iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Massey Lawsuit: Over 700 Allege Mining Company Poisoned Their Water With Coal Slurry

VICKI SMITH   11/13/10 12:49 PM ET   AP

Coal Slurry Lawsuit

MORGANTOWN, W.Va. — Eighteen months ago, Christina Doyle packed up her two kids for an eight-hour journey to a West Virginia courthouse, hoping for some resolution to a lawsuit over water pollution she believes caused her daughter's learning disabilities and slow growth.

This weekend, the 32-year-old who now lives in South Carolina is doing it again. And so will hundreds of others who believe Virginia-based Massey Energy Co. and subsidiary Rawl Sales & Processing have poisoned their water wells with 1.4 billion gallons of toxic coal slurry.

The company has denied wrongdoing, though residents say the proof flows from their faucets as red, orange or black water. They say the chemicals in slurry have left them and their children with developmental disabilities, cancers and other maladies.

Since that hot day in Williamson, when Doyle and others packed a field house and a courthouse, the case has been handed from one judge to another. Now, a five-judge mass litigation panel has ordered 748 plaintiffs to appear Monday in Charleston for the start of a three-day meeting or risk being cut from the case.

"I think it is kind of unnecessary," says Doyle, who will make the trip from Andrews, S.C., with her 14-year-old daughter, Savannah, and 10-year-old son, Hunter.

"Hopefully they're prepared for the chaos that might ensue," she said, noting many families have children with disabilities like attention deficit disorder – which they believe were caused by the toxic water.

Plaintiffs' attorney Kevin Thompson says most of his clients will pile onto buses in Williamson before dawn and make the 90-minute trip to the Charleston Civic Center, despite what Thompson calls an obvious hardship on many elderly and ailing plaintiffs.

"The judges want to make sure the people of Rawl are serious about pursuing their claims, and they believe this is a way to test this," he says. "And yes, the people are very serious about their claims. They have jumped through flaming hoop after flaming hoop."

The current and former residents of Rawl, Lick Creek, Sprigg and Merrimac are suing Massey for injecting slurry into 1,000 acres of former underground mines between 1978 and 1987. Slurry is created when coal is washed to help it burn more efficiently.

Massey attorney Dan Stickler did not respond to several requests for comment from The Associated Press. The company has defended the practice in court documents, arguing mineral rights agreements dating to 1889 give it "the full right to take and use all water found on the premises."

For decades, coal companies in Appalachia have injected slurry into worked-out mines as a cheap alternative to dams and other systems that can safely store or treat the slurry. The industry says the practice is safe, but critics contend slurry seeps through natural and manmade cracks, eventually contaminating groundwater.

The state Department of Environmental Protection has imposed a temporary ban on new injection sites. Earlier this year, a team of West Virginia University researchers advised lawmakers to start monitoring coal slurry, even though they could not conclusively demonstrate a hazard to public health.

They also claim Massey drilled 40 more holes than it was permitted, pumping water out to relieve pressure and to make room for more waste. That waste came within feet of their homes, and the lawsuit says tests show the slurry "ripples and bubbles through the system in varying degrees, from highly toxic to simply toxic."

At an August hearing, the five-judge panel denied more than 100 Massey motions to dismiss the cases of those plaintiffs who didn't attend the previous mediation attempt.

That kept the lawsuit alive for not only 556 people who say they are already sick or disabled, but for nearly 200 additional plaintiffs who want a medical monitoring program.

"I think it's going to be either all or nothing," says Thompson. "Either everyone is going to trial, or no one is going to trial."

If a settlement is not reached during the three-day meeting, the case is scheduled to go to trial next summer.

All Christina Doyle wants is what's best for her daughter, whose monthly drugs and daily hormone injections would cost more than $3,000 without insurance. Savannah was born without a pituitary gland, which is in the brain and regulates the body's growth hormones.

The injections cause "horrible mood swings" that make a teenage girl's life even more difficult. Savannah struggles with homework and cannot have children, said Doyle, who was raised in Lick Creek and lived there while pregnant with her daughter.

Despite Savannah's problems, she made local news last year when she plunged into a pond to save a drowning 3-year-old neighbor.

Still, Doyle says she's long been told by specialists that genetics can't account for her daughter's poor health.

"I did not do drugs. I did everything right. I took prenatal vitamins," Doyle says. "I can't think of anything else it could have been but the water."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

MORGANTOWN, W.Va. — Eighteen months ago, Christina Doyle packed up her two kids for an eight-hour journey to a West Virginia courthouse, hoping for some resolution to a lawsuit over water pollut...
MORGANTOWN, W.Va. — Eighteen months ago, Christina Doyle packed up her two kids for an eight-hour journey to a West Virginia courthouse, hoping for some resolution to a lawsuit over water pollut...
Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 453
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (15 total)
11:48 AM on 11/17/2010
It is time for clean, sustainable alternative energy.

Wind, solar, geothermal and biofuels all need to ramp up production
and move to diversify our energy economy.
ThatsTheTheWayItIs
religion, ideology, partisanship are delusional
05:03 PM on 11/16/2010
Re pollution from mining and fracking: buy solar stocks.

Solar stocks are underpriced because investors are inundated with big energy propaganda to convince them solar is not viable. But it is, particularly when privately-owned, where it competes with peak daytime retail electric rates, the highest there are (because AC is the biggest user).

Solar takes business from the utilities, they hate it and spread misinformation about it. Businesses and people can't own their own coal, gas or nuclear plant, but they can own solar. They are installing solar all over the world, the US is the laggard. But denial does not last forever, when it breaks stocks soar. Solar is still very small cap, big run ups are easy.

I hate benefiting from human suffering, but these disasters will help us switch to clean solar, and I don't feel bad if I make money from that. Making green by investing in green seems fair to me.
02:16 PM on 11/16/2010
Any lawyer who cites a contract from 1889 should be dragged outside and beaten. Massey is pathetic and disgusting and I hope the owner reaps it one day.
ThatsTheTheWayItIs
religion, ideology, partisanship are delusional
04:54 PM on 11/16/2010
Mineral rights are like any property, unfortunately. People are living on land stolen from the Indians by their great-great-great-grandparents, still belongs to them. 1889 is not that long ago. I'm 60 and I've known people who were alive then.

Americans have a short concept of time, particularly those in the West. I'm from MA, grew up in a house that was there before Revolution, basement was anyway, 120 years before 1889.
06:12 AM on 11/17/2010
Mineral rights != Water rights.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GandenT
11:29 AM on 11/16/2010
Massey executives were unavailable for comment on this story as they were busy counting their massive profits while discussing ways to present themselves in court as being on the very edge of bankruptcy should they have to clean up their messes and harm with a tiny little bit of their massive profits...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
roydoe
roydoe knows all-sometimes
11:22 AM on 11/16/2010
Y'all cain't prove it was us who poisoned no wells. We's good Americans who is fighten' fer our right to make a profit. You are commies fer even thinkin' 'bout gittin' in our ways. Go back to Cuba commies. That'll fix 'em.-

Massey Energy Company
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Russ Klettke
Business and fitness writer
11:22 AM on 11/16/2010
This story is as old as the Johnstown Flood of 1889. There, 2200 people died and their survivors made the mistake of being too poor to fight the country club that was responsible for the inadequate dam.

In that case, money/top lawyers got the blame off the back of the dam owners (the Southfork Fishing and Hunting Club), putting 100% of the blame on "acts of God." But definitions of liability shifted by legislative acts that followed – even if there is no overt, intentional negligence, simply being associated with the fault places liability on the shoulders of the cause of the problem. What is disturbing today is the Massey, BP and other major polluters have become savvier at PR and lobbying – with no limits on campaign contributions, thank you Roberts Supreme Court – such that reparative/preventive legislation is less likely to happen.

In other words, Massey will fight tooth and nail to lawyer themselves out of it. They already spent $3 million to elect a judge who then threw out a $50 million judgment against them by a lower court (http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2010/04/massey_energy_blankenship.html) – a pretty good investment for them, and murderous to people who suffer the consequences.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
den1953
The National Inquire of Politics the GOP!
11:21 AM on 11/16/2010
Hurry get Senator Manchin on the horn and tell him to bring his deer rifle!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lolablev
Bring Peace into your Life
11:04 AM on 11/16/2010
And how did West Virginia Vote? Well, the 1st and 2nd congressional districts went Republican. the 2nd district went incumbent. Perhaps these folks live in the 3rd district? Or perhaps once again those who suffer continue to suffer because of their ignorance at the voting booth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nobody78
A little left of Center
11:22 AM on 11/16/2010
Probably a little of both.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jsgaetano
Legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus
10:50 AM on 11/16/2010
I'd like to feel bad for them... but they've had a very long history of voting FOR this kind of thing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Finne
Into Full Frontal Nerdity
12:29 PM on 11/16/2010
They believe in the old "have cake and eat it too" theory.

These same people believe that we can tap American natural gas without paying the price of further destruction of the environment.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:39 AM on 11/16/2010
Doyle better hope she doesn't just disappear off the face of the earth for daring to confront the energy industry.

See the scary, sudden disappearance of a vet studying swan deaths from dispersant chemicals:

http://www.examiner.com/human-rights-in-national/gulf-swan-doctor-disappearance
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doodlebug2
10:30 AM on 11/16/2010
isn't this congress with the teaparts going to do away with the epa?
excellent idea.
10:24 AM on 11/16/2010
I sympathize but are these the same people that consistently vote members of congress in who are against cap and trade, any environmental laws, for jobs at any cost, for deregulation etc? When will they accept that environmentalist is not a bad word? If you don't have clean air to breathe and clean drinking water, what use is a good job?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nobody78
A little left of Center
11:24 AM on 11/16/2010
They did say that the water did cause learning disabilities.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:13 AM on 11/16/2010
SAY NO TO GAS!!!!!!!!!!!!

DRILLING = POISIONING OF WATER/AIR = CANCER

WATCH 'GASLAND'
10:46 AM on 11/16/2010
Another problem. The Gas drilling industry uses a process called "cracking", by injecting chemicals into the ground to release gas reserves. The problem is that nobody knows what the chemicals are as it is an industry secret. All they know is that you can light the kitchen faucet on fire with a match as the water comes out.
05:02 PM on 11/16/2010
The word is "fracking."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nobody78
A little left of Center
11:25 AM on 11/16/2010
Yes, If you haven't seen Gasland you need to watch it.
Eric4969
Type Today Post Tomorrow
10:02 AM on 11/16/2010
Keep Voting Repug and this will be the Standard for Company regulations, Profit over PEople!!!!!!!