iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Tea Party Favorites Rand Paul & Jim DeMint Struggle To Name Specific Budget Cuts (VIDEO)


First Posted: 11/07/10 12:15 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:10 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- Signaling how difficult it will be for the Republican Party to live up to its campaign promises of cutting spending while preserving the Bush tax cuts and not cutting benefits for seniors, Tea Party favorites Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) and Sen.-elect Rand Paul (R-Ky.) struggled on Sunday to actually name any specific cuts they plan on making.

On ABC's "This Week," Christiane Amanpour repeatedly pressed Paul to move beyond "slogans and platitudes" to "direct information" on how the Republican Party will balance the budget and cut the deficit.

Paul immediately reiterated that he was going to push for a balanced budget amendment and said that cuts needed to come from across the board -- including defense spending. Whenever Amanpour asked whether a specific program -- such as Medicare, Social Security and health care -- would be cut, Paul simply kept reiterating that he was going to be looking "across the board." He was unable, however, to actually name anything significant that would be on the chopping block:

AMANPOUR: Give me one specific cut, Senator-elect.

PAUL: All across the board.

AMANPOUR: One significant one. No, but you can't just keep saying all across the board.

PAUL: Well, no, I can, because I'm going to look at every program, every program. But I would freeze federal hiring. I would maybe reduce federal employees by 10 percent. I'd probably reduce their wages by 10 percent. The average federal employee makes $120,000 a year. The average private employee makes $60,000 a year. Let's get them more in line, and let's find savings. Let's hire no new federal workers.

AMANPOUR: Pay for soldiers? Would you cut that?

PAUL: I think that's something that you can't do. I don't think --

AMANPOUR: You cannot do? [...]

AMANPOUR: So, again, to talk about the debt and to talk about taxes, there seems to be, again, just so much sort of generalities, for want of a better word. [...]

PAUL: Well, the thing is that you can call it a generality, but what if -- what if I were president and I said to you, Tomorrow, we're going to have a 5 percent cut across the board in everything? That's not a generality, but there are thousands of programs. If you say, Well, what are all the specifics? There are books written on all the specifics. There's a book by Christopher Edwards, downsizing government, goes through every program. That's what it will take. It's a very detailed analysis.

DeMint had a similar experience on NBC's "Meet the Press." When asked by host David Gregory where the American people should be prepared to sacrifice in order to cut the deficit, DeMint said, "I don't think the American people are going to have to sacrifice as much as the government bureaucrats who get paid about twice what the American worker does. First of all, we just need to return to pre-Obama levels of spending in 2008. We need to cut earmarks so people can stop taking home the bacon, we need to defund Obamacare and then we need to look at the entitlement programs, such as the way Paul Ryan has done in the House with his Road to America's Future."

When Gregory pointed out that going back to 2008 spending levels won't get anywhere close to balancing the budget, he asked whether everything would be on the table. DeMint said he opposed cutting Social Security. "If we can just cut the administrative waste, we can cut hundreds of billions of dollars a year at the federal level. We need to keep our promises to seniors, David, and cutting benefits to seniors is not on the table." DeMint also said that cutting benefits for veterans is out.

WATCH:

Both DeMint and Paul said they oppose raising the debt ceiling, a procedure that Congress -- including Republicans -- do routinely.

Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Va.), who is likely to become the next House Majority Leader, refused to say on "Fox News Sunday" that he would make sure the government doesn't go into default on its debt, stating that it would be President Obama's fault if it does. "The president's got a responsibility as much or more so than Congress to make sure that we are continuing to function in a way that the people want," he said.

He has, however, left the door open to the GOP possibly supporting a raising of the debt ceiling by saying that the party will try to "demonstrate a commitment to the fiscal discipline and an established track record by the time that vote comes up."

Republicans -- including Sen. John Cornyn (Tex.) and Rep. Pete Sessions (Tex.) -- have consistently been unable to name specific cuts they will make to the budget in order to offset an extension of the Bush tax cuts. On Oct. 3, Paul also said that he didn't see extending the Bush tax cuts as "a cost to government."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Signaling how difficult it will be for the Republican Party to live up to its campaign promises of cutting spending while preserving the Bush tax cuts and not cutting benefits for senior...
WASHINGTON -- Signaling how difficult it will be for the Republican Party to live up to its campaign promises of cutting spending while preserving the Bush tax cuts and not cutting benefits for senior...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,963
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (109 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GreenKate
02:04 PM on 11/13/2010
If you cut services enough at any level of government non compliance with the law usually will increase. In my state the DMV is closed 20% of the time to save money. But even before they did this, going to the DMV was an all day affair. Pack a lunch and bring a book. If I did not have to use my car everyday for work I probably would have just said screw this.
The GOP cut the IRS about 15 years ago and the fat cats have been getting away with murder ever since. No one loves the IRS but their job is to catch white collar criminals. Had they been funded and allowed to do their job most of this Madoff and Goldman Sachs stuff would not have gone as far as it did.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GreenKate
06:32 AM on 11/13/2010
According to the US Civil Service website a college grad can expect to start at a grade 7 which pays about $32K per year. More if you live somewhere like NYC or SF, but not much more- you'll still have 2 roommates and live on ramen. If you enter the federal service with a masters degree they may start you at closer to $50K. This is a far cry from the average person making $120,000 as Rand Paul claims. After his 10% pay cut, if you have a 4 year degree, he wants to pay you about $28,000. He is trying to incite more hatred of government by lying and saying the average bureaucrat makes twice what the public earn. If the average college grad in private industry is getting $14,000 per year, we as a nation should throw in the towel.
08:56 PM on 11/22/2010
Only about 25% of adults in the United States are college graduates, so the salary of college graduates in their first year working for the federal government is a very small percentage of federal employees. Federal employees make about $70K per year, compared to $60K for private sector workers doing the same job. Benefits for federal workers are about $40K compared to about $10K for private sector workers. His numbers aren't exact, but, when benefits are taken into account, Rand Paul's statement is actually pretty accurate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GreenKate
06:15 AM on 11/13/2010
"The average fed employee makes $120,000 per year" NOT. The man is a liar, pure and simple.
Maybe his useless Washington DC friends do. But not the real civil servants who keep things running no matter which new busload of freaks the voters send up the hill every 2 years.

Let DeMint and Paul start by taking no salary for their upcoming term. That is the only way we the people will get our money's worth from these two.
12:54 AM on 11/13/2010
Earlier this week, USA Today published an analysis of the federal workforce showing that it pays to work for the government: The number of feds earning more than $150,000 per year has increased tenfold since 2005, and the number earning above $180,000 has increased twentyfold. That prompted us to take a look at White House salaries, and it turns out that working for Barack Obama is not a bad gig.
04:24 PM on 11/11/2010
When I worked as a government contractor at the Department of Labor, we had a couple of rounds of mandatory cuts. All of the government bigwigs spent all of their time in meetings trying to figure out how to cut the budget. That meant they were NOT ON THE JOB DOING WHAT THEY WERE HIRED TO DO. So how did they cut the budget? One of the first cuts was to the information technology budget. So when we ran reports that had to be distributed, we could no longer print 10 copies. We printed one copy, and someone stood at the copier and made the other 9 copies. Not because it was cheaper that way; it clearly was not. No, it was because the IT budget had been cut, but the adminstrative support budget had not.

It's a hypocritical shell game that will not save ONE NICKEL.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
diversityreport
Editor American Diversity Report
02:31 PM on 11/11/2010
Years ago I was asked by my urban planning professor, a former federal staffer from the Reagan era, how would I cut the federal budget by 10%. When everyone in the class cut 10% across all departments, he called us all cowards. He then instructed us to do the exercise again and choose priorities. We did. Our elected officials should also be required to make choices and back up heated rhetoric with details.
photo
IndyGuy
Et tu, Brute?
01:12 PM on 11/10/2010
This is why I find the whole "tea party/conservative Republican" party to be total BS. You can't even name something you'd cut?! And of course we know that to really get a hold of the debt we will need to kill the Bush tax cuts as well as major spending cuts to our huge entitlement: the military. But these people will never do any of those things. They faux populism was just used to get elected. All these people care about is power and their insignificant "cuts." What a joke! Hopefully the American people will see their true nature in 2012!
02:24 AM on 11/12/2010
Not wanting to be tied down to comments before you have a plan is a pretty smart idea. The one thing his daddy is, is consistent. The left has no idea what is coming. The irony.. all this chatter about peace and rights and you give your side a rubber stamp. Its pretty sad actually.
12:07 PM on 11/14/2010
No, what's sad is thinking that a politician doesn't need to have a plan until AFTER being elected. Running on principles without a practical method of applying said principles is an insane strategy to support. To break it down more simply, you can't run on "curbing spending" if you don't take it a step further and explain HOW you'd go about accomplishing it. Somehow these dopes got elected regardless, so it appears the voters are equally clueless... but my point still stands even if a majority is giving logic a cold shoulder.
Clevelandinwi
Progressive is good; regressive, not so much.
11:54 AM on 11/09/2010
demint and paul - sick and sicker.
02:44 AM on 11/12/2010
Obama and Pelosi - dumb and dumber.
04:45 AM on 11/09/2010
Cut their health-care for starters.
11:12 AM on 11/09/2010
Yes, and their government pay.
04:05 AM on 11/09/2010
Well, they could just compromise and circumcise each other.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
timzilla
10:25 PM on 11/08/2010
Lying lies and the liars that tell them. There are the same number of overworked federal employees today that there were in 1966 and they earn considerably less than their counterparts in the private sector. How about we start by cutting the salaries and benefits of members of Congress by 25%? That's where the real pork is.
02:27 AM on 11/12/2010
hahahahahahhaahhahahahahahahhaahhaahhaahahahhahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahah

whew... Im still laughing at that.

Overworked federal employees. Are you on drugs? Seriously. Show me a person in govt thats overworked because I have never seen any hard work from any govt employees.

Cake jobs. Nearly impossible to be fired from.. with the best healthcare on earth.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
timzilla
11:49 PM on 11/12/2010
You're watching too much C-SPAN. Federal employees are not having cocktails in DC bars at noon or chasing pages in the Senate cloakroom. Earmarks and contractors with lobbyist firms are the real porkers in the federal budget and everyone knows it.

The fact is granny gets her Social Security check on-time every month, the IRS processes electronic tax returns within a week, the mail hits your box 6-days a week and there are very few planes colliding in the sky due to controller error.

Maybe you are thinking about the State DMV. The fact is there are the same number of federal employees as there were 40-years ago. There are certainly more federal agencies with more missions to accomplish than during the Johnson Administration. It's common sense. Blaming federal employees to deflect from the real causes of the deficit is a very old ploy that just doesn't stand-up to reason. Cutting the pay of a Yellowstone park ranger or a TSA schmuck sniffing shoes for explosives at LAX really isn't going to make a dent in the deficit at all but it sure sounds good to a confused, angry and easily mislead voter.

http://www.data360.org/dsg.aspx?Data_Set_Group_Id=228
12:10 PM on 11/14/2010
I'm a full-time tutor for suspended and special ed kids at my local school district and I don't have any benefits whatsoever. No health care, no paid sick days, no paid vacations... nothing. I make $22/hour. Please explain to me again how my job is "cake" or how my healthcare is the "best".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:11 PM on 11/08/2010
Take a good look at this guy, would trust somebody named "Dement" that name alone should set off an alarm in your Head.(LOL)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CroatianCritter
is keeping people honest
08:02 PM on 11/08/2010
Once again, I will be the defender of Rand Paul on this website. Let's take a look at our budget deficit! What would you liberals do? Close to two trillion needs to be raised every year. Rand Paul (Like I expected) appears to be willing to slash our biggest deficit problem, the defense budget. I don't know how that can be seen as a bad thing? The path we are currently on can not be sustained. I also saw that interview and he does not appear to agree with the idea of cutting entitlement benefits. He knows (Like real budget hawks) that Social Security and Medicare have paid for themselves up to this point and the problem with these programs resides in the future. Liberals need to accept the fact that this government is too big, tyrannical and does not listen to the American populace anymore. The only way to get your government back appears to be slashing it apart. I agree with this philosophy. I also ask you this question, "What has the government done for you lately?" Kennedy was wrong. If you get taxed, the government SHOULD BE DOING things for you because they are stealing your income. They just take your money and give it to the politically connected and rich elites who have controlled this government over the past thirty years. So why do you want to keep paying taxes then?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:29 PM on 11/08/2010
How about the highway you drive on. How about that Fireman and Police Officer you want to see in time of trouble. How about that National Park you want to take a vacation in. And then there is your Armed Forces who might have to fight our Wars, oh and then Medicare, Medicade and So.Sec. You migtht not need any of these things, but the vast majorty of the rest of us Americans do. You Repubs don't think about anything but YOUR SELVES. Man, its a BIG WORLD out here and a lot of HUMAN BEINGS in it. People pay Taxes not because they like to, but because it is nesscesary to sustain a civilized society.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:38 PM on 11/08/2010
The Croation got me excited. I should have puntuated with (?) Questions marks in my reply.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CroatianCritter
is keeping people honest
10:49 PM on 11/08/2010
You completely missed my point. You can have these things. How are you going to pay for it? Like in real life, you may have to put the Call of Duty game or purchase of a hybrid on hold until you get enough money to pay for them. That is my point. You can't keep paying for these things with Chinese money. Something has to be cut. What is your solution?
11:25 AM on 11/09/2010
Wow, you've got so much goofy, and incorrect BS in your post that it's hard to figure out where to start. You're like a spoiled brat who has no clue why things are so nice. You need to move to some place that doesn't have a government; like Somalia. See how you like your food and water (if you can find food and water) without the FDA & water dept keeping them clean. See how things really work, without federal, state, or local institutions, regulations, rules, and laws.

For God's sake: do you Repubs run your families without rules? Marriage is a "regulated" entity. Raising capable children requires well defined rules, or else you get spoiled Jack-@sses. Even animals have rules among themselves.
06:35 PM on 11/08/2010
The "average" federal worker doesn't make 120k a year.

"Overall, federal workers earned an average salary of $67,691 in 2008 for occupations that exist both in government and the private sector, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data. The average pay for the same mix of jobs in the private sector was $60,046 in 2008, the most recent data available."

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2010-03-04-federal-pay_N.htm

He should stop cherry picking stats.
04:14 AM on 11/09/2010
All you could come up with is from USA Today? That is quite sad and shows how low the education standards have sunk. Furthermore, in many places, such the Pacific states, it is very hard to live on such a low salary. Perhaps, it would work for those in states of lower expectation and education, such as Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana, West Virginia, could get by on that, as most of you live in tar paper shacks and have outhouses.

You, and others just like you (Tea Bagger) need a lot of remedial something.
02:37 AM on 11/12/2010
Didnt know when you farted on a keyboard a bunch of hot air typed out.
12:59 AM on 11/13/2010
Earlier this week, USA Today published an analysis of the federal workforce showing that it pays to work for the government: The number of feds earning more than $150,000 per year has increased tenfold since 2005, and the number earning above $180,000 has increased twentyfold. That prompted us to take a look at White House salaries, and it turns out that working for Barack Obama is not a bad gig.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lesterbud
Facts ARE Liberty
05:02 PM on 11/08/2010
Paul's interview is getting huge play here in Europe (here on business - again). In a region where fair, insightful and probing reporting is expected, Amanpour is a proven champion. Rand looked small, dull and disingenuous - like a rat who thinks it knows where the cheese is.
He is simply a regressive little punk that used fear to get elcted. Now that he has done that, he has no clue what to do.
11:29 AM on 11/09/2010
My thoughts exactly.