past two years,'" added Goodwin.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Republicans made significant inroads among gay and lesbian voters in the midterm elections, with national exit polls for the House races showing that the GOP captured 31 percent of the v...
WASHINGTON -- Republicans made significant inroads among gay and lesbian voters in the midterm elections, with national exit polls for the House races showing that the GOP captured 31 percent of the v...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,285
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (86 total)
Joan Saniuk
Clergywoman & math professor
02:33 PM on 11/10/2010
It's a free country. And having said that... why would you feed the hand that bites you?
12:07 AM on 11/09/2010
If neither party is going to support making me a first class citizen, then I may as well vote for the party that will let me pay less taxes, i.e. Republicans. Yes, the religious fanatics are loud and annoying, but the Log Cabin Repubs and several prominent conservatives are showing far more guts than the Democratic party has in at least *trying* to secure some of my rights.

How does it look when a group of Republicans gets DADT declared unconstitutional and the "fierce advocate" Obama turns around and gets an injunction to keep the policy in place?!?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mary Mckay
Capitalism is not God
08:44 PM on 11/08/2010
You democrats have no balls. Your spineless. Where is the opposition coming from??? I wont vote for democrats anymore if they can't get anything done. I think the Democrats are sooo flaccid I'm sick at heart.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Radical Logic
Surrender indecision and become your dreams
05:36 AM on 11/23/2010
I'd suggest therapy as its obvious to the rest of the world that are not mentally stable.
12:36 AM on 11/08/2010
What strikes me are the comments that somehow the President or Democratic leadership are anti-gay, while Republicans are suddenly 'attractive' to gay and lesbian voters, who have just noticed them and fallen in love.

In truth, of course, if there were no Republican party DOMA, ENDA, DADT, and a great many other facts of life would already be taken care of. DADT, for example, which is getting so much attention on this post, was only a compromise needed because of the existence of Republicans. Minus Republicans, there would be no need for any of this heartburn over unjust or unconstitutional bigoted laws. We'd be past it.

No one is voting for Republicans because they think they're good for civil rights. Even the Log Cabin group all-but defected from the Republican party during the last several election cycles because they realized (wow!) they weren't being heard by Republican leadership. Their attacks on DADT in the courts is NOT part of their connection to the main Republican platform, but a continuation of their essential disenfranchisement from their own party, so that they are now striking out and working on their own issues irregardless of what their party leadership thinks.

Actually, maybe that's a good idea.
photo
MadAs
Tuned-in science editor
12:06 AM on 11/08/2010
You know, if supporters of the Public Option or Equal Payer were to be as easily pre-polled or exit-polled as the gay community we would have seen the same result: People expecting deliverance of the promised results.

But today's gay switch-voters are as myopic as 99ers who voted for Repubs to punish (i.e., send message to) Dems: that is, both groups just voted against their own best interests.

That said, our countrymen are justified in being angry, cynical, and revolutionary in the voting booth. The polar ends are whipping this country around by its backbone and the middle body doesn't know whether to pretend like it isn't hurting or to join one end or the other to stop the rip it feels in coming apart.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
larmar
The vile maxim of the masters of mankind
10:05 PM on 11/08/2010
Maybe if Dems would have used rescission like the Repugs did, to move policy forward, then the blood bath at the polls wouldn't have been so bad. Could still use it in the Senate to end filibuster, but Harry Milquetoast Reid won't do it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilipB
11:52 AM on 11/07/2010
The poll was from such a small sample that the assertion in the headline in not yet proven.
Either way, large numbers of Gays and Lesbians voted Democratic.
It should be noted that the Democrats have historically received wide support from the generous group.
It should also be noted that democrats have made promises for decades to this group in ending lack of equal protections under the constitution with little action and modest results.
Democrats would be wise to heed the concerns raised by Gays and Lesbians, and not tell them to "shut up".
The Republicans bigoted rhetoric and pernicious actions against Gays and Lesbians historically is a stain on that party, but that should not be used as cover by those who assume that Gays and Lesbians will always be patient with the Democrats in the status quo of inequality.
Right now the actions in addressing inequality are in the hands of the courts, with two appeals...the oral arguments in the prop 8 appeal to be heard next month, and the oral arguments in the DADT appeal likely in late February of 2011.
It would seem that referendums have failed Gays and Lesbians, as has the legislature, so the only hope now lies with the courts, with uncertainty if the SCOTUS will even grant centiorari if it gets that far.
jwalker13
Compassion is much more than a campaign slogan.
10:39 AM on 11/07/2010
So, let's use the 2008 election as a stepping point -- 120,000,000 people voted in the 2008 presidential election. In contrast, 64,000,000 voted in the 2010 House primary.

If gays account for 3% of the electorate that means that gays were 1,920,000 votes. 31% voted Republican, 595,200. 69% voted Democrat, 1,324,800. Now, let's look at the youth vote from 2008.

120,000,000 people voted, according to exit polls, 23,000,000 of those votes were Americans under 30 -- ~ 25%., 3% of that electorate disappeared, that is 690,000 votes. 40% of the vote went to Republicans which means that roughly 8 million votes went to Republicans from the youth vote.

Let's compare those numbers: gays give .5 million extra votes and it's their own fault, they should suffer like evil sub-humans. Youth gives 8 million votes to Republicans and the article where I found this information had 2 posts and was never posted on the front page. Yet, here we are, blaming the big, bad, evil gays for Republicans taking over the house.

Finally, if 64,000,000 people voted in 2008, .5 million voted for Republicans, that is 1/128th of the elctorate. Meanwhile, for the youth, 1/8th of the electorate went to Republicans. And this isn't even looking at white men, independents, African American, or latino votes and how they shifted.

We can stop blaming gays now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dave AlmostEquality
11:24 PM on 11/07/2010
Stop confusing them with facts! LOL
Harpo1129
You can't spell Progressive without Progress
10:38 AM on 11/08/2010
No one said that the gay people that voted republican gave the house to the republicans. Of course that didn't happen. What we are all saying is that if the gay community EVER want equality in this country, or any OTHER minority wants equality in this country for that matter, a vote for the republicans will NOT gain that equality for you. We are only saying that those gay individuals that voted for a republican only voted against their own best interests.
07:40 PM on 11/11/2010
I reviewed the comments, and actually none of them say what you appear to think “we are all saying.”

One commenter said, “[I] can’t believe they could be that ignorant.” It’s unclear if the commenter meant that all gay people, or all gay people who voted republican, are ignorant.

Another commenter called a gay poster’s logic “stupid.” At least that commenter, while clearly prejudiced, didn’t explicitly insult the person.

Still another suggested Stockholm syndrome.

That’s just this last page. Overall, gay people here have been treated much worse than other groups, such as young people and the poor, who are a lot less likely to vote than gay people, and a lot more likely to vote Republican when they do.

Here, I think, is part of the problem: many straight people believe that democratic politicians support gay rights, when in fact they rarely do – at least actively. The example that springs to mind is Bill Clinton. He gave lip-service to equal rights, but he actually signed a law that prohibits married, same-sex couples from getting federal benefits. That’s hardly offset by the fact that his military ban was slightly less harsh, at least on paper, than the previous ban. And Obama is now defending it.

Some think the dems will soon push for gay rights. I wonder if they realize that LGBT people have been fighting for legal equality, with virtually no active support from the dems, since at least the 1970s?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GayGrandpa
09:51 AM on 11/07/2010
Yeah there is a lot of discussion about this but I think some "darlings" were simply peeved and thought they show the President their dissatisfaction by doing this...I don't think it is any more than that. The shame is there goes our reputation for having some smarts. }:^(
07:38 AM on 11/07/2010
I cannot believe that 31% of the gays voted Republican. There just can't believe they could be that ignorant! :-(
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GayGrandpa
09:52 AM on 11/07/2010
Hey take it easy...69% voted Democrat!
11:56 PM on 11/06/2010
Greaaaaaaaaaat ! Iran and Repubs have a similiar view and treatment of gays. Coming to you soon I am sure !
10:23 PM on 11/06/2010
I'll be the first to admit, I didn't even bother to vote this election. Why would I? The Democrats know how to say exactly what they think I want to hear, but then they don't follow through. The Republicans have made it VERY clear how they feel about we evil homuhseckshuls. And there were no Independents running in my local elections. So, rather than give my vote to people who don't deserve it, I kept it for myself. I know it's horribly unAmerican to not vote, but then I'm just a second class citizen anyway. Give the Republicans time and they'll probably take away my right to vote anyway.
01:27 AM on 11/07/2010
See that's still stupid also, I mean you lost by not voting, the Dems at least will try, and pay lip service, the GOP won't even do that
09:28 PM on 11/08/2010
*I* didn't lose anything. And I can't stand being lied to by politicians who pretend to like me to get my vote and then turn their backs on me once they're in power. I almost prefer the Republicans, at least they're honest about how they feel about me.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lynettema
Little old lady
09:57 PM on 11/06/2010
Your'e a Republican if you put greed ahead of everything including your own civil rights.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:39 PM on 11/06/2010
What's the name of the syndrome where people being tortured by their captors start to have feelings for their abusers? Remember Patty Hearst? someone help me out here... THAT is the only thing that could explain why even one gay person could vote for a republican.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
HarryP
FORWARD
10:13 PM on 11/06/2010
Stockholm Syndrome?
10:13 PM on 11/06/2010
Stockholm syndrome. And yeah, pretty much. I don't care HOW much the Republicans think they can fix the economy, as a gay man I know exactly where I stand with the nutbag Bible-thumpers that make up that party. I wouldn't vote Republican if they offered me a million dollars. They've spent the last several decades telling me how much they hate me, so I'd have to be seriously mental to support them now.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rebecca Borchers
01:53 AM on 11/07/2010
You supported them by not voting at all.
09:24 PM on 11/06/2010
OK, lets do a simple version of the math? For simplicity sake, lets pretend the sample was 100,000 people.

In 2010, 3% of the voters identified as gay, that would be 3000 people. 68% voted Democrat, that's 2040 people. 31% voted Republican, that's 930 people.

BUT in 2008, 4% of the voters identified as gay, that would be 4000 people. 80% voted Democrat, that's 3200. 19% voted Republican, that 760 people.

What do the numbers show us? They show us that in pure numbers, a few more people voted Republican rather than Democrat. (Not twice as many) More importantly, a quarter of the people who voted in 2008 stayed home. What could possibly explain why they stayed home? Hmmm.
10:25 PM on 11/07/2010
Good point, but it’s more revealing to consider the total population instead of a sample. The turnout in 2008 was about 64%, and in 2010 it was about 41.5%. Assuming the gay turnout was the same as the general population in 2008, 64 out of 100 gays voted, with 12 voting Republican and 52 voting Democrat. In 2010, as you pointed out, the proportion of gays voting compared to the general population was 3/4 as much as in 2008. So only about 31 out of 100 gays voted (3/4 of 41.5%), with only about 10 voting Republican and 21 voting Democrat.

When you look at the total population of gays, FEWER voted for Republicans this year than in 2010. The real change was that more than half of the gays who voted in 2008 stayed home in 2010, and the vast majority of those who stayed home voted Democrat last time. Fortunately, the number of gays who are so stupid that they would vote for Republicans actually went down a little.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ipanemagirl
progressive
08:45 PM on 11/06/2010
The Gays are upset with the democrats who are the only ones that support them, so they turn to the GOP folks who think they should be killed or even exterminated? Good luck with that strategy. If gays depend on the GOP to get their way, they will be very disapointed!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dave AlmostEquality
11:32 PM on 11/07/2010
First of all, I will premise this by saying that yes, I voted Democratic in national offices, Rep and Senate. However, I did so while holding my nose.

With that said, nobody depends on the GOP to do anything but drive the country back into the ditch we are trying to get out of. But most of us have come to realize that we cannot depend on the Democrats either. Most of us realize that we are not going to secure our rights through the legislative nor the executive branches, but will come to us through the courts, just like almost all other civil rights movements.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ipanemagirl
progressive
02:27 PM on 11/08/2010
I honestly believe Obama will push for gay rights. With these new teabaggers in congress, it may be more difficult now, and the superior court leans r-wing now as well, so democrats are our only hope in getting equality for the gays. I watch Maddow daily and she has been a real fighter on the subject and it will be thanks to her , if Obama succeeds! I'm all for it, and hope it will pass soon!