HuffPost Social Reading

U.S., South Korea Fail To Finalize Stalled Trade Deal

KELLY OLSEN   11/11/10 04:27 PM ET  AP

South Korea Obama

SEOUL, South Korea — South Korea and the United States failed to score a breakthrough on a long-stalled free trade agreement and will keep negotiating, their presidents said Thursday, in a sharp setback to hopes of speedily ratifying the ambitious accord.

The two sides have been holding negotiations this week to jump-start the deal to slash tariffs and other barriers to trade that was signed in 2007 when previous administrations were in power. It remains unratified by lawmakers in both countries.

Progress has been slowed by U.S. demands that South Korea reduce its surplus in auto trade and further open its market for American beef. The global financial crisis in 2008 and recession that followed also sapped momentum.

"We share the view that we need more time," South Korean President Lee Myung-bak said at a joint press conference with President Barack Obama.

Obama had hoped to announce a deal on the pact while in South Korea for a summit of the Group of 20 economic powers, but instead he will return home empty-handed.

"We have asked our teams to work tirelessly in the coming days and weeks to get this completed," Obama said.

"We don't want months to pass before we get this done," he said. "We want this to be done in a matter of weeks."

The leaders did not say what issues prevented an agreement, but South Korean news reports said earlier this week that the U.S. was pressing Seoul to loosen auto fuel and emissions standards to help boost U.S. sales of cars to South Korea.

Kim Dong-cheol, a lawmaker with South Korea's opposition Democratic Party and a member of the parliamentary foreign affairs and trade committee, told The Associated Press before the presidents spoke that he received a call from Trade Minister Kim Jong-hoon on Thursday that indicated the talks might be unsuccessful.

Trade Minister Kim reported to President Lee Myung-bak that "it would be difficult to reach a deal on the FTA before the G-20 due to unreasonable U.S demands," according to the lawmaker.

Lee told his trade minister that "if so, it would be better to discuss it later," according to Kim Dong-cheol, the lawmaker, who did not provide further details.

The White House says the deal could add at least $10 billion to U.S. gross domestic product and boost exports to South Korea by $10 billion to $11 billion a year. It would be the largest U.S. trade deal since a 1994 agreement with Canada and Mexico.

Bilateral trade between South Korea and the U.S. totaled $66.7 billion in 2009, down sharply from $84.7 billion in 2008 as global commerce suffered during the economic downturn.

American businesses have warned that the U.S. risks losing out to rivals, including the European Union, which signed a free trade agreement with South Korea last month. Seoul and Brussels are aiming to have it take effect in July of next year, pending ratification.

"Time is of the essence," Thomas Donohue, president of the Washington-based U.S. Chamber of Commerce – the biggest U.S. business lobby – said in a statement Thursday expressing disappointment that an agreement was not reached. "American jobs are on the line."

South Korea, which has been aggressive in pursuing free trade deals, has pacts in effect with India, the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations and other countries. It is also negotiating other agreements.

Cars have been a particular concern of the United States in trade relations with South Korea, home to Hyundai Motor Co. and Kia Motors Corp., which together form the world's fifth-biggest automotive group.

Figures compiled by auto industry groups in South Korea show that it exported 449,403 vehicles to the U.S. last year, while South Koreans purchased 6,140 vehicles made by American manufacturers, based on vehicle registrations.

U.S. automakers Ford Motor Co. and Chrysler Group LLC have criticized the trade imbalance, arguing that the Korean market has been closed off to American-made cars by arbitrary regulations. General Motors, which owns a majority stake in Korean automaker Daewoo, has remained neutral in the talks.

The South Korean figures do not include the 200,371 vehicles sold in the U.S. last year by Hyundai that were made at its American plant nor the 114,845 sold in South Korea by GM Daewoo Auto & Technology Co., the South Korean unit of General Motors Co.

Hyundai builds its popular Sonata midsize car, its Elantra compact and the Santa Fe crossover vehicle at plants in Alabama and Georgia. Kia builds the Sorento crossover vehicle in Georgia.

Ford CEO Alan Mulally said he was appreciative of Obama's efforts "to negotiate a meaningful free trade agreement with Korea. I know the U.S. government negotiated in good faith to improve the agreement for American automakers and workers."

Chrysler said in a statement it supported the administration's effort to finalize "an enforceable agreement that provides meaningful market access for American-made vehicles in South Korea."

The U.S. auto market is about 10 times bigger than South Korea's. There were 10.4 million vehicles sold in the United States last year. There were about 1.4 million sold in South Korea in 2009, according to the Korea Automobile Manufacturers Association.

Regarding beef, South Korea halted imports of American beef after a Canadian-born cow infected with mad cow disease was discovered in the U.S. in 2003. Seoul eventually agreed to resume imports, but huge street demonstrations in response forced the government to backtrack and limit shipments to younger cows considered less at risk. The U.S. says its beef is safe.

__

AP White House Correspondent Ben Feller, Associated Press writers Kwang-tae Kim, Hyung-jin Kim and Ken Thomas, and AP Auto Writers Tom Krisher and Dee-Ann Durbin in Detroit contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
SEOUL, South Korea — South Korea and the United States failed to score a breakthrough on a long-stalled free trade agreement and will keep negotiating, their presidents said Thursday, in a sharp...
SEOUL, South Korea — South Korea and the United States failed to score a breakthrough on a long-stalled free trade agreement and will keep negotiating, their presidents said Thursday, in a sharp...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 145
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:34 AM on 11/13/2010
Sounds like some good news. I would not trust Obama to negotiate anything, he seems to give away the store before the negotiating begins.
02:08 PM on 11/14/2010
Read the attached. Apparently "W" had a deal in place that was rejected after Obama's addition of a term that favored U.S. Auto Union workers. Let's face it. The guy is a menace to our nation.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/11/clarices_pieces_restoring_amer.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:41 AM on 11/15/2010
ya, right. I would trust W as far as I could .....

I or america do not need any more trade deals, we always get the short end, no matter which party is in power. I think Obama has a silent (R) after his name, and if he was white the right would love him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
atexasdem
Pointing out the foolishness of republican voters.
11:50 PM on 11/12/2010
Good republicans continue to buy Korean Cars, televisions and electronics, they support American jobs going to Korea, Billions spent on American military forces to protect Korea while complaining about American high unemployment and trade deficits caused by Korean trade restrictions.
These are the people republicans want in congress. These are the people the tea party fought to get into congress. These are the same people who blame Obama for the high unemployment in the US.
Are they truly that dumb or do they just hate their own country that much.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:38 AM on 11/13/2010
Think you have a problem with republicans. Well the only difference with Obama is that there is a (D) after his name.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
atexasdem
Pointing out the foolishness of republican voters.
12:50 PM on 11/13/2010
George W Bush didn't make overseas trade missions trying to get "allies" to open their markets to American products. Obama attends world financial summits and trade missions promoting American products and industry and Republicans complain about the fuel cost of Air Force one. Obama tries to pressure foreign countries to open their markets, import American products, agree to follow the same import restrictions on American products that they ask of us and yet Republicans criticize.
Your wrong. Can you tell me exactly how many trade missions George W Bush attended in his EIGHT years as president? Can you tell me how many actual fair trade agreements were made where countries that exported to America were held to match their laws to American laws on imports? I'll help you , Not one. Not one single trade mission, not one single law saying that their import laws had to match ours if they wanted "free trade".
Obama two years into his presidency is doing all he can to actual "free trade" agreements where Their exports to America and their imports from America operate under identical trade rules. Bush did ZERO.
There's a message there. Listen to it instead of Rush Limbaugh for once.
02:00 PM on 11/12/2010
Trade barriers should go up against other countries the same as they have applied to the United States. Globalization is not a grass roots effort from the bottom up, it is being imposed from the top down. Tarriffs are not protectionism, it's "protect your job". American workers are getting broadsided by US corporation who get tax breaks to off shore jobs and are also flooded with 12 million illegal aliens who are taking work for less pay, no benefits and no occupational safety and health concerns. It's called the "squeeze play".
01:34 PM on 11/12/2010
President O losing Mojo?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
atexasdem
Pointing out the foolishness of republican voters.
11:53 PM on 11/12/2010
No it's people like you who think buying Korean cars while they don't allow American cars is a great idea. It's people like you who continue to buy foreign products that don't buy ours and then Blame Obama for losing their jobs.
01:02 PM on 11/12/2010
I split my time between Korea and the States, and here are some things I would like to point out:
1. The same regulations for foreign cars apply to Japanese cars, German cars, and American cars in Korea.
Hundreds of thousands of Japanese and German cars were sold last year in Korea. Only 6140 U.S. manufactured cars were sold in the same period. Do you really think this is just a problem of trade agreements?
2. Beef - U.S. beef is quite common all around Korea, but Koreans seem to be mainly worried about the age of the cattle that is imported. There are some studies conducted in Europe that state older cattles are more vulnerable to mad cow disease. That is why Korea only imports beef from cattle under three years of age. The U.S. wants to export meat from older cattle.
In addition, Korean cuisine calls for parts believed to be more exposed to the mad cow disease, such as bone marrow, liver, etc. That is why Koreans are more cautious about what beef they import. They really trust Australian beef, which is almost entirely grass fed and raised in pastures. So it may not be so easy to persuade Koreans to import U.S. beef as it is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christopher Hull
Democratic Socialist
12:51 PM on 11/12/2010
We shouldn't have free trade with Korea or anybody else. We should have fair trade. Take our best interests and then the other countries intrests into account as well.
DUH
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:13 PM on 11/12/2010
At least Obama isn't giving other countries a blank check to take our workers away.

He's openly criticizing China about currently manipulation and he's not about ready to sign away our work force unless S. Korea bends.

Having the U.S. Chamber of Commerce trying to push this worries me. Their interests are not with the U.S. worker. Their interest lies in the fulfilling promises to companies that pay dues. They pay dues to increase profits. If profits means producing goods overseas and shipping the final product back to the U.S. to increase profits, that's what they are pushing for.

The sooner Americans realize the CoC does NOT represent the American worker, the better.
11:36 AM on 11/12/2010
too bad the repubs didn't have more power, they could have given away more of our economy the way they did with china
11:34 AM on 11/12/2010
if you call it a deal where S Korea gets to export to the US whatever they want without tariffs, and we're not allowed to export anything to them, I'm glad we didn't finalize it
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
1088
10:08 AM on 11/12/2010
President Obama is doing the best for America, not want to give an unbalance trade deal, like what he have with China right now. It should be a win win situation, period.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Elkins
09:39 AM on 11/12/2010
Summits are usually face time to sign already agreed upon items. When you announce failure it loses face for all involved. I wonder where the break down occurred. Did the Community Organizer enter the fray thinking his charm would win the day?? Much like the Chicago Olympic bid?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Bebe36
Grateful for every day.
10:21 AM on 11/12/2010
The Chicago Olympic bid?

When all of you supposed patriots and I Love America liars stood up and cheered because Obama was turned down?

The h8red you f00ls feel for our president is so overwhelming that you are happy when he fails to get something for our country.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jerzygurl
10:49 AM on 11/12/2010
It's pretty sad that whenever someone says the smallest negative thing about Obama, its hatred.
Don't you realize that argument only makes him look weaker.
photo
Cdangers
wish people would pick up a book once in a while.
09:36 AM on 11/12/2010
Car emissions has a little to do with the problems they are having in passing the FTA but let me tell you. I've been driving Korea cars made for the Korean market for 8 years now and they are more focused on numbers than reality. They make cars here that can rightfully claim low emissions, but in reality these cars probably produce more emissions over time. Reason being is that they put underpowered engines in cars in order to meet the emissions goal but in a country that is 70% mountainous these cars need to be dropped into lower gears and keep the engines at high RPM's just to keep a constant speed up a relatively low incline. Daily I find that I need to mash the accelerator down just to keep the speed limit. Secondly, and most importantly, the Korean car companies screw their own people and cheaper American cars will put quite a dent in their bottom lines. Example. Hyundai Sonata. In the US it will come with 7 airbags and a 10 year warranty. Get the same car in KOREA where it's made and you will get the car minus the airbags and with a 2 year warranty. The kicker. That same car is $6-$8,ooo cheaper in the USA.
konkyboy
From little things, big things grow
09:36 AM on 11/12/2010
Maybe, just maybe, Obama didn't agree to 25 cents an hour for employees.
09:34 AM on 11/12/2010
Good. We don't need more "free trade" agreements.
09:09 AM on 11/12/2010
Here's an idea, how about If we pull our fracking troops out of South Korea