More

Volcker: Fed's $900 Billion Plan Won't Do Much To Boost Economy

First Posted: 11/05/10 09:16 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:10 PM ET

Volcker

SEOUL, South Korea (AP, By Kelly Olsen) -- Former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker says the U.S. central bank's plan to buy hundreds of billions of dollars in government bonds probably won't do much to boost the economic recovery.

The Fed announced Wednesday that it would purchase $600 billion in Treasurys, aiming to lower long-term interest rates in an effort to spur spending and ultimately lower the U.S. unemployment rate, currently at 9.6 percent. The move comes on the heels of previous purchases of $1.7 trillion in mortgage and Treasury bonds.

Volcker told a business audience in Seoul that the Fed's bond plan is obviously an attempt to spur the U.S. economy but "is not the kind of action that's likely to change the general picture that I've described as slow and labored recovery over a period of time."

The Fed's move has caused worries in South Korea and other emerging markets in Asia. Those governments fear that lower interest rates in the U.S. will further push investors to seek higher returns overseas and that this tide of money will drive up their currencies and destabilize their markets.

Volcker served as Fed chief from 1979 until 1987 under presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan and is currently chairman of President Barack Obama's Economic Recovery Advisory Board. He also warned that the U.S. won't find its way out of the economic doldrums through over-stimulation.

"The thought that you can create a prosperous economy by inflating is an illusion, in my judgment," he told reporters after his speech. "And we should never forget that. I thought we'd learned that lesson and I hope we continue to learn that lesson."

The Fed faces a dilemma in balancing the aim of boosting the economy now while avoiding fears of a future jump in inflation due to the monetary stimulus, said Volcker, who as central bank chairman hiked interest rates aggressively to tame inflation.

"The influence of this kind of action on longer term interest rates, in particular, is ambiguous because the immediate impact of buying bonds ought to be to drive bond prices up and interest rates down," he said. "But if people get concerned about longer run inflationary impacts, the effects go in the other direction."

In theory, the Fed's action is expected to lower interest rates because bond prices and interest rates -- also known as yields -- move in opposite directions. The yield is the fixed amount of annual interest paid to the owner of the bond expressed as a percentage of the bond price, so the extra demand created by the Fed's purchases should push bond prices up and lower the yield.

But when investors fear inflation will be higher in the future they demand that bonds pay a higher interest rate to protect their investment from the value-eroding effects of inflation.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
SEOUL, South Korea (AP, By Kelly Olsen) -- Former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker says the U.S. central bank's plan to buy hundreds of billions of dollars in government bonds probably won't do m...
SEOUL, South Korea (AP, By Kelly Olsen) -- Former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker says the U.S. central bank's plan to buy hundreds of billions of dollars in government bonds probably won't do m...
Filed by Ryan McCarthy  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 357
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cadawa
01:59 AM on 11/09/2010
It would do a lot to boost the economy if it went to the right place. If it went to small businesses that can't loans from the banks we bailed out; if it went to seniors who have been screwed two years in a row; if it went to loan modifications to the people who can't get them from the banksters.
Making exporting jobs unprofitable doesn't cost anything and it might even generate some income.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
mrclark
I search for the America I believed in as a boy.
10:31 AM on 11/09/2010
We need to quit loaning money to the large banks and let them fail. If we take the support (FED window) two or three of these banks would fail fairly quickly. You must understand that most of Wall Street is currently underwater even today from the mess they created.
photo
Lorianne
ama vitam
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
mrclark
I search for the America I believed in as a boy.
01:30 AM on 11/08/2010
Can we trade the new one for the old one, I will kick Bernanke in to boot.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cadawa
01:52 AM on 11/09/2010
I highly recommend "Inside Job". Bernanke is one of the authors of the meltdown.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
mrclark
I search for the America I believed in as a boy.
10:16 AM on 11/09/2010
The FED is a dirty organization and is against the average American. Sadly, a lot of our populace go through life with blinders on or get their talking from FOX news or MSNBC. I am progressive in my thinking, but I realize there are good people on both sides. What goes for news today troubles me because the negative nature of our discourse interferes in our dealing with the serious problems currently facing our country. The arguments you see on tv are orchestrated by the moneyed interests in America to keep our eye from seeing what is really happening, which is that we are not only getting robbed blind by the Wall Street banks, but by the Federal Reserve also. This makes me aggravated with our President, for he is a smart man but he ignores the graft and corruption right in front of him. Bernanke, Paulson, and Geithner should have been arrested and taken away in chains long ago
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jabailo
(Participant) Texeme.Construct()
01:24 AM on 11/08/2010
Did someone leave the latch off the gate of the Alzheimer's Home fence?

We've got too many retired Fed Chairmen running about ...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
mrclark
I search for the America I believed in as a boy.
12:12 AM on 11/08/2010
He is right it did not to much to help the economy, but it did raise your price of gas. This Quantitive Easing is terrible for the working class because their dollar is devalued, and the firms who have received the cash from the FED have placed it in the stock market to bid up the price of oil and other commodities. If we had any leadership the FED would be put in a conservatorship and the large banks would be busted up.
photo
Lorianne
ama vitam
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cadawa
01:54 AM on 11/09/2010
The purpose of this exercise, according to the plutos and their private club, the Federal Reserve, is to transfer their debt to the pleds.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joebhed
Greenback Revolutionist
08:41 PM on 11/07/2010
While I agree with the good Governor on his conclusion, I find his explanation wanting.
""The thought that you can create a prosperous economy by inflating is an illusion, in my judgment,"
By inflating what, Sir?
When the economy itself is deflating for lack of circulating medium necessary to bring about potential GDP growth, then what you need is to reflate the economy back to its non-inflationary potential.
We're millions of jobs and Trillions of needed government services away from inflation.
We are prevented from achieving our potential non-inflationary GDP by the simple fact that there is no money, unfortunate tenet of the debt-money system.

We are entering an austerity-fed debt-deflation cycle.
Without doubt, our economy will be smaller, but there is no need to hit the depths of suffering that awaits a move forward through debt-driven Austerianism..

QEII policy will fail.
For one thing the repurchase of existing debt will only plug further the unproductive capital feeders at the top of the financial food chain.
Dos the policy enable, or discourage, hoarding?
The purchase of new government debt as issued places the use of the newly-created medium directly into today's economy in a positive way.
Think M1 and M2 increase.
But its still a debt.
Totally unnecessary.
Unfortunately, I guess Volcker never read Milton Friedman's : "A Fiscal and Monetary Framework for Economic Stability".
Cause its all in there.
Restore economic stability through monetary reform.
The Money System Common.
photo
Kassandra
Idiot savant artistic genius
03:30 PM on 11/07/2010
If America doesn't clean up it's financial act we will find ourselves currency isolated. Other major economies don't want to fall into the abyss along with US.
They gave US time to take the crooks to jail and we haven't; we're still letting them paly with the world and that includes all our polluting industries.
We bailed them out and now, they own America; our government, our homes, our jobs.
We're in for a very rough ride.
You won't hear about this on the "news" either. I just heard this on Amy Goodman this afternoon so I went to look up the whole interview:

Finance Has Become a New Form of Warfare
http://www.hamsayeh.net/hamsayehnet_iran-international-news1869.htm
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
SayNOtoGOP
Project Manager, Sustainable Energy
03:15 PM on 11/07/2010
Jesse Ventura lays out the banking cartel, Wall Street and the Federal Government's roles in the (ongoing) finacial crisis on his "Conspiracy Theory" on TruTV (three parts) in layman's terms, anyone can understand. The ambush of Goldman-Sachs "executives" is a bit hokey, but the rest rings pretty true:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvaGbb6PNbI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fuo6Mo1kH28

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wRfuAUubT0
03:00 PM on 11/07/2010
Looks like those "crazy" people on the internet telling you to buy gold are finally vindicated.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wingnutgator
05:29 PM on 11/07/2010
I say this coming in 2002 and bought gold aggressively. Have more than tripled my money in the last 8 years and have prospered mightily during the real estate bubble. However, I think gold is reaching a top and am now selling to lock in profits. How did your stocks do the last decade?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kevin Atlanta
Active Citizen 54
08:34 AM on 11/07/2010
This Bernanke move is more of the voodoo economics that his criminal malfeasance in regulation and oversight created in the Heist of History.

The intent is the second collapse that will pull the global economy into chaos of bankruptcy, defaults and currency wars right on schedule.

Instead of beefing up oversight and cleaning up the mess from the Dubya Wrecking Crew's removal of 500 FBI Banking examiners this witless wonder just pumps more of his Rothschilds cash into funny money and empty promises.
06:41 PM on 11/07/2010
Agreed. This is just more smoke and mirrors that will do nothing for the working class in this country.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Y3rMawm
veni, vidi, bibi.
01:29 AM on 11/08/2010
Oh it will do something for....er to the working class alright. But it ain't gonna be pretty.
08:06 AM on 11/07/2010
What Tall Paul isn't saying is how dangerous this policy can be. In theory if you are looking at a spreadsheet and assume rational well meaning players it is brilliant. In reality when you are printing money and handing it to the same people that created the housing bubble you are staring at a disaster.

Let us talk about what this is really about. The banks are in trouble again and need the Fed to rescue them. The banks will take the money from the Fed speculate on commodities and bid up the price of consumer goods at the same time the dollar devalues in reaction to the Fed's move. This will make things more expensive for firms that actually produce things like Kraft and Caterpillar and increase the cost of oil increasing the cost of all consumer goods. In an environment when wages are increasing with the cost of inputs and consumers can absorb the price increases this is no big deal. In a 9.6% U3 and 17% U6 environment this amounts to a tax on the working class that actually produces things other than derivatives and debt. The offset of decreased borrowing cost will not offset the increase in input cost.

This is the stuff that violent revolutions are made of. Call this what it is, a tax on the working class to save the banks for a 3rd time.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:44 AM on 11/07/2010
From the point of view of economists, the problem is that there is too much in savings. Not everyone is in debt. Many businesses and individuals are flush with cash. So how do you get them to spend, as spending will help the economy and create jobs?

Fiscal policy is dead. Monetary policy is the only way available. To do that, you need to create negative real interest rates, which makes it so people will lose money on savings compared to inflation, so they will spend it or invest it in higher risk investments. Look up the Fisher equation to understand how this is done.

I'm guessing you're a conservative. Read this op-ed from Bush's economic advisor to understand what I'm talking about:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/19/business/economy/19view.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1289147672-RteKhnH+L2mgkjSQtWCYWQ

http://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/2009/04/observations-on-negative-interest-rates.html
12:00 PM on 11/07/2010
Actually I'm pretty liberal. I just don't have much faith in the monetarist nonsense that got us into this mess to begin with.

I think this will result in higher cost on consumers for fuel and food and will result in lower spending. I also think you are about to put a bunch of small businesses out of business by increasing the cost of the commodities they depend on in an environment of diminished demand.

You never addressed the primary concern other than to say you are trying to force capital in riskier asset classes and you have no guarantee that move will be domestic.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:01 PM on 11/07/2010
If you're a liberal, read Paul Krugman and substitute the US whenever you see Japan. We're trying to escape a liquidity trap:

http://www.slate.com/?id=1937
02:33 AM on 11/07/2010
Steve Ballmer dumped $1.3 billion in stock last week, what does he know that we do not? Actually insider sales outnumber buys by a factor of 30 now... see: http://www.arabianmoney.net/us-stocks/2010/11/07/microsoft-ceo-sells-1-3bn-stake-as-insiders-head-for-the-exit/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:36 AM on 11/07/2010
Anybody notice the time stamping seems to be screwed up ?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:45 AM on 11/07/2010
Daylight savings time meltdown like the Y2K scare?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:34 AM on 11/07/2010
Mr. Volcker, the question then is, will it hurt the economy ?

If yes, tell the President.

And do knock some sense in him now that Larry Summers is gone.
Impaler
Ride to the sound of gunfire
01:29 AM on 11/07/2010
Some how, I feel the dark side involved in this, and its Emperor S O R O S, plan to make billions in currency transactions (he does, and has done this) he will start an early sell off of dollars, crash the price then make billions when it reverses. Let's not forget Obama is just his study,.