More

GE Makes Huge Technology Bet On China

11/ 9/10 03:29 PM ET   AP

Ge

NEW YORK — General Electric Co. plans to sink more than $2 billion into its efforts in China through 2012 as the conglomerate looks to tackle the country's pressing energy and infrastructure needs.

GE said Tuesday that it will likely spend $500 million on research and development and new customer innovation centers in China, adding more than 1,000 new jobs. More than $1.5 billion is expected to be put toward new joint ventures with Chinese state-owned enterprises in high-technology sectors.

The news comes a day after GE named John Rice head of global operations. In that role, Rice will concentrate on growth in markets including China, India, the Middle East and Brazil. It also comes after GE emerged as a big winner from President Barack Obama's trip to India, as the company signed multiple deals in that market.

GE sees huge potential in both India and China. China's rapid growth over the past 10 years has left it grappling to find enough energy to support its companies and residents, which GE plans to service. A partnership with State Grid Corp. of China, a power distributor and one of the world's biggest utilities, will help provide more access to the region.

"China is one of the world's fastest growing areas with a tremendous need for infrastructure," Dan Heintzelman, president and CEO of GE Energy Services, said in a statement.

GE, which began business in China in 1906, is looking to keep pace with China's migration from a rural to an urban society. Heintzelman notes that the country is likely to be predominantly urban by 2020, and will need to make big changes to its electric distribution.

Chairman and CEO Jeff Immelt added in a statement that China is the world's fastest-growing market for aviation, energy, transportation, health care and financial services.

The company, based in Fairfield, Conn., has 36 wholly owned entities and joint ventures in China in manufacturing, service and research and development. It has 14,000 workers in China.

GE said the new customer innovation centers, which will be built in six cities, will be used to better serve the west, north, central and south China markets. Among the cities being considered for centers include Chengdu, Shenyang and Xian. The new facilities will work closely with existing research and development operations in Shanghai, Beijing and Wuxi.

The centers will concentrate on product development, engineering, sourcing support and delivery in areas such as rural health care, renewable and clean energy, energy-efficient lighting, rail and aviation.

To accomplish its work in these areas, GE is teaming with Chinese businesses. In addition to the partnership with State Grid, GE agreed to start a joint venture with Beijing National Railway Research & Design Institute of Signal & Communication to supply railway and urban transit signaling systems.

GE is looking to form a joint venture with Chengdu Locomotive & Rolling Stock Works, a company owned by China South Locomotive and Rolling Stock Corp., to create systems and parts for diesel locomotives. It also is involved in a joint acquisition with State Grid-owned Shanghai Electric Power Co. for a controlling interest in Shanghai Tianling Switchgear Co., a Shanghai-based maker of green power distribution equipment.

"These commitments represent GE's confidence in China's long-term economic prospects," Mark Norbom, president and CEO of GE Greater China, said in a statement.

The deals come on top of those signed in India. Immelt traveled to India this past weekend with Obama and other executives looking to drum up business for U.S. companies.

GE was selected to provide the 107 F414 engines for Tejas light combat aircraft, in a transaction tentatively valued at $822 million. GE Transportation was chosen as one of two bidders to make 1,000 diesel locomotives over the next decade, in a deal that could be worth over $1 billion. And GE also signed a $750 million turbine deal.

Shares of GE shed 2 cents to $16.68 in afternoon trading.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Filed by Ryan McCarthy  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 99
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
goodmarina
Most People use Religion to justify their bias!
09:52 PM on 11/09/2010
And who is going to take a chance on the American worker?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Republican = FAIL
07:46 PM on 11/09/2010
I am going to laugh sooo hard when China nationalizes all of GEs business.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GPTP
09:12 PM on 11/09/2010
LOL
06:19 PM on 11/09/2010
If India opens it's markets, it will become another US in short order. China will simply flood it with cheap goods.

In India, cheap is king. Unless they somehow agree to keep china out we can't win this
06:17 PM on 11/09/2010
these companies could careless about America and we in the US need to start caring less about them. The discussions in these boardrooms haven't been about how to help America out of it's funk or how their globalization schemes haven't helped anyone but themselves.
04:57 PM on 11/09/2010
Am I my brother's keeper?

More crucially, is any American corporation obligated to "take care of" other Americans (other than the shareholders of said corporation)?

That is ultimately the question, and most big corporations answer it in the negative. There are no laws mandating it. It is quintessentially American to make the most profits in business, and it is not the most profitable to invest in America except in limited circumstances.

Those are structural facts. If you seek to change them, you are changing the core values of America.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Republican = FAIL
07:50 PM on 11/09/2010
What would you know about America, fool.
04:26 PM on 11/09/2010
I don't mind putting my neck on the line, so I will make this prediction:

If President Obama makes a deal with India for them to open their large and growing consumer market to American Corporations, and if the Republican Congress refuses to remove the special tax treatment that Corporations receive for shipping jobs overseas, American Corporations will sign contracts to deliver American made products to India, but instead of investing in manufacturing plants in America, American Corporations will open factories in China and other Asian Countries and then ship products with American Corporate Labels to India directly from those Asian Countries.

The US Chamber of Commerce will defend the actions claiming:

#1. It is good for the Profit sheet of American Corporations.

#2. It is good for the 401k plans of average Americans.

The US Chamber of Commerce will call bogus the claim that unless jobs are created on American soil, the present 401k owners will be the last Americans to have a 401k plan or any other job benefit.

FreddieVee
04:19 PM on 11/09/2010
GE's CEO and Obama are tight. Why?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Angel R1240
Progressive for REAL change
04:09 PM on 11/09/2010
Well GE is creating jobs in China and in India and not in America. Well GE is another mulitinational corporation that is not interested in creating jobs in America but they want to create jobs in China and in India I believe one of the reasons is because they want to take advantage of the tax cuts to create jobs overseas by the way which does not make any sense why would we want to help corporations create jobs overseas when we need the jobs here in America.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GPTP
09:13 PM on 11/09/2010
Their responsibility is to create profit not jobs.
04:00 PM on 11/09/2010
What are you? A bunch of commies?? Don't you know that it is unAmerican to question others' unfettered use of their private property?

It is more PROFITABLE to do it in China - not just manufacturing - R&D costs a mere 20% if done in China. Any surprise that most of the Fortune international 500 have R&D centers in China? The workers are smart and well educated, and they work hard, and do not mind long hours (as long as they are paid well by Chinese standards). Can't beat that combination.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:13 PM on 11/09/2010
HILARIOUS. you call us commies because we want to engage in the capitalist system of working for money, and you defend China, who ARE COMMIES.

here's a little lesson in economics, since you think you are the master of all economic and american theories:

China, by exploiting workers, poisoning the planet and depleting resources IS EXTERNALIZING ITS COSTS, which is the only reason it is "profitable" to do business there. If, say, they were required by a trade treaty to stop externalizing costs and start charging what it really costs to do business that doesn't kill workers and the planet, you would find that most jobs would return to the US, because there would no longer be such an "end price" differential.

And there is nothing "un-american" about questioning abuses of workers and the planet for private profits, quite the opposite, which is what makes us better than exploiter-nations and a preferred site for investment.
06:43 PM on 11/09/2010
You mean better "AT" exploitation?

About 80% of the $300 Billion exported to America are exported by AMERICAN companies from China. Those practices, if true, are largely the fault of the American companies.

Have you noticed that Beijing does not really care all that much whether exports are $300 Billion? China only earns measly labor costs in assembly, and get hit with all these costs that should be 'externalized'. Beyond a certain point it is not worth it.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Rick Carnes
03:59 PM on 11/09/2010
You could have bought GE stock on March 2, 2009 for 7.09, today it is at 16.61 for a 234% profit.

The stock market is up 80% since 2008. The largest run-up since WWII.

The money is in investing, not in working.

I'm not saying this is right... I'm just saying it is what it is.
06:45 PM on 11/09/2010
This is what Dagong wrote in this week's downgrade of American debt to AA+:

"The root cause is that something is wrong with the economic development model adopted by the United States [...] Due to the high economic financialization, more than half of the profits in the real economy come from the returns of financial activities. If we exclude the factor of virtual economy, the U.S. actual GDP is about 5 trillion U.S. dollars in 2009, per capita GDP about $ 15,000. Meanwhile, the total domestic consumption was 10.0 trillion U.S. dollars and government expenditure was 4.5 trillion U.S. dollars. The production capacity of real value in the national economy is the material base to arrange social distribution and consumption. As the U.S. government arranges its budget according to the GDP including the virtual value, its revenue must fall short of its expenditure, so the socialization and normalization of debts will exacerbate the environment of economic development. It is predicted that the average real GDP per year of the United States will not reach 6 trillion U.S. dollar and per capita GDP will be less than 20,000 in the coming 3-5 years."

In September, 2010, the Securities and Exchange Commission denied the application of Dagong to become a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization in the U.S.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Rick Carnes
06:16 PM on 11/10/2010
Wow... what can you say but "Ouch"...

I think someone needs to cut up the credit cards!
Funny that the Chinese are downgrading debt that they hold so much of!

They have based their entire economy on selling exports into our market. Now they say we can't afford them. Ya' gotta' love that!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Edward Murray
McSweeney's, Daily Kos, The 4-Hour Workweek
03:16 PM on 11/09/2010
Just curious, where's the conservative outrage over a private company dumping $2bn into a Chinese investment overseas?

Obama couldn't even VISIT India in an effort to secure more jobs in America without the smear campaign kicking into high gear.

Oh, right, but I forgot: Every move one political party makes is trying to strip you of your liberties, and every move that a different party and private businesses make is for your own good.
03:02 PM on 11/09/2010
GE forgets that China is a "one copy country". Many software and computer makers learned to their chagrin that China buys one copy of a program or one computer and then reverse engineers it (or just flat out copies it) and produces their own. They will do the same to GE.
02:40 PM on 11/09/2010
So, when the rethugs and baggers argue that the top 1 percent MUST have their Bush tax break, because after all, they are the ones investing and creating jobs, they always fail to mention that THESE are the jobs being created and invested in. And to think, they have supporters. Not sayin all rethugs and baggers are stupid, but the stupid do seem to be drawn to that crowd.
02:04 PM on 11/09/2010
China is almost exactly as large geographically as the continental United States, but China has a billion more citizens than we do. It makes sense for GE and other global firms to foster cooperative ventures with the Chinese. In fact it would be foolhardy for GE to ignore China.

Many people view China as a source of cheap labor for American companies and obviously that has been the case for some time, but it will not continue indefinitely. Every year more Chinese enter the middle class and they will not go back to being our stooges and working for peanuts. Wages are rising in China every year.

GE is farsighted and smart to invest heavily in China and the returns on their investments down the road will be enormous.
KnoxScott
whatever
01:59 PM on 11/09/2010
F*#$K GE!