More

Graphic Cigarette Warning Labels On Packs Unveiled By FDA (PHOTOS)

First Posted: 11/10/10 11:00 AM ET   Updated: 05/25/11 07:10 PM ET

MICHAEL FELBERBAUM, Associated Press

RICHMOND, Va. - Corpses, cancer patients and diseased lungs: These are some of the images the federal government plans for larger, graphic warning labels for cigarette packages.

The images are part of a new push announced by the Food and Drug Administration and the Department of Health and Human Services on Wednesday to reduce tobacco use, which is responsible for about 443,000 deaths per year.

The number of Americans who smoke has fallen dramatically over the past 40 years, but those declines have stalled recently. About 46 million adults in the U.S., or 20.6 percent, smoke cigarettes, along with 19.5 percent of high school students.

The new prevention plan is part of the law passed in June 2009 giving the FDA authority to regulate tobacco, including marketing and labeling guidelines, banning certain products and limiting nicotine. The law doesn't let the FDA ban nicotine or tobacco entirely.

"Today, FDA takes a crucial step toward reducing the tremendous toll of illness and death caused by tobacco use by proposing to dramatically change how cigarette packages and advertising look in this country," FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg said in a news release.

"The health consequences of smoking will be obvious every time someone picks up a pack of cigarettes."

The FDA is proposing 36 labels for public comment, which include phrases like "smoking can kill you" and "cigarettes cause cancer," but also feature graphic images to convey the dangers of tobacco use.

The agency will select the final labels in June after reviews of scientific literature, public comments, and results from an 18,000-person study. Cigarette makers will then have 15 months to start using the new labels.

The new warning labels are to take up half of a pack -- both front and back -- of cigarettes and contain "color graphics depicting the negative health consequences." Warning labels also must constitute 20 percent of advertisements.

"It acts as a very public billboard because you all of the sudden are reading something about lung cancer from that pack behind the cash register, whereas before you were just reading Marlboro," said David Hammond, a health behavior researcher at the University of Waterloo in Canada, who is working with the firm designing the labels with for the FDA.

In recent years, several countries have introduced labels similar to those proposed by the FDA.
While it is impossible to say how many people quit because of the labels that have been introduced in several countries, Hammond said every source of evidence suggests that the labels do help people quit.

Given the population in the U.S., the impact of the warning labels could be "significant," Hammond said.

Rate This Slide
Not scary.
TERRIFYING!

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10
Current Top 5 Slides
Users who voted on this slide
loading...

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTH

MICHAEL FELBERBAUM, Associated Press RICHMOND, Va. - Corpses, cancer patients and diseased lungs: These are some of the images the federal government plans for larger, graphic warning labels for ciga...
MICHAEL FELBERBAUM, Associated Press RICHMOND, Va. - Corpses, cancer patients and diseased lungs: These are some of the images the federal government plans for larger, graphic warning labels for ciga...
Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 691
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (16 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:45 PM on 11/20/2010
They will have to up the ante in short order as these images do not shock.

Cheers,
Jack
01:01 AM on 11/20/2010
Every little bit of information which tells people how gross smoking is helps to stop people from starting. The aim is prevention not cure. They used to be so sexy but now they are seen to be what they are - coffin nails.
05:25 PM on 11/15/2010
Nice try, FDA...
The likelihood that ANYBODY will quit tobacco because of graphic ads like these are slim at best.
Like any other addiction, the users themselves will have to hit rock bottom before they make the choice to change...if they choose to do so.
Of course, Nature often does so every day...the ultimate hard way!

Still, worth a try...along with raising BOTH the prices AND excise taxes across the board on ALL tobacco products! If you are going to nail one, you might as well nail them all...they are just as guilty as butts for cancer and addiction to nicotine.

I gave up smoking cigars five years ago (lost the taste for them), and haven't missed them one bit.
--RKJ
06:22 PM on 11/16/2010
but young people who have not yet started might not do so after seeing the ads. And people who are in the midst of quitting, might be compelled to not give up. When I was a teenager, I saw the ads from PETA and other photos of rabbits being used to test makeup in their eyes, apparently because they have no tear ducts. Since then, I stopped eating meat due to the cruelty aspect. So graphic images can and do have an impact. Hopefully these ads will work.
06:55 AM on 11/15/2010
waste of time. make them $20 a pack and people will still smoke.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrJM
https://twitter.com/misterjayem
06:01 PM on 11/14/2010
But smoking still makes you look cool, right?

-- MrJM
02:58 PM on 11/14/2010
I love this Org and i belong to the movement against Smoking but this is a big industry,the effect will be minimal.
photo
Js420
Another beautiful sunny day!
10:20 PM on 11/13/2010
Love the ads, its about time the hyprocrisy ends. People will start asking, how can such a harmful substance be legal & its users given a free pass. Legalize pot, tobacco use will sharply decrease
01:13 PM on 11/13/2010
American Cancer Society: Smoking makes women ugly and men impotent.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:08 PM on 11/12/2010
.......reasonable to assume that if consuming it can kill you then - it might be unhealthy
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Conan776
04:17 PM on 11/12/2010
Looks like I picked the right week to switch to a personal vaporizer. My starter kit w/ 18mg cartos from Vapor4Life.com came in the mail on Monday and I haven't smoked a cigarette since.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CJ24
07:30 PM on 11/12/2010
Congrats! I also got my pv from v4l exactly 37 days ago and I have not had a cigarette since that day and no cheating, not once. People out there, if you really want to quit, as I did, then do yourself a HUGE favor and check out personal vaporizers. And do your homework on ecfdotcom and get a good one and some flavored liquids. You will never smoke again. If I can do it after 24 yrs of smoking, anybody can. I tried patches, gum and lastly the dreaded chantix, nothing worked.
02:43 PM on 11/12/2010
This plan is short-sighted; likely a ploy by the tobacco companies to divert attention from their real sins. (Philip Morris is “advising” the FDA, said the spider to the fly.) And the unintended consequences are enormous. The basic idea is punitive, intended to affect behavior by inflicting visual trauma on miscreants. But cigarette packs are everywhere, so the images will traumatize children and nonsmokers. And still not address the problem.

Some of us will quit; most of us will buy a nice cigarette case and repair to our happy land of denial. That is where addicts live, and, trust me, we have learned the most direct routes home. Nonsmokers will be far more affected by those pictures than will I or my fellow addicts. I am not defending smoking – I hate it, am ashamed of it – but the FDA’s "truth" campaign hides the problem.

Cigarettes can do their dirty work because they have been designed to create an exquisite addiction. They alter brain chemistry, for heaven’s sake, affect neurological function. The FDA should be looking at the genesis -- chemistry and silence -- not the ultimate effect. Punishing addicts with those gruesome images is like cutting off the top of a weed or treating the symptoms of an illness rather than the cause.

One more thing. If these regulations are adopted, Democrats are toast. With these images afoot, every cigarette package will be a bullhorn for small government and deregulation and all that hooey.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thinkingwomanmillstone
My life is microbiodegradable.
07:47 AM on 11/12/2010
Is not the same Federal government who wants to do this still subsidizing tobacco farmers to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars? Hey southern repubs and teabaggers...there's a place to start with your budget cuts.
02:27 PM on 11/12/2010
Looks like interestly the HuffPost is ONLY showing the LEAST grapic pictures.

I found 33 on CBS.. http://www.cbsnews.com/2300-204_162-10005517.html?tag=page

Why is that?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
L3p3rm3ss14h
Morality is Temporary. Wisdom is Permanent.
02:32 AM on 11/12/2010
Pics were shooped. You can tell by the pixels.

But seriously, though, those lame attempts at "shocking" don't come anywhere near the shock already produced when you go to buy a pack of cigs and see the PRICE.
01:07 AM on 11/12/2010
i want morbidly obese people on burger wrappers (obesity is now #1 preventable death)

and aborted fetuses on doors of abortion clinics. (I mean, abortions kill too you know)
photo
Js420
Another beautiful sunny day!
10:32 PM on 11/13/2010
Both would do little or nothing. People who eat Mcdonalds dont care what they look like naked.
04:26 PM on 11/11/2010
Scare tactics show no political home - both the left and the right use senseless practices.