iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

First Salvo In Social Security Fight: OweNo, A $20 Million Campaign Launched With Bayh, Conrad As Allies

First Posted: 11/09/10 03:51 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:10 PM ET

Evan Bayh Kent Conrad

WASHINGTON -- In what may be the first major move of the forthcoming Social Security debate, the Peterson Foundation launched on Tuesday a $20 million TV ad campaign to promote the need for a major discussion on debt and deficit reduction.

Titled "OweNo," the campaign, which promotes a mock presidential candidate irreverently named Hugh Jidette (get it? Huge debt), doesn't take on Social Security reform directly. But the connections are fairly obvious and it has the program's defenders deeply wary about being outgunned. The Peterson Foundation, for one, has never shied away from its push to reform the entitlement program. And in introducing the $20 million effort, the organization's founder, former Nixon commerce secretary and fiscal conservative Pete Peterson made it abundantly clear that Social Security is in his sights.

"Solving our fiscal issues without fundamental entitlement reform is a statistical impossibility," he said. "Entitlement reform must provide benefits for the most vulnerable. But if we wait too long to reform and we confront a crisis, the politics may become brutal and even violent and in such a situation there would be no assurance that the safety net, even for the most vulnerable, might not be seriously frayed."

Perhaps the most frightening part of the unveiling, however, is that Peterson -- long a scourge of progressives for having earned hundreds of millions in the hedge fund business while preaching financial sacrifice for others -- has prominent Democrats backing his latest campaign. Appearing alongside him at the Newsuem on Tuesday morning was outgoing Sen. Evan Bayh (D-Ind.) and Budget Committee Chair Sen. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.).

"People on the left who don't want to touch entitlements, that is just unrealistic," said Conrad. "I would say to my friends on the left it is unrealistic, Medicare and Social Security are headed for insolvency. The idea that nothing has to be done is divorced from reality. On the right, those who say no new revenue, I believe, are also in denial."

"The election a week ago today would have been a lot more edifying if we had more commercials like that then the ones running out there in the various states," Bayh said of the ad campaign. "Very impressive."

Rally - HD from Peterson Foundation on Vimeo.


The remark from Conrad carries additional resonance because of the senator's position on the presidential-appointed deficit commission. He is, in the end, just one of 18 members. But he's a Democratic member. And his open embrace of tackling Social Security reform -- even if it's on the margins -- gives a telling indication as to where the commission's conversation on entitlement reform is heading.

An equally telling aspect of the Peterson Foundation effort is the price tag. Twenty million dollars is a hefty sum for issue advocacy. And as witnessed during the health care reform debate, ad expenditures do have the capacity to frame public opinion so long as they're not counteracted with effective pushback. The Peterson Foundation's resources won't be matched by the other side of the ideological divide, which notes that Social Security not only survived the most recent crash just fine but will also be paying full benefits through 2037 (and 75-percent benefits for 100 years after that).

The OweNo campaign will appear on national television during the Sunday news shows, cable programs, online, and on select billboards. It will also cater to two specific markets: Denver and Columbus. And while those two cities may seem like random choices, it's worth noting that on Tuesday morning, Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), fresh off a close election win, argued that it is time for a "conversation" on Social Security reform.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- In what may be the first major move of the forthcoming Social Security debate, the Peterson Foundation launched on Tuesday a $20 million TV ad campaign to promote the need for a major di...
WASHINGTON -- In what may be the first major move of the forthcoming Social Security debate, the Peterson Foundation launched on Tuesday a $20 million TV ad campaign to promote the need for a major di...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,055
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (69 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:23 PM on 12/10/2010
all the Boomers out there who have paid into this all your working life are going to be left high and dry if these people get their way. Want to lower the deficit? CUT THE MILITARY BUDGET. Bush doubled it in 8 years. Start getting better work out of Homeland Security than the hokey-jokey airport assaults
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
BLGould
Webcams are a perfect excuse for guerilla theatre!
09:50 PM on 11/23/2010
Today, I began seeing Peter G. Peterson Foundation TV spots, portraying a fictional Presidential candidate, Hugh Jidette (get it? "Huge Debt"?), bragging about driving our nation into a national debt hole we will never climb out of. It's VERY clever propaganda. It's about 10 YEARS TOO LATE.

Billionaire Peterson's propaganda campaign should have started with the Bush/Cheney administration turning a $250 Billion SURPLUS into a $1.3 TRILLION DEBT. It didn't. Peterson's "foundation" found its voice only AFTER WE elected a Democrat as our President.

Billionaire Peterson has targeted Social Security as the CAUSES of our national debt. No mention of the TENS OF BILLIONS wasted in Bush/Cheney's Iraq War; no mention of the $700 BILLION in debt we would incur extending the Bush tax cuts for the top 2% like... Peterson.

The annual income cap on Social Security payments is $100K. If you earn less than $100K, your liability is 100% relative to your earnings. If your income is $1 Million, it is 10% relative to your annual earnings and if you're a BILLIONAIRE like Peterson et al, it is 0.1% OR LESS. The burden for OUR Social Security system is born mostly by US MIDDLE CLASS TAXPAYERS, yet that 10% to 0.1% OR LESS is TOO MUCH for the wealthiest to bear.

"LittleSis" http://littlesis.org/person/33849/Peter_G_Peterson and FAIR http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=4106 have a clear picture of Peterson and his poisonous "philanthropy". Visit BOTH.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:25 PM on 12/10/2010
I think we can safely predict that this campaign will brainwash those without critical thinking skills
11:08 AM on 11/14/2010
This is an extremely important issue. I believe that the plan for debt reduction should come up for a "special election vote by the people". Our congress and Senate has proven that they cannot be trusted not to be bribed or conjoled. The PEOPLE should decide what is going to cut and whether or not taxes get raised. Congress and Senate are not concerned about American citizens they are only concerned about thier own pitiful job and benefits and perks. Let the people decide this one.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
BLGould
Webcams are a perfect excuse for guerilla theatre!
10:34 PM on 11/23/2010
I heartily support plebiscites as expressions of the will of the people. They can also be manipulated by obscenely wealthy people controlling our media to enslave us through duplicity and deception. Be careful what you wish for. You may get it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:26 PM on 12/10/2010
as opposed to what we have now?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
outofstepper
C21H30O2
03:21 AM on 11/11/2010
Social Security does not impact the deficit or the debt in any way. The Republicans want to raid the trillions of dollars that are in there so they can spend it on tax cuts for the richest Americans, plain and simple. Eliminating Social Security would not shave one penny off of the deficit unless you took those trillions of dollars and paid off the debt. (Not likely to happen though).
12:40 PM on 11/11/2010
The proposals don't remove ANY money from the social security system. They ADD money by increasing the pay cap somewhat. An addition is when you take money that is outside the current social security system and put it in. A raid of the social security system would be if we exempted baseball players from paying social security taxes, or doubled their benefits.

The proposals move money around from one group in social security to another. For example, changing the PIA formula to lower benefits to higher incomes for future retirees. No money leaves the SS system.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:43 AM on 11/13/2010
Its NOT necessary to begin with and it certainly is not a bi partisan commission.

Obama is in on it too!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:27 PM on 12/10/2010
what does the proposal raise the cap to?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mad as heck
Just say No to lobbyists
09:36 PM on 11/10/2010
Why do they call SS and Medicare "entitlements"? We pay into them with every paycheck. I call foul on trying to make them sound like freebies or handouts, and therefore ripe for elimination.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:41 AM on 11/13/2010
They want you to believe it is broke so they can gain more access to the fund itself.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:28 PM on 12/10/2010
they're being obtuse, and you are right to call them on it, they're both insurance programs, and we pay premiums to them
08:49 PM on 11/10/2010
Why not donate the $20 million to a job creation program instead of promoting this job elimination and attack Social Security report.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marie Russell-Barker
Grandmother, Greatgrandmother.
06:32 PM on 11/10/2010
Sen. Evan Bayh (D-Ind.) and Budget Committee Chair Sen. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.), Bayh is a turn coat, I don't like someone who quits and right away go out and find a micro phone to down the ones that stayed and fought. Just mark my word he is on his way to become one of those who are going to become a Republican. He claim that there were to much fighting in the Senate now a days for him to complete his term. Oh well I guess if you can not stand the heat get out of the kitchen, and the Budget Committee Chair Sen. Conrad, fits in that category as well.

I have found something very puzzling to me. Those who want to cut Medicare never refuse it, one do have that options but nobody ever do not even the very rich why? This would be funny except for the advertisement and the money changing hands how did this happened how do this serve the Citizens, beside scarring them to death.
photo
You Are My Density
Independent--it's just ONE country.
06:09 PM on 11/10/2010
Gotta love how they want to make it more difficult for seniors and the disabled (1/3 of all SS payments go to people who are disabled and can't work or orphans) to live. Why isn't anyone talking about taxing the rich more? Why are they SO privileged? And if not more, why not tax the rich at the same levels everyone else is being taxed? Why should a rich person who makes most of his money in the stock market pay a lower percentage of his income in taxes than someone scraping by on a clerk's salary? Social Security is NOT in trouble. It has money, lots of it, till 2037. And if we want it to go on in perpetuity, all we have to do is have the rich pay the same thing everyone else does for Social Security, and that would take care of it without having to change benefits or raise retirement ages, which isn't good for the economy since it keeps young people from jobs they might have if older people were able to retire. I really wonder why the facts can't be agreed on in this country. The fright-wing media puts lies out there every day, people believe them, and then we're all making choices based on fantasy instead of reality, and somehow this is allowed to continue, all to the benefit of the rich and to the detriment of the poor and middle class. When are we going to wake up?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
littleblackcat
04:49 PM on 11/10/2010
There are two reforms I can suggest for Social Security: One is to lift the cap on earnings and gauge benefits according to need since if you are living off the income of your multi-million-dollar investments to the tune of three million a year, you do not need a check from Social Security at all. You would never miss the money taken out of your income either.
The other, and this one is really a serious need: All persons receiving Social Security Disability should be evaluated periodically. In the little New England town where I live, there are dozens of healthy young people who are on SSD for absolutely no good reason. During one of our events, one of these was working for the town, setting up tents, etc. and I asked him where he worked. He said he was on SSD and I asked why? He looked me right in the eye and replied "Mental retardation." My reply to him was "Nonsense! You may not be an Einstein, you may even be a bit slow-minded but retarded you are NOT! You are perfectly capable to do the work at the site and you need to be looking for work with which you are comfortable." His answer? "Why should I?"
You can't blame him though, look how the rich abuse the rest of us, and those of us in the middle are tired of being squeezed.
11:15 AM on 11/14/2010
If you pay int it, you are entitle to get it. SS belongs to the American citizens who have paid into itas required. It should be off the table for any body to mess with. Keeping it free of fraud should be the only contact government has with it. That and sending out the checks!!
photo
comicpro
Stupid Should Be Painful
04:10 PM on 11/10/2010
Perhaps the most frightening part of the unveiling, however, is that Peterson -- long a scourge of progressives for having earned hundreds of millions in the hedge fund business while preaching financial sacrifice for others -- has prominent Democrats backing his latest campaign. Appearing alongside him at the Newsuem on Tuesday morning was outgoing Sen. Evan Bayh (D-Ind.) and Budget Committee Chair Sen. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.).
=================================================================
Those are not Democrats but Blue Dog Rethugs! another rich person telling us poor folk what we need to do. Unreal.
08:39 PM on 11/10/2010
Evan Bayh and Kent Conrad has been a thorn in the side of Democrats making real progress for a long time. Like Ronald Reagan, a little money Bay's rich wife who sat on multiple
Health Insurance Companies boards changed his politics.
01:48 PM on 11/10/2010
There is no money for SS or medicare, no money for the poor or seniors, but PLENTY of money for wars and the military industrial complex and for tax cuts for billionaires. Why not raise the cap for social security so billionaires pay the same ss tax that I do? That would fix social security forever. Oh yeah, it effects the rich so we can't have that.

In related news, the demand for cat food is expected to soar, Purina stock at all time highs...
03:01 PM on 11/10/2010
I hate cat food. How about modifying my letter below? I really hope everyone who reads this becomes an immediate activist and sends something like it to all of your congresspeople immediately. If we don't take action our life savings will be decimated. Again.

Find your congresspeople at: http://www­.congress.­org/congre­ssorg/dbq/­officials/

Dear ____:

I understand an enormous ad campaign is underway to convince us that it's for our own good that our SS/Medicare benefits be reduced or eliminated. These benefits are being demonized as "entitlements," or worse, "suckling at the government teat."

We regular citizens have contributed to what can only be described as a compulsory government savings program for our entire working lives. We have paid over 9% of our salaries with our employers matching that, or, if self-employed, we have contributed over 18%.

I demand you not compromise our benefits in any way. This is our money. We demand the services for which we paid these enormous amounts. Any compromise means that you endorse the largest tax hike in the history of the nation, or more aptly, the biggest tax fraud.

Get the money by getting us out of Iraq and Afghanistan. Or, the top 2% of Americans need to pay just taxes. Or you can remove the SS cap. But don't even think about stepping on the backs of the middle and lower class.

Please e-mail me immediately to let me know your position. Thank you for your attention.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CTtransplant
We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow
04:13 PM on 11/10/2010
Terrific letter, buster!  Thank you!  Folks, it's pretty well done for you - and, I don't know about YOU, but I'm going to take advantage of buster's time and generosity in creating this...and send it to as MANY of my elected officials as I can!  Good job, buster!  Much appreciated!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:55 PM on 11/10/2010
I sent it to 2 of my so called representatives, both dems, but they've both already made their position clear.

*SS has to be fixed.*

Just like there are WMD's in Iraq.
Just like we don't torture.
So many lies, so little time.
01:45 PM on 11/10/2010
A draft proposal by the deficit commission today suggests curbing Social Security benefits and raising the retirement age and $200 billion a year in domestic and defense spending cuts.

They plan on shrinking the size and freezing the pay of the federal workforce.

The cuts are part of suggestions by the commission co-chairmen to save more than $3.8 trillion over the next decade by cutting programs and by squeezing Social Security and health benefits, wiping out tax breaks and overhauling the budget process.

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2010/11/deficit-commission-co-chairs-propose-curbing-social-security-increases-/1
02:09 PM on 11/10/2010
USA Today reports:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2010-11-10-federal-savings-social-security_N.htm

• Future changes to Social Security designed to ensure its solvency for 75 years, rather than 27 years as currently designed. Wealthier recipients would get less in benefits, wealthier workers would pay more in payroll taxes, and the retirement age would be raised to 69 by 2075.

To make the plan more palatable, a new special minimum benefit would be added to keep minimum-wage workers who completed their careers above the poverty threshold in retirement.
12:00 PM on 11/11/2010
They have always paid a larger percentage to the lower paid workers. That is not new. I sometimes think the commission are being fed untrue facts.
08:45 PM on 11/10/2010
How about them letting the tax cuts expire. I tell you they are thrying to do this and then they can claim they found the money to pay for the tax cuts of the wealthy.How about they pass the Bill in the Senate discontinuing the tax break corporations receive by reducing their taxes in the U.S.
by the taxes they pay on their overseas businesses. I suppose it is still on hold in the Senate.

If they do this all those bewildered Tea Party people who do not want their SS and Medicare
cut, will not know what hit them.
01:41 PM on 11/10/2010
it becomes more and more clear that our experiment in democracy will not work. it is a truism that those with the most resources will prevail. well, it was great while it lasted.

why don't we ask our scandanavian socialist friends to help us form a new society. after all, they seem to follow the teachings of Jesus with a smattering of democracy.

i have always been amazed that we in america could think that capitalism and christianity could coexist on one piece of land.
photo
comicpro
Stupid Should Be Painful
04:12 PM on 11/10/2010
I am a rogue who will soon start preying on the rich and violently taking away their riches by force. That is what is coming down the pike. America is doomed to be a separate divided country and I plan on taking mine!
photo
MaryMay
May your tears come from laughing
05:25 PM on 11/10/2010
Sounds extreme, but we watched Marie Antoinette last night (Sophia Coppola's movie) and when the "peasants" stormed the Bastille and actually got to Versailles, that was the end for the aristocracy that spent France into bankruptcy. When you watch the movie, you are held in a state of disbelief at the extreme extravagance of the royal court while people literally starved.

At the end, you saw the royal bedchamber stripped and in shambles. Your post brought that scene to mind.

I can't say I advocate violence, or taking someone else's property, though after watching this movie, I can see how it could happen here in America if things keep going the way they are.
08:47 PM on 11/10/2010
or Capitalism and Democracy. Or our Constitution and Capitalism.Capitalism by its very nature will turn corrupt, because people are corrupted by money. Regulation is the only answer and
there is no regulation any moe.
le marc
vietvet,old guy,been alot of places in the world,
01:36 PM on 11/10/2010
All I can say is good luck on that fellers. Do you really think that you can convince the average person who really works for a living to give up something they, and their employer, have been paying forward into for decades. The thing they do not understand about Medicare and SS is that, like the NRA and guns, they "will have to pry it loose from my cold, dead hands". You tell a factory, construction, or any other grunt worker to wait until 70 to collect, or look to Wall St. for retirement dough, and see what they say.
01:34 PM on 11/10/2010
So called Democrats that promote this agenda based on the "insolvency" lie should be sued for propaganda.

The facts don't change based on Petersons unsubstantiated assertions.