iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Murkowski Write-In Count: Miller Files Lawsuit To Enforce Spelling In Alaska Senate Race

BECKY BOHRER   11/ 9/10 10:44 PM ET   AP

Murkowski Write In Ballot Count
A ballot showing a vote for U.S. Senate write-in candidate Lisa Murkowski is seen as the absentee ballots are counted at the State of Alaska Division of Elections Office November 9, 2010 in Fairbanks, Alaska. U.S. Senate incumbent and write-in candidate Lisa Murkowski holds a narrow lead against the Republican nominee and Tea Party-backed candidate Joe Miller, who defeated Murkowski in the Republican primary election. (Photo by Eric Engman/Getty Images)

JUNEAU, Alaska — Election workers will begin scrutinizing tens of thousands of ballots in the Alaska Senate race on Wednesday in a scene reminiscent of the 2000 Florida recount. There will be no hanging chads this time around – just lots of scribbled names.

The vote count could help determine whether Sen. Lisa Murkowski wins re-election as a write-in candidate – or whether the courts get the final say in what has been a fiercely contested race.

Murkowski waged an aggressive write-in campaign after losing the GOP primary to the Sarah Palin-backed candidate Joe Miller. Write-ins held an overall lead of 11,557 Tuesday, when early-cast and some absentee ballots were added to the election night count. It remains unclear how many of those write-ins were for Murkowski or for the 159 other write-in candidates.

In the first batch of nearly 22,500 absentee and early cast ballots counted Tuesday, Miller showed a gain of 1,882 votes on the write-in candidates. A total of nearly 29,000 absentee ballots were expected to be tallied Tuesday.

Miller has ceded nothing, calling Murkowski's pronouncement that she's "made history" premature.

The two sides have hired attorneys and started raising money for what could become a lengthy court battle – the first lawsuit was filed late Tuesday – particularly if the vote count tightens. Murkowski's legal team includes Ben Ginsberg, who worked for George W. Bush and Dick Cheney during the 2000 Florida recount.

In that presidential election, it boiled down to ballots with hanging chads and confusion over what votes to count. There are no chads in Alaska's election process. To make a vote count, voters had to fill in an oval on the write-in section of the ballot, and then write a name.

That's where it gets complicated.

What happens if people misspell Murkowski? What if the handwriting isn't legible? What if a voter scribbles the name "Lisa M." instead of the full Murkowski?

Under state law, the write-in oval must be filled in and either a candidate's last name or the name as it appears on her candidacy declaration has to be written in. Miller's attorney, Thomas Van Flein, said he intends to hold the state to that standard.

Election officials made clear Monday that they will use discretion in determining voter intent where the written name "appears to be a variation or misspelling" of Murkowski or Lisa Murkowski. Van Flein called that practice unacceptable.

Van Flein filed a lawsuit Tuesday asking a federal judge to uphold that law. He's seeking a Wednesday hearing. A spokesman for the Alaska Division of Law had no immediate comment.

Lt. Gov. Craig Campbell, who oversees elections, said the write-in count would go on as scheduled Wednesday.

The process will play out like this: Beginning Wednesday in an obscure building on the outskirts of Juneau, there were will be 15 tables where 30 ballot counters will analyze more than 91,000 write-in ballots by hand. Each table will count an Alaska house district, and work through it one precinct at a time.

The campaigns will have one observer each at every table, and reporters will be allowed in the room to watch the count unfold. Alaska Division of Elections Director Gail Fenumiai will be on hand to settle disputes, in consultation with legal counsel for the state.

The ballots will be brought onsite by a security detail, and will remain at the counting site.

Neither Miller nor Murkowski plans to be on hand for the count. Miller was in Juneau on Tuesday to meet with volunteers, then planned to spend the rest of the week elsewhere in Alaska.

Murkowski returned to Washington for a legal defense fund fundraiser on Monday. She planned to spend time with family and return to work when the lame duck session of Congress convenes Monday.

Both campaigns were training observers Tuesday.

Murkowski spent much of her campaign educating voters on the write-in process. "Fill it in, write it in," became her mantra and she handed out wristbands and even ran an ad riffing on a spelling bee aimed at instructing voters how to spell her name properly.

This is the first write-in campaign in a major race in Alaska since 1998, and election officials were still finalizing instructions for ballot counters Monday, leaving campaign officials grumbling.

Officials have at times made contradictory statements or changed things.

For example, the counting of write-in ballots was pushed up eight days from the initially announced date. The move was intended to avoid keeping citizens and candidates in the dark, said Lt. Gov. Craig Campbell, who oversees elections. Van Flein said it created logistical hurdles.

Campbell also reversed course and said a write-in vote for "Joe Miller" would count toward the GOP nominee's tally.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
JUNEAU, Alaska — Election workers will begin scrutinizing tens of thousands of ballots in the Alaska Senate race on Wednesday in a scene reminiscent of the 2000 Florida recount. There will be no...
JUNEAU, Alaska — Election workers will begin scrutinizing tens of thousands of ballots in the Alaska Senate race on Wednesday in a scene reminiscent of the 2000 Florida recount. There will be no...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,803
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (48 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:53 PM on 11/10/2010
I grew up in a neighborhood that was mostly Polish and German, and believe me, after growing up going to Roszczynyk's pharmacy for prescriptions, walking past Leszczynksi's funeral home on the way to St. Mary's of Czestochowa school where Father Grndzlewski taught catechism, M-U-R-K-O-W-S-K-I is a piece of cake.
05:56 PM on 11/10/2010
Effective corporate lackey
versus
Lunatic corporate lackey

Should we care?
If so, aren't we better off with the Republican that will achieve less damage to civilization?
05:53 PM on 11/10/2010
Does "Murkowsky" count?

What if the "i" in "Murkowski" is not dotted?
11:47 PM on 11/10/2010
how about LM
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gevan
big dubya
04:08 PM on 11/10/2010
As Alaska used to be Russian, would write in votes cast written in Cyrillic be counted?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:38 AM on 11/11/2010
Мурковски!
thekid360
Black, Union and Proud, Booyah
03:57 PM on 11/10/2010
Frankly I don't care for either one of them but Miller probably has a valid reason to complain, considering Alaska would appear to be a low intellingent state. After all they did elect a certified
nut to be governor.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:40 AM on 11/11/2010
I think Alaska would fare much better if they had their elections in the summer months, before the descent of the long Arctic night and the seasonal affective disorder.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gevan
big dubya
04:01 AM on 11/11/2010
Congress only standardized Congressional elections in the 1870s, but they didn't think Alaska would be taking part then.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marie Russell-Barker
Grandmother, Greatgrandmother.
02:56 PM on 11/10/2010
How could any one in their right mind have voted for someone that cheated and had another person fired by suing different computers started a complaint against this person set it up on the Job computer and signed in as another person on their computer and complained against the person that the complaint was against. How could anyone trust him. He is a disgrace to the human race. He is not worthy of becoming a Senator representing Alaska or any other state. He should be in jail if you ask me.
photo
freddsky
The youth culture has fled its Petri dish!
01:35 PM on 11/10/2010
Suppose I live in Wassilly AK and I wanted to vote for Dennis Miller (or Elva Miller) only I hit my head on the way to the polling booth. Dazed and headachy afterwards I honestly can't remember whether I wrote-in or mistakenly selected the written name "Miller" through my badly dazed vision. I can only hope that the teams and teams of partisan lawyers will do the best they can to weigh my intent. If I checked Miller, it'll probably go to Joe. If I wrote Miller it'll probably go to Joe. If I wrote Silas Miller it probably won't go to Joe, or to Sarah Miller in the next town over. If I write "Meller" because I was too addled to close my lines or dot my i's, it'll probably go before Sonia Sotomayor.
01:30 PM on 11/10/2010
How is Joe Miller going to sleep at night if he goes to Washington simply because his electorate are bad spellers. Does he think that these same bad spellers will ever respect him? See full analysis and offer best misspellings of Murkowski here: http://bif­ocalpoint.­blogspot.c­om/2010/11­/joe-mille­r-stands-u­p-every-vo­terwho.htm­l
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
TheRevV
My micro-bio is microbial.
12:00 PM on 11/10/2010
Glad to hear Alaska's courts ruled on the side of INTENT. If they had ruled otherwise, TP dominance could be ensured in every state within the next 2 decades... Phase 1: Dismantle public schools. Education fragments. Literacy and penmanship drops Phase 2: Eliminate all pre-written ballots Phase 3: Introduce a law that says all official candidates must be written by the voter on the ballot along with write-ins Phase 4: All TP candidates in each state change their last name to a single letter. As literacy dissolves, all TP candidates simply change their name to "X"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gevan
big dubya
04:02 PM on 11/10/2010
Phase 2 would take it back to what The Founders knew and experienced. The idea of printed ballots and secret balloting as well came later.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
TheRevV
My micro-bio is microbial.
04:57 PM on 11/10/2010
Well, they didn't really have a choice. Nearly everything was handwritten in the 1780s, and even if there were printed ballots they'd take a LOOOONG time reaching everyone delivered from horseback. Your point is kind of a pointless thing to point out, really... unless there's a sil.ly TP movement to try to bring that back from a 200+ year-old grave. Though I'd like it to stop at printed ballots because paperless ballots are too easy to tamper with.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:47 PM on 11/10/2010
Speaking as a poll worker, can you imagine the manpower required to sort through an entire precinct's ballots by hand? (At my precinct, perhaps 60 or 70 ballots out of 1500 had write-in votes, and each of these had to be sorted out and tabulated - and that took over an hour.) Maybe you want to volunteer to do it without pay, but for me, working an 18-hour shift is enough for one day. Oh, yes - the TP would also have to repeal all the voters' rights acts that have been passed to make literacy requirements illegal.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
TheRevV
My micro-bio is microbial.
10:19 AM on 11/11/2010
It would be quite a bit of work, but that's how write-ins work. I'd rather they exist than not. Can you imagine if a ballot ONLY allowed for pre-typed candidates? On the flip side, we already know how paperless ballots with no paper backup can be tampered with.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wckoko
It's been real.Real what, we're not saying...
11:50 AM on 11/10/2010
Maybe we shouldn't give the voters of Alaska too much credit for knowing what they are doing at the polls. After all, these are the same people who put Sarah Palin into office for two years.
11:46 AM on 11/10/2010
As a Product (or byproduct) of School Busing, I got to see other cultures and they mine. I met folks I got to introduce to Run DMC, LL Cool J, Beastie Boys, Gap Band, Hip-hop and they hipped me to: Rush, AC/DC, Fleetwood, Eagles, VH, and some dragged me (kicking and Screaming) to some Country Music, so I'm surprised I have to be the one to tell Joe and his Cult Like Following,...

"You Gotta Know when to Hold 'em, know when to Fold 'em,..."

Kenny tore that song Up, I almost lost my Ghetto Pass I liked that song so much:):):)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:19 AM on 11/10/2010
I think that in the future, candidates who attempt to enforce the spelling of supporters of a write-in candidate should be required to pass a spelling test before proceeding any further.
11:22 AM on 11/10/2010
You don't need to be able to spell to copy a name. A trained monkey could do it. This is an election, not filling out a gift card at an office birthday party. Sorry if expecting people to take a little care in deciding who our leaders are, is asking to much
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:26 AM on 11/10/2010
All I'm asking is that Miller prove that he can spell chrysanthemum, and then we can be done with it!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
justlw
Have you checked xkcd 1190 lately?
11:28 AM on 11/10/2010
It's imbalanced in favor of the candidate with the simple name printed on the ballot. It changes the election from "which candidate do you believe should fill this office" to "did you remember to write down the name?" It moves the election from picking a candidate to asking one side to take more care than the other.

It is no more fair nor a test of intelligence than requiring one candidate's supporters, but not the other, to remember to walk over a certain sequence of floor tiles as they enter the polling place, and disqualifying them if they step on a black tile instead of a white tile. But, hey, they could write it down in advance!

The point of an election is *not* a memorization or organization skills at the moment of voting. Nowhere other than in your posts has that ever been posited in the history of democracy.

Again, even in the heat of an argument of how important precision is, you misspelled "too much" and left out your terminal punctuation. Stuff happens. It happens to me. I would not want such stuff to disenfranchise either me or you, even if you're voting for a candidate I do not personally care for.
11:34 AM on 11/10/2010
I'd settle for a legitimate reason why a voter's intent has little or no merit from that candidate.
09:53 PM on 11/13/2010
Because no one can read their minds. Do you know what every voter's intent was?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
justlw
Have you checked xkcd 1190 lately?
11:10 AM on 11/10/2010
It's been posited here that allowing variant spellings of the candidates name is somehow allowing for the "dumbing down" of the electorate, since we're not enforcing simple adherence to the rules of spelling.

One of the obvious problems with this theory is that what we actually have here is the equivalent of a spelling bee where one contestant is asked to spell "cat," with the answer conveniently handed to them at the door, and the other is asked to spell "syzygy."

I propose that in the future, to keep the aspects of both intelligence *and* fairness in the mix, that we eliminate preprinted ballots and require that instead of the candidate's name, the voter must write a pre-assigned random pair of words. This will not only be more equable and a fun "brain-teaser," it will also reduce the chance of "vote bots" being sent in to automatically rig the election. This would also be used to replace every "yes" or "no" option in ballot propositions.

CAPTCHA voting: just say MELON-OPPORTUNISTIC!
11:33 AM on 11/10/2010
You need not know how to spell if you copy the name on a piece of paper before you write it on the ballot to decide who will have a leadership position in our federal government. I't not asking a lot that people take a little time before hand. How do you know the person who writes murkowsky isn't voting for one of the many murkowsky's in Alaska. Who gave the government the power to decide that. I would rather not vote then give another person the power to 'divine' my intent.
01:13 PM on 11/10/2010
Is it really hard to tell intent if someone wrote Murkowski, Murkosky, Murtkowsky, Murkowki or Murckowski? Our last commander in chief couldn't pronounce "Nuclear". I suspect he couldn't spell it either.
11:00 AM on 11/10/2010
by Dermot Cole/News-Mine,

The Supreme Court has made it clear ,..the decades,..is to try and determine voter intent in all instances.
The court decision last week on the abundance of phony write-in candidates who signed up just before the election, said, “The decision we reach today is informed by our previous cases regarding the importance of facilitating voter intent.”
,...The decision quoted a 1978 ruling in which the court found, “In the absence of fraud, election statutes will be liberally construed to guarantee to the elector an opportunity to freely cast his ballot, to prevent his disenfranchisement and to uphold the will of the electorate.”

It also cited a 1995 decision that “a true democracy must seek to make each citizen’s vote as meaningful as every other vote to ensure the equality of all people under the law.”

In 2007, the court said that in a state House election in which the vote was 765-764, that three votes in which voters had marks next to both candidates should not be counted. But the court found the marks on the three ballots were such that the voters had clearly chosen one candidate, the other mark was not consequential and the votes should be counted.
,...As the court found in 1979, “the crucial question in determining the validity of ballot markings is one of voter intent.
10:40 AM on 11/10/2010
If nothing else, Kid Joe will definitely keep his winning streak for Cheney's Conservative of the Month award, previously the Richard Nixon Award.

And if you're wondering, couldn't be named after Bush, he wasn't in charge:):):):)

Such Delusions of Granduer on this scale are rarely unrewarded in the Conservative Community.