iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

NPR, Corporation For Public Broadcasting Denounce Debt Commission's Recommendations


First Posted: 11/11/10 05:07 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:10 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) and NPR are denouncing the recommendation of the co-chairs of President Obama's Fiscal Commission to eliminate funding for public broadcasting, long an objective of many conservatives. The Smithsonian Institution, also a target of the report, said that it has no plans to start charging admission to visitors.

"American public broadcasting represents a model public-private partnership," said CPB in a statement. "The federal investment represents an average of 15 percent of funding for the more than 1,100 public radio and television stations around the country, and stations use this investment to raise funds from the communities they serve. In some cases, especially in rural and low-income areas, public broadcasting serves as a lifeline of content, information and services to the community. Therefore, the percentage of federal funding is higher in these regions. Public television and radio stations deliver free, universally available, non-commercial, high-quality programming and services to communities throughout the country."

According to the nonprofit corporation, PBS reaches more than 118 million people through television and nearly 21 million people online. Around 37 million listen to public radio each week. It argues that for approximately $1.35 from each taxpayer every year, "public broadcasting returns six times that amount in programming and services, creating 17,000 jobs in the American economy."

"This important investment, through CPB and the other public broadcasting programs, should be supported for the benefit, education and enrichment of all Americans," concludes the statement.

NPR, which receives funding from CPB, also put out a statement, saying, "The National Commission's proposal to eliminate federal funding for public media would have a profound and detrimental impact on all Americans."

"Federal funding has been a central component of public radio stations' ability to serve audiences across the country," adds NPR. "It's imperative for funding to continue to ensure that this essential tool of democracy survives and thrives well into the future."

Smithsonian spokesperson Linda St.Thomas said that the institution had no comment on the report but added that they had no intention of making visitors pay fees. In recent decades, the Smithsonian has studied the issue of charging admission at least three times -- and rejected it on each occasion.

"A fee might hit people we want to attract -- families," said Sheila Burke, then the Smithsonian's deputy secretary and chief operating officer, in 2006.

"Smithsonian is the national museum and is 60 percent funded with taxpayer dollars," said St. Thomas in an e-mail to The Huffington Post. "We will not be charging admission, as per the last [Board of Regents] decision.

Over the years, conservatives have repeatedly tried to yank funding for CPB, with Republicans most recently riled up over NPR's firing of analyst Juan Williams for comments he made about Muslims while on Fox News. "In light of their rash decision, we will include termination of federal funding for NPR as an option in the YouCut program so that Americans can let it be known whether they want their dollars going to that organization," said Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Va.)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) and NPR are denouncing the recommendation of the co-chairs of President Obama's Fiscal Commission to eliminate funding for public broadcasti...
WASHINGTON -- The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) and NPR are denouncing the recommendation of the co-chairs of President Obama's Fiscal Commission to eliminate funding for public broadcasti...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 519
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alithegreat
02:40 PM on 11/12/2010
rural poor kids would most lose out from this. urban poor will have a better shot, by virtue of superior access to services in general, but it's definitely the poor who are the targets of this attack from the cons. they'd rather see the poor at church. via church, the poor can more easily be controlled through fear and religiously directed scapegoating using pious agents of intolerance who make up the mush dogs of the right wing. it better serves the cons' purposes to have a scared, ignorant electorate, who will vote for them out of fear. they don't want too much information calming their flocks down, god forbid. such information would surely cause most good people, especially poor people and christians, to become empowered and vote liberally and democrat, in their actual economic and health interests.

who, but the church and the baggercons, could convince people making less than $30k/year for a family of four, that they pay income taxes? who, but the church and the baggercons could convince anyone that universal healthcare is bad? who, but the church and the baggercons, could convince anyone that earmarks don't benefit conservative states, or that liberal states take more than they give in money and benefits? who, but the church and baggercons, could convince anyone, ANYONE, that people who talk the most about secession, who proudly fly a flag indicative of a failed secession, are the most patriotic people??

it's a study in highly effective mind-messing on the suggestible.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
JShankel
I want my country forward
01:30 PM on 11/12/2010
Okay, let's start with lesson one:

A tax cut IS a spending increase.  They are one and the same thing. 

When it comes to budgeting, there are only two things on the sheet: revenues and expenses.  That's it.  Everything boils down to either a revenue or an expense.

When we argue that lowering taxes will improve the economy, we're arguing that stimulative government spending will improve the economy.

When we argue that cutting government spending will improve the deficit, we are arguing that increasing taxes will improve the deficit.

I realize a great many people don't see things this way.  I realize I'm about to get a series of objections that start with "no, tax cuts are NOT spending" because people have "SPENDING BAD" and "TAX CUTS GOOD" wired into their skulls.

But a budget doesn't have columns for "the government has no right to..." and "this is my money, not yours..." and "President Wilson destroyed America" and any other things you read in your monthly Objectivist newsletter.

But the fact remains: budgets consist of revenues and expenses.  Not revenues, expenses and moral framings.

Tax cuts ARE spending.  Tax increases ARE spending cuts.  They're the same thing.

The argument is whether cutting taxes or hiring contractors is a more EFFECTIVE way of spending.  Or whether raising taxes or cutting contracts is a more EFFECTIVE way of decreasing the deficit.  That's the argument. 

It's a question of HOW, not WHAT.  There are only two WHATS: revenues and expenses.
11:00 AM on 11/12/2010
Why do you need government money.
You can have George Soros bank rolling your existence... It will be a match made in heaven..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Comidoki
Scare a Republican, Register to Vote
12:04 PM on 11/12/2010
run along now, the adults are talking.
01:07 PM on 11/12/2010
Wow. The Right only has ONE target: Soros.

Why are you all so afraid of one man, when you have Murdoch, the Koch Brothers, and thousands of other corporations?
09:31 AM on 11/12/2010
The Right would just love this. It would keep our children even dumb.er.

PBS is about the only decent programming out there for kids. And NPR is the only decent news and intelligent programming for adults.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alithegreat
02:11 PM on 11/12/2010
funny thing is, it'd only make bagger kids dumber, imo, bc by and large, "liberal elites" like to make sure their kids get a thorough, real education. complete with math, actual science, and actual history, whereas the baggers seem to prefer to teach their kids only what they faithfully BELIEVE bc faux news and their preacher told them so.
09:30 AM on 11/12/2010
They deserve it. Their quality of journalism sux. Everyone thinks they're liberal, but the programmer/editor is just plain a bad journalist -- almost never giving balanced reports on anything, and seldom imparting crucially important information. Case in point: the Re†hugs now have redistricting power. This huge fact was not ONCE mentioned on NPR before the midterms. Then immediately afterward it was all over it as a discussion point. This is just ONE example. Lots of repetition, droning of everyone else's headline news. Almost zero real contribution to the public weal.
I don't trust their journalism, and haven't for years.

Maybe with their demise a real independent, excellent outlet will form.

One can dream, can't one?
07:04 PM on 11/13/2010
a perfect time to stop the funding of the 420,000,000 of our tax dollars that go to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting…...
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Quasi Libertarian
Only Team America: World Police Can Save Us!
09:00 AM on 11/12/2010
Well, we keep hearing stories about "Little Johnny" doing without, or not getting some type of medical care. It seems to me that the 490 Million dollars annually that goes to the Corporation for Publica Broadcasting could help a lot of "Little Johnny's" and even a few "Sad Sally's".....
 
BTW, since corporations are "evil" this is a good chance to stick it to one........
09:42 AM on 11/12/2010
No one has ever said that ALL corporations are evil.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Quasi Libertarian
Only Team America: World Police Can Save Us!
10:48 AM on 11/12/2010
The IS the Huffington Post......................
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:50 AM on 11/12/2010
PBS should stop whining and start airing commercials. It's not like they''ll up and die if govt. funding is cut. Every welfare program must be cut. including farm subsidies, corporate welfare and a out of control Pentagon budget.
08:39 AM on 11/12/2010
I hear commercials ALL the time on both NPR and the local programs running on NPR stations. If I hear "this program is funded by the Annie (?) Casey Foundation" one more time I'll turn purple. Just one example. These dopes need to get off the public teat and start going after more advertisers, just like the dopes on the right do. Fair, huh? Oh, guess not. The left always think they are due free $$$.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VeritasVincit2
on the hunt for Biggie and Tupac
08:51 AM on 11/12/2010
The left always think they are due free $$$. The left subsidizes the right's red sates. This little memory lapse of the right claiming the Left does not work or wants everything free is a joke. The right should get an education. Read or listen to something other than Fox News so they can have conversation without sounding illiterate. The rhtoric that comes from the mouths of the right is insulting and inflammatory. Yesterday a Judge had to tell baggers to watch their tone. They are destroying this country just as they were instructed to.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Ruthless1
Enough TEA already!
08:53 AM on 11/12/2010
So, you did not read the article.
10:59 AM on 11/12/2010
You obviously have no idea why we need radio and TV stations that are totally supported by public donation,.ANY time a radio station or television station is being paid for by running commercials, the companys that paying for the commercial air time can cut it off any time they want to. That gives the companies TOTAL control of what's released to the general public. We have enough of that going on already. If you cut farm subsidies, what would you eat. If they weren't getting subsidies, they only way they could even break-even on what it costs to run a farm, would be to double the price of everything they sell. This money this country spends on it's military is a little less then half of the military budget of every other country in the world COMBINED!. The United States, is NOT the worlds police force.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:52 AM on 11/12/2010
What part of " my tax dollars should not subsidize your idea of good tv " did you not get? Turn off the TV and throw it in the trash bin and teach your kids how to read good books. Your kids will be much better off.

And I'm all for cutting farm subsidies to ZERO. If someone can't operate a farm profitably they need to come work as my Gardner. I'm all for slashing the Pentagons budget by 80% of its current size. The pentagon does not need $800 toilets.
07:19 AM on 11/12/2010
NPR always says they get such a small amount of taxpayer funding yet they fight tooth and nail for every penny.
09:24 AM on 11/12/2010
Of course they do, just like EVERY corporation that gets money.

At least NPR is actually IN the public's interest.
09:44 AM on 11/12/2010
If you think political correctness, supporting nanny-state policies and large government are the public interest, as I'm sure you do, it is. As a taxpayer, who doesnt subscribe to their philosophy, I resent having a dime of my taxes supporting it as I'm sure you would if NPR supported mine.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rory talbot
Former Dem but they r now wing of Corp. party
06:25 AM on 11/12/2010
Of course. Why would we not expect Obama to de-fund the one stop gap to the corporate run, Right Wing media? He's WEAK!
08:40 AM on 11/12/2010
If all you smarty pants on the left think NPR is so fab....I guess they can compete with the dullards on the right. Right?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VeritasVincit2
on the hunt for Biggie and Tupac
08:52 AM on 11/12/2010
Smarty Pants???? You should watch public TV you could learn something.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VeritasVincit2
on the hunt for Biggie and Tupac
08:55 AM on 11/12/2010
The right has been after NPR for years. It does not mean they will be cut.
03:13 AM on 11/12/2010
All this, and much more, thanks to Obama.
02:07 AM on 11/12/2010
Reagan said that a government bureaucracy was the closest thing to eternal life on Earth, and we're seeing why right now. Every time a new government entitlement or spending program is created, a constituency is also created that will fight you every time you try to roll back spending by a penny. They'll fight you without any regard for the macroeconomic or macrobudget situation the country finds itself in. This is why it is so hard to cut spending.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
writersbloc
04:36 AM on 11/12/2010
That's political science 101, and something that I assume to be true as well though I would have to review the lit on it.

Anyway, public broadcasting makes up a very tiny piece of the budget pie, really tiny. Most stations get enough to cover operating costs (if lucky). The rest is taken from corporate underwriters, foundation grants, and subscriber donations. PBS stations belong to the people of the US, at least they were supposed to. It is responsive to its listeners, more so than most commercial stations, and for better or worse, tries to provide programming that serves the local community. No Glenn Becks on PBS.
08:41 AM on 11/12/2010
Ummmm....no....the are responsive to the left.

Time to get off the gubmnt teat and compete in the free market, dearie.
08:52 AM on 11/12/2010
I'm a big fan of NPR and PBS. I would hate to see them go. Now, it seems to me, that the public deserves a non-political NPR and PBS, too. It is alright to take a view on reported events ,but it must not be a biased view, if public money is involved. By biased I mean personnel decisions should not be decided based on whose ox is being gored and how unhappy they are to be gored. The management of NPR made a biased decision on Juan Williams and if they stand by it, they have to take the medicene.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ItsBarranti
05:23 AM on 11/12/2010
The fact that you even used the word Entitlement proves that your opinions don't deserve any weight in this discussion.
01:39 AM on 11/12/2010
Waste of taxpayer money. It's a business. Let it be run like other businesses.

There's no reason for our government to be in the radio business.
01:46 AM on 11/12/2010
Yup just like there no reason the government should be subsidizing farmers or manufacturing. Oh and by the way, I don't like the fact that the government paved the road by your house and helped fund your kids education so if you would kindly send me a check for my taxes that the government spent on you I'd appreciate it.
02:17 AM on 11/12/2010
Good point. They should stop the corn subsidies. Just saw the corn farming movie about that business and it's impact on our food quality.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ItsBarranti
05:25 AM on 11/12/2010
Yes, the American people should not be allowed to have information unless they are putting money in the pockets of Murdoch and his ilk to get it.
07:18 AM on 11/12/2010
That would be a relevant point if taxpayers were subsidizing Murdoch. And his "ilk".
01:38 AM on 11/12/2010
Any "debt commission" that does not recommend reducing the defense budget is simply a farce.
09:18 AM on 11/12/2010
They did propose military cuts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sueinmn
12:54 AM on 11/12/2010
Whats funny is this plan to balance the budget or pay the deficit. No Congress has lived with in so as we get on this epayment plan, whos gonna make sure they dont run it up again before this one is squared away. I dont think this group (all of them) can handle a credit card .
01:40 AM on 11/12/2010
Well considering the re/ch wing twinks proclaiming that we must live within our means are the ones who for the 8 years of the Bush administration charged everything to the deficit like drunken sailors debt be dammned.
07:42 AM on 11/12/2010
What are re/ch twinks?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sueinmn
12:50 AM on 11/12/2010
Its a witch hunt and unexcusable not to mke those who created this large deficit from pay it back. NOT the middlke class and poor. Bankers, rich and the war contractors.